Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Linux-HA: Dev

Re: OCF Script for Jboss

 

 

Linux-HA dev RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


keisuke.mori+ha at gmail

Jun 11, 2009, 3:06 AM

Post #1 of 7 (1050 views)
Permalink
Re: OCF Script for Jboss

Hi,

I'm posting an OCF RA for JBoss, which was originally posted by Stefan
to the users list, and includes some modifications as suggested by
Takenaka-san:

http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/users/53969

Stefan,
Do you have any comment on this modification?

Dejan,
Would you please review this RA if you have any chance?

If you are all OK, I will commit the RA to the -dev repository.

Thanks,

--
Keisuke MORI
Attachments: jboss (9.87 KB)


dejanmm at fastmail

Jun 11, 2009, 4:47 AM

Post #2 of 7 (965 views)
Permalink
Re: OCF Script for Jboss [In reply to]

Hi Keisuke-san,

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 07:06:42PM +0900, Keisuke MORI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm posting an OCF RA for JBoss, which was originally posted by Stefan
> to the users list, and includes some modifications as suggested by
> Takenaka-san:
>
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/users/53969
>
> Stefan,
> Do you have any comment on this modification?
>
> Dejan,
> Would you please review this RA if you have any chance?

Script with comments attached. And a bit to reiterate:

Why use resource specific logs? Shouldn't it be better to have
all in one place, i.e. wherever lrmd is logging (lrmd will catch
all stdin/stderr output). I don't know anything about jboss.
Perhaps it is common to log to a separate file. In particular if
the logging goes on while the process is running. It's just that
start/stop should probably leave some trace in lrmd logs.

This RA doesn't do enough validation for binaries, scripts, etc.

Cheers,

Dejan

> If you are all OK, I will commit the RA to the -dev repository.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Keisuke MORI


> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev[at]lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
Attachments: jboss (10.4 KB)


nakahira at intellilink

Sep 8, 2009, 10:46 PM

Post #3 of 7 (726 views)
Permalink
Re: OCF Script for Jboss [In reply to]

Hi, Dejan

I'm sorry I didn't get back to you sooner.
I took over takenaka-san's work.

I corrected a JBoss RA referring to your comments.
The modification and my comments is written in the attached patch.

Best Regards,
NAKAHIRA Kazutomo

Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi Keisuke-san,
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 07:06:42PM +0900, Keisuke MORI wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm posting an OCF RA for JBoss, which was originally posted by Stefan
>> to the users list, and includes some modifications as suggested by
>> Takenaka-san:
>>
>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/users/53969
>>
>> Stefan,
>> Do you have any comment on this modification?
>>
>> Dejan,
>> Would you please review this RA if you have any chance?
>
> Script with comments attached. And a bit to reiterate:
>
> Why use resource specific logs? Shouldn't it be better to have
> all in one place, i.e. wherever lrmd is logging (lrmd will catch
> all stdin/stderr output). I don't know anything about jboss.
> Perhaps it is common to log to a separate file. In particular if
> the logging goes on while the process is running. It's just that
> start/stop should probably leave some trace in lrmd logs.
>
> This RA doesn't do enough validation for binaries, scripts, etc.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dejan
>
>> If you are all OK, I will commit the RA to the -dev repository.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --
>> Keisuke MORI
>
>
>> _______________________________________________________
>> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev[at]lists.linux-ha.org
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
>> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev[at]lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/


--
----------------------------------------
NAKAHIRA Kazutomo
NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION
Open Source Business Unit
Software Services Integration Business Division
Attachments: jboss (12.6 KB)


dejanmm at fastmail

Sep 9, 2009, 5:50 AM

Post #4 of 7 (718 views)
Permalink
Re: OCF Script for Jboss [In reply to]

Hi Kazutomo-san,

On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 02:46:52PM +0900, NAKAHIRA Kazutomo wrote:
> Hi, Dejan
>
> I'm sorry I didn't get back to you sooner.
> I took over takenaka-san's work.
>
> I corrected a JBoss RA referring to your comments.
> The modification and my comments is written in the attached patch.

Many thanks for your work.

I made some changes and the result is attached. The changes are
mainly in the documentation (meta-data). I also renamed the two
timeout parameters: this way your intention should be clearer.
There are other minor changes, please let me know if you find
anything wrong or not clear.

The stop procedure should be simplified by splitting the pkill
-TERM and pkill -QUIT parts into two sequential processes (not
interleaved as it is now). Then you could also make a short
function with signal and timeout as input.

The JAVA_HOME variable is sometimes already available in the
environment, perhaps that could be used instead of requiring that
the user sets that parameter.

I find the "jboss_" prefix for parameters superfluous, for
instance it should be just "name" and not "jboss_name" since it's
obvious that the parameter is in the jboss primitive, but I leave
that to you to decide.

Cheers,

Dejan

> Best Regards,
> NAKAHIRA Kazutomo
>
> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi Keisuke-san,
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 07:06:42PM +0900, Keisuke MORI wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm posting an OCF RA for JBoss, which was originally posted by Stefan
> >> to the users list, and includes some modifications as suggested by
> >> Takenaka-san:
> >>
> >> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/users/53969
> >>
> >> Stefan,
> >> Do you have any comment on this modification?
> >>
> >> Dejan,
> >> Would you please review this RA if you have any chance?
> >
> > Script with comments attached. And a bit to reiterate:
> >
> > Why use resource specific logs? Shouldn't it be better to have
> > all in one place, i.e. wherever lrmd is logging (lrmd will catch
> > all stdin/stderr output). I don't know anything about jboss.
> > Perhaps it is common to log to a separate file. In particular if
> > the logging goes on while the process is running. It's just that
> > start/stop should probably leave some trace in lrmd logs.
> >
> > This RA doesn't do enough validation for binaries, scripts, etc.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Dejan
> >
> >> If you are all OK, I will commit the RA to the -dev repository.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> --
> >> Keisuke MORI
> >
> >
> >> _______________________________________________________
> >> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev[at]lists.linux-ha.org
> >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> >> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________________
> > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev[at]lists.linux-ha.org
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------
> NAKAHIRA Kazutomo
> NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION
> Open Source Business Unit
> Software Services Integration Business Division
Attachments: jboss.new (12.2 KB)


nakahira at intellilink

Sep 11, 2009, 4:41 AM

Post #5 of 7 (694 views)
Permalink
Re: OCF Script for Jboss [In reply to]

Hi, Dejan

Thank you for the swift response.

I corrected a JBoss RA referring to your comments.
And I am testing a JBoss RA now.

On completion of the operation test, I post a latest RA to the list.
Please wait for a while...

Best Regards,
NAKAHIRA Kazutomo

Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi Kazutomo-san,
>
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 02:46:52PM +0900, NAKAHIRA Kazutomo wrote:
>> Hi, Dejan
>>
>> I'm sorry I didn't get back to you sooner.
>> I took over takenaka-san's work.
>>
>> I corrected a JBoss RA referring to your comments.
>> The modification and my comments is written in the attached patch.
>
> Many thanks for your work.
>
> I made some changes and the result is attached. The changes are
> mainly in the documentation (meta-data). I also renamed the two
> timeout parameters: this way your intention should be clearer.
> There are other minor changes, please let me know if you find
> anything wrong or not clear.
>
> The stop procedure should be simplified by splitting the pkill
> -TERM and pkill -QUIT parts into two sequential processes (not
> interleaved as it is now). Then you could also make a short
> function with signal and timeout as input.
>
> The JAVA_HOME variable is sometimes already available in the
> environment, perhaps that could be used instead of requiring that
> the user sets that parameter.
>
> I find the "jboss_" prefix for parameters superfluous, for
> instance it should be just "name" and not "jboss_name" since it's
> obvious that the parameter is in the jboss primitive, but I leave
> that to you to decide.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dejan
>
>> Best Regards,
>> NAKAHIRA Kazutomo
>>
>> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>>> Hi Keisuke-san,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 07:06:42PM +0900, Keisuke MORI wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm posting an OCF RA for JBoss, which was originally posted by Stefan
>>>> to the users list, and includes some modifications as suggested by
>>>> Takenaka-san:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/users/53969
>>>>
>>>> Stefan,
>>>> Do you have any comment on this modification?
>>>>
>>>> Dejan,
>>>> Would you please review this RA if you have any chance?
>>> Script with comments attached. And a bit to reiterate:
>>>
>>> Why use resource specific logs? Shouldn't it be better to have
>>> all in one place, i.e. wherever lrmd is logging (lrmd will catch
>>> all stdin/stderr output). I don't know anything about jboss.
>>> Perhaps it is common to log to a separate file. In particular if
>>> the logging goes on while the process is running. It's just that
>>> start/stop should probably leave some trace in lrmd logs.
>>>
>>> This RA doesn't do enough validation for binaries, scripts, etc.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Dejan
>>>
>>>> If you are all OK, I will commit the RA to the -dev repository.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Keisuke MORI
>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________
>>>> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev[at]lists.linux-ha.org
>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
>>>> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________
>>> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev[at]lists.linux-ha.org
>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
>>> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>>
>> --
>> ----------------------------------------
>> NAKAHIRA Kazutomo
>> NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION
>> Open Source Business Unit
>> Software Services Integration Business Division
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________________
>> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev[at]lists.linux-ha.org
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
>> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/


--
----------------------------------------
NAKAHIRA Kazutomo
NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION
Open Source Business Unit
Software Services Integration Business Division
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev[at]lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/


nakahira at intellilink

Sep 15, 2009, 3:08 AM

Post #6 of 7 (652 views)
Permalink
Re: OCF Script for Jboss [In reply to]

Hi, Dejan

I'm sorry to have kept you waiting.
The operation test was completed and the latest JBoss RA is attached.

The only difference from your comment is the stop procedure.

I was misunderstanding about sending SIGQUIT to the JVM process.
It means "Do JVM thread dump" and never stops the JVM process.

And I redefined the stop procedure of JBoss as follows.

1. Execute shutdown.sh script
2. Waiting a JBoss process down until $SHUTDOWN_TIMEOUT seconds pass
3-1. If a JBoss process stops normally, then return $OCF_SUCCESS
3-2. If a JBoss process dose not stops, then goto step 4
4. Output JVM thread dump to $CONSOLE
5. Execute "pkill -TERM $PSTRING" command $KILL_TIMEOUT times.
6-1. If a JBoss process stops, then return $OCF_SUCCESS
6-2. If a JBoss process dose not stops, then goto step 7
7. Execute "pkill -KILL $PSTRING" command until a JBoss process is stopped
8-1. If a JBoss process stops, then return $OCF_SUCCESS
8-2. If a JBoss process dose not stops, then JBoss RA stop action will
be timed-out


Best Regards,
NAKAHIRA Kazutomo

NAKAHIRA Kazutomo wrote:
> Hi, Dejan
>
> Thank you for the swift response.
>
> I corrected a JBoss RA referring to your comments.
> And I am testing a JBoss RA now.
>
> On completion of the operation test, I post a latest RA to the list.
> Please wait for a while...
>
> Best Regards,
> NAKAHIRA Kazutomo
>
> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>> Hi Kazutomo-san,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 02:46:52PM +0900, NAKAHIRA Kazutomo wrote:
>>> Hi, Dejan
>>>
>>> I'm sorry I didn't get back to you sooner.
>>> I took over takenaka-san's work.
>>>
>>> I corrected a JBoss RA referring to your comments.
>>> The modification and my comments is written in the attached patch.
>> Many thanks for your work.
>>
>> I made some changes and the result is attached. The changes are
>> mainly in the documentation (meta-data). I also renamed the two
>> timeout parameters: this way your intention should be clearer.
>> There are other minor changes, please let me know if you find
>> anything wrong or not clear.
>>
>> The stop procedure should be simplified by splitting the pkill
>> -TERM and pkill -QUIT parts into two sequential processes (not
>> interleaved as it is now). Then you could also make a short
>> function with signal and timeout as input.
>>
>> The JAVA_HOME variable is sometimes already available in the
>> environment, perhaps that could be used instead of requiring that
>> the user sets that parameter.
>>
>> I find the "jboss_" prefix for parameters superfluous, for
>> instance it should be just "name" and not "jboss_name" since it's
>> obvious that the parameter is in the jboss primitive, but I leave
>> that to you to decide.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dejan
>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> NAKAHIRA Kazutomo
>>>
>>> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>>>> Hi Keisuke-san,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 07:06:42PM +0900, Keisuke MORI wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm posting an OCF RA for JBoss, which was originally posted by Stefan
>>>>> to the users list, and includes some modifications as suggested by
>>>>> Takenaka-san:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/users/53969
>>>>>
>>>>> Stefan,
>>>>> Do you have any comment on this modification?
>>>>>
>>>>> Dejan,
>>>>> Would you please review this RA if you have any chance?
>>>> Script with comments attached. And a bit to reiterate:
>>>>
>>>> Why use resource specific logs? Shouldn't it be better to have
>>>> all in one place, i.e. wherever lrmd is logging (lrmd will catch
>>>> all stdin/stderr output). I don't know anything about jboss.
>>>> Perhaps it is common to log to a separate file. In particular if
>>>> the logging goes on while the process is running. It's just that
>>>> start/stop should probably leave some trace in lrmd logs.
>>>>
>>>> This RA doesn't do enough validation for binaries, scripts, etc.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Dejan
>>>>
>>>>> If you are all OK, I will commit the RA to the -dev repository.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Keisuke MORI
>>>>> _______________________________________________________
>>>>> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev[at]lists.linux-ha.org
>>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
>>>>> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________
>>>> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev[at]lists.linux-ha.org
>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
>>>> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>>> --
>>> ----------------------------------------
>>> NAKAHIRA Kazutomo
>>> NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION
>>> Open Source Business Unit
>>> Software Services Integration Business Division
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________
>>> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev[at]lists.linux-ha.org
>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
>>> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>
>


--
----------------------------------------
NAKAHIRA Kazutomo
NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION
Open Source Business Unit
Software Services Integration Business Division
Attachments: jboss (11.8 KB)


dejanmm at fastmail

Sep 15, 2009, 5:06 AM

Post #7 of 7 (644 views)
Permalink
Re: OCF Script for Jboss [In reply to]

Hi Kazutomo-san,

On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 07:08:53PM +0900, NAKAHIRA Kazutomo wrote:
> Hi, Dejan
>
> I'm sorry to have kept you waiting.
> The operation test was completed and the latest JBoss RA is attached.
>
> The only difference from your comment is the stop procedure.
>
> I was misunderstanding about sending SIGQUIT to the JVM process.
> It means "Do JVM thread dump" and never stops the JVM process.

Ah, OK. Now I understand. QUIT by default means kill process and
do coredump.

> And I redefined the stop procedure of JBoss as follows.
>
> 1. Execute shutdown.sh script
> 2. Waiting a JBoss process down until $SHUTDOWN_TIMEOUT seconds pass
> 3-1. If a JBoss process stops normally, then return $OCF_SUCCESS
> 3-2. If a JBoss process dose not stops, then goto step 4
> 4. Output JVM thread dump to $CONSOLE
> 5. Execute "pkill -TERM $PSTRING" command $KILL_TIMEOUT times.
> 6-1. If a JBoss process stops, then return $OCF_SUCCESS
> 6-2. If a JBoss process dose not stops, then goto step 7
> 7. Execute "pkill -KILL $PSTRING" command until a JBoss process is stopped
> 8-1. If a JBoss process stops, then return $OCF_SUCCESS
> 8-2. If a JBoss process dose not stops, then JBoss RA stop action will be
> timed-out

OK. This script is now in the repository. I just replace '..' by
'.' to source ${OCF_ROOT}/resource.d/heartbeat/.ocf-shellfuncs
properly and modified some metadata content.

Many thanks for the contribution.

Cheers,

Dejan

>
> Best Regards,
> NAKAHIRA Kazutomo
>
> NAKAHIRA Kazutomo wrote:
>> Hi, Dejan
>>
>> Thank you for the swift response.
>>
>> I corrected a JBoss RA referring to your comments.
>> And I am testing a JBoss RA now.
>>
>> On completion of the operation test, I post a latest RA to the list.
>> Please wait for a while...
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> NAKAHIRA Kazutomo
>>
>> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>>> Hi Kazutomo-san,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 02:46:52PM +0900, NAKAHIRA Kazutomo wrote:
>>>> Hi, Dejan
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry I didn't get back to you sooner.
>>>> I took over takenaka-san's work.
>>>>
>>>> I corrected a JBoss RA referring to your comments.
>>>> The modification and my comments is written in the attached patch.
>>> Many thanks for your work.
>>>
>>> I made some changes and the result is attached. The changes are
>>> mainly in the documentation (meta-data). I also renamed the two
>>> timeout parameters: this way your intention should be clearer.
>>> There are other minor changes, please let me know if you find
>>> anything wrong or not clear.
>>>
>>> The stop procedure should be simplified by splitting the pkill
>>> -TERM and pkill -QUIT parts into two sequential processes (not
>>> interleaved as it is now). Then you could also make a short
>>> function with signal and timeout as input.
>>>
>>> The JAVA_HOME variable is sometimes already available in the
>>> environment, perhaps that could be used instead of requiring that
>>> the user sets that parameter.
>>>
>>> I find the "jboss_" prefix for parameters superfluous, for
>>> instance it should be just "name" and not "jboss_name" since it's
>>> obvious that the parameter is in the jboss primitive, but I leave
>>> that to you to decide.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Dejan
>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> NAKAHIRA Kazutomo
>>>>
>>>> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>>>>> Hi Keisuke-san,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 07:06:42PM +0900, Keisuke MORI wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm posting an OCF RA for JBoss, which was originally posted by Stefan
>>>>>> to the users list, and includes some modifications as suggested by
>>>>>> Takenaka-san:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/users/53969
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stefan,
>>>>>> Do you have any comment on this modification?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dejan,
>>>>>> Would you please review this RA if you have any chance?
>>>>> Script with comments attached. And a bit to reiterate:
>>>>>
>>>>> Why use resource specific logs? Shouldn't it be better to have
>>>>> all in one place, i.e. wherever lrmd is logging (lrmd will catch
>>>>> all stdin/stderr output). I don't know anything about jboss.
>>>>> Perhaps it is common to log to a separate file. In particular if
>>>>> the logging goes on while the process is running. It's just that
>>>>> start/stop should probably leave some trace in lrmd logs.
>>>>>
>>>>> This RA doesn't do enough validation for binaries, scripts, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Dejan
>>>>>
>>>>>> If you are all OK, I will commit the RA to the -dev repository.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Keisuke MORI
>>>>>> _______________________________________________________
>>>>>> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev[at]lists.linux-ha.org
>>>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
>>>>>> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________________
>>>>> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev[at]lists.linux-ha.org
>>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
>>>>> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>>>> --
>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>> NAKAHIRA Kazutomo
>>>> NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION
>>>> Open Source Business Unit
>>>> Software Services Integration Business Division
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________
>>>> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev[at]lists.linux-ha.org
>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
>>>> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------
> NAKAHIRA Kazutomo
> NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION
> Open Source Business Unit
> Software Services Integration Business Division
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev[at]lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Linux-HA dev RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact lists@gossamer-threads.com
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.