darrent at akurit
May 3, 2011, 6:37 AM
Views: 175
Permalink
|
|
Re: [Openais] An OCF agent for LXC (Linux Containers) - Linux-HA-Dev Digest, Vol 90, Issue 1
|
|
Lars/Team
I agree.
I can understand that there are some parameters that are MANDATORY and
UNPREDICTABLE, but there are just as likely to be parameters that are
MANDATORY and have a REASONABLE DEFAULT VALUE.
As an example, the IP address is Mandatory and Unpredictable, but the
path too and name of a configuration file (although still Mandatory)
could have a Reasonable Default Value (although there may still be merit
in allowing it to be overridden to provide localisations etc).
I think it's too extreme to force all mandatory value to not be given
default values, as (for example this particular case), there are a few
mandatory values that do have reasonable defaults that could be used, in
most cases.
Darren
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 12:00 -0600,
linux-ha-dev-request [at] lists wrote:
> Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 20:49:41 +0200
> From: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb [at] novell>
> Subject: Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [Openais] An OCF agent for LXC (Linux
> Containers)
> To: High-Availability Linux Development List
> <linux-ha-dev [at] lists>
> Message-ID: <20110501184941.GR17955 [at] suse>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> On 2011-04-26T16:03:48, Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan [at] suse> wrote:
>
> > - the "required" attributes in meta-data need to be reviewed,
> > a parameter is either required or has a default, cannot be
> > both
>
> Why would this be the case?
>
>
> Regards,
> Lars
>
|
Re: [Openais] An OCF agent for LXC (Linux Containers) - Linux-HA-Dev Digest, Vol 90, Issue 1
