pauls at globaliqx
Feb 19, 2003, 12:17 PM
Post #5 of 5
(722 views)
Permalink
|
Thanks Alan,
That was sort of a sarcastic comment from me... ;-)
I have it running here on two Dell desktops @ 500MHz. Running quite
nicely, even a bit quicker and more responsive.
It would even appear that my master does not take over (wrongly) for my
secondary when it goes down. A little clarification:
When I take down the secondary machine the master takes over the
resources for it even though the secondary was not running any services
at the time.
Looks good.
-Paul
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 10:35:17 -0700
Alan Robertson <alanr [at] unix> opened up to us and said:
> Paul Slinski wrote:
> > I've been waiting to see how many broken systems there were in the
> > lists;-)
> >
> > I'll get it installed here tomorrow and pipe up with any probs.
>
> We do a pretty reasonable job with testing - I did 10,000 failover
> tests spread across 2 clusters - one running nice_failback on, and the
> other off. All tests passed.
>
> Here are the problems reported so far:
>
> Steve Snodgrass found (and fixed) a problem in send_arp where it
> ignores the interface, etc. on the command line
> (Thanks Steve!)
> A minor compile problem on some newer compilers in a test
> utility. Made APC snmp module compile with net-snmp as well as
> ucd-snmp An LSB-incompatibility in the heartbeat init script
> comments. Fixed ccm program to not run on ping nodes.
> Added a missing build dependency to the RPM specfile
>
> All are fixed in CVS, and none require a full retest.
>
> I've done a few hundred iterations of the failovers of this CVS
> version, and
> it passed.
>
> --
> Alan Robertson <alanr [at] unix>
>
> "Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship.... Let me
> claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William
> Wilberforce
--
Paul Slinski
System Administrator
Global IQX
http://www.globaliqx.com/
pauls [at] globaliqx
|
