Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Linux-HA: HA-WG-Technical
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?
 

Index | Next | Previous | View Flat


dejan at suse

Jul 1, 2011, 1:51 AM


Views: 2310
Permalink
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? [In reply to]

On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 06:09:10PM +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Florian Haas <florian.haas [at] linbit> wrote:
> > On 2011-06-30 11:36, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb [at] suse> wrote:
> >>> On 2011-06-30T19:07:42, Andrew Beekhof <andrew [at] beekhof> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> It would alleviate the part where RA writers need to know (and we need
> >>>> to document) when to call validate-all.
> >>>
> >>> Uhm, RA writers don't need to know when to call validate-all.
> >>
> >> I was referring to this (which apparently I only half read):
> >>
> >>> a) automatically directly prior to an intended "start" - in which case
> >>> it is redundant, since the "start" can report exactly the same.
> >>
> >> Start can do this, but only if we educate RA writers to do so.
> >> I'd favor doing it explicitly and automagically.
> >
> > I'm in full agreement with Andrew on this one.
>
> Oh crap. Sorry everyone, I must be wrong ;-)

I concur with both :)

> _______________________________________________
> ha-wg-technical mailing list
> ha-wg-technical [at] lists
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-wg-technical
_______________________________________________
ha-wg-technical mailing list
ha-wg-technical [at] lists
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-wg-technical

Subject User Time
RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? lmb at suse Jun 28, 2011, 2:10 AM
    Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? florian.haas at linbit Jun 28, 2011, 3:51 AM
        Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? lmb at suse Jun 28, 2011, 5:32 AM
            Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? dejan at suse Jun 28, 2011, 7:36 AM
                Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? lmb at suse Jun 28, 2011, 2:02 PM
                    Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? dejan at suse Jun 30, 2011, 3:48 AM
                        Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? lmb at suse Jun 30, 2011, 1:48 PM
            Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? florian.haas at linbit Jun 28, 2011, 10:56 PM
                Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? tserong at novell Jun 28, 2011, 11:40 PM
                Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? lmb at suse Jun 29, 2011, 2:06 AM
                    Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? andrew at beekhof Jun 29, 2011, 5:32 PM
                        Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? lmb at suse Jun 30, 2011, 1:10 AM
                            Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? andrew at beekhof Jun 30, 2011, 2:07 AM
                                Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? lmb at suse Jun 30, 2011, 2:09 AM
                                    Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? andrew at beekhof Jun 30, 2011, 2:36 AM
                                        Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? florian.haas at linbit Jul 1, 2011, 12:47 AM
                                            Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? andrew at beekhof Jul 1, 2011, 1:09 AM
                                                Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? dejan at suse Jul 1, 2011, 1:51 AM
                                                Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? lmb at suse Jul 6, 2011, 8:31 AM
                                                    Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? florian.haas at linbit Jul 6, 2011, 8:43 AM
                                                        Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? lmb at suse Jul 7, 2011, 3:42 AM
                                                            Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? andrew at beekhof Jul 7, 2011, 5:54 PM
    Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? lmb at suse Jul 8, 2011, 2:40 PM
        Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? andrew at beekhof Jul 9, 2011, 12:23 AM
        Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? dejan at suse Jul 9, 2011, 6:09 AM
    Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? lmb at suse Jul 11, 2011, 3:21 AM
        Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? andrew at beekhof Jul 11, 2011, 4:10 AM
    Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? lmb at suse Jul 11, 2011, 4:19 AM
        Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? andrew at beekhof Jul 11, 2011, 4:38 AM
    Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? lmb at suse Jul 12, 2011, 4:27 AM
        Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? andrew at beekhof Jul 12, 2011, 10:44 PM

  Index | Next | Previous | View Flat
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.