Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 08:29:02 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Hi, On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:41:33PM +0100, Eberhard Kuemmerle wrote: > Hi, > > my nfsserver resource is configured like that: > > primitive nfs oc 09 Feb 2012 07:51:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/78095 Hi Lars, Thank you for your comment. An allotment of the same IP is not made now when IP is assigned to a loopback device in IPv6addr; have a proble 07 Feb 2012 17:54:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/78052 Hi Kazuyoshi-san, On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 01:19:37PM +0900, Kazuyoshi Mii wrote: > Hi, > > I found lxc RA does not work with LXC-0.7.5 because the o 07 Feb 2012 09:14:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/78048 On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 09:51:46PM +0900, nozawat wrote: > Hi Lars > > I added IPv6 correspondence to a script of Lars. Which is nice, thank you ;-) 07 Feb 2012 03:06:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/78039 Hi Lars I added IPv6 correspondence to a script of Lars. I am corresponding to the contents of the following ML. http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lis 06 Feb 2012 04:51:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/78017 Hi, I found lxc RA does not work with LXC-0.7.5 because the output of the command lxc-info used in RA has changed since LXC-0.7.5. So I wrote two pa 05 Feb 2012 20:19:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/78013 Ich werde ab 06.02.2012 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 09.02.2012. Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. I will answer 05 Feb 2012 18:44:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/78012 Hi Serge Thank you. I applied it to my repository. 2012/2/6 Serge Dubrouski <sergeyfd@gmail.com>: > Takatoshi - > > Please consider apllying attach 05 Feb 2012 18:42:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/78011 Takatoshi - Please consider apllying attached patch to your version of pgsql RA. It's all cosmetics: replacing tabs with spaces and improving English 05 Feb 2012 09:13:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/78003 Hi Dejan, all, 02.02.2012 19:44, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hello all, > > Sorry for crossposting, but can anybody comment on the matter > bellow? T 02 Feb 2012 23:33:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77979 Hello all, Sorry for crossposting, but can anybody comment on the matter bellow? Thanks! Dejan On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 02:22:35PM +0100, Dejan Muha 02 Feb 2012 08:44:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77967 Hi Alex, On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 11:57:25AM +0100, alexander.krauth@basf.com wrote: > Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 26.01.2012 23:22:00: > > Hello, > 02 Feb 2012 05:15:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77956 Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 26.01.2012 23:22:00: > Hello, > > The resource agents release 3.9.2 was end of last June, quite a > while ago. High time 02 Feb 2012 02:57:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77946 Hi David, I write a demand from me. 1) Please implement the check of the parameter in ipredirect_validate.(For example, it is necessary to check a f 01 Feb 2012 19:19:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77936 Hi Dejan, Thank you for your applied. Regards, Tomo On 2012/02/01, at 22:42, Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2 01 Feb 2012 15:37:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77928 Hi, On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 08:24:21PM +0900, nozawat wrote: > Hi > > Path designation of ocf-shellfunc remained old. > Therefore I switched to a 01 Feb 2012 05:42:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77922 Hi Lars, On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 12:41:51PM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 02:32:27PM +0900, Keisuke MORI wrote: > > Hi Dejan 01 Feb 2012 05:36:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77921 On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 02:32:27PM +0900, Keisuke MORI wrote: > Hi Dejan, > > 2012/1/31 Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de>: > > Hi Keisuke-san, > > > 01 Feb 2012 03:41:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77919 Hi Path designation of ocf-shellfunc remained old. Therefore I switched to a current path. Regards, Tomo 01 Feb 2012 03:24:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77918 Hi Dejan, 2012/1/31 Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de>: > Hi Keisuke-san, > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:52:24PM +0900, Keisuke MORI wrote: >> Hi Deja 31 Jan 2012 21:32:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77916 A minor suggestion on the tomcat RA. It uses "wget -O ..." to verify that tomcat is running. If the URL is an https://... type, and wget can't verify 31 Jan 2012 13:17:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77905 On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 04:31:09PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hey Lars, > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 05:52:28PM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > 31 Jan 2012 12:21:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77903 Taking this to the mailing list as well, to give it a wider audience ... On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 07:56:56AM -0800, b-a-t wrote: > Referring to the #5 31 Jan 2012 12:12:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77904 Hi, On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:58:06AM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 07:51:48AM +0200, Dominik Klein wrote: > > 31 Jan 2012 07:57:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77895 Somewhat based on Dummy, and somewhat based on IPaddr2, here's an RA I put together to do port redirection via iptables. I have an application (Shibb 31 Jan 2012 07:47:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77894 Hey Lars, On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 05:52:28PM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 04:18:02AM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > Hi 31 Jan 2012 07:31:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77893 Hi Dejan > > How do you think about a patch of this tomcat? > > Applied. > Many Thanks! Regards, Tomo > Hi, > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:17:34 31 Jan 2012 06:01:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77890 Hi Keisuke-san, On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:52:24PM +0900, Keisuke MORI wrote: > Hi Dejan > > 2012/1/31 Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de>: > > Hi Kei 31 Jan 2012 05:02:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77889 Hi Dejan 2012/1/31 Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de>: > Hi Keisuke-san, (...) > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 08:46:35PM +0900, Keisuke MORI wrote: >> The 31 Jan 2012 04:52:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77888 Hi, On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:17:34AM +0900, nozawat wrote: > Hi Dejan > > How do you think about a patch of this tomcat? Applied. Cheers, Dejan 31 Jan 2012 04:50:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77887 Hi, On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 05:20:53PM +0900, nozawat wrote: > Hi Dejan > > I have two reasons to change the process check. > 1)There is the patte 31 Jan 2012 04:13:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77878 Hi Keisuke-san, On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 08:46:35PM +0900, Keisuke MORI wrote: > Hi Dejan, > > 2012/1/31 Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de>: > > Hi Ke 31 Jan 2012 04:06:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77877 On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:34:19AM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:24:19PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > > As for the 31 Jan 2012 03:52:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77876 Hi Dejan, 2012/1/31 Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de>: > Hi Keisuke-san, > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:38:35PM +0900, Keisuke MORI wrote: >> Hi, >> 31 Jan 2012 03:46:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77875 On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:24:19PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > As for the regular expression like ^ or $, it looks like working as > > expecte 31 Jan 2012 02:34:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77874 Hi, On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 02:22:48PM +0900, nozawat wrote: > Hi Dejan > > > Why is it important to match multiple lines? > When I check normal WEB 30 Jan 2012 12:34:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77862 Hi Keisuke-san, On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:38:35PM +0900, Keisuke MORI wrote: > Hi, > > 2012/1/28 Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de>: > > Hi, > > > > 30 Jan 2012 12:24:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77861 Hi Takatoshi-san, On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:50:01AM +0900, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote: > Hi > > "loglevel" variable is not declared with local statemen 30 Jan 2012 05:57:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77856 Hi, 2012/1/28 Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de>: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:09:13PM +0900, nozawat wrote: >> Hi Dejan >> >> I'm agreeable 30 Jan 2012 03:38:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77849 Hi Dejan, 2012/1/27 Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de>: >> 2. apache RA: testregex matching fix >>     http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/d 30 Jan 2012 03:00:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77848 Hi Dejan > Why is it important to match multiple lines? When I check normal WEB page, I think that a newline code enters in almost all. Corresponding 29 Jan 2012 21:22:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77841 Hi All, Apologies for the mass email, but it seemed most appropriate to post a followup to all the lists I originally sent the LCA 2012 HA miniconf 29 Jan 2012 19:24:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77870 Hi "loglevel" variable is not declared with local statement in ha_log(). It affects resource agent's behavior. -- Regards, Takatoshi MATSUO 29 Jan 2012 18:50:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77836 On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 03:25:32PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi Keisuke-san, > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:37:18PM +0900, Keisuke MORI wrote 29 Jan 2012 07:55:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77829 Hi Dejan, Thank you for comments. > OK. Applied that too. The ocft test passes, but cannot work > without specifying the existing address. I'm not s 28 Jan 2012 15:04:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77828 Hi Hideo-san, On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:09:26AM +0900, renayama19661014@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > Hi Dejan, > > Thank you for comments. > > > > > > > Now 27 Jan 2012 12:42:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77821 Hi, On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:09:13PM +0900, nozawat wrote: > Hi Dejan > > I'm agreeable in the opinion. > I send the patch which I revised. > > 27 Jan 2012 12:34:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77820 On 01/27/2012 12:30 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:25:59PM -0500, Digimer wrote: >> On 01/26/2012 05:22 PM, Dejan 27 Jan 2012 11:48:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77817 Hi, On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:25:59PM -0500, Digimer wrote: > On 01/26/2012 05:22 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > Hello, > > > > The resource agen 27 Jan 2012 09:30:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77815 On 01/26/2012 05:22 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hello, > > The resource agents release 3.9.2 was end of last June, quite a > while ago. High time 27 Jan 2012 09:25:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77814 Hi Keisuke-san, On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:37:18PM +0900, Keisuke MORI wrote: > Hi Dejan, > > I would appreciate you for bringing up for the new rel 27 Jan 2012 06:25:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77813 Hi Dejan, I would appreciate you for bringing up for the new release. I really look forward to see it very soon! Among other issues, I consider tha 27 Jan 2012 04:37:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77812 Hello, The resource agents release 3.9.2 was end of last June, quite a while ago. High time to do a new one. Any obstacles or release blockers? Or o 26 Jan 2012 14:22:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77800 Hi Dejan, Thank you for comments. > > > > > Now the ocft test fails: > > > > > > > > > > 2012/01/23_21:39:40 ERROR: IP address [127.0.0.3] is a loo 24 Jan 2012 17:09:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77754 On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 07:34:10PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi Hideo-san, > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:34:34AM +0900, renayama19661014@ybb 24 Jan 2012 11:09:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77739 Hi Hideo-san, On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:34:34AM +0900, renayama19661014@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > Hi Dejan, > > > > Now the ocft test fails: > > > > > > 24 Jan 2012 10:34:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77738 Hi Dejan, > > Now the ocft test fails: > > > > 2012/01/23_21:39:40 ERROR: IP address [127.0.0.3] is a loopback > > address, thus can not be preferre 23 Jan 2012 17:34:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77706 Hi Dejan, > > How about the patch of this place? > > Applied. Thanks for the patch. Many Thanks!! > Now the ocft test fails: > > 2012/01/23_21:39 23 Jan 2012 16:13:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77705 Hi Hideo-san, On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:09:57AM +0900, renayama19661014@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > Hi Dejan, > > How about the patch of this place? Applie 23 Jan 2012 12:41:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77700 Hi Alan Thank you for your comments. This was solved with the following patches. <https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/commit/e567a6d99 22 Jan 2012 22:47:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77677 On 12/07/2011 09:14 PM, nozawat wrote: > Hi Andrew > >> Right, but the location and its deletion date back over 8 years IIRC. > I seem to delete it in 22 Jan 2012 21:30:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77675 Hi Dejan, How about the patch of this place? Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Mon, 2012/1/16, renayama19661014@ybb.ne.jp <renayama19661014@ybb 22 Jan 2012 16:09:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77674 On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 04:18:02AM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi Lars, > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:55:57PM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > > 21 Jan 2012 08:52:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77669 Hi Dejan, > > Sorry.. > > Because I was small, I did not divide this patch into one patch. > > OK. I split them and applied. I confirmed the reflec 20 Jan 2012 19:36:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77668 Hi Hideo-san, On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:02:25AM +0900, renayama19661014@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > Hi Dejan, > > Thank you for comments. > > > > This patc 20 Jan 2012 07:10:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77661 Hello, it is possible to use an user name to migrate a domain via qemu+ssh? I checked the function VirtualDomain_Migrate_To but I did not find any 20 Jan 2012 05:13:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77659 Hi Dejan I'm agreeable in the opinion. I send the patch which I revised. > I'll apply this one. BTW, can you share your use case. If there is not 19 Jan 2012 21:09:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77656 Hi Lars, On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:55:57PM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > Taking this to the mailing list to give it a wider audience. > > On Tue, 19 Jan 2012 19:18:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77655 Hi, On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:42:07AM +0900, nozawat wrote: > Hi Dejan and Lars > > I send the patch which settled a conventional argument. > 1)a 19 Jan 2012 11:20:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77644 Hi Dejan and Lars I send the patch which settled a conventional argument. 1)apache-001.patch ->I am the same with the patch which I sent last ti 18 Jan 2012 18:42:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77619 Hi, On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:26:05AM +0900, nozawat wrote: > Hi Dejan > > I was very sorry to mistake the spelling of your name (in the previous 18 Jan 2012 08:13:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77612 Hi, On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:19:58AM +0900, nozawat wrote: > Hi Dejna and Lars > > When, for example, it is a logic of the examples of Lars to tr 18 Jan 2012 08:12:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77611 Hi Dejan I was very sorry to mistake the spelling of your name (in the previous email). Regards, Tomo 2012$BG/(B1$B7n(B18$BF|(B11:19 nozawat 17 Jan 2012 18:26:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77600 Hi Dejna and Lars When, for example, it is a logic of the examples of Lars to try both, in the case of IPv6, is the check of IPv4 that I enter ever 17 Jan 2012 18:19:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77599 On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:41:41AM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:07:09AM +0900, nozawat wrote: > > Hi Dejan and Lars, > > 17 Jan 2012 06:28:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77586 On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:07:09AM +0900, nozawat wrote: > Hi Dejan and Lars, > > I send the patch which I revised according to indication of Lars. > 17 Jan 2012 02:41:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77579 Hi Dejan How do you think about a patch of this tomcat? The following patches want more you to look. This is a patch of the changes by a process che 16 Jan 2012 18:17:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77570 Hi Dejan Thank you for an applied. Regards, Tomo 2012$BG/(B1$B7n(B14$BF|(B2:49 Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de>: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2 16 Jan 2012 18:08:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77569 Hi Dejan and Lars, I send the patch which I revised according to indication of Lars. >> OK. I guess that this won't introduce a regression. And I gu 16 Jan 2012 18:07:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77568 Hi, Thank you for pointing that out! Regards, Junko IKEDA 2012/1/17 Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de>: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 03:10:14PM +0100, 16 Jan 2012 17:52:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77567 On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 03:10:14PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:32:20PM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 0 16 Jan 2012 11:22:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77558 On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:32:20PM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 05:50:14PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > Hi Serge, > > 16 Jan 2012 06:10:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77547 Hi Dejan, Thank you for comments. > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 02:49:24PM +0900, renayama19661014@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > We made a patch 15 Jan 2012 16:07:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77516 Hi Dejan, Thank you for comments. > > This patch revises the next point. > > > > * When route has been already assigned, RA skips an allotment. > 15 Jan 2012 16:02:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77515 On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 05:50:14PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote 14 Jan 2012 18:32:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77512 On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 06:58:21PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 02:27:56PM +0900, nozawat wrote: > > Hi > > > > 14 Jan 2012 03:55:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77508 On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 05:50:14PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi Serge, > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 09:11:43AM -0700, Serge Dubrouski wrote: > 14 Jan 2012 03:32:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77507 Hi again Hideo-san, Again, apologies for such a late response. On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 02:49:24PM +0900, renayama19661014@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > Hi All, 13 Jan 2012 10:28:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77501 Hi Hideo-san, Sorry for picking up this so late. On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 02:48:52PM +0900, renayama19661014@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > Hi All, > > We made 13 Jan 2012 10:10:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77499 Hi, On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 02:27:56PM +0900, nozawat wrote: > Hi > > 1.apache.patch(Coping of monitor failure) > When a newline code is include 13 Jan 2012 09:58:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77498 Hi, On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:07:59AM +0900, nozawat wrote: > Hi Dejan > > Thank you for your comments. > I revise an indication point and send i 13 Jan 2012 09:49:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77497 Hi Everyone, I've just pushed the changes to the DHCPD resource agent to my repository, that makes the following changes: - Removes the required 12 Jan 2012 07:55:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77471 Hi Dejan Thank you for your comments. I revise an indication point and send it again. Regards, Tomo 2012$BG/(B1$B7n(B10$BF|(B5:40 Dejan Muh 10 Jan 2012 18:07:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77449 Hi Dejan,Tim How do you think about a patch of this apache? Regards, Tomo 2011$BG/(B12$B7n(B14$BF|(B14:27 nozawat <nozawat@gmail.com>: > Hi 10 Jan 2012 17:17:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77448 Hi, On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 05:52:51PM +0900, nozawat wrote: > Hi > > The patches of slapd are as follows. > 1)slapd-001.patch > ->I made modif 09 Jan 2012 12:40:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77422 Hi, On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 02:35:44PM +0900, nozawat wrote: > Hi > > Because a return value of slapd_validate_all was not returned definitely, > 09 Jan 2012 12:22:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77421 Hi, On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 02:30:15PM +0900, nozawat wrote: > Hi > > I added check of config file to rsyslog-ra Patch applied. Thanks! Dejan > 09 Jan 2012 11:58:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77419 Hi, On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:15:38AM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 05:08:18PM +0800, Qiu Zhigang wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 09 Jan 2012 11:53:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77418 Hi Everyone, I apologize for my lack of response till now, December was a bit hectic for me. I have, however, read over your points of discussion an 09 Jan 2012 10:07:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77416 Hi Serge, On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 09:11:43AM -0700, Serge Dubrouski wrote: > I did a couple of weeks ago :-) Hmm, me completely missed it. Sorry abo 09 Jan 2012 08:50:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/77415