seino.cluster2 at gmail
Jun 21, 2012, 2:12 AM
Post #3 of 13
Re: Behavior of booth when the fail-over in nodes and in sites is caused at the same time
[In reply to]
I would like to report bugzilla.novell.com.
However, I not sure "Classification" and "Product".
I could not search about booth.
Would you tell me which should I select?
2012/6/21 Jiaju Zhang <jjzhang [at] suse>:
> On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 16:40 +0900, Yuichi SEINO wrote:
>> Hi Jiaju,
>> I have a question about booth.
>> I structure 2 sites and 1 arbitrator. And each site consist of 2
>> node(ACT node and STB node).
>> Firstly, I kill corosync in one node. This node have a booth and a ticket.
>> Then booth is fail-over to STB node. The site including this node
>> always have a ticket.
>> However, an another site is granted at the same time. Â Therefore, 2
>> sites was granted.
>> I guess that sites cause fail-over because of a ticket was out of
>> expire date in synchronized timing.
>> However, I not see any reason to be granted 2 sites. Â Are you correct
>> this behavior?
>> A following information is each site of ticket information after this
>> case was caused.
>> siteA:<ticket_state id="ticketA" owner="2" expires="1340255934"
>> ballot="2" granted="true" last-granted="1340255142"/>
>> siteB:<ticket_state id="ticketA" owner="2" expires="1340255933"
>> ballot="2" granted="true" last-granted="1340255441"/>
>> siteC(arbitrator):<ticket_state id="ticketA" owner="2"
>> expires="1340255934" ballot="2" granted="false"/>
> I think I've not quite understood what happened there. From this ticket
> information, Both siteA and siteB think ticket owner is "2", which is
> consistent, so why you say ticket was granted on two sites?
> For siteC, it has not gotten the last-granted for the time being, it
> should get this information shortly, or even for some reason siteC
> cannot get it, because the algorithm is majority-based, so it is no harm
> and allowable;)
> Or I have not gotten the full picture of this problem? If so, you can
> report a bug to bugzilla.novell.com, attaching the full logs there, then
> it will be good for us to investigate;)
E-mail:seino.cluster2 [at] gmail
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker [at] oss
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf