<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Lucene | General</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>08 Nov  2009 05:37:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.1-1</title>
<description>On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Michael McCandless wrote: &amp;gt; OK thanks Andi, +1 to release! (minor comments below) Thanks Mike ! Here is my +1 as well. We now</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 13:57:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88153</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.1-1</title>
<description>OK thanks Andi, +1 to release! (minor comments below) Mike On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Andi Vajda &amp;lt;vajda@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Nov 7, 2009,</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 13:22:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88152</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.1-1</title>
<description>On Nov 7, 2009, at 2:44, Michael McCandless  &amp;lt;lucene@mikemccandless.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Signature &amp;amp; md5 check out. I got everything working and ran my us</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 10:49:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88146</link>
</item><item>
<title>Apache Lucene java 2.9.1 released</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Release 2.9.1 of Apache Lucene java is now available. This release fixes bugs from 2.9.0, including on</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 07:19:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88137</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.1-1</title>
<description>Signature &amp;amp; md5 check out. I got everything working and ran my usual basic &amp;quot;index &amp;amp; search first 100K docs from wikipedia&amp;quot; smoke test just fine. But</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 02:44:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88132</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.1-1</title>
<description>With the (imminent) release of Java Lucene 2.9.1, a PyLucene 2.9.1-1 release closely tracking it is ready. Release candidate 1 of PyLucene 2.9.1-1 i</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 00:18:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88127</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene 2.9.1, take 4</title>
<description>+1  On Nov 3, 2009, at 2:05 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: &amp;gt; OK, again! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts from svn rev 832363 (on the 2.9 &amp;gt; branch</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 07:20:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88125</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene 2.9.1, take 4</title>
<description>+1 2009/11/6 Uwe Schindler &amp;lt;uwe@thetaphi.de&amp;gt; &amp;gt; +1, Let&amp;#039;s release it as soon as possible! After that I start to create the &amp;gt; first 3.0 release artifa</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 16:59:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88034</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene 2.9.1, take 4</title>
<description>+1, Let&amp;#039;s release it as soon as possible! After that I start to create the first 3.0 release artifacts (after some more tuning in trunk is done, but i</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 16:05:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88022</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene 2.9.1, take 4</title>
<description>+1 On Nov 3, 2009, at 2:05 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: &amp;gt; OK, again! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts from svn rev 832363 (on the 2.9 &amp;gt; branch)</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 14:57:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88021</link>
</item><item>
<title>Open source search social evening in London - 18th Nov</title>
<description>Hi all, (Apologies for the cross-post) It&amp;#039;s been a while since the last time we met up, so we&amp;#039;re organising another open source search social evenin</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 13:57:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88014</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to Index only newly added documents?</title>
<description>Like Simon mentioned you might want to create a document identifier or UUID - if you don&amp;#039;t have one already and use this code snippet to check if doc</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 10:22:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87942</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to Index only newly added documents?</title>
<description>The common approach is to use a UUID field in the index and run an updateDocument with a delete term holding the UUID for a document. That way only th</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 08:19:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87920</link>
</item><item>
<title>Free live video streaming of ApacheCon US 2009</title>
<description>Team, For those Lucene fanatics not in Oakland this week for ApacheCon US, don&amp;#039;t miss the FREE live video streaming, starting today:  http://stream</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 05:25:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87912</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>Thanks Ted, Keeping an track of the documents that are getting added and the total number of documents, would lead to a progress bar.  Ted Dunning w</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 03:57:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87910</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>If you wanna do it on a per document basis you could possibly use a reader that reports back the bytes / chars read and the total size of the reader t</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 00:06:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87899</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>Hi  Can you please unsubscribe me from this mailing list.  Thanks and Regards Jagannadham  -----Original Message----- From: Ted Dunning [mailt</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 22:15:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87897</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>Just count how many documents have been indexed. Simon was correct when he said it was relatively trivial. If you want slightly more refinement, you</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 22:04:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87896</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to Index only newly added documents?</title>
<description>thanks for the reply!.. BUt i need to filter out the already indexed documenst ...i.e if the resouces directory contains 2 documents which are index</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 21:41:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87895</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>But the biggest problem in building it is ...like you have progress bar for file upload where you know the exact size of flie and how much has been up</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 21:36:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87894</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>There is no API which supports what you are asking for but building yourself should not be a problem at all. simon On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:10 PM,</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 08:09:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87866</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>Why not? Indexing is very fast. ------Original Message------ From: tarunsapra To: general@lucene.apache.org ReplyTo: general@lucene.apache.org S</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 06:10:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87865</link>
</item><item>
<title>Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>Is it possible to to have an Ajax progress bar for indexing process ? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Progress-bar-for-indexin</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 05:19:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87862</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to Index only newly added documents?</title>
<description>The api a&amp;quot;lows you to add documents to an index. However it does not have any functionality to detect which ones are new or changed. Regardless, thi</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 04:34:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87861</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to Index only newly added documents?</title>
<description>Look the class: org.pdfbox.searchengine.lucene.IndexFiles This a example classe for create and indexing documents when you add or delete the documen</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 04:26:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87860</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
