<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Linux | Kernel</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>06 Jul  2008 19:28:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>[PATCH] Pass the attribute to the low level sysdev show/store function v2</title>
<description>MCE: Pass the attribute to the low level sysdev show/store function v2 This is an update to the earlier sysdev attribute conversion giant patch. Onl</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 17:00:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/942951</link>
</item><item>
<title>next-0704: WARNING: at kernel/sched.c:4254 add_preempt_count; PANIC</title>
<description>Hi WARNING: at kernel/sched.c:4254 add_preempt_count+0x61/0x63() Modules linked in: i2c_nforce2 Pid: 3620, comm: rtorrent Not tainted 2.6.26-rc8-next</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 16:48:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/942949</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Priorities in Anticipatory I/O scheduler</title>
<description>Modifications to the Anticipatory I/O scheduler to add multiple priority levels. It makes use of anticipation and batching in current anticipatory sch</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 15:05:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/942932</link>
</item><item>
<title>On the number of Kconfig options</title>
<description>I wrote a small script that measures the number of kernel config options as a function of time. The following table contains 6 values on each row: &amp;quot;</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 14:33:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/942922</link>
</item><item>
<title>[RFC] [PATCH] scatterlist: add iteration helper</title>
<description>Iteration over a sg list is not that trivial when you take into account that memory pages might have to be mapped before being used. Unfortunately, th</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 13:48:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/942906</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Remove obsolete content from include/linux/init.h.</title>
<description>Remove apparently obsolete content from init.h referring to gcc 2.9x and to &amp;quot;no_module_init&amp;quot;. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day &amp;lt;rpjday@crashcourse.ca&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 13:47:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/942905</link>
</item><item>
<title>Kernel oops (bug) in fs/buffers.c:create_empty_buffers</title>
<description>Hi, caught this one on kerneloops.org: http://www.kerneloops.org/searchweek.php?search=create_empty_buffers void create_empty_buffers(struct page *</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 13:23:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/942895</link>
</item><item>
<title>HELP: Getting unexpected fakeraid behavior. Fix?</title>
<description>I apologize if this is a question that has come up a lot. I&amp;#039;ve done a fair amount of googling on it, and while I&amp;#039;ve learned a lot, I have not been ab</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 13:07:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/942890</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: tty session leader issue [cause now known!] (was Re: 2.6.25.3: su gets stuck for root)</title>
<description>Tim Connors wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Joe Peterson wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I have done some more investigation on this problem, and I am posting &amp;gt;&amp;gt; here my re</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 11:49:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/942882</link>
</item><item>
<title>Runtime accounting bug?</title>
<description>Hello, I run two copies (dual processor system) of &amp;quot;mprime&amp;quot; from the GIMPS project. After a while running (weeks?) the cumulative runtime reported b</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2008 11:00:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/942947</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
