<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Lucene | General</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>25 Nov  2009 08:08:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>That failure can be ignored. The test is old (was in the 1st rev of the book, but I&amp;#039;ve removed it in the 2nd edition) -- it&amp;#039;s asserting that building</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2009 01:47:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/90043</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>I would really not see this as a real test failure. The test assumes that a compound file index is slower during indexing, which is normally so. But m</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2009 01:46:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/90042</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>On 24 Nov, Andi Vajda wrote: &amp;gt; I built PyLucene trunk using Lucene Java source from the artifact&amp;#039;s svn rev &amp;gt; and all unit tests and ported &amp;quot;Lucene in</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2009 01:32:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/90041</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, Uwe Schindler wrote: &amp;gt; I have built the artifacts for the final release of &amp;quot;Apache Lucene Java &amp;gt; 3.0.0&amp;quot; a second time, because o</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2009 20:10:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/90031</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>&amp;gt; As DM Smith said, since the bug is longstanding and we are only now &amp;gt; just hearing about it, it appears not to be that severe in practice. &amp;gt; I guess</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2009 02:09:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89868</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>As DM Smith said, since the bug is longstanding and we are only now just hearing about it, it appears not to be that severe in practice. I guess users</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2009 02:01:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89867</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>Hi all, Hoss reported a bug about two fields missing in the equals/hashCode of BooleanQuery (which exists since 1.9, https://issues.apache.org/jira/b</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 23:26:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89856</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>+1 2009/11/23 Uwe Schindler &amp;lt;uwe@thetaphi.de&amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; As a non-counting vote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; +1 to release these artifacts as Lucene 3.0 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2009 19:56:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89724</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; As a non-counting vote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; +1 to release these artifacts as Lucene 3.0 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I tested lucene-core.3.0.0.jar with my updated application, n</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2009 13:41:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89689</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>Hi, As a non-counting vote: +1 to release these artifacts as Lucene 3.0 I tested lucene-core.3.0.0.jar with my updated application, no problems occ</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2009 13:23:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89688</link>
</item><item>
<title>Query of users</title>
<description>Hi, I have a user database that I want to make lucene searchable. a web administrator must be able to search for mobile numbers, name etc. My problem</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2009 09:10:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89628</link>
</item><item>
<title>[ANNOUNCE] Apache Tika 0.5 Released</title>
<description>(...apologies for the cross posting...) The Apache Lucene project is pleased to announce the release of Apache Tika 0.5. The release contents have be</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2009 07:50:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89606</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)</title>
<description>Hi, I have built the artifacts for the final release of &amp;quot;Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0&amp;quot; a second time, because of a bug in the TokenStream API (found by S</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2009 07:07:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89605</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0</title>
<description>Hi, I have built the artifacts for the final release of &amp;quot;Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0&amp;quot;, targeted for release on 2009-11-25. The artifacts are here: http</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 06:39:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89526</link>
</item><item>
<title>[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Tika 0.5 release candidate #1</title>
<description>Hi All, The vote passes. Here are the result tallies: PMC Votes: +1 Jukka Zitting +1 Grant Ignersoll +1 Chris Mattmann Non-binding votes: -1 Karl</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2009 18:53:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89386</link>
</item><item>
<title>[ANN] Apache Mahout 0.2 Released</title>
<description>Apache Mahout 0.2 has been released and is now available for public download at http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/lucene/mahout Apache Mahout is a</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 05:34:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89250</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene Not Throwing Matches Without Spaces</title>
<description>Simon, Thanks for replying.Next time, I will take care to post question in right forum. I understood your explanation.But still, if I want to get ma</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 21:28:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89237</link>
</item><item>
<title>Lucene Java 3.0.0 RC1 now available for testing</title>
<description>Hello Lucene users,   On behalf of the Lucene dev community (a growing community far larger than just the committers) I would like to announce the</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 14:25:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89221</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene Not Throwing Matches Without Spaces</title>
<description>Solr&amp;#039;s WordDelimiterFilter has an option splitOnCaseChange i think that might work for your SaddamHussain example. if you want to use Ted&amp;#039;s first app</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 09:24:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89166</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene Not Throwing Matches Without Spaces</title>
<description>That is what is going on. To fix the problem you generally need to do a bit of statistics on your corpus to discover word pairs that appear both with</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 09:14:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89165</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene Not Throwing Matches Without Spaces</title>
<description>Nishu, first you should send this question to java-users not to general :) When you index a doc the the content &amp;quot;mighty duck&amp;quot; your TokenStream most l</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 08:09:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89156</link>
</item><item>
<title>Lucene Not Throwing Matches Without Spaces</title>
<description>Lucene is not throwing matches when search string is without space and data in my index file is with space.For e.g. if &amp;quot;Saddam Hussain&amp;quot; text is in ind</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 05:16:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89145</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Open source search social evening in London - 18th Nov</title>
<description>Hi all, Just a reminder that we&amp;#039;re meeting up this Wednesday at the location below. It just occurred to me that we haven&amp;#039;t put anything about oursel</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 13:07:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/89041</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 0.5 release candidate #1</title>
<description>Hey Jukka, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; The only issue I see with the release are the temporary Maven release &amp;gt; plugin files found in the source archive. Did you take the pa</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 07:28:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88960</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2</title>
<description>+1 from me.  On Nov 12, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: &amp;gt; Please vote on releasing the artifacts at: &amp;gt; https://repository.apache.org/conten</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 07:02:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88959</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 0.5 release candidate #1</title>
<description>On Nov 14, 2009, at 2:27 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: &amp;gt; Hi Folks, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I have posted a candidate for the Apache Tika 0.5 release. The source c</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 07:01:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88958</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 0.5 release candidate #1</title>
<description>Hi, [x] +1 Release the packages as Apache Tika 0.5. The only issue I see with the release are the temporary Maven release plugin files found in the</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 04:59:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88945</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2</title>
<description>Hi, On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll &amp;lt;gsingers@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Please vote on releasing the artifacts at: &amp;gt; https://repository.</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 03:07:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88937</link>
</item><item>
<title>[OT] Webinar on spatial search using Lucene and Solr</title>
<description>From Here to There, You Can Find it Anywhere: &amp;gt; Building Local/Geo-Search &amp;gt; with Apache Lucene and Solr  Join us for a free webinar hosted by TechTar</description>
<pubDate>15 Nov  2009 14:42:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88903</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Apache Tika 0.5 release candidate #1</title>
<description>Hi Folks, I have posted a candidate for the Apache Tika 0.5 release. The source code is at: http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-tika-0.5/rc1/</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2009 11:27:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88823</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Release 0.2</title>
<description>Please vote on releasing the artifacts at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-002/org/apache/mahout/ KEYS file is in</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 13:58:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88645</link>
</item><item>
<title>Research Scientist Position</title>
<description>Hello -   Forgive me if I&amp;#039;m not supposed to post positions on this list - I wanted to present a very interesting opportunity for a Research Scienti</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2009 11:30:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88536</link>
</item><item>
<title>Lucene &amp;amp; Mahout @ openexpo (Germany)</title>
<description>Hi all, I just wanna give you a heads-up for an upcoming event. Apache Lucene and Apache Mahout will be present at the openexpo (free open source con</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 23:56:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88479</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: &amp;quot;heavy committing&amp;quot;</title>
<description>http://www.google.com/search?q=heavy+committing We are top ranked in google... ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.t</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 16:38:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88452</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;heavy committing&amp;quot;</title>
<description>I think I would agree with mark miller, the heavy committing always makes me laugh and won&amp;#039;t get old. Uwe has created some new open source terminolog</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 16:35:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88451</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;heavy committing&amp;quot;</title>
<description>On Tuesday 10 November 2009 20:30:13 Ted Dunning wrote: &amp;gt; Toll! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Eine gunstige beschreibung. Thanks :)  &amp;gt; You must have been taking some pretty g</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 16:28:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88450</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;heavy committing&amp;quot;</title>
<description>Toll! Eine gunstige beschreibung. You must have been taking some pretty good notes to fit all those details in! On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:58 AM, Is</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 11:30:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88389</link>
</item><item>
<title>[ANNOUNCE] Apache PyLucene 2.9.1</title>
<description>I am pleased to announce the availability of Apache PyLucene 2.9.1. Apache PyLucene, a subproject of Apache Lucene, is a Python extension for accessi</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 08:21:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88380</link>
</item><item>
<title>[ANN] Solr 1.4.0 Released</title>
<description>Apache Solr 1.4 has been released and is now available for public  download! http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/lucene/solr/ Solr is the popular,</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 08:01:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88371</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.1-1</title>
<description>On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Andi Vajda wrote: &amp;gt; With the (imminent) release of Java Lucene 2.9.1, a PyLucene 2.9.1-1 release &amp;gt; closely tracking it is ready.</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 07:59:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88370</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: &amp;quot;heavy committing&amp;quot;</title>
<description>Juhuuuu - Heavy Committing rocks! ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de &amp;gt; -----Orig</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 07:25:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88369</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;heavy committing&amp;quot;</title>
<description>Isabel, you rock! :) On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Isabel Drost &amp;lt;isabel@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; wget http://www.heise.de/open/artikel/ApacheCon-200</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 07:02:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88368</link>
</item><item>
<title>&amp;quot;heavy committing&amp;quot;</title>
<description>wget http://www.heise.de/open/artikel/ApacheCon-2009-Lucene-Hadoop-und-mehr-852929.html grep &amp;#039;&amp;quot;hea&amp;#039; ApacheCon-2009-Lucene-Hadoop-und-mehr-852929.html</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 04:58:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88362</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.1-1</title>
<description>My +1 to release. On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Grant Ingersoll &amp;lt;gsingers@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; +1 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Nov 7, 2009, at 3:18 AM, Andi Vajda wrote:</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 05:35:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88247</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.1-1</title>
<description>+1 On Nov 7, 2009, at 3:18 AM, Andi Vajda wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; With the (imminent) release of Java Lucene 2.9.1, a PyLucene 2.9.1-1  &amp;gt; release closely tracki</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 05:29:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88246</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.1-1</title>
<description>On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Michael McCandless wrote: &amp;gt; OK thanks Andi, +1 to release! (minor comments below) Thanks Mike ! Here is my +1 as well. We now</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 13:57:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88153</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.1-1</title>
<description>OK thanks Andi, +1 to release! (minor comments below) Mike On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Andi Vajda &amp;lt;vajda@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Nov 7, 2009,</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 13:22:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88152</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.1-1</title>
<description>On Nov 7, 2009, at 2:44, Michael McCandless  &amp;lt;lucene@mikemccandless.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Signature &amp;amp; md5 check out. I got everything working and ran my us</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 10:49:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88146</link>
</item><item>
<title>Apache Lucene java 2.9.1 released</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Release 2.9.1 of Apache Lucene java is now available. This release fixes bugs from 2.9.0, including on</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 07:19:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88137</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.1-1</title>
<description>Signature &amp;amp; md5 check out. I got everything working and ran my usual basic &amp;quot;index &amp;amp; search first 100K docs from wikipedia&amp;quot; smoke test just fine. But</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 02:44:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88132</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.1-1</title>
<description>With the (imminent) release of Java Lucene 2.9.1, a PyLucene 2.9.1-1 release closely tracking it is ready. Release candidate 1 of PyLucene 2.9.1-1 i</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 00:18:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88127</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene 2.9.1, take 4</title>
<description>+1  On Nov 3, 2009, at 2:05 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: &amp;gt; OK, again! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts from svn rev 832363 (on the 2.9 &amp;gt; branch</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 07:20:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88125</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene 2.9.1, take 4</title>
<description>+1 2009/11/6 Uwe Schindler &amp;lt;uwe@thetaphi.de&amp;gt; &amp;gt; +1, Let&amp;#039;s release it as soon as possible! After that I start to create the &amp;gt; first 3.0 release artifa</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 16:59:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88034</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene 2.9.1, take 4</title>
<description>+1, Let&amp;#039;s release it as soon as possible! After that I start to create the first 3.0 release artifacts (after some more tuning in trunk is done, but i</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 16:05:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88022</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene 2.9.1, take 4</title>
<description>+1 On Nov 3, 2009, at 2:05 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: &amp;gt; OK, again! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts from svn rev 832363 (on the 2.9 &amp;gt; branch)</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 14:57:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88021</link>
</item><item>
<title>Open source search social evening in London - 18th Nov</title>
<description>Hi all, (Apologies for the cross-post) It&amp;#039;s been a while since the last time we met up, so we&amp;#039;re organising another open source search social evenin</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 13:57:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88014</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to Index only newly added documents?</title>
<description>Like Simon mentioned you might want to create a document identifier or UUID - if you don&amp;#039;t have one already and use this code snippet to check if doc</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 10:22:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87942</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to Index only newly added documents?</title>
<description>The common approach is to use a UUID field in the index and run an updateDocument with a delete term holding the UUID for a document. That way only th</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 08:19:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87920</link>
</item><item>
<title>Free live video streaming of ApacheCon US 2009</title>
<description>Team, For those Lucene fanatics not in Oakland this week for ApacheCon US, don&amp;#039;t miss the FREE live video streaming, starting today:  http://stream</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 05:25:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87912</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>Thanks Ted, Keeping an track of the documents that are getting added and the total number of documents, would lead to a progress bar.  Ted Dunning w</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 03:57:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87910</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>If you wanna do it on a per document basis you could possibly use a reader that reports back the bytes / chars read and the total size of the reader t</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 00:06:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87899</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>Hi  Can you please unsubscribe me from this mailing list.  Thanks and Regards Jagannadham  -----Original Message----- From: Ted Dunning [mailt</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 22:15:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87897</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>Just count how many documents have been indexed. Simon was correct when he said it was relatively trivial. If you want slightly more refinement, you</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 22:04:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87896</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to Index only newly added documents?</title>
<description>thanks for the reply!.. BUt i need to filter out the already indexed documenst ...i.e if the resouces directory contains 2 documents which are index</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 21:41:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87895</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>But the biggest problem in building it is ...like you have progress bar for file upload where you know the exact size of flie and how much has been up</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 21:36:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87894</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>There is no API which supports what you are asking for but building yourself should not be a problem at all. simon On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:10 PM,</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 08:09:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87866</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>Why not? Indexing is very fast. ------Original Message------ From: tarunsapra To: general@lucene.apache.org ReplyTo: general@lucene.apache.org S</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 06:10:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87865</link>
</item><item>
<title>Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>Is it possible to to have an Ajax progress bar for indexing process ? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Progress-bar-for-indexin</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 05:19:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87862</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to Index only newly added documents?</title>
<description>The api a&amp;quot;lows you to add documents to an index. However it does not have any functionality to detect which ones are new or changed. Regardless, thi</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 04:34:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87861</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to Index only newly added documents?</title>
<description>Look the class: org.pdfbox.searchengine.lucene.IndexFiles This a example classe for create and indexing documents when you add or delete the documen</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 04:26:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87860</link>
</item><item>
<title>how to Index only newly added documents?</title>
<description>Hi People, I am stuck with a problem ,i have a resources directory in which i have lot of documents , my java programs picks up documents from this d</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 04:06:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87848</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Release Apache Lucene 2.9.1, take 4</title>
<description>OK, again! I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts from svn rev 832363 (on the 2.9 branch), here:  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc4_lu</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 02:05:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87838</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3</title>
<description>+1 On Oct 29, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: &amp;gt; OK, let&amp;#039;s try this again! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on t</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 07:30:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87793</link>
</item><item>
<title>assistance with Apache Forrest</title>
<description>I did some research to find the ASF projects that manage their websites with Apache Forrest, and am sending similar email to each project&amp;#039;s dev mail l</description>
<pubDate>01 Nov  2009 19:30:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87774</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3</title>
<description>Where are the MD5 hashes of the top level artifacts? On Oct 29, 2009, at 7:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: &amp;gt; OK, let&amp;#039;s try this again! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve bui</description>
<pubDate>01 Nov  2009 13:41:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87767</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>confirmed, projector will be in the room for the meetup.     Erik On Oct 30, 2009, at 9:31 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at</description>
<pubDate>01 Nov  2009 03:12:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87754</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3</title>
<description>On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Michael McCandless &amp;lt;lucene@mikemccandless.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; OK, let&amp;#039;s try this again! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifact</description>
<pubDate>31 Oct  2009 10:59:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87746</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>I assume there will be one, but let me check. On Oct 30, 2009, at 9:31 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:37:08AM -0700, Marvin</description>
<pubDate>31 Oct  2009 09:42:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87745</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>On Oct 30, 2009, at 9:31 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:37:08AM -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 08:</description>
<pubDate>30 Oct  2009 21:50:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87736</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3</title>
<description>+1  Michael On 10/29/09 4:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: &amp;gt; OK, let&amp;#039;s try this again! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on</description>
<pubDate>30 Oct  2009 19:05:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87731</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:37:08AM -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 08:44:05AM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; The other t</description>
<pubDate>30 Oct  2009 18:31:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87730</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3</title>
<description>+1 Looks good, no problems detected! Greetings from Oakland, just arrived. ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.theta</description>
<pubDate>30 Oct  2009 17:17:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87724</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3</title>
<description>OK, let&amp;#039;s try this again! I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9 branch), here:  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/sta</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 16:27:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87628</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: non-exact matching of search terms</title>
<description>Fuzzy search is supported. http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_3_2/queryparsersyntax.html It is common to rewrite the user&amp;#039;s query to invoke capabilitie</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 10:46:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87558</link>
</item><item>
<title>non-exact matching of search terms</title>
<description>if i search a term &amp;#039;lucene&amp;#039;, is there any way i can get results with lucene, luce, lu even l? thanks a lot. -- View this message in context: http://</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 07:35:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87530</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0</title>
<description>On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Bill Au &amp;lt;bill.w.au@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I think someone has already pointed this out before.  On numerous occasions &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 06:11:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87524</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0</title>
<description>I think someone has already pointed this out before. On numerous occasions I have had to dig into the Lucene code when writing code to extend Solr.</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 06:07:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87523</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0</title>
<description>Yeah, unfortunately, I think we need to use the new Jars. On Oct 29, 2009, at 8:52 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Uwe Sc</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 05:59:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87522</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0</title>
<description>On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Uwe Schindler &amp;lt;uwe@thetaphi.de&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Yes, it&amp;#039;s too bad! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; But you will replace the lucene jars in the artifacts</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 05:52:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87521</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0</title>
<description>Yes, it&amp;#039;s too bad! But you will replace the lucene jars in the artifacts before releasing? Because it would not be good to have jar files with versio</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 05:49:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87520</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0</title>
<description>So what we feared has come to pass - Lucene found more bugs and is going to restart the release. The bugs found however, don&amp;#039;t affect Solr... so I thi</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 05:40:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87519</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2</title>
<description>Robert found another bug in 2.9. I resolved one yesterday and reopened LUCENE-2002. So I changed my mind: -1 :( ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Alle</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 03:13:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87497</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 08:44:05AM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote: &amp;gt; The other thing we need to do at this point,  Presumably a projector is going to</description>
<pubDate>28 Oct  2009 06:37:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87390</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>The other thing we need to do at this point, is make sure our initial  speakers are lined up. I am sure Erik and Stefan will be there, but  not sur</description>
<pubDate>28 Oct  2009 05:44:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87376</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2</title>
<description>+1 On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless &amp;lt; lucene@mikemccandless.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; OK, I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwe</description>
<pubDate>28 Oct  2009 05:04:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87375</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>: We should proably add this to the main site, and send anouncement email : to all the user lists (w/replies to general). Email sent to all the *-us</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 20:01:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87345</link>
</item><item>
<title>[ANNOUNCE] Lucene MeetUp in Oakland, CA - Tue Nov 3rd @ 8PM</title>
<description>(cross posted to many user lists, please confine reply to general@lucene) There will be a Lucene meetup next week at ApacheCon in Oakland, CA on Tue</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 19:57:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87344</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>: I added some more details to the wiki page, including a signup form so : we can better track the number of attendees. Karl had a good point on java</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 13:29:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87316</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2</title>
<description>+1 On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Uwe Schindler &amp;lt;uwe@thetaphi.de&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; OK, I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 07:43:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87279</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m feeling emptiness, too. Looks like I forgot the public_html part  when copying. All is restored now.  On Oct 26, 2009, at 10:14 PM, Yonik Seel</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 03:22:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87267</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
