Mailing List Archive: Linux: Kernel

[patch 000/100] 2.6.29.2 -stable review

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

chrisw at sous-sol

Apr 23, 2009, 12:20 AM

Post #1 of 9 (234 views)
Permalink

[patch 000/100] 2.6.29.2 -stable review

tvrtko.ursulin at sophos

Apr 23, 2009, 6:47 AM

Post #2 of 9 (222 views)
Permalink

Re: [patch 000/100] 2.6.29.2 -stable review [In reply to]

On Thursday 23 April 2009 08:20:20 Chris Wright wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.29.2 release.
> There are 100 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and
> wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
>
> These patches are sent out with a number of different people on the
> Cc: line. If you wish to be a reviewer, please email stable [at] kernel
> to add your name to the list. If you want to be off the reviewer list,
> also email us.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, Apr 25, 07:00 UTC. Anything received
> after that time might be too late.

Hi,

Could you please include a fix for forcedeth resume from hibernation
regression as well?

http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=123885046818928&w=4

Tvrtko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo [at] vger
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

greg at kroah

Apr 23, 2009, 7:49 AM

Post #3 of 9 (221 views)
Permalink

Re: [stable] [patch 000/100] 2.6.29.2 -stable review [In reply to]

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 02:47:50PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> On Thursday 23 April 2009 08:20:20 Chris Wright wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.29.2 release.
> > There are 100 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and
> > wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
> >
> > These patches are sent out with a number of different people on the
> > Cc: line. If you wish to be a reviewer, please email stable [at] kernel
> > to add your name to the list. If you want to be off the reviewer list,
> > also email us.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat, Apr 25, 07:00 UTC. Anything received
> > after that time might be too late.
>
> Hi,
>
> Could you please include a fix for forcedeth resume from hibernation
> regression as well?
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=123885046818928&w=4

Do you have the git commit id of this patch in Linus's tree?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo [at] vger
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

tvrtko.ursulin at sophos

Apr 23, 2009, 7:56 AM

Post #4 of 9 (221 views)
Permalink

Re: [stable] [patch 000/100] 2.6.29.2 -stable review [In reply to]

On Thursday 23 April 2009 15:49:18 Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 02:47:50PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > On Thursday 23 April 2009 08:20:20 Chris Wright wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.29.2 release.
> > > There are 100 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and
> > > wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with
> > > it.
> > >
> > > These patches are sent out with a number of different people on the
> > > Cc: line. If you wish to be a reviewer, please email stable [at] kernel
> > > to add your name to the list. If you want to be off the reviewer list,
> > > also email us.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Sat, Apr 25, 07:00 UTC. Anything received
> > > after that time might be too late.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could you please include a fix for forcedeth resume from hibernation
> > regression as well?
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=123885046818928&w=4
>
> Do you have the git commit id of this patch in Linus's tree?

It should be this one 35a7433c789ba6df6d96b70fa745ae9e6cac0038.

Thanks,

Tvrtko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo [at] vger
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

greg at kroah

Apr 23, 2009, 8:02 AM

Post #5 of 9 (222 views)
Permalink

Re: [stable] [patch 000/100] 2.6.29.2 -stable review [In reply to]

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 03:56:37PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> On Thursday 23 April 2009 15:49:18 Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 02:47:50PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > > On Thursday 23 April 2009 08:20:20 Chris Wright wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.29.2 release.
> > > > There are 100 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and
> > > > wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with
> > > > it.
> > > >
> > > > These patches are sent out with a number of different people on the
> > > > Cc: line. If you wish to be a reviewer, please email stable [at] kernel
> > > > to add your name to the list. If you want to be off the reviewer list,
> > > > also email us.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Sat, Apr 25, 07:00 UTC. Anything received
> > > > after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Could you please include a fix for forcedeth resume from hibernation
> > > regression as well?
> > >
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=123885046818928&w=4
> >
> > Do you have the git commit id of this patch in Linus's tree?
>
> It should be this one 35a7433c789ba6df6d96b70fa745ae9e6cac0038.

Looks good, we should queue it up for the next release (at 100 patches,
this one looks pretty full...)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo [at] vger
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

tvrtko.ursulin at sophos

Apr 23, 2009, 8:08 AM

Post #6 of 9 (221 views)
Permalink

Re: [stable] [patch 000/100] 2.6.29.2 -stable review [In reply to]

On Thursday 23 April 2009 16:02:00 Greg KH wrote:
[snip]
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Could you please include a fix for forcedeth resume from hibernation
> > > > regression as well?
> > > >
> > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=123885046818928&w=4
> > >
> > > Do you have the git commit id of this patch in Linus's tree?
> >
> > It should be this one 35a7433c789ba6df6d96b70fa745ae9e6cac0038.
>
> Looks good, we should queue it up for the next release (at 100 patches,
> this one looks pretty full...)

OK, but if at all possible please squeeze it in in .2. I copied stable twice I
think during the discussion about this regression which was almost one month
ago now.

Tvrtko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo [at] vger
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

greg at kroah

Apr 23, 2009, 8:45 AM

Post #7 of 9 (217 views)
Permalink

Re: [stable] [patch 000/100] 2.6.29.2 -stable review [In reply to]

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 04:08:41PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> On Thursday 23 April 2009 16:02:00 Greg KH wrote:
> [snip]
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Could you please include a fix for forcedeth resume from hibernation
> > > > > regression as well?
> > > > >
> > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=123885046818928&w=4
> > > >
> > > > Do you have the git commit id of this patch in Linus's tree?
> > >
> > > It should be this one 35a7433c789ba6df6d96b70fa745ae9e6cac0038.
> >
> > Looks good, we should queue it up for the next release (at 100 patches,
> > this one looks pretty full...)
>
> OK, but if at all possible please squeeze it in in .2. I copied stable twice I
> think during the discussion about this regression which was almost one month
> ago now.

Yes, but you never provided the git commit id of the patch that is in
Linus's tree to us. Without that, knowing what to add to the -stable
tree is pretty much impossible, given our current workload of the
-stable queue.

Please make it very easy on us, we are slow :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo [at] vger
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

tvrtko.ursulin at sophos

Apr 23, 2009, 9:17 AM

Post #8 of 9 (217 views)
Permalink

Re: [stable] [patch 000/100] 2.6.29.2 -stable review [In reply to]

On Thursday 23 April 2009 16:45:02 Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 04:08:41PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > On Thursday 23 April 2009 16:02:00 Greg KH wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Could you please include a fix for forcedeth resume from
> > > > > > hibernation regression as well?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=123885046818928&w=4
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you have the git commit id of this patch in Linus's tree?
> > > >
> > > > It should be this one 35a7433c789ba6df6d96b70fa745ae9e6cac0038.
> > >
> > > Looks good, we should queue it up for the next release (at 100 patches,
> > > this one looks pretty full...)
> >
> > OK, but if at all possible please squeeze it in in .2. I copied stable
> > twice I think during the discussion about this regression which was
> > almost one month ago now.
>
> Yes, but you never provided the git commit id of the patch that is in
> Linus's tree to us. Without that, knowing what to add to the -stable
> tree is pretty much impossible, given our current workload of the
> -stable queue.
>
> Please make it very easy on us, we are slow :)

OK, will keep that in mind in the future. This is the first time I am trying
to get something into stable so I didn't know the right process. I assumed it
is enough to copy stable [at] kernel with anything resembling a regression fix
and you diligent people take care of it. Will do better if another
opportunity arises.

Thanks,
Tvrtko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo [at] vger
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

chrisw at sous-sol

Apr 23, 2009, 9:25 AM

Post #9 of 9 (220 views)
Permalink

Re: [stable] [patch 000/100] 2.6.29.2 -stable review [In reply to]

* Tvrtko Ursulin (tvrtko.ursulin [at] sophos) wrote:
> OK, will keep that in mind in the future. This is the first time I am trying
> to get something into stable so I didn't know the right process. I assumed it
> is enough to copy stable [at] kernel with anything resembling a regression fix
> and you diligent people take care of it.

I like the optimism ;-) Thanks for Cc'ing stable (I know I actually
checked for the resolution, and at the time it simply wasn't resolved yet).

thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo [at] vger
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads