tj at kernel
Nov 23, 2009, 8:26 AM
Post #1 of 1
(67 views)
Permalink
|
|
[PATCH 01/14] sched, kvm: fix race condition involving sched_in_preempt_notifers
|
|
In finish_task_switch(), fire_sched_in_preempt_notifiers() is called
after finish_lock_switch(). However, depending on architecture,
preemption can be enabled after finish_lock_switch() which breaks the
semantics of preempt notifiers. Move it before finish_arch_switch().
This also makes in notifiers symmetric to out notifiers in terms of
locking - now both are called under rq lock.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj [at] kernel>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi [at] redhat>
---
kernel/sched.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 3c11ae0..de8a765 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2751,9 +2751,9 @@ static void finish_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
prev_state = prev->state;
finish_arch_switch(prev);
perf_event_task_sched_in(current, cpu_of(rq));
+ fire_sched_in_preempt_notifiers(current);
finish_lock_switch(rq, prev);
- fire_sched_in_preempt_notifiers(current);
if (mm)
mmdrop(mm);
if (unlikely(prev_state == TASK_DEAD)) {
--
1.6.5.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo [at] vger
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
