Mailing List Archive: Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?

Mailing List Archive: Linux-HA: HA-WG-Technical
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?

Index | Next | Previous | View Flat

andrew at beekhof

Jun 30, 2011, 2:07 AM

Views: 2387
Permalink

Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation? [In reply to]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb [at] suse> wrote:
> On 2011-06-30T10:32:56, Andrew Beekhof <andrew [at] beekhof> wrote:
>
>> Random thought...
>>
>> What about having monitor just be about started/stopped/failed (as
>> suggested above) and have the cluster automatically call validate-all
>> (which would check for tools and config options) before start ops?
>
> What would the point be?

It would alleviate the part where RA writers need to know (and we need
to document) when to call validate-all.
Failures would also show up in the CIB (and therefor the tools) under
the validate-all op, not start - this might be slightly more helpful
for users' debugging.

>
>
>
> --
> Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc.
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
> "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
>
>
_______________________________________________
ha-wg-technical mailing list
ha-wg-technical [at] lists
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-wg-technical

Subject	User	Time
RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	lmb at suse	Jun 28, 2011, 2:10 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	florian.haas at linbit	Jun 28, 2011, 3:51 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	lmb at suse	Jun 28, 2011, 5:32 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	dejan at suse	Jun 28, 2011, 7:36 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	lmb at suse	Jun 28, 2011, 2:02 PM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	dejan at suse	Jun 30, 2011, 3:48 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	lmb at suse	Jun 30, 2011, 1:48 PM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	florian.haas at linbit	Jun 28, 2011, 10:56 PM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	tserong at novell	Jun 28, 2011, 11:40 PM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	lmb at suse	Jun 29, 2011, 2:06 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	andrew at beekhof	Jun 29, 2011, 5:32 PM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	lmb at suse	Jun 30, 2011, 1:10 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	andrew at beekhof	Jun 30, 2011, 2:07 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	lmb at suse	Jun 30, 2011, 2:09 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	andrew at beekhof	Jun 30, 2011, 2:36 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	florian.haas at linbit	Jul 1, 2011, 12:47 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	andrew at beekhof	Jul 1, 2011, 1:09 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	dejan at suse	Jul 1, 2011, 1:51 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	lmb at suse	Jul 6, 2011, 8:31 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	florian.haas at linbit	Jul 6, 2011, 8:43 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	lmb at suse	Jul 7, 2011, 3:42 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	andrew at beekhof	Jul 7, 2011, 5:54 PM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	lmb at suse	Jul 8, 2011, 2:40 PM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	andrew at beekhof	Jul 9, 2011, 12:23 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	dejan at suse	Jul 9, 2011, 6:09 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	lmb at suse	Jul 11, 2011, 3:21 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	andrew at beekhof	Jul 11, 2011, 4:10 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	lmb at suse	Jul 11, 2011, 4:19 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	andrew at beekhof	Jul 11, 2011, 4:38 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	lmb at suse	Jul 12, 2011, 4:27 AM
Re: RA spec: explicit "probe" operation?	andrew at beekhof	Jul 12, 2011, 10:44 PM

Index | Next | Previous | View Flat

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads