<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Lucene | General</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>22 Nov  2008 13:35:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>parse url addresses and boost by field</title>
<description>Hello all, I have two questions: 1. Lucene doesn&amp;#039;t parse url addresses well for me. It stores it in (almost) full format: www.address.net or www.add</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2008 02:48:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/67043</link>
</item><item>
<title>How to get the keywords in articles which hitted by search?</title>
<description>For instance, I use search term &amp;quot;lucene OR java OR keyword&amp;quot; to create a query, and the result comes back with a bunch of articles, my question is how</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2008 08:03:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66929</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] [RESULT] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Graduation Approval Vote)</title>
<description>Hi, On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Jukka Zitting &amp;lt;jukka.zitting@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Please vote on approving the graduation of Tika. This vote is o</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2008 23:38:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66695</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Simplest way to check for an exact match on an tokenized/stored field?</title>
<description>Thanks for the reply Steve. Yes I am aware that the standard analyzer can &amp;quot;match&amp;quot; two different texts. That&amp;#039;s why my idea included a final pass iterat</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2008 10:27:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66688</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Simplest way to check for an exact match on an tokenized/stored field?</title>
<description>Hi chaiguy1337, On 10/26/2008 at 6:09 PM, chaiguy1337 wrote: &amp;gt; Hi group. I have a Lucene index that contains a bunch of text documents, &amp;gt; which are b</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2008 10:18:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66684</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: What happend hits</title>
<description>Hi Sean,  Not many people subscribe to this list - try java-user@l.a.o instead.  Check out the javadocs for the Hits class - many of your question</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2008 09:34:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66683</link>
</item><item>
<title>Simplest way to check for an exact match on an tokenized/stored field?</title>
<description>Hi group. I have a Lucene index that contains a bunch of text documents, which are both tokenized (using the standard analyzer, not KeywordAnalyzer) a</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2008 15:09:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66659</link>
</item><item>
<title>What happend hits</title>
<description>Hello, Â  I&amp;#039;m sure this question has been asked before but I can&amp;#039;t find the answer. I&amp;#039;ve just update to the latest version of lucene and it has left m</description>
<pubDate>25 Oct  2008 08:23:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66645</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Graduation Approval Vote)</title>
<description>+1  Lucas Matthieu Riou wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Jukka Zitting &amp;lt;jukka.zitting@gmail.com&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; The Tika communi</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2008 12:17:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66622</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Graduation Approval Vote)</title>
<description>+1  Lucas Matthieu Riou wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Jukka Zitting &amp;lt;jukka.zitting@gmail.com&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; The Tika communi</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2008 12:07:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66621</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Graduation Approval Vote)</title>
<description>+1  Lucas Matthieu Riou wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Jukka Zitting &amp;lt;jukka.zitting@gmail.com&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; The Tika communi</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2008 12:04:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66620</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Graduation Approval Vote)</title>
<description>+1 Good job. Craig On Oct 24, 2008, at 7:07 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: &amp;gt; Please vote on approving the graduation of Tika. This vote is open for &amp;gt; th</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2008 10:45:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66623</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Graduation Approval Vote)</title>
<description>On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Jukka Zitting &amp;lt;jukka.zitting@gmail.com&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; The Tika community has voted [1] to request and the Lucene P</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2008 08:18:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66619</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Graduation Approval Vote)</title>
<description>Hi, The Tika community has voted [1] to request and the Lucene PMC has accepted [2] graduating Apache Tika to a Lucene subproject. As described in in</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2008 07:07:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66604</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Subproject Acceptance Vote)</title>
<description>Hi, On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Jukka Zitting &amp;lt;jukka.zitting@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; So, conditional on graduation approval by the Incubator PMC, pl</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2008 06:38:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66603</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: search starts with</title>
<description>Hello RIZ, google &amp;quot;lucene search syntax&amp;quot;: http://lucene.apache.org/java/1_4_3/queryparsersyntax.html you need to use hello* w On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 a</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2008 15:55:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66558</link>
</item><item>
<title>search starts with</title>
<description>Hi Firends, I am new to this forum.I really appriciate your help. I wanted to form a &amp;quot;start with query&amp;quot; in lucene. Lets say for instance i want to get</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2008 14:05:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66553</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Subproject Acceptance Vote)</title>
<description>Jukka Zitting wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; As summarized below, the incubating Tika project has voted to indicate &amp;gt; their willingness to graduate into a Lucene s</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2008 01:48:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66507</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Subproject Acceptance Vote)</title>
<description>+1 and I look forward to seeing Tika closer to Lucene.  Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch  ----- Original Message -</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2008 20:39:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66502</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Graduate Tika to a Lucene subproject (Subproject Acceptance Vote)</title>
<description>Hi, As summarized below, the incubating Tika project has voted to indicate their willingness to graduate into a Lucene subproject. We feel that Tika</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2008 17:17:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66499</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene Index file vs. database</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Thank you for your reply. &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m just affraid of choosing wrong option for the project and later it would &amp;gt; be harder to change it. I&amp;#039;m making the s</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2008 04:12:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66458</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: documentation for V1.0.2</title>
<description>2.3.0 included some serious indexing speed improvements - reports indicate 2 to 8 times faster indexing. FYI, version 2.4.0 is the most recent releas</description>
<pubDate>17 Oct  2008 12:54:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66424</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: documentation for V1.0.2</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m working on a system that is using Lucene 1.0.2 I&amp;#039;m a contractor, so, while I&amp;#039;m encrouging there immediate upgrade, I&amp;#039;m not able to make them to s</description>
<pubDate>17 Oct  2008 12:46:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66423</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: documentation for V1.0.2</title>
<description>Steven A Rowe wrote: &amp;gt; Hmm, looking closer, I see that release 1.02 *was* referred to as 1.0.2 - see Lucene&amp;#039;s home page as of July 2002: The last Sou</description>
<pubDate>17 Oct  2008 11:47:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66428</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: documentation for V1.0.2</title>
<description>Hmm, looking closer, I see that release 1.02 *was* referred to as 1.0.2 - see Lucene&amp;#039;s home page as of July 2002: &amp;lt;http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucen</description>
<pubDate>17 Oct  2008 11:22:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66422</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: documentation for V1.0.2</title>
<description>Thanks for the help, and pointing me to the right mailing list ;) On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Steven A Rowe &amp;lt;sarowe@syr.edu&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi Chad,</description>
<pubDate>17 Oct  2008 10:54:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66421</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: documentation for V1.0.2</title>
<description>Hi Chad, Not too many people watch the general@l.a.o list - much more traffic over on java-user@l.a.o. Lucene didn&amp;#039;t use a patch version number unti</description>
<pubDate>17 Oct  2008 10:52:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66420</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: documentation for V1.0.2</title>
<description>I think you&amp;#039;d have to dig into the SVN archive: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/ Although, I don&amp;#039;t see 1.0.2 there. That was pre m</description>
<pubDate>17 Oct  2008 10:22:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66419</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: question about wildcard like search</title>
<description>Hi, I think you&amp;#039;ll normally get quicker answers for this type of question on the main Lucene users mailing list: java-user@lucene.apache.org Anyway</description>
<pubDate>17 Oct  2008 00:42:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66415</link>
</item><item>
<title>FYI: Tika is voting to graduate to a Lucene subproject</title>
<description>Dear Lucene and Incubator PMCs, Based on previous discussions about Tika&amp;#039;s future and current status, I have now started the graduation process for T</description>
<pubDate>16 Oct  2008 16:31:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66408</link>
</item><item>
<title>documentation for V1.0.2</title>
<description>Where can I get doc for 1.0.2? The lucene site apparently only goes back to 1.4.3</description>
<pubDate>16 Oct  2008 12:49:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66402</link>
</item><item>
<title>question about wildcard like search</title>
<description>I need to do a query where i&amp;#039;m looking for strings that are embedded into a single word in one of the fields. In other words, a field my have a phras</description>
<pubDate>16 Oct  2008 11:55:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66395</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: lucene 1.4 booleanquery</title>
<description>: So, I put add a query in the &amp;quot;should&amp;quot; fashion, it will return all things : matching that query, but they won&amp;#039;t rank as high as required matches? No</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2008 12:14:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66316</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: lucene 1.4 booleanquery</title>
<description>So, I put add a query in the &amp;quot;should&amp;quot; fashion, it will return all things matching that query, but they won&amp;#039;t rank as high as required matches? On Thu</description>
<pubDate>10 Oct  2008 10:14:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66210</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: lucene 1.4 booleanquery</title>
<description>: &amp;gt; Why would you submit a query with both of the booleans set to false? : &amp;gt;  What does this mean, functionally.  Use cases? : : There are no use cas</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2008 17:26:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66190</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Search Mediawiki and Intranet?</title>
<description>: Currently I&amp;#039;m researching our documentation needs. Our documentations are : split over several servers, including Sharepoint, our Fileserver, and a</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2008 15:17:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66188</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: lucene 1.4 booleanquery</title>
<description>On Donnerstag, 9. Oktober 2008, ChadDavis wrote: &amp;gt; Why would you submit a query with both of the booleans set to false? &amp;gt; Â What does this mean, func</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2008 11:40:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66180</link>
</item><item>
<title>lucene 1.4 booleanquery</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m working with an older version of lucene. In that version the BooleanQuery.add() takes three arguments. The query and two booleans -- &amp;#039;required&amp;#039;</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2008 10:28:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66179</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Subjects DB Matching</title>
<description>Hi Mauro, I&amp;#039;d go to one of the Lucene mail archives, and search &amp;quot;record  linkage&amp;quot;, there you will find various conversations on the topic [1].  Al</description>
<pubDate>07 Oct  2008 08:43:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66134</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Subjects DB Matching</title>
<description>mauro: I assume you are working with the &amp;quot;Lucene-Java&amp;quot; package to build your software? (as opposed to one of the other subprojects like Solr, Mahou</description>
<pubDate>06 Oct  2008 16:37:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66111</link>
</item><item>
<title>[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr Logo Contests</title>
<description>By popular demand (and after a few false starts) Solr is holding a contest to pick a new Solr logo. Full details about the contest, and how to subm</description>
<pubDate>03 Oct  2008 11:22:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/66030</link>
</item><item>
<title>Search Mediawiki and Intranet?</title>
<description>Hi, Currently I&amp;#039;m researching our documentation needs. Our documentations are split over several servers, including Sharepoint, our Fileserver, and a</description>
<pubDate>02 Oct  2008 02:46:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65991</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene Index file vs. database</title>
<description>Thank you for your reply. I&amp;#039;m just affraid of choosing wrong option for the project and later it would be harder to change it. Pozdrav :)  Otis Gosp</description>
<pubDate>30 Sep  2008 10:23:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65937</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene Index file vs. database</title>
<description>Zoki, A better list to ask this on is java-user@lucene. In short, you can really go either way. Some people feel more comfortable storing everythin</description>
<pubDate>30 Sep  2008 07:58:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65926</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Updation of field/metadata value in a document</title>
<description>Yes, but only if all your fields are stored (and not just indexed). Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch  ----- Origin</description>
<pubDate>30 Sep  2008 07:53:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65925</link>
</item><item>
<title>Updation of field/metadata value in a document</title>
<description>Hi All, I have a query regarding document updation in Lucene Index. Is there a way to &amp;quot;update&amp;quot; a Document i.e. retrieve the existing Document from t</description>
<pubDate>30 Sep  2008 03:34:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65909</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: JIRA Forwarding</title>
<description>Do you have the &amp;quot;Administration&amp;quot; menu item in the top of your page?  Next to the &amp;quot;Create New Issue&amp;quot;? Actually, I see the diff... I think  you are</description>
<pubDate>29 Sep  2008 10:46:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65883</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: JIRA Forwarding</title>
<description>Thanks, Grant -- the functionality I wanted is now in place. And thanks Hoss, for showing the way. On Sep 29, 2008, at 5:48 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrot</description>
<pubDate>29 Sep  2008 09:35:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65882</link>
</item><item>
<title>Lucene Index file vs. database</title>
<description>Hi, First I want to apologize if I&amp;#039;m asking something that was asked already. I tried search, but couldn&amp;#039;t find what I was looking for (or I simply</description>
<pubDate>29 Sep  2008 06:46:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65881</link>
</item><item>
<title>Subjects DB Matching</title>
<description>I am studying the possibility to use Lucene in order to build a matching system for a database of subjects. The subjects are stored in records of data</description>
<pubDate>29 Sep  2008 06:12:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65884</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: JIRA Forwarding</title>
<description>I set Marvin up as an admin on the project. I also setup a  notification scheme. I think you should be able to do what you need  to do at this poi</description>
<pubDate>29 Sep  2008 05:48:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65880</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: JIRA Forwarding</title>
<description>On Sep 29, 2008, at 1:06 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; : If I read &amp;gt; : &amp;lt;http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/docs/latest/ &amp;gt; smtpconfig.html&amp;gt;, &amp;gt; :</description>
<pubDate>29 Sep  2008 04:35:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65879</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: JIRA Forwarding</title>
<description>: If I read : &amp;lt;http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/docs/latest/smtpconfig.html&amp;gt;, : correctly, I can&amp;#039;t do that myself, because although I&amp;#039;m &amp;quot;project</description>
<pubDate>28 Sep  2008 22:06:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65872</link>
</item><item>
<title>JIRA Forwarding</title>
<description>Greets, How do I get Lucy&amp;#039;s JIRA set up so that it forwards discussion to the lucy-dev list, as happens with Java Lucene&amp;#039;s JIRA and java-dev? If I r</description>
<pubDate>28 Sep  2008 21:54:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65871</link>
</item><item>
<title>ApacheCon US promo</title>
<description>Cross-posting... Just wanted to let everyone know that there will be a number of Lucene/ Solr/Mahout/Tika related talks, training sessions, and Bird</description>
<pubDate>26 Sep  2008 11:53:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65844</link>
</item><item>
<title>ANNOUNCE: Application Period Opens for Travel Assistance to ApacheCon US 2008</title>
<description>NOTE: This is a cross posted announcement to all Lucene sub-projects, please confine any replies to general@lucene. ------------- The Travel Assist</description>
<pubDate>26 Sep  2008 10:25:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65843</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Updating an index??</title>
<description>It&amp;#039;s better to use the static IndexReader.indexExists(Directory)  method, since the file &amp;quot;segments&amp;quot; has actually changed to &amp;quot;segments_N&amp;quot;  in recent</description>
<pubDate>19 Sep  2008 05:32:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65553</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Updating an index??</title>
<description>Ah I see. Hopefully that will make it into Lucene.NET eventually (it&amp;#039;s using the 2.0 codebase right now), thought it hasn&amp;#039;t been updated in a while.</description>
<pubDate>18 Sep  2008 07:46:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65479</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Updating an index??</title>
<description>The latest versions of Lucene (java) have a constructor for  IndexWriter that does not take a boolean create argument, and simply  opens for append</description>
<pubDate>18 Sep  2008 03:06:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65465</link>
</item><item>
<title>Updating an index??</title>
<description>Hi all. I&amp;#039;m new to Lucene, reading Lucene in Action, and using Lucene.NET, but my question is not platform specific. I&amp;#039;m baffled about the &amp;quot;create&amp;quot; p</description>
<pubDate>17 Sep  2008 19:07:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65454</link>
</item><item>
<title>[ANN] katta-0.1.0 release - distribute lucene indexes in a grid</title>
<description>After 5 month work we are happy to announce the first developer  preview release of katta. This release contains all functionality to serve a large,</description>
<pubDate>17 Sep  2008 17:06:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65451</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Local Lucene and Local Solr</title>
<description>hi  i am looking for a Lucene Solr consultant to work onsite in west london for at least 6 months . rates are around 400- 500 a day  olease call me</description>
<pubDate>16 Sep  2008 08:59:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65380</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Local Lucene and Local Solr</title>
<description>OK, I have completed the software grant for Local Lucene. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1387 At this point, there needs to be one</description>
<pubDate>15 Sep  2008 12:11:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65290</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Preliminary, fundamental question about the demo</title>
<description>Hello, Two things you should know: 1) this is the general@lucene list -- it&amp;#039;s hte starting point for people with questions baout the entire Lucene</description>
<pubDate>10 Sep  2008 14:11:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/65040</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Preliminary, fundamental question about the demo</title>
<description>ok, my mistake. apparently the dot &amp;#039;.&amp;#039; is not considered a separator, so documents containing &amp;quot;java.util.Vector&amp;quot; will *not* be matched by a search for</description>
<pubDate>08 Sep  2008 01:21:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64878</link>
</item><item>
<title>Preliminary, fundamental question about the demo</title>
<description>Hi, I just started with Lucene today, and the first thing I did was try out the small demo. I followed the instructions in &amp;quot;Getting started - Buildin</description>
<pubDate>08 Sep  2008 01:16:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64877</link>
</item><item>
<title>Escaped boolean queries with wildcards</title>
<description>In order to support autocomplete in a location search, I&amp;#039;m taking the query string and adding a wildcard to the end. This works fine in general, but I</description>
<pubDate>04 Sep  2008 09:38:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64749</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GermanAnalyzer</title>
<description>Hello Heidi, I&amp;#039;m using the german-analyzer without problems. Letters like Ã¤,Ã¼,Ã¶ are can be Searched. Maybe something in your code. Can you post so</description>
<pubDate>04 Sep  2008 03:34:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64715</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GermanAnalyzer</title>
<description>Thank you very much for the Infos. But i think really, that the GermanAnalyzer isnÂ´t working correctly.  -- View this message in context: http://</description>
<pubDate>04 Sep  2008 03:12:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64714</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GermanAnalyzer</title>
<description>On Mittwoch, 3. September 2008, heidiweber wrote: &amp;gt; Do i need another (german-) steemer? &amp;gt; Or what could be wrong? Is this a bug in the germananalyze</description>
<pubDate>03 Sep  2008 11:36:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64650</link>
</item><item>
<title>GermanAnalyzer</title>
<description>Hello, i use the GermanAnalyzer. But i believe that this analyzer isnÂ´t working correct or i make an error in my code. For indexing and searching i</description>
<pubDate>03 Sep  2008 01:49:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64628</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Local Lucene and Local Solr</title>
<description>So, the consensus seems to be to split into contrib modules for Lucene  Java and Lucene Solr. I just need to finish up the paperwork over in  incub</description>
<pubDate>02 Sep  2008 09:43:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64596</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Replicating Lucene Index with out SOLR</title>
<description>Currently we index every certain amount of time on A. -copy the index   Copying the whole index everytime ?  Currently i am investigating how i c</description>
<pubDate>27 Aug  2008 20:36:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64437</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Replicating Lucene Index with out SOLR</title>
<description>Hi, You may want to ask on the java-user list (more subscribers), which I&amp;#039;m CC-ing, so we can continue discussion there. I think you will have to imp</description>
<pubDate>27 Aug  2008 18:42:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64433</link>
</item><item>
<title>Replicating Lucene Index with out SOLR</title>
<description>I have the following requirement Right now we have multiple indexes serving our web application. Our indexes are around 30 GB size. We want to repl</description>
<pubDate>27 Aug  2008 16:34:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64426</link>
</item><item>
<title>We need Java Developer with Lucene experience in SSFO, CA</title>
<description>Contractor position in SSF (South San Francisco)  _____   We are looking for excellent Java developer who loves solving difficult problems. The Pr</description>
<pubDate>27 Aug  2008 15:28:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64418</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Local Lucene and Local Solr</title>
<description>: As to where, from the Solr point of view, a geosearch feature seems : core, thus it should go in Solr core. if i remember correctly,the LocalSolr h</description>
<pubDate>25 Aug  2008 11:24:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64318</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Local Lucene and Local Solr</title>
<description>The code has been contributed - no need to do a premature commit anywhere else. The next steps would be for interested developers to open up JIRA iss</description>
<pubDate>25 Aug  2008 11:18:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64317</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Local Lucene and Local Solr</title>
<description>Yes, that is true, but the main issue will then be &amp;quot;how to not release  it&amp;quot; if the parent project (i.e. Lucene and Solr) does a release. I  could s</description>
<pubDate>25 Aug  2008 11:06:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64316</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Local Lucene and Local Solr</title>
<description>1. sounds like the right choice to me. On the topic of committing early, would committing it and allowing people to svn up/co, build locally, and imp</description>
<pubDate>25 Aug  2008 10:20:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64315</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Local Lucene and Local Solr</title>
<description>I like #1 best. I think it&amp;#039;s important to allow users of just Lucene to do searches  with geo queries/filtering/sorting easily. Mike Grant Ingerso</description>
<pubDate>25 Aug  2008 09:19:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64312</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Local Lucene and Local Solr</title>
<description>On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Grant Ingersoll &amp;lt;gsingers@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; The creators of Local Lucene and Local Solr &amp;gt; (http://www.nsshutdown.</description>
<pubDate>25 Aug  2008 08:59:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64311</link>
</item><item>
<title>Local Lucene and Local Solr</title>
<description>The creators of Local Lucene and Local Solr (http://www.nsshutdown.com/projects/lucene/whitepaper/locallucene.htm ) have generously agreed to donate</description>
<pubDate>25 Aug  2008 08:41:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64310</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene-based Distributed Index Leveraging Hadoop</title>
<description>2008/8/21 Stefan Groschupf &amp;lt;sg@101tec.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Is there any material published about this? I would be very interested to &amp;gt; see Marks slides and hear</description>
<pubDate>22 Aug  2008 09:17:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64223</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Multi Lingual indexing</title>
<description>Hi Ayush, You will get a quicker/better response if you use the java-user@lucene.apache.org list instead of the general@l.a.o list - few people are s</description>
<pubDate>22 Aug  2008 08:39:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64222</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene-based Distributed Index Leveraging Hadoop</title>
<description>Stefan, I&amp;#039;ve got a lot of reading and learning to do :o) Thanks for the info, and good luck with your deployment. Rich</description>
<pubDate>22 Aug  2008 07:04:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64213</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene-based Distributed Index Leveraging Hadoop</title>
<description>Hi, &amp;gt; In terms of which project best fits my needs my gut feeling is that &amp;gt; dlucene is pretty close. It supports incremental updates, and doesn&amp;#039;t &amp;gt; b</description>
<pubDate>22 Aug  2008 03:42:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64198</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene-based Distributed Index Leveraging Hadoop</title>
<description>Stefan, &amp;gt; Is there any material published about this? I would be very interested to &amp;gt; see Marks slides and hear about the discussion. I believe all</description>
<pubDate>22 Aug  2008 03:01:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64197</link>
</item><item>
<title>Multi Lingual indexing</title>
<description>Hi,  I am new to Lucene and got stuck while trying to accomplish a multi lingual indexing. Suppose i have two indexes, one English and one French and</description>
<pubDate>22 Aug  2008 00:03:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64189</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene-based Distributed Index Leveraging Hadoop</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Hi All, Hi Mark, &amp;gt; It was interesting to hear Mark Butler present his implementation of &amp;gt; Distributed Lucene at the Hadoop User Group meeting in Lo</description>
<pubDate>21 Aug  2008 10:41:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64169</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Lucene-based Distributed Index Leveraging Hadoop</title>
<description>message to Mark Butler . i am looking for candidates that have lucene exp for contract and permanent positions  can you please send me your cv &amp;gt; Dat</description>
<pubDate>21 Aug  2008 08:51:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64167</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene-based Distributed Index Leveraging Hadoop</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Stefan Groschupf (4 Apr) wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I just noticed - to late though - Ning already contributed the code to &amp;gt; hadoop. So I guess my question should b</description>
<pubDate>21 Aug  2008 08:36:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/64166</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: RFO- Indexing &amp;#039;meaningfull&amp;#039; xml</title>
<description>Hello Hoss,  Thanks for your reply :-) I believe I&amp;#039;m in the first case: &amp;quot;to be able to search for &amp;#039;foo&amp;#039; and get back a list of all sessions where the</description>
<pubDate>07 Aug  2008 06:39:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/63706</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene Performance and usage alternatives</title>
<description>Ezer, I&amp;#039;ve never tried it, but I just downloaded the wpSearch Wordpress  plugin, that uses Zend Search for Lucene: http://devzone.zend.com/node/view</description>
<pubDate>07 Aug  2008 05:20:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/63700</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: RFO- Indexing &amp;#039;meaningfull&amp;#039; xml</title>
<description>: In addition to the full text search, I&amp;#039;d like to be able to perform searches : such as: : - list sessions from:xxx timestamp:200808* : - list sess</description>
<pubDate>06 Aug  2008 15:59:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/63677</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene Performance and usage alternatives</title>
<description>On Aug 5, 2008, at 2:29 PM, ezer wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Thanks Stefan and Grant. &amp;gt; Yes solr seems very intresting i tried once, i am seeing now the  &amp;gt; part of t</description>
<pubDate>05 Aug  2008 11:58:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/63646</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene Performance and usage alternatives</title>
<description>Thanks Stefan and Grant. Yes solr seems very intresting i tried once, i am seeing now the part of the php client you mentioned. What hapens if rhater</description>
<pubDate>05 Aug  2008 11:29:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/63645</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene Performance and usage alternatives</title>
<description>An alternative is always to distribute the index to a set of servers.  If you need to scale I guess this is the only long term perspective. You can d</description>
<pubDate>05 Aug  2008 09:19:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/63634</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene Performance and usage alternatives</title>
<description>Grant, wich other information can i provide in order to clarify my questions?  ezer wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Yes i saw that.. it talks about performance, but not</description>
<pubDate>05 Aug  2008 09:04:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/63633</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene Performance and usage alternatives</title>
<description>My point is more that you don&amp;#039;t necessarily need to go looking for  variants. I&amp;#039;ve seen Lucene Java scale to millions no problem. I  talked w/ a g</description>
<pubDate>05 Aug  2008 08:57:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/63635</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
