
fche at redhat
Sep 15, 2006, 11:34 AM
Post #1 of 2
(192 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108]
|
|
Hi - On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 07:31:48PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > Ar Gwe, 2006-09-15 am 13:08 -0400, ysgrifennodd Frank Ch. Eigler: Yeah, or something. :-) > > Alan Cox <alan[at]lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes: > > - where 1000-cycle int3-dispatching overheads too high > > Why are your despatching overheads 1000 cycles ? (and if its due to int3 > why are you using int 3 8)) Smart teams from IBM and Hitachi have been hammering away at this code for a year or two now, and yet (roughly) here we are. There have been experiments involving plopping branches instead of int3's at probe locations, but this is self-modifying code involving multiple instructions, and appears to be tricky on SMP/preempt boxes. - FChE - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo[at]vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|