grundler at parisc-linux
Nov 24, 2009, 1:27 PM
Post #2 of 4
(100 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: [PATCHSET 0-5] remove unneeded nfsd #includes
[In reply to]
|
|
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 07:58:15PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Some arch files had unneeded #includes directives from linux/nfsd/*.
> Some vfs files had unneeded #includes directives from linux/nfsd/*.
...
> patches:
> [PATCH 1/5] parsic: remove unused nfsd #includes
> Some kind soul, please compile with this patch? compile
> is all that's needed.
Boaz,
linux-2.6 compiles for parisc with this patch. Please add:
Tested-by: Grant Grundler <grundler [at] parisc-linux>
thanks,
grant
>
> [PATCH 2/5] sparc: remove unused nfsd #includes
> [PATCH 3/5] s390: remove unused nfsd #includes
> These two were cross compiled. Should we submit them through
> nfsd tree or the ARCH trees?
>
> [PATCH 4/5] vfs: nfsctl.c unused nfsd #includes
> [PATCH 5/5] lockd: Remove unused nfsd headers #includes
> Can these patches go through the nfsd tree?
> Who's ACKs should we collect? Andrew?
>
> Bruce Hi
> With this set applied, the only nfsd files used publicly are:
> const.h export.h nfsfh.h stats.h syscall.h
>
> These files can be moved to source folder:
> cache.h debug.h nfsd.h state.h xdr3.h xdr4.h xdr.h
>
> Why is debug.h exported from Kernel? (include/linux/nfsd/Kbuild)
>
> So just to see how this move might look like see last patch:
> [RFC] nfsd: Move private headers to source directory
> This patch was compiled, as well, on x86(32/64), sparc64, s390
>
> Thanks
> Boaz
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo [at] vger
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo [at] vger
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
