<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Linux | Kernel</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>11 Oct  2008 04:46:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: Update cacheline size on X86_GENERIC</title>
<description>On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 07:29:19PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: &amp;gt; I also think there are reasonable arguments the other way, and I &amp;gt; personally also thin</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 04:20:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/983037</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] sched: fair scheduler should not resched rt tasks</title>
<description>On Sat, 2008-10-11 at 03:01 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: &amp;gt; Using ftrace, I noticed latencies in real-time tasks where they were &amp;gt; needlessly calling s</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 04:02:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/983036</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [ALSA PATCH] alsa-git merge request</title>
<description>At Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:12:18 +0200 (CEST), Jaroslav Kysela wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Linus, please pull from: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  git pull git://git.alsa-project.org/alsa-kernel</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 03:21:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/983035</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: recv() hangs until SIGCHLD ?</title>
<description>David Schwartz, le Fri 10 Oct 2008 21:48:45 -0700, a écrit : &amp;gt; &amp;gt; We are using the Boehm GC which uses the signals SIGXCPU and SIGPWR to &amp;gt; &amp;gt; pause+rest</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 02:30:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/983034</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] mm: use a radix-tree to make do_move_pages() complexity linear</title>
<description>Nick Piggin wrote: &amp;gt; If you are worried about vmalloc overhead, I&amp;#039;d suggest testing with -mm. &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve rewritten the vmap code so it is now slightly sca</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 02:19:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/983033</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] mm: use a radix-tree to make do_move_pages() complexity linear</title>
<description>On Saturday 11 October 2008 19:54, Brice Goglin wrote: &amp;gt; Christoph Lameter wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Would it be possible to restructure this in such a way that we w</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 01:58:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/983032</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] mm: use a radix-tree to make do_move_pages() complexity linear</title>
<description>Christoph Lameter wrote: &amp;gt; Would it be possible to restructure this in such a way that we work in chunks &amp;gt; of 100 or so pages each so that we can avoi</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 01:54:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/983031</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] HP-WMI: additional keycode (or typo)</title>
<description>Hello Matthew, On my HP 2510, pressing the (i) button generates an unknown keycode: 0x213b. So here is a patch adding support for it. However, as it</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 01:51:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/983030</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: rtl8169_get_stats seems to be adding random crap to rx_missed_errors count</title>
<description>On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 7:42 AM, Alex Bennee &amp;lt;kernel-hacker@bennee.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Bruno Prémont &amp;gt; &amp;lt;bonbons@linux-vser</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 01:49:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/983029</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH 53/85] i7300_idle driver v1.55</title>
<description>Len, * Len Brown &amp;lt;lenb@kernel.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c &amp;gt; +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c &amp;gt; @@ -62,6 +62,13 @@ void idle_n</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 01:33:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/983028</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Update cacheline size on X86_GENERIC</title>
<description>On Saturday 11 October 2008 19:08, Andi Kleen wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I guess there is a reasonable argument to not care about P4 so &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I don&amp;#039;t think it is. Ignor</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 01:29:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/983027</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: recv() hangs until SIGCHLD ?</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; We run a multithread application which is using pthreads and sockets. A &amp;gt;&amp;gt; thread uses accept() then dispatch the socket to one of the workers &amp;gt;&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 01:28:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/983025</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [git pull] fastboot tree for v2.6.28</title>
<description>* Andrew Morton &amp;lt;akpm@linux-foundation.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 08:47:12 +0200 Ingo Molnar &amp;lt;mingo@elte.hu&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; When i saw your pat</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 01:28:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/983026</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Update cacheline size on X86_GENERIC</title>
<description>&amp;gt; I guess there is a reasonable argument to not care about P4 so I don&amp;#039;t think it is. Ignoring old systems would be a mistake and the wrong signal. O</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 01:05:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/983023</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] block: fix nr_phys_segments miscalculation bug</title>
<description>On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:04:03 +0200 Jens Axboe &amp;lt;jens.axboe@oracle.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Sat, Oct 11 2008, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; This is against the la</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 01:01:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/983024</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] drm: fix leak of uninitialized data to userspace (acpi_system_read_event)</title>
<description>&amp;gt; From: Vegard Nossum &amp;lt;vegard.nossum@gmail.com&amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Does that also mean that the DRM patch fixed the first one? :-) Yes, that&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;the original kmemc</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 00:55:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/983022</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [git pull] fastboot tree for v2.6.28</title>
<description>On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 08:47:12 +0200 Ingo Molnar &amp;lt;mingo@elte.hu&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; When i saw your patches then initially my impression was &amp;quot;oh my, this &amp;gt; will</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 00:48:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/983021</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: libata: set queue SSD flag for SSD devices</title>
<description>On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 17:55 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:05:28 +0200 &amp;gt; Jens Axboe &amp;lt;jens.axboe@oracle.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 00:33:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/983003</link>
</item><item>
<title>[no subject]</title>
<description>Date:  Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:41:36 -0400 From:  Bill Davidsen  &amp;gt;Yudha Harimantoro T wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi all, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Yesterday I build kernel 2.6.26.6 and it&amp;#039;s r</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 00:30:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/983002</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [update5] [PATCH] init: bzip2 or lzma -compressed kernels and initrds</title>
<description>H. Peter Anvin wrote: &amp;gt; Alain Knaff wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; H. Peter Anvin wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi Alain, &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Are you planning to submit an updated patch any time soon?</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 00:28:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/983001</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [bug] latest -git boot hang</title>
<description>* Tejun Heo &amp;lt;tj@kernel.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; It does sound like perhaps the option should be hidden more, if it&amp;#039;s &amp;gt; &amp;gt; really only reasonably enabled for s</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 00:19:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/983000</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [bug] latest -git boot hang</title>
<description>On Sat, Oct 11 2008, Tejun Heo wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Linus Torvalds wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; | 870d6656126add8e383645732</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 00:11:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/982999</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] block: fix nr_phys_segments miscalculation bug</title>
<description>On Sat, Oct 11 2008, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: &amp;gt; This is against the latest git (b922df7383749a1c0b7ea64c50fa839263d3816b). &amp;gt; &amp;gt; = &amp;gt; From: FUJITA Tomonor</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 00:04:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/982998</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] sched: fair scheduler should not resched rt tasks</title>
<description>Using ftrace, I noticed latencies in real-time tasks where they were needlessly calling schedule due to sched_fair sending out time slices. This patc</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2008 00:01:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/982997</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [git pull] fastboot tree for v2.6.28</title>
<description>* Arjan van de Ven &amp;lt;arjan@infradead.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; You can try to convince me otherwise, but I really do think this &amp;gt; &amp;gt; patch is fundamentally the</description>
<pubDate>10 Oct  2008 23:47:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/982995</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
