msoffen at iso-ne
Jul 17, 2008, 9:05 AM
Post #1 of 2
(109 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: Re: cronjobs v1.2 rc1 OCF resource agent nowavailable
|
|
Afternoon All,
For *BSD it would be an additional package that is required (and would
need to be tested for during the ConfigureMe step).
Matt
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 16:48 +0100, David Lee wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> > On Jul 17, 2008, at 2:20 PM, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote:
> >
> > > Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:15, David Lee <t.d.lee[at]durham.ac.uk>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Darwin. it's on our list of 'heartbeat' OSes. Anyone have any
> > >>> knowledge
> > >>> of current versions and 'bash'?
> > >>
> > >> bash is the default shell on darwin
> > >
> > > ack - don't know the version thou.
> > > will try to get that information
> >
> >
> > GNU bash, version 3.2.17(1)-release (i386-apple-darwin9.0)
> > Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>
> Looks promising. Thanks, Andrew.
>
> I suppose the real question is a pair:
> (a) What is the earliest version of darwin that we need to support?
> (b) Does that version of darwin have a reasonable 'bash'?
>
>
> By example, taking the Solaris equivalent (which is what I know a little
> about):
>
> A few years ago that would have been: "(a) Solaris 2.6; (b) no easy bash".
> Nowadays: "(a) Solaris 2.8 (probably 2.9). (b) Decent bash since 2.8".
>
>
>
> So a migration to assume availability of bash is looking promising.
>
>
|
