<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Lucene | c-dev</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>22 Nov  2008 13:34:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>using date-recency criteria within Lucene</title>
<description>We want to be able to apply a date-score criteria within Lucene so that more-recent documents score higher.    We also want to be able to apply so</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2007 14:00:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/44377</link>
</item><item>
<title>[RESULT] Mark lucene4c as dormant (was Re: [VOTE] Mark lucene4c as dormant)</title>
<description>On 10/9/06, Garrett Rooney &amp;lt;rooneg@electricjellyfish.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Since there hasn&amp;#039;t been any significant work on Lucene4c in quite some &amp;gt; time, I&amp;#039;d</description>
<pubDate>18 Oct  2006 11:26:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/41197</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Mark lucene4c as dormant</title>
<description>+1 -Yonik On 10/9/06, Garrett Rooney &amp;lt;rooneg@electricjellyfish.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Since there hasn&amp;#039;t been any significant work on Lucene4c in quite some</description>
<pubDate>10 Oct  2006 08:09:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/40863</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Mark lucene4c as dormant</title>
<description>On 10/10/06, Leo Simons &amp;lt;mail@leosimons.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Oct 9, 2006, at 5:34 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Since there hasn&amp;#039;t been any significant wo</description>
<pubDate>10 Oct  2006 07:43:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/40862</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Mark lucene4c as dormant</title>
<description>On Oct 9, 2006, at 5:34 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote: &amp;gt; Since there hasn&amp;#039;t been any significant work on Lucene4c in quite some &amp;gt; time, I&amp;#039;d like to officia</description>
<pubDate>10 Oct  2006 07:28:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/40861</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Mark lucene4c as dormant</title>
<description>On 10/9/06, Yoav Shapira &amp;lt;yoavs@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On 10/9/06, Garrett Rooney &amp;lt;rooneg@electricjellyfish.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  [ X ] +1 - Mark Lu</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2006 09:17:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/40822</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Mark lucene4c as dormant</title>
<description>Hi, On 10/9/06, Garrett Rooney &amp;lt;rooneg@electricjellyfish.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;  [ X ] +1 - Mark Lucene4c as dormant. &amp;gt;  [ ] 0 - I have no opinion. &amp;gt;  [ ]</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2006 09:11:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/40821</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [VOTE] Mark lucene4c as dormant</title>
<description>On 10/9/06, Garrett Rooney &amp;lt;rooneg@electricjellyfish.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Since there hasn&amp;#039;t been any significant work on Lucene4c in quite some &amp;gt; time, I&amp;#039;d</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2006 08:34:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/40820</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Mark lucene4c as dormant</title>
<description>Since there hasn&amp;#039;t been any significant work on Lucene4c in quite some time, I&amp;#039;d like to officially mark it as dormant so I don&amp;#039;t have to keep writing</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2006 08:34:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/40819</link>
</item><item>
<title>relevance in Lucene</title>
<description>hi Friends i would like to know that on what behalf Lucene defines &amp;quot;Relevance&amp;quot; in search results. if anyone worked on Relevance parameter from Lucene</description>
<pubDate>13 Jul  2006 04:47:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/37877</link>
</item><item>
<title>query for search through lucene for BLOB</title>
<description>hi all i have some PDF files stored in Oracle 9i as BLOB. now i want to search for a string in those pdf files using Lucene. then i want to show the</description>
<pubDate>12 Jul  2006 04:37:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/37831</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene Dynamic http Web Page Search</title>
<description>You may want to check this out as well: http://incubator.apache.org/solr/   On 6/29/06, Clive. &amp;lt;clive.lancaster@bestwestern.co.uk&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Than</description>
<pubDate>30 Jun  2006 10:03:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/37453</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene Dynamic http Web Page Search</title>
<description>Thanks for that I have managed to fined Lucene4DB http://www.netomatix.com/Products/DocumentManagement/Lucene4DB.aspx that may do the job. -- View th</description>
<pubDate>29 Jun  2006 09:11:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/37396</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene Dynamic http Web Page Search</title>
<description>Yes, I inject database files into a Lucene index every day using Cold Fusion. If it can be done with CF it can be done with .NET.  On 6/29/06, Clive</description>
<pubDate>29 Jun  2006 08:58:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/37395</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene Dynamic http Web Page Search</title>
<description>On 6/29/06, Clive. &amp;lt;clive.lancaster@bestwestern.co.uk&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I am working on adding a search feature to a web site that uses single &amp;gt; dat</description>
<pubDate>29 Jun  2006 08:34:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/37394</link>
</item><item>
<title>Lucene Dynamic http Web Page Search</title>
<description>Hi,  I am working on adding a search feature to a web site that uses single database driven aspx pages and would like to know if Lucene can search us</description>
<pubDate>29 Jun  2006 08:05:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/37393</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Supporting deleteDocuments in IndexWriter (Code and Performance Results Provided)</title>
<description>Sorry, meant to send it to java-dev.  Regards, Ning  Ning Li Search Technologies IBM Almaden Research Center 650 Harry Road San Jose, CA 95120</description>
<pubDate>08 May  2006 16:02:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/35137</link>
</item><item>
<title>Supporting deleteDocuments in IndexWriter (Code and Performance Results Provided)</title>
<description>Today, applications have to open/close an IndexWriter and open/close an IndexReader directly or indirectly (via IndexModifier) in order to handle a mi</description>
<pubDate>08 May  2006 15:55:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/35136</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: coldfusion and google suggest idea</title>
<description>Excuse my ignorance. I&amp;#039;ll have to go find that mailing list. Sorry for your inconvenience. On 4/11/06, Garrett Rooney &amp;lt;rooneg@electricjellyfish.net&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>11 Apr  2006 11:35:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/34341</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: coldfusion and google suggest idea</title>
<description>On 4/11/06, Tim Archambault &amp;lt;tarchambault@bangordailynews.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Using Ajax, I&amp;#039;d like the search box on my website to perform like GOOGLE &amp;gt; SUG</description>
<pubDate>11 Apr  2006 11:33:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/34340</link>
</item><item>
<title>coldfusion and google suggest idea</title>
<description>Using Ajax, I&amp;#039;d like the search box on my website to perform like GOOGLE SUGGEST. When opening a Lucene index with LUKE, I noticed I can review the t</description>
<pubDate>11 Apr  2006 11:32:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/34339</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: lucene c</title>
<description>Garrett Rooney schrieb: &amp;gt; On 3/20/06, anton feldmann &amp;lt;anton.feldmann@uni-bielefeld.de&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; i want to write a search engine in c ar</description>
<pubDate>20 Mar  2006 12:55:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/33718</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: lucene c</title>
<description>On 3/20/06, anton feldmann &amp;lt;anton.feldmann@uni-bielefeld.de&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi &amp;gt; &amp;gt; i want to write a search engine in c are there examples? Unfortunately,</description>
<pubDate>20 Mar  2006 12:28:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/33717</link>
</item><item>
<title>lucene c</title>
<description>Hi i want to write a search engine in c are there examples? cherrs anton feldmann</description>
<pubDate>20 Mar  2006 12:20:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/33716</link>
</item><item>
<title>lucene searching in pdf</title>
<description>I am writing a program to search into an PDF document. I have problems with generate an index file outof a lot of pdf documents. I want that i can s</description>
<pubDate>20 Mar  2006 12:13:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/33715</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Does the project really use C?</title>
<description>On 2/24/06, yueyu lin &amp;lt;popeyelin@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;  And the last question is if the project is active. I&amp;#039;ve seen that project &amp;gt; since last year bu</description>
<pubDate>24 Feb  2006 10:33:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/32953</link>
</item><item>
<title>Does the project really use C?</title>
<description>Hi,  I&amp;#039;m a Lucene for java&amp;#039;s user. Now I&amp;#039;m exciting to see the Lucene4C. As I know before, there&amp;#039;s another project named CLucene. That project is usi</description>
<pubDate>24 Feb  2006 01:28:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/32937</link>
</item><item>
<title>*** URGENT: Provide your Board Report *NOW* ***</title>
<description>Folks, Your report is well overdue, and were it not for the fact that the Board pushed back their meeting by a week this month, the Incubator report</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2005 14:05:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/29720</link>
</item><item>
<title>Searching for text information in databases</title>
<description>I can&amp;#039;t find anywhere, a Lucene example for indexing and full-text searching of a simple database table, to return table rows ranked by relevance, not</description>
<pubDate>06 Oct  2005 09:04:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/29395</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Ruby &amp;amp; Lucene &amp;amp; ApacheCon</title>
<description>On 8/8/05, Erik Hatcher &amp;lt;erik@ehatchersolutions.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Thomas - have you had a look at PyLucene and how they do the gcj/SWIG &amp;gt; wizardry? What</description>
<pubDate>08 Aug  2005 12:46:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27901</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Ruby &amp;amp; Lucene &amp;amp; ApacheCon</title>
<description>Thomas - have you had a look at PyLucene and how they do the gcj/SWIG  wizardry? What kinds of issues did you encounter with gcj? Perhaps  Andi Va</description>
<pubDate>08 Aug  2005 11:49:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27893</link>
</item><item>
<title>punt for now.</title>
<description>I did manage to build and install the pre-gcj-backend version of lucene4c. The SoC guy will have to run with that for now and hopefully when the gcj-</description>
<pubDate>04 Aug  2005 13:03:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27826</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Starting from scratch with lucene4c/mod_mbox</title>
<description>Any chance the core dump is being caused by me linking directly to the liblucene4c.so instead of the .la file? Anyone building lucene4c into a module</description>
<pubDate>04 Aug  2005 05:31:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27805</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Starting from scratch with lucene4c/mod_mbox</title>
<description>Well, given the issues I&amp;#039;ve had so far (and I&amp;#039;ve got 20+ years and as first a C developer then a UNIX sysadmin) a college kid with minimal linux exper</description>
<pubDate>29 Jul  2005 11:42:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27732</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Starting from scratch with lucene4c/mod_mbox</title>
<description>--- Garrett Rooney &amp;lt;roonroonegcelectricjellyfish&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Well, if it&amp;#039;s crashing inside &amp;gt; _Jv_RJviRegisterClassHookDefaulten perhaps &amp;gt; looking a</description>
<pubDate>29 Jul  2005 11:07:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27730</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Starting from scratch with lucene4c/mod_mbox</title>
<description>steve johnson wrote: &amp;gt; Not to sound more like a moron than I have to, but I&amp;#039;m &amp;gt; not a developer, I&amp;#039;m a sysadmin. I&amp;#039;m trying to set up &amp;gt; a developmen</description>
<pubDate>29 Jul  2005 11:06:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27731</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Starting from scratch with lucene4c/mod_mbox</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Stack trace &amp;gt; &amp;gt; #0 0xb71a83b0 in _Jv_RegisterClassHookDefault () from &amp;gt; /usr/lib/libgcj.so.6 &amp;gt; #1 0xb71a8958 in _Jv_RegisterClasses () from &amp;gt; /u</description>
<pubDate>28 Jul  2005 08:18:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27705</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Starting from scratch with lucene4c/mod_mbox</title>
<description>--- Garrett Rooney &amp;lt;rooneg@electricjellyfish.net&amp;gt; wrote:  &amp;gt; Well, the only reason you need the trunk version of &amp;gt; APR for Lucene4C is &amp;gt; that Paul fi</description>
<pubDate>27 Jul  2005 07:14:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27650</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Starting from scratch with lucene4c/mod_mbox</title>
<description>steve johnson wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;Well, first off, one is linked against libapr-0.so &amp;gt;&amp;gt;and one is linked &amp;gt;&amp;gt;with libapr-1.so, that&amp;#039;s probably a bad thing...</description>
<pubDate>26 Jul  2005 14:23:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27623</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Starting from scratch with lucene4c/mod_mbox</title>
<description>&amp;gt; &amp;gt; Well, first off, one is linked against libapr-0.so &amp;gt; and one is linked &amp;gt; with libapr-1.so, that&amp;#039;s probably a bad thing... &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;d suggest making</description>
<pubDate>26 Jul  2005 14:11:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27622</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Starting from scratch with lucene4c/mod_mbox</title>
<description>mod_mbox.so /myth/steve/mod_mbox_l/trunk/module-2.0/.libs/mod_mbox.so         liblucene4c.so =&amp;gt; /usr/local/lucene4c/lib/liblucene4c.so (0xb7e4</description>
<pubDate>26 Jul  2005 13:47:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27620</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Starting from scratch with lucene4c/mod_mbox</title>
<description>steve johnson wrote: &amp;gt; mod_mbox.so &amp;gt; /myth/steve/mod_mbox_l/trunk/module-2.0/.libs/mod_mbox.so &amp;gt;         liblucene4c.so =&amp;gt; &amp;gt; /usr/local/lucene</description>
<pubDate>26 Jul  2005 13:45:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27621</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Starting from scratch</title>
<description>&amp;gt; &amp;gt; Try the trunk, not the gcj-backend branch. Also, &amp;gt; since you have two &amp;gt; different versions of APR involved, it&amp;#039;s possible &amp;gt; you&amp;#039;re picking up t</description>
<pubDate>26 Jul  2005 13:34:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27617</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Starting from scratch with lucene4c/mod_mbox</title>
<description>Update: By using the trunk version of apr I got lucene4c to build. By deleting the liblucene4c.la file I got mod_mbox to build using lucene4c. Now</description>
<pubDate>26 Jul  2005 13:32:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27616</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Starting from scratch with lucene4c/mod_mbox</title>
<description>steve johnson wrote: &amp;gt; Update: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; By using the trunk version of apr I got lucene4c to &amp;gt; build. By deleting the liblucene4c.la file I got &amp;gt; mod_mbox</description>
<pubDate>26 Jul  2005 13:30:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27619</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Starting from scratch</title>
<description>steve johnson wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;Try the trunk, not the gcj-backend branch. Also, &amp;gt;&amp;gt;since you have two &amp;gt;&amp;gt;different versions of APR involved, it&amp;#039;s possible</description>
<pubDate>26 Jul  2005 13:29:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27618</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Starting from scratch</title>
<description>steve johnson wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve tried so many permutations that I decided to &amp;gt; start again from scratch building a mod_mbox/lucene4c &amp;gt; development environ</description>
<pubDate>26 Jul  2005 13:24:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27615</link>
</item><item>
<title>Starting from scratch</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve tried so many permutations that I decided to start again from scratch building a mod_mbox/lucene4c development environment. new httpd ver 2.0.54</description>
<pubDate>26 Jul  2005 13:04:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27614</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: bad liblucene4c.la while building lucene4c</title>
<description>steve johnson wrote: &amp;gt; I really don&amp;#039;t mean to be obtuse but as I previously &amp;gt; mentioned I&amp;#039;ve never used libtool (of any variant). I &amp;gt; suspect I have t</description>
<pubDate>25 Jul  2005 16:57:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27613</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: bad liblucene4c.la while building lucene4c</title>
<description>I really don&amp;#039;t mean to be obtuse but as I previously mentioned I&amp;#039;ve never used libtool (of any variant). I suspect I have to hack the generated Makefi</description>
<pubDate>25 Jul  2005 16:56:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27612</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: bad liblucene4c.la while building lucene4c</title>
<description>steve johnson wrote: &amp;gt; I am trying to build lucene4c to use with mod_mbox for &amp;gt; a SoC project. I have checked out the gcj-backend &amp;gt; branch of lucene4</description>
<pubDate>25 Jul  2005 16:24:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27611</link>
</item><item>
<title>bad liblucene4c.la while building lucene4c</title>
<description>I am trying to build lucene4c to use with mod_mbox for a SoC project. I have checked out the gcj-backend branch of lucene4c, checked out the trunk ve</description>
<pubDate>25 Jul  2005 16:21:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27610</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: mod_mbox with lucene4c</title>
<description>russell johnson wrote: &amp;gt; When I build the lucene4c library I get a liblucene4c.la that does not &amp;gt; look like any other .la file I have looked at and mo</description>
<pubDate>11 Jul  2005 09:45:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27609</link>
</item><item>
<title>mod_mbox with lucene4c</title>
<description>When I build the lucene4c library I get a liblucene4c.la that does not look like any other .la file I have looked at and mod_mbox make does not like i</description>
<pubDate>11 Jul  2005 09:11:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27608</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Reasonable development environment</title>
<description>Owen McCabe wrote: &amp;gt; Apologies if parts of this are too obvious (or too vague). I&amp;#039;m not &amp;gt; familiar enough to know where meat is needed. Thanks, I&amp;#039;ll</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2005 21:52:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27607</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Reasonable development environment</title>
<description>&amp;gt;And now that you mention it, if you do get it working then reducing the &amp;gt;steps you need to take into a HOWTO would be quite useful... &amp;gt; &amp;gt;-garrett He</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2005 21:22:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27606</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Reasonable development environment</title>
<description>The developer I am building this for will be working adding search functionality to mod_mbox using lucene4c. BTW using the trunk apr and gcc 4.0 got</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2005 08:44:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27605</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Reasonable development environment</title>
<description>Lucene4c is optional for mod_mbox. It is not required. All the current features for mod_mbox work just fine without Lucene4c. -Paul steve johnson w</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2005 08:37:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27604</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Reasonable development environment</title>
<description>--- Garrett Rooney &amp;lt;rooneg@electricjellyfish.net&amp;gt; &amp;gt; And now that you mention it, if you do get it &amp;gt; working then reducing the &amp;gt; steps you need to ta</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2005 07:58:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27603</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Reasonable development environment</title>
<description>steve johnson wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m trying to build an development environment for a &amp;gt; friend to do some mod_mbox work that requires &amp;gt; lucene4c. After 2</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2005 07:39:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27602</link>
</item><item>
<title>Reasonable development environment</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m trying to build an development environment for a friend to do some mod_mbox work that requires lucene4c. After 2 whole days of building packa</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2005 07:33:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27601</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: compile error with gcc 4</title>
<description>Owen McCabe wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; I ran into a little trouble compiling lucene4c with a recent version &amp;gt; of gcc and I thought I&amp;#039;d document it here in case an</description>
<pubDate>05 Jul  2005 21:00:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27600</link>
</item><item>
<title>compile error with gcc 4</title>
<description>Hi, I ran into a little trouble compiling lucene4c with a recent version of gcc and I thought I&amp;#039;d document it here in case anyone else ran into it. Mo</description>
<pubDate>05 Jul  2005 20:50:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27599</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: become a contributor</title>
<description>Feng (Michael) Ji wrote: &amp;gt; hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; How can I start to work on lucene4c project and do my &amp;gt; contribution? I guess I have to contact program &amp;gt; manager</description>
<pubDate>01 Jul  2005 15:25:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27598</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Building lucene4c from subversion</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Attached, since &amp;#039;svn commit&amp;#039; didnt work :) It looks like Doug just added you to the appropriate authorization file in svn, so you should be able t</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2005 13:14:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27597</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Building lucene4c from subversion</title>
<description>Paul Querna wrote: &amp;gt; Garrett Rooney wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; J Robinson wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hello Garrett: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Thanks again for the tips so far. &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve gotten gcc</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2005 12:04:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27596</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Building lucene4c from subversion</title>
<description>Garrett Rooney wrote: &amp;gt; J Robinson wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hello Garrett: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Thanks again for the tips so far. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve gotten gcc-4.0 installed (into &amp;gt;&amp;gt; /home</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2005 10:58:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27595</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Building lucene4c from subversion</title>
<description>J Robinson wrote: &amp;gt; Hello Garrett: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Thanks again for the tips so far. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve gotten gcc-4.0 installed (into &amp;gt; /home/jrobinson/local), and apr,</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2005 10:45:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27594</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Building lucene4c from subversion</title>
<description>Hello Garrett: Thanks again for the tips so far.  I&amp;#039;ve gotten gcc-4.0 installed (into /home/jrobinson/local), and apr, apr-utils, and apr-iconv inst</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2005 10:38:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27593</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Building lucene4c from subversion</title>
<description>J Robinson wrote: &amp;gt; Hello Garrett: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Thanks for the tips. Am working on getting a build &amp;gt; going. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Q: Why is JCG required? I thought this was a</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2005 08:44:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27592</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Building lucene4c from subversion</title>
<description>Hello Garrett: Thanks for the tips. Am working on getting a build going. Q: Why is JCG required? I thought this was a C implementation? jrobinson</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2005 08:25:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27591</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Building lucene4c from subversion</title>
<description>J Robinson wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m new to lucene4c and especially to SVN. Are there &amp;gt; instructions somewhere how to fetch the latest sources &amp;gt; of luc</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2005 08:05:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27590</link>
</item><item>
<title>Building lucene4c from subversion</title>
<description>Hello, I&amp;#039;m new to lucene4c and especially to SVN. Are there instructions somewhere how to fetch the latest sources of lucene4c via SVN? Thanks in ad</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2005 07:53:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27589</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Lucene 1.4.x or Lucene from SVN trunk?</title>
<description>On Jun 5, 2005, at 2:41 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote: &amp;gt; 3) It&amp;#039;s unclear when newer versions of Lucene will be actually  &amp;gt; released, so if we switch now i</description>
<pubDate>06 Jun  2005 02:20:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27588</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Directory interface</title>
<description>Paul Querna wrote: &amp;gt; why can&amp;#039;t we have a simple struct that wraps the FSDirectory? &amp;gt; &amp;gt; All it needs is an int to identify each Directory object type</description>
<pubDate>05 Jun  2005 12:12:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27587</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Directory interface</title>
<description>Garrett Rooney wrote: &amp;gt; The current interface exposed by Lucene4c requires the user to pass in &amp;gt; a path when a directory is needed, as opposed to us</description>
<pubDate>05 Jun  2005 12:05:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27586</link>
</item><item>
<title>Should Lucene4c depend on APR?</title>
<description>Currently, Lucene4c makes extremely limited use of APR. It&amp;#039;s basically used for a very small amount of memory allocation (which we could do without</description>
<pubDate>05 Jun  2005 11:56:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27585</link>
</item><item>
<title>Directory interface</title>
<description>The current interface exposed by Lucene4c requires the user to pass in a path when a directory is needed, as opposed to using an actual directory ob</description>
<pubDate>05 Jun  2005 11:48:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27584</link>
</item><item>
<title>Lucene 1.4.x or Lucene from SVN trunk?</title>
<description>(Note: I&amp;#039;m ccing ruby-dev@lucene.apache.org since the Ruby people are probably going to have to think about these same issues, so getting their opin</description>
<pubDate>05 Jun  2005 11:41:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27583</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gcj-backend (was Re: missing headers)</title>
<description>Rolando Abarca wrote: &amp;gt; mmm... what&amp;#039;s the difference between the gcj-backend and the &amp;quot;regular&amp;quot; &amp;gt; version of lucene4c?... The gcj-backend branch was</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2005 16:01:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27582</link>
</item><item>
<title>gcj-backend (was Re: missing headers)</title>
<description>On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:46:10PM -0700, Garrett Rooney wrote: &amp;gt; You might have better luck using jlibtool (the C based libtool that &amp;gt; comes with AP</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2005 14:00:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27581</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: missing headers</title>
<description>Rolando Abarca wrote: &amp;gt; ok, I think this is totally related to lucent4c: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m trying to compile the gcj-branch, as suggested here, and it&amp;#039;s &amp;gt; failing</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2005 13:46:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27580</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: missing headers</title>
<description>ok, I think this is totally related to lucent4c: I&amp;#039;m trying to compile the gcj-branch, as suggested here, and it&amp;#039;s failing with this: /usr/bin/libtoo</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2005 13:42:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27579</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: missing headers</title>
<description>On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 12:48:41PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote: &amp;gt; Yes, the current trunk of mod_mbox depends on the gcj-backend branch of &amp;gt; Lucene4c, whi</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2005 12:52:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27578</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: missing headers</title>
<description>Rolando Abarca wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m trying to compile mod_mbox, wich needs lucent4c, but in the &amp;gt; mbox_search.h file, there&amp;#039;s a reference to a lcn_init.</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2005 12:48:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27577</link>
</item><item>
<title>missing headers</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m trying to compile mod_mbox, wich needs lucent4c, but in the mbox_search.h file, there&amp;#039;s a reference to a lcn_init.h file, and the configure sc</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2005 12:42:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27576</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [patch] lcn_index_writer_optimize</title>
<description>Paul Querna wrote: &amp;gt; Attached patch adds lcn_index_writer_optimize. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; This was too easy. Thanks, applied in revision 179346. -garrett</description>
<pubDate>31 May  2005 20:59:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27575</link>
</item><item>
<title>[patch] lcn_index_writer_optimize</title>
<description>Attached patch adds lcn_index_writer_optimize. This was too easy. -Paul</description>
<pubDate>31 May  2005 19:50:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27574</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Java Handling Signals?</title>
<description>Paul Querna wrote: [..snip..] &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Program received signal SIGPWR, Power fail/restart. Okay, I did find out that SIGPWR is used by the GCJ garbage co</description>
<pubDate>31 May  2005 17:20:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27573</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Java Handling Signals?</title>
<description>Garrett Rooney wrote: &amp;gt; Paul Querna wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I took my first swing at integrating mod_mbox and Lucene4c this &amp;gt;&amp;gt; afternoon. Code wise, it all work</description>
<pubDate>31 May  2005 17:10:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27572</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Java Handling Signals?</title>
<description>Paul Querna wrote: &amp;gt; I took my first swing at integrating mod_mbox and Lucene4c this &amp;gt; afternoon. Code wise, it all worked. However, running the cod</description>
<pubDate>31 May  2005 16:56:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27571</link>
</item><item>
<title>Java Handling Signals?</title>
<description>I took my first swing at integrating mod_mbox and Lucene4c this afternoon. Code wise, it all worked. However, running the code, I quickly ran into a</description>
<pubDate>31 May  2005 16:41:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27570</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [patch] fix auto* for gcj-branch</title>
<description>Paul Querna wrote: &amp;gt; Attached is a slightly updated patch that fixes the &amp;#039;make dist&amp;#039; created &amp;gt; tarballs. Should now be extremely easy to make release</description>
<pubDate>31 May  2005 14:51:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27569</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [patch] fix auto* for gcj-branch</title>
<description>Garrett Rooney wrote: &amp;gt; Paul Querna wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Attached patch fixes the auto* based build on the gcj-backend branch. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; - Create config.nice &amp;gt;&amp;gt; -</description>
<pubDate>31 May  2005 14:48:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27568</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [patch] fix auto* for gcj-branch</title>
<description>Paul Querna wrote: &amp;gt; Attached patch fixes the auto* based build on the gcj-backend branch. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; - Create config.nice &amp;gt; - Updated list of source and in</description>
<pubDate>31 May  2005 14:34:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27567</link>
</item><item>
<title>[patch] fix auto* for gcj-branch</title>
<description>Attached patch fixes the auto* based build on the gcj-backend branch. - Create config.nice - Updated list of source and include files - Setup depende</description>
<pubDate>31 May  2005 14:23:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27566</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] gcj-branch makefile &amp;#039;stuff&amp;#039;</title>
<description>Paul Querna wrote: &amp;gt; And before I fall asleep, this time I will attach the patch. Thanks Paul, I&amp;#039;ll take a look at testing and committing this stuff</description>
<pubDate>30 May  2005 23:22:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27565</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] gcj-branch makefile &amp;#039;stuff&amp;#039;</title>
<description>And before I fall asleep, this time I will attach the patch.  Paul Querna wrote: &amp;gt; Attached is a little convince patch against the current GCJ-backen</description>
<pubDate>29 May  2005 22:23:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27564</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] gcj-branch makefile &amp;#039;stuff&amp;#039;</title>
<description>Attached is a little convince patch against the current GCJ-backend Makefile. - Uses the shell function to expand the cflags/cppflags/libraries from</description>
<pubDate>29 May  2005 22:19:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27563</link>
</item><item>
<title>Printing results works, plus some bite sized tasks</title>
<description>So I just got the command line tool back to the level of functionality it was at before I decided to switch to GCJ. It can now run a search and prin</description>
<pubDate>28 May  2005 12:51:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/c-dev/27562</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
