<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Lucene | General</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>22 Nov  2008 13:33:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>parse url addresses and boost by field</title>
<description>Hello all, I have two questions: 1. Lucene doesn&amp;#039;t parse url addresses well for me. It stores it in (almost) full format: www.address.net or www.add</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2008 02:48:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/67043</link>
</item><item>
<title>How to get the keywords in articles which hitted by search?</title>
<description>For instance, I use search term &amp;quot;lucene OR java OR keyword&amp;quot; to create a query, and the result comes back with a bunch of articles, my question is how</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2008 08:03:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66929</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] [RESULT] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Graduation Approval Vote)</title>
<description>Hi, On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Jukka Zitting &amp;lt;jukka.zitting@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Please vote on approving the graduation of Tika. This vote is o</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2008 23:38:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66695</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Simplest way to check for an exact match on an tokenized/stored field?</title>
<description>Thanks for the reply Steve. Yes I am aware that the standard analyzer can &amp;quot;match&amp;quot; two different texts. That&amp;#039;s why my idea included a final pass iterat</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2008 10:27:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66688</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Simplest way to check for an exact match on an tokenized/stored field?</title>
<description>Hi chaiguy1337, On 10/26/2008 at 6:09 PM, chaiguy1337 wrote: &amp;gt; Hi group. I have a Lucene index that contains a bunch of text documents, &amp;gt; which are b</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2008 10:18:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66684</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: What happend hits</title>
<description>Hi Sean,  Not many people subscribe to this list - try java-user@l.a.o instead.  Check out the javadocs for the Hits class - many of your question</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2008 09:34:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66683</link>
</item><item>
<title>Simplest way to check for an exact match on an tokenized/stored field?</title>
<description>Hi group. I have a Lucene index that contains a bunch of text documents, which are both tokenized (using the standard analyzer, not KeywordAnalyzer) a</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2008 15:09:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66659</link>
</item><item>
<title>What happend hits</title>
<description>Hello,   I&amp;#039;m sure this question has been asked before but I can&amp;#039;t find the answer. I&amp;#039;ve just update to the latest version of lucene and it has left m</description>
<pubDate>25 Oct  2008 08:23:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66645</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Graduation Approval Vote)</title>
<description>+1  Lucas Matthieu Riou wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Jukka Zitting &amp;lt;jukka.zitting@gmail.com&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; The Tika communi</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2008 12:17:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66622</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Graduation Approval Vote)</title>
<description>+1  Lucas Matthieu Riou wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Jukka Zitting &amp;lt;jukka.zitting@gmail.com&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; The Tika communi</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2008 12:07:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66621</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Graduation Approval Vote)</title>
<description>+1  Lucas Matthieu Riou wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Jukka Zitting &amp;lt;jukka.zitting@gmail.com&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; The Tika communi</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2008 12:04:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66620</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Graduation Approval Vote)</title>
<description>+1 Good job. Craig On Oct 24, 2008, at 7:07 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: &amp;gt; Please vote on approving the graduation of Tika. This vote is open for &amp;gt; th</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2008 10:45:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66623</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Graduation Approval Vote)</title>
<description>On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Jukka Zitting &amp;lt;jukka.zitting@gmail.com&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; The Tika community has voted [1] to request and the Lucene P</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2008 08:18:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66619</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Graduation Approval Vote)</title>
<description>Hi, The Tika community has voted [1] to request and the Lucene PMC has accepted [2] graduating Apache Tika to a Lucene subproject. As described in in</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2008 07:07:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66604</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Subproject Acceptance Vote)</title>
<description>Hi, On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Jukka Zitting &amp;lt;jukka.zitting@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; So, conditional on graduation approval by the Incubator PMC, pl</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2008 06:38:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66603</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: search starts with</title>
<description>Hello RIZ, google &amp;quot;lucene search syntax&amp;quot;: http://lucene.apache.org/java/1_4_3/queryparsersyntax.html you need to use hello* w On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 a</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2008 15:55:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66558</link>
</item><item>
<title>search starts with</title>
<description>Hi Firends, I am new to this forum.I really appriciate your help. I wanted to form a &amp;quot;start with query&amp;quot; in lucene. Lets say for instance i want to get</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2008 14:05:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66553</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Subproject Acceptance Vote)</title>
<description>Jukka Zitting wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; As summarized below, the incubating Tika project has voted to indicate &amp;gt; their willingness to graduate into a Lucene s</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2008 01:48:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66507</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Subproject Acceptance Vote)</title>
<description>+1 and I look forward to seeing Tika closer to Lucene.  Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch  ----- Original Message -</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2008 20:39:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66502</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Subproject Acceptance Vote)</title>
<description>Hi, As summarized below, the incubating Tika project has voted to indicate their willingness to graduate into a Lucene subproject. We feel that Tika</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2008 17:17:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66499</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene Index file vs. database</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Thank you for your reply. &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m just affraid of choosing wrong option for the project and later it would &amp;gt; be harder to change it. I&amp;#039;m making the s</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2008 04:12:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66458</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: documentation for V1.0.2</title>
<description>2.3.0 included some serious indexing speed improvements - reports indicate 2 to 8 times faster indexing. FYI, version 2.4.0 is the most recent releas</description>
<pubDate>17 Oct  2008 12:54:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66424</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: documentation for V1.0.2</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m working on a system that is using Lucene 1.0.2 I&amp;#039;m a contractor, so, while I&amp;#039;m encrouging there immediate upgrade, I&amp;#039;m not able to make them to s</description>
<pubDate>17 Oct  2008 12:46:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66423</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: documentation for V1.0.2</title>
<description>Steven A Rowe wrote: &amp;gt; Hmm, looking closer, I see that release 1.02 *was* referred to as 1.0.2 - see Lucene&amp;#039;s home page as of July 2002: The last Sou</description>
<pubDate>17 Oct  2008 11:47:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66428</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: documentation for V1.0.2</title>
<description>Hmm, looking closer, I see that release 1.02 *was* referred to as 1.0.2 - see Lucene&amp;#039;s home page as of July 2002: &amp;lt;http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucen</description>
<pubDate>17 Oct  2008 11:22:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66422</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
