sfr at canb
Sep 13, 2012, 12:36 AM
Post #4 of 7
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the tty tree
[In reply to]
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:59:25 +0200 Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias [at] igalia> wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 16:14 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in
> > drivers/staging/ipack/devices/ipoctal.c between commit 734cc1783816
> > ("TTY: use tty_port_register_device") from the tty tree and commit
> > 2afb41d9d30d ("Staging: ipack/devices/ipoctal: Check tty_register_device
> > return value") from the staging tree.
> > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
> > (no action is required).
> I don't see tty_port_register_device in any header file in staging.
> Is it defined in tty tree and it is not merged into staging tree?
Yes, that is the case.
Stephen Rothwell sfr [at] canb