jkosina at suse
Nov 25, 2009, 3:56 AM
Post #4 of 5
(61 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the ext4 tree
[In reply to]
|
|
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, tytso [at] mit wrote:
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the trivial tree got a conflict in
> > > fs/ext4/balloc.c between commit 4433871130f36585fde38e7dd817433296648945
> > > ("ext4: fold ext4_free_blocks() and ext4_mb_free_blocks()") from the ext4
> > > tree and commit 15dcf8433b514d1dc1b80d87a0798c2db2c37e95 ("tree-wide: fix
> > > some typos and punctuation in comments") from the trivial tree.
> > >
> > > The former moved the comment fixed by the latter and fixed the typo along
> > > the way.
> >
> > Dropped the mballoc hunk from my queue, thanks.
>
> You mean balloc hunk, I hope. (In the commit in question, I moved the
> comment from fs/ext4/balloc.c to fs/ext4/mballoc.c.)
Yup, sorry, I have been looking at completely different patch while
writing the mail and got side-tracked.
Anyway, the conflict between ext4 and trivial trees should be gone now.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo [at] vger
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
