rjw at sisk
May 11, 2012, 12:34 PM
Post #6 of 6
On Friday, May 11, 2012, Dave Jones wrote:
Re: CPU frequency drivers MAINTAINERS update
[In reply to]
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:16:25PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, May 05, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi Dave,
> > >
> > > On Friday, May 04, 2012, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > Remove myself as cpufreq maintainer.
> > > > x86 driver changes can go through the regular x86/ACPI trees.
> > > > ARM driver changes through the ARM trees.
> > > > cpufreq core changes are rare these days, and can just go to lkml/direct.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej [at] redhat>
> > >
> > > Would you mind if I took over the maintenance of cpufreq, so that it goes
> > > along with the other core power management code?
> > I'm taking the silence as "no, I wouldn't". :-)
> Sure. I'll still be looking at it occasionally so I'll be around to ack
> things if necessary.
> I just don't have time to deal with build-testing
> architectures I don't care about for eg, and dealing with the inevitable fallout
> when things break.
> The only words of advice I give to you or whoever takes over, is to push back
> on adding more sysfs knobs to cpufreq. There's no end to what people want to do,
> and adding "just one more knob" seems to be the default action. It's already
> gotten out of hand, and more knobs aren't always the right answer.
Thanks a lot,
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo [at] vger
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/