philippe at alcoy
Jun 26, 2012, 7:08 AM
Post #5 of 5
On 26 June 2012 18:51, Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg [at] linbit> wrote:
Re: [PATCH] Fix ha.cf node parsing in ha_propagate
[In reply to]
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 05:46:44PM +0700, Philippe Alcoy wrote:
>> On 22 June 2012 17:20, Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg [at] linbit> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 06:29:43PM +0700, Philippe Alcoy wrote:
>> > > # HG changeset patch
>> > > # User Philippe Alcoy <philippe [at] alcoy>
>> > > # Date 1340188944 -25200
>> > > # Node ID f6ce2daddba6234643f715c46b28d5562940eb1f
>> > > # Parent add12b838ef461b20eec223e551bf508038dc640
>> > > Fix ha.cf node parsing in ha_propagate
>> > Someone is actually *using* this?
>> > and even with multiple nodes per "node" line in ha.cf?
>> Probably not. I was just curious and tested it in the lab.
>> > > diff -r add12b838ef4 -r f6ce2daddba6 heartbeat/lib/ha_propagate.in
>> > > --- a/heartbeat/lib/ha_propagate.in Mon Apr 09 17:50:27 2012 +0200
>> > > +++ b/heartbeat/lib/ha_propagate.in Wed Jun 20 17:42:24 2012 +0700
>> > > @@ -27,9 +27,8 @@
>> > > for line in f:
>> > > if line.startswith("node"):
>> > > toks = line.split()
>> > > - if (len(toks) == 2):
>> > > - nodeName = toks
>> > > - nodes.append(nodeName)
>> > > + if (len(toks) > 0):
>> > I'd suggest to use > 1.
>> If you decide to keep ha_propagate, I would recommend > 0.
>> The script would work even if for some unknown reasons there is only
>> one node in the list.
> python -c 'print len("node".split())'
> The first token in toks is "node".
> A "node" line without node names is invalid.
You're right. I just found out that I had used a wrong config file
when I tested it.
My mistake. Thanks Lars.
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev [at] lists
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/