florian.haas at linbit
Mar 18, 2011, 7:56 AM
Post #23 of 36
On 03/18/2011 03:50 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
New resource agents common/core provider name?
[In reply to]
> Sent while on the go -- please excuse typos. Thanks!
Yeah, and as you could tell my phone played a trick on me there. No clue
how I managed to send that one out. Sorry.
Anyway, my real reply is below.
> Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg at linbit.com> schrieb:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:54:36AM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:41:34AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb at novell.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2011-03-15T23:37:32, Tim Serong <tserong at novell.com> wrote:
>>>>> If pressed I'd probably vote for clusterlabs.
>>>> Okay, this seems that we're now mostly all in favor of clusterlabs,
>>>> right? Or at least it's the one we got least push-back against ;-)
>>>> (Just for the record and getting the last word in, I still prefer
>>>> opencf, but I can live with clusterlabs.)
>>> Either is fine by me.
>> I was waiting for inspiration, but somehow it didn't happen.
>> Anyway, of all suggestions I found planet-ha the best. Though
>> mice-bikers-from-mars (or how was it?) is definitely a runner-up.
> "*labs" sounds too much like not-quite-there-yet
> experimental-level quality stuff.
I wholeheartedly agree with that. Which is not to imply that I dislike
Andrew's choice of domain name, but for the provider name I think there
is a better option on the table.
> I personally like "core".
> Yes, that may be boring,
> but in a positive, HA conservative way boring, so that is good.
I completely second that one too. People like boring when it comes to
HA, stuff that "just works".
So my vote, FWIW, is for "core".
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/ha-wg-technical/attachments/20110318/7e246c06/attachment-0001.pgp