<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Lucene | General</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>08 Nov  2009 19:09:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.1-1</title>
<description>On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Michael McCandless wrote: &amp;gt; OK thanks Andi, +1 to release! (minor comments below) Thanks Mike ! Here is my +1 as well. We now</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 13:57:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88153</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.1-1</title>
<description>OK thanks Andi, +1 to release! (minor comments below) Mike On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Andi Vajda &amp;lt;vajda@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Nov 7, 2009,</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 13:22:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88152</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.1-1</title>
<description>On Nov 7, 2009, at 2:44, Michael McCandless  &amp;lt;lucene@mikemccandless.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Signature &amp;amp; md5 check out. I got everything working and ran my us</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 10:49:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88146</link>
</item><item>
<title>Apache Lucene java 2.9.1 released</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Release 2.9.1 of Apache Lucene java is now available. This release fixes bugs from 2.9.0, including on</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 07:19:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88137</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.1-1</title>
<description>Signature &amp;amp; md5 check out. I got everything working and ran my usual basic &amp;quot;index &amp;amp; search first 100K docs from wikipedia&amp;quot; smoke test just fine. But</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 02:44:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88132</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.1-1</title>
<description>With the (imminent) release of Java Lucene 2.9.1, a PyLucene 2.9.1-1 release closely tracking it is ready. Release candidate 1 of PyLucene 2.9.1-1 i</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 00:18:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88127</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene 2.9.1, take 4</title>
<description>+1  On Nov 3, 2009, at 2:05 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: &amp;gt; OK, again! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts from svn rev 832363 (on the 2.9 &amp;gt; branch</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 07:20:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88125</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene 2.9.1, take 4</title>
<description>+1 2009/11/6 Uwe Schindler &amp;lt;uwe@thetaphi.de&amp;gt; &amp;gt; +1, Let&amp;#039;s release it as soon as possible! After that I start to create the &amp;gt; first 3.0 release artifa</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 16:59:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88034</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene 2.9.1, take 4</title>
<description>+1, Let&amp;#039;s release it as soon as possible! After that I start to create the first 3.0 release artifacts (after some more tuning in trunk is done, but i</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 16:05:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88022</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene 2.9.1, take 4</title>
<description>+1 On Nov 3, 2009, at 2:05 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: &amp;gt; OK, again! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts from svn rev 832363 (on the 2.9 &amp;gt; branch)</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 14:57:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88021</link>
</item><item>
<title>Open source search social evening in London - 18th Nov</title>
<description>Hi all, (Apologies for the cross-post) It&amp;#039;s been a while since the last time we met up, so we&amp;#039;re organising another open source search social evenin</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 13:57:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/88014</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to Index only newly added documents?</title>
<description>Like Simon mentioned you might want to create a document identifier or UUID - if you don&amp;#039;t have one already and use this code snippet to check if doc</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 10:22:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87942</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to Index only newly added documents?</title>
<description>The common approach is to use a UUID field in the index and run an updateDocument with a delete term holding the UUID for a document. That way only th</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 08:19:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87920</link>
</item><item>
<title>Free live video streaming of ApacheCon US 2009</title>
<description>Team, For those Lucene fanatics not in Oakland this week for ApacheCon US, don&amp;#039;t miss the FREE live video streaming, starting today:  http://stream</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 05:25:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87912</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>Thanks Ted, Keeping an track of the documents that are getting added and the total number of documents, would lead to a progress bar.  Ted Dunning w</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 03:57:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87910</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>If you wanna do it on a per document basis you could possibly use a reader that reports back the bytes / chars read and the total size of the reader t</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 00:06:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87899</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>Hi  Can you please unsubscribe me from this mailing list.  Thanks and Regards Jagannadham  -----Original Message----- From: Ted Dunning [mailt</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 22:15:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87897</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>Just count how many documents have been indexed. Simon was correct when he said it was relatively trivial. If you want slightly more refinement, you</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 22:04:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87896</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to Index only newly added documents?</title>
<description>thanks for the reply!.. BUt i need to filter out the already indexed documenst ...i.e if the resouces directory contains 2 documents which are index</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 21:41:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87895</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>But the biggest problem in building it is ...like you have progress bar for file upload where you know the exact size of flie and how much has been up</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 21:36:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87894</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>There is no API which supports what you are asking for but building yourself should not be a problem at all. simon On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:10 PM,</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 08:09:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87866</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>Why not? Indexing is very fast. ------Original Message------ From: tarunsapra To: general@lucene.apache.org ReplyTo: general@lucene.apache.org S</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 06:10:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87865</link>
</item><item>
<title>Progress bar for indexing process.?</title>
<description>Is it possible to to have an Ajax progress bar for indexing process ? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Progress-bar-for-indexin</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 05:19:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87862</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to Index only newly added documents?</title>
<description>The api a&amp;quot;lows you to add documents to an index. However it does not have any functionality to detect which ones are new or changed. Regardless, thi</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 04:34:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87861</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to Index only newly added documents?</title>
<description>Look the class: org.pdfbox.searchengine.lucene.IndexFiles This a example classe for create and indexing documents when you add or delete the documen</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 04:26:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87860</link>
</item><item>
<title>how to Index only newly added documents?</title>
<description>Hi People, I am stuck with a problem ,i have a resources directory in which i have lot of documents , my java programs picks up documents from this d</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 04:06:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87848</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Release Apache Lucene 2.9.1, take 4</title>
<description>OK, again! I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts from svn rev 832363 (on the 2.9 branch), here:  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc4_lu</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 02:05:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87838</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3</title>
<description>+1 On Oct 29, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: &amp;gt; OK, let&amp;#039;s try this again! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on t</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 07:30:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87793</link>
</item><item>
<title>assistance with Apache Forrest</title>
<description>I did some research to find the ASF projects that manage their websites with Apache Forrest, and am sending similar email to each project&amp;#039;s dev mail l</description>
<pubDate>01 Nov  2009 19:30:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87774</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3</title>
<description>Where are the MD5 hashes of the top level artifacts? On Oct 29, 2009, at 7:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: &amp;gt; OK, let&amp;#039;s try this again! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve bui</description>
<pubDate>01 Nov  2009 13:41:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87767</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>confirmed, projector will be in the room for the meetup.     Erik On Oct 30, 2009, at 9:31 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at</description>
<pubDate>01 Nov  2009 03:12:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87754</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3</title>
<description>On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Michael McCandless &amp;lt;lucene@mikemccandless.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; OK, let&amp;#039;s try this again! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifact</description>
<pubDate>31 Oct  2009 10:59:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87746</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>I assume there will be one, but let me check. On Oct 30, 2009, at 9:31 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:37:08AM -0700, Marvin</description>
<pubDate>31 Oct  2009 09:42:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87745</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>On Oct 30, 2009, at 9:31 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:37:08AM -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 08:</description>
<pubDate>30 Oct  2009 21:50:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87736</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3</title>
<description>+1  Michael On 10/29/09 4:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: &amp;gt; OK, let&amp;#039;s try this again! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on</description>
<pubDate>30 Oct  2009 19:05:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87731</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:37:08AM -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 08:44:05AM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; The other t</description>
<pubDate>30 Oct  2009 18:31:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87730</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3</title>
<description>+1 Looks good, no problems detected! Greetings from Oakland, just arrived. ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.theta</description>
<pubDate>30 Oct  2009 17:17:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87724</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3</title>
<description>OK, let&amp;#039;s try this again! I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9 branch), here:  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/sta</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 16:27:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87628</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: non-exact matching of search terms</title>
<description>Fuzzy search is supported. http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_3_2/queryparsersyntax.html It is common to rewrite the user&amp;#039;s query to invoke capabilitie</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 10:46:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87558</link>
</item><item>
<title>non-exact matching of search terms</title>
<description>if i search a term &amp;#039;lucene&amp;#039;, is there any way i can get results with lucene, luce, lu even l? thanks a lot. -- View this message in context: http://</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 07:35:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87530</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0</title>
<description>On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Bill Au &amp;lt;bill.w.au@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I think someone has already pointed this out before.  On numerous occasions &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 06:11:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87524</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0</title>
<description>I think someone has already pointed this out before. On numerous occasions I have had to dig into the Lucene code when writing code to extend Solr.</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 06:07:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87523</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0</title>
<description>Yeah, unfortunately, I think we need to use the new Jars. On Oct 29, 2009, at 8:52 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Uwe Sc</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 05:59:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87522</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0</title>
<description>On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Uwe Schindler &amp;lt;uwe@thetaphi.de&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Yes, it&amp;#039;s too bad! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; But you will replace the lucene jars in the artifacts</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 05:52:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87521</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0</title>
<description>Yes, it&amp;#039;s too bad! But you will replace the lucene jars in the artifacts before releasing? Because it would not be good to have jar files with versio</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 05:49:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87520</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0</title>
<description>So what we feared has come to pass - Lucene found more bugs and is going to restart the release. The bugs found however, don&amp;#039;t affect Solr... so I thi</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 05:40:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87519</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2</title>
<description>Robert found another bug in 2.9. I resolved one yesterday and reopened LUCENE-2002. So I changed my mind: -1 :( ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Alle</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 03:13:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87497</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 08:44:05AM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote: &amp;gt; The other thing we need to do at this point,  Presumably a projector is going to</description>
<pubDate>28 Oct  2009 06:37:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87390</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>The other thing we need to do at this point, is make sure our initial  speakers are lined up. I am sure Erik and Stefan will be there, but  not sur</description>
<pubDate>28 Oct  2009 05:44:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87376</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2</title>
<description>+1 On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless &amp;lt; lucene@mikemccandless.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; OK, I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwe</description>
<pubDate>28 Oct  2009 05:04:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87375</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>: We should proably add this to the main site, and send anouncement email : to all the user lists (w/replies to general). Email sent to all the *-us</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 20:01:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87345</link>
</item><item>
<title>[ANNOUNCE] Lucene MeetUp in Oakland, CA - Tue Nov 3rd @ 8PM</title>
<description>(cross posted to many user lists, please confine reply to general@lucene) There will be a Lucene meetup next week at ApacheCon in Oakland, CA on Tue</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 19:57:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87344</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>: I added some more details to the wiki page, including a signup form so : we can better track the number of attendees. Karl had a good point on java</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 13:29:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87316</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2</title>
<description>+1 On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Uwe Schindler &amp;lt;uwe@thetaphi.de&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; OK, I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 07:43:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87279</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m feeling emptiness, too. Looks like I forgot the public_html part  when copying. All is restored now.  On Oct 26, 2009, at 10:14 PM, Yonik Seel</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 03:22:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87267</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0</title>
<description>On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll &amp;lt;gsingers@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; OK, take two is up in the same place.  Please vote. I&amp;#039;m seeing emptin</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 19:14:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87263</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0</title>
<description>OK, take two is up in the same place. Please vote. On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: &amp;gt; Tis the season for releases... &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Please</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 18:58:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87262</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0</title>
<description>Yes. I need to update the POMs too, so scratch this vote for a little bit. On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:35 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: &amp;gt; Hmmm, weren&amp;#039;t you goi</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 15:57:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87249</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0</title>
<description>Hmmm, weren&amp;#039;t you going to update the version numbers to 1.4.1-dev like we just discussed in the other thread? That way if someone changes some of the</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 15:35:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87248</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0</title>
<description>Tis the season for releases... Please vote on releasing the Solr 1.4.0 artifacts located at http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/   (note,</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 15:15:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87247</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2</title>
<description>&amp;gt; OK, I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback) &amp;gt; from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  http://people.apache.org/</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 14:24:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87246</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2</title>
<description>On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Michael McCandless wrote: &amp;gt; OK, I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback) &amp;gt; from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 13:52:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87240</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2</title>
<description>+1 On Oct 26, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: &amp;gt; OK, I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback) &amp;gt; from svn rev 829889</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 12:48:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87239</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2</title>
<description>OK, I&amp;#039;ve built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback) from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here:  http://people.apache.org/~mikemcc</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 11:43:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87225</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1</title>
<description>On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Uwe Schindler &amp;lt;uwe@thetaphi.de&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Looks good. One thing: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; In Mark&amp;#039;s artifacts, he changed the common-build</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 09:47:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87213</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1</title>
<description>Looks good. One thing: In Mark&amp;#039;s artifacts, he changed the common-build.xml to not have -dev in the version before the release. You can see this in S</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 09:43:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87212</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1</title>
<description>OK, I&amp;#039;ve built release artifacts from svn rev 829846 (on the 2.9 branch), here:  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/lucene2.9.1/ Cha</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 09:18:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87211</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Solution for unwanted ngrams</title>
<description>This sort of fine distinction probably requires user feed back. If the idioms are highly distinctive, then a learning system that is highly resistant</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 09:00:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87210</link>
</item><item>
<title>Solution for unwanted ngrams</title>
<description>Hi, Imagine you have a text : &amp;quot;Apartment not for sale&amp;quot;. and another &amp;quot;Sale! Apartment for rent&amp;quot; Search query: &amp;quot;Apartment for sale&amp;quot;. The above search</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 07:29:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/87200</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>Hi, On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Grant Ingersoll &amp;lt;gsingers@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I thought we had one up already on the Lucene wiki.  Otherwise, g</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2009 16:59:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86950</link>
</item><item>
<title>Issue with Tokenising with Standard Analyzer and comma&amp;#039;s</title>
<description>Hi, I am not a Lucene expert by any means and I am hoping that you all may be able to help me with a little problem i currently have. I am using the</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2009 06:38:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86880</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>Hi, On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Michael Busch &amp;lt;buschmic@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Can actually everyone come to the meetups or only people who registe</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 01:30:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86692</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>: It&amp;#039;s SFO .. ah, well, you can&amp;#039;t have everything in life. Well .... it&amp;#039;s not as bad as it may seem. *if* your flight is on time, and *if* you take</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2009 23:07:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86688</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>Chris Hostetter wrote: &amp;gt; : &amp;gt; http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneAtApacheConUs2009 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I cross linked to that over from the main meetup organiza</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2009 22:54:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86687</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>Oh never mind - I just noticed that this is already mentioned on the wiki...  Michael On 10/19/09 10:34 PM, Michael Busch wrote: &amp;gt; Can actually eve</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2009 22:36:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86686</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>Can actually everyone come to the meetups or only people who registered for ApacheCon and paid conf fees?  Michael On 10/19/09 10:26 PM, Chris Hos</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2009 22:34:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86685</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>: &amp;gt; http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneAtApacheConUs2009 I cross linked to that over from the main meetup organization page on the apachecon w</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2009 22:26:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86684</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>&amp;gt; There is an initial schedule online at: &amp;gt; http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneAtApacheConUs2009 &amp;gt; Isabel I still plan to do the Katta introduc</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2009 11:12:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86633</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>Isabel Drost wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:52:33 -0400 &amp;gt; Grant Ingersoll &amp;lt;gsingers@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I thought we had one up already on the L</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2009 07:23:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86622</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:52:33 -0400 Grant Ingersoll &amp;lt;gsingers@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I thought we had one up already on the Lucene wiki. Otherwise, go</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2009 06:58:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86621</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>I thought we had one up already on the Lucene wiki. Otherwise, go for  it. On Oct 15, 2009, at 11:37 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Wed, Oc</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 10:52:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86313</link>
</item><item>
<title>Organizing the Lucene meetup (Was: ApacheCon US)</title>
<description>Hi, On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Grant Ingersoll &amp;lt;gsingers@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Just a friendly reminder to all about Lucene ecosystem events at</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 08:37:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86303</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene PMC welcomes Chris Mattmann</title>
<description>Hey Grant and everyone, Thanks so much for voting me in. It&amp;#039;s been a great time working within the Apache Lucene community for the last 4-5 years and</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 08:02:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86292</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene PMC welcomes Chris Mattmann</title>
<description>On Wed Grant Ingersoll &amp;lt;gsingers@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m pleased to announce the Lucene PMC has voted to add Chris &amp;gt; Mattmann to the PMC. Chris has</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 01:37:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86282</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [VOTE] Graduate Lucene.Net as a subproject under Apache Lucene</title>
<description>The vote has now closed and passed with the following results:  +1 Andi Vajda +1 Andrzej Bialecki +1 Michael McCandless +1 Jukka Zitting +1 Grant</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2009 18:08:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86279</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene PMC welcomes Chris Mattmann</title>
<description>Hi, On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Grant Ingersoll &amp;lt;gsingers@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m pleased to announce the Lucene PMC has voted to add Chris Mat</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2009 10:02:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86255</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene PMC welcomes Chris Mattmann</title>
<description>Congratulations Chris !!!! On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 17:13, Grant Ingersoll &amp;lt;gsingers@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m pleased to announce the Lucene PMC has</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2009 10:00:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86254</link>
</item><item>
<title>Lucene PMC welcomes Chris Mattmann</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m pleased to announce the Lucene PMC has voted to add Chris Mattmann  to the PMC. Chris has been a long time contributor to Nutch and Tika,  with</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2009 08:13:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86248</link>
</item><item>
<title>[ANNOUNCE] Apache PyLucene 2.9.0</title>
<description>I am pleased to announce the availability of Apache PyLucene 2.9.0. Apache PyLucene, a subproject of Apache Lucene, is a Python extension for accessi</description>
<pubDate>13 Oct  2009 18:02:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86189</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.0-1</title>
<description>On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Andi Vajda wrote: &amp;gt; With the recent release of Java Lucene 2.9.0, a PyLucene 2.9.0-1 release &amp;gt; closely tracking it is ready. &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>13 Oct  2009 13:53:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86159</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.0-1</title>
<description>OK thanks Andi. I was missing that initVM is needed even to populate the statics, but that makes total sense. Mike On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:28 PM,</description>
<pubDate>13 Oct  2009 13:09:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86158</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.0-1</title>
<description>On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Michael McCandless wrote: &amp;gt; One question: how does one gain access to the public static constants &amp;gt; Version.LUCENE_XX from oal.V</description>
<pubDate>13 Oct  2009 11:28:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86149</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.0-1</title>
<description>On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Andi Vajda &amp;lt;vajda@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.9.0-1. +1 I walked thro</description>
<pubDate>13 Oct  2009 05:41:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86113</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.0-1</title>
<description>+1 On Oct 7, 2009, at 8:04 PM, Andi Vajda wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; With the recent release of Java Lucene 2.9.0, a PyLucene 2.9.0-1  &amp;gt; release closely tracking i</description>
<pubDate>13 Oct  2009 05:25:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86112</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.0-1</title>
<description>On Mon, 12 Oct 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote: &amp;gt; : Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.9.0-1. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; +1 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; 7efc6e335d729e1df68ba5db83f689</description>
<pubDate>12 Oct  2009 21:56:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86088</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.0-1</title>
<description>: Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 2.9.0-1. +1 7efc6e335d729e1df68ba5db83f6897a worked for me as advertised (after the expected s</description>
<pubDate>12 Oct  2009 21:19:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/86087</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Graduate Lucene.Net as a subproject under Apache Lucene</title>
<description>+1 On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Otis Gospodnetic &amp;lt; otis_gospodnetic@yahoo.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; +1 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Otis &amp;gt; -- &amp;gt; Sematext is hiring -- http://sematex</description>
<pubDate>10 Oct  2009 07:50:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/85944</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Graduate Lucene.Net as a subproject under Apache Lucene</title>
<description>+1  Otis -- Sematext is hiring -- http://sematext.com/about/jobs.html?mls Lucene, Solr, Nutch, Katta, Hadoop, HBase, UIMA, NLP, NER, IR  ----- Orig</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2009 22:03:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/85933</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Graduate Lucene.Net as a subproject under Apache Lucene</title>
<description>+1 to graduate. On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Grant Ingersoll &amp;lt;gsingers@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; +1 to graduate. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Oct 8, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Georg</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2009 12:27:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/85910</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Graduate Lucene.Net as a subproject under Apache Lucene</title>
<description>: On behalf of Lucene.Net mentor, committers and community, this is a call for : vote to graduate the Lucene.Net project +1  -Hoss</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2009 10:42:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/85904</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
