<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Lucene | General</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>26 Nov  2009 11:27:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>[ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 released</title>
<description>Hello Lucene users,  On behalf of the Lucene dev community (a growing community far larger than just the committers) I would like to announce the rel</description>
<pubDate>26 Nov  2009 02:24:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/90170</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>On 25 Nov, Uwe Schindler wrote: &amp;gt; I would really not see this as a real test failure. The test assumes that a &amp;gt; compound file index is slower during i</description>
<pubDate>26 Nov  2009 02:15:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/90157</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>On Nov 25, 2009, at 1:46, &amp;quot;Uwe Schindler&amp;quot; &amp;lt;uwe@thetaphi.de&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I would really not see this as a real test failure. The test assumes  &amp;gt; that a</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2009 08:10:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/90079</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>Thanks! So I think I start to copy the artefacts to the apache/maven dist directories and update the websites tomorrow. I got the following binding</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2009 07:09:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/90078</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>+1. I downloaded the artifacts, tried the demo, verified signatures, MD5s, etc. On Nov 22, 2009, at 10:07 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I hav</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2009 06:53:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/90077</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>I need one more vote!? Does somebody have some +1 anywhere? :-) Uwe ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2009 06:51:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/90076</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>That failure can be ignored. The test is old (was in the 1st rev of the book, but I&amp;#039;ve removed it in the 2nd edition) -- it&amp;#039;s asserting that building</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2009 01:47:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/90043</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>I would really not see this as a real test failure. The test assumes that a compound file index is slower during indexing, which is normally so. But m</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2009 01:46:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/90042</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>On 24 Nov, Andi Vajda wrote: &amp;gt; I built PyLucene trunk using Lucene Java source from the artifact&amp;#039;s svn rev &amp;gt; and all unit tests and ported &amp;quot;Lucene in</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2009 01:32:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/90041</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, Uwe Schindler wrote: &amp;gt; I have built the artifacts for the final release of &amp;quot;Apache Lucene Java &amp;gt; 3.0.0&amp;quot; a second time, because o</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2009 20:10:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/90031</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>&amp;gt; As DM Smith said, since the bug is longstanding and we are only now &amp;gt; just hearing about it, it appears not to be that severe in practice. &amp;gt; I guess</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2009 02:09:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89868</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>As DM Smith said, since the bug is longstanding and we are only now just hearing about it, it appears not to be that severe in practice. I guess users</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2009 02:01:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89867</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>Hi all, Hoss reported a bug about two fields missing in the equals/hashCode of BooleanQuery (which exists since 1.9, https://issues.apache.org/jira/b</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 23:26:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89856</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>+1 2009/11/23 Uwe Schindler &amp;lt;uwe@thetaphi.de&amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; As a non-counting vote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; +1 to release these artifacts as Lucene 3.0 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2009 19:56:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89724</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; As a non-counting vote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; +1 to release these artifacts as Lucene 3.0 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I tested lucene-core.3.0.0.jar with my updated application, n</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2009 13:41:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89689</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>Hi, As a non-counting vote: +1 to release these artifacts as Lucene 3.0 I tested lucene-core.3.0.0.jar with my updated application, no problems occ</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2009 13:23:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89688</link>
</item><item>
<title>Query of users</title>
<description>Hi, I have a user database that I want to make lucene searchable. a web administrator must be able to search for mobile numbers, name etc. My problem</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2009 09:10:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89628</link>
</item><item>
<title>[ANNOUNCE] Apache Tika 0.5 Released</title>
<description>(...apologies for the cross posting...) The Apache Lucene project is pleased to announce the release of Apache Tika 0.5. The release contents have be</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2009 07:50:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89606</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>Hi, I have built the artifacts for the final release of &amp;quot;Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0&amp;quot; a second time, because of a bug in the TokenStream API (found by S</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2009 07:07:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89605</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0</title>
<description>Hi, I have built the artifacts for the final release of &amp;quot;Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0&amp;quot;, targeted for release on 2009-11-25. The artifacts are here: http</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 06:39:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89526</link>
</item><item>
<title>[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Tika 0.5 release candidate #1</title>
<description>Hi All, The vote passes. Here are the result tallies: PMC Votes: +1 Jukka Zitting +1 Grant Ignersoll +1 Chris Mattmann Non-binding votes: -1 Karl</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2009 18:53:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89386</link>
</item><item>
<title>[ANN] Apache Mahout 0.2 Released</title>
<description>Apache Mahout 0.2 has been released and is now available for public download at http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/lucene/mahout Apache Mahout is a</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 05:34:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89250</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene Not Throwing Matches Without Spaces</title>
<description>Simon, Thanks for replying.Next time, I will take care to post question in right forum. I understood your explanation.But still, if I want to get ma</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 21:28:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89237</link>
</item><item>
<title>Lucene Java 3.0.0 RC1 now available for testing</title>
<description>Hello Lucene users,   On behalf of the Lucene dev community (a growing community far larger than just the committers) I would like to announce the</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 14:25:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89221</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene Not Throwing Matches Without Spaces</title>
<description>Solr&amp;#039;s WordDelimiterFilter has an option splitOnCaseChange i think that might work for your SaddamHussain example. if you want to use Ted&amp;#039;s first app</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 09:24:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89166</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
