Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 23 Nov 2009 05:39:10 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On Friday 20 November 2009, Joern Engel wrote: > Mails are purely for review and comments. If this is deemed > merge-ready, please the git tree at > 23 Nov 2009 04:18:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157081 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >of recent regressions. > >The following bug entry is o 23 Nov 2009 04:18:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157080 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:50:45PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 12:43 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12 23 Nov 2009 04:16:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157079 * Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:45:50PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org 23 Nov 2009 04:08:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157078 Hi Linus: This push fixes a crash in the gcm driver when used in conjunction with an asynchronous cipher (e.g., aesni-intel). Please pull from git: 23 Nov 2009 04:05:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157077 Hi, I got the following opps when leaving X with rc8: [ 183.846716] Unpin not necessary for ffff88016bba2200 ! [ 183.860064] BUG: unable to handle 23 Nov 2009 04:04:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157075 * Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: > > > Another possibility is to do > > > > > > if (tty->low_latency) > > > schedule_delayed 23 Nov 2009 04:04:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157076 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:45:50PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 12:22 +0 23 Nov 2009 04:01:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157074 > > Another possibility is to do > > > > if (tty->low_latency) > > schedule_delayed_work(&tty->buf.work, 0); > > else > > 23 Nov 2009 03:59:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157073 On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 04:02:11PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14265 > Subject 23 Nov 2009 03:57:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157071 On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 03:44:01PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote: > Old binutils do not support PCLMULQDQ-NI and PSHUFB, to make kernel > can be compiled by 23 Nov 2009 03:55:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157069 Commit-ID: 4ed7c92d68a5387ba5f7030dc76eab03558e27f5 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/4ed7c92d68a5387ba5f7030dc76eab03558e27f5 Author: Peter 23 Nov 2009 03:55:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157070 Commit-ID: f67218c3e93abaf0f480bb94b53d234853ffe4de Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/f67218c3e93abaf0f480bb94b53d234853ffe4de Author: Peter 23 Nov 2009 03:54:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157072 Commit-ID: 5e942bb33371254a474653123cd9e13a4c89ee44 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/5e942bb33371254a474653123cd9e13a4c89ee44 Author: Peter 23 Nov 2009 03:54:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157068 Commit-ID: 2e2af50b1fab3c40636839a7f439c167ae559533 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/2e2af50b1fab3c40636839a7f439c167ae559533 Author: Peter 23 Nov 2009 03:54:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157065 Commit-ID: 6c2bfcbe58e0dd39554be88940149f5aa11e17d1 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/6c2bfcbe58e0dd39554be88940149f5aa11e17d1 Author: Peter 23 Nov 2009 03:54:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157067 Commit-ID: a66a3052e2d4c5815d7ad26887b1d4193206e691 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/a66a3052e2d4c5815d7ad26887b1d4193206e691 Author: Peter 23 Nov 2009 03:53:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157064 Commit-ID: a4234bfcf4d72a10a99176cdef007345e9c3b4aa Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/a4234bfcf4d72a10a99176cdef007345e9c3b4aa Author: Ingo M 23 Nov 2009 03:53:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157063 Commit-ID: 0e7810be30f66e9f430c4ce2cd3b14634211690f Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/0e7810be30f66e9f430c4ce2cd3b14634211690f Author: Jan Be 23 Nov 2009 03:53:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157066 Commit-ID: 457dc928f586f3f4b930206965e6db270034e97e Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/457dc928f586f3f4b930206965e6db270034e97e Author: Ingo M 23 Nov 2009 03:53:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157062 Commit-ID: 6e3d8330ae2c4b2c11a9577a0130d2ecda1c610d Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/6e3d8330ae2c4b2c11a9577a0130d2ecda1c610d Author: Ingo M 23 Nov 2009 03:52:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157059 Commit-ID: d9c2d5ac6af87b4491bff107113aaf16f6c2b2d9 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/d9c2d5ac6af87b4491bff107113aaf16f6c2b2d9 Author: Yingha 23 Nov 2009 03:52:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157058 Commit-ID: 021428ad1418cf3c386a1a0157140c3ea29b17ef Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/021428ad1418cf3c386a1a0157140c3ea29b17ef Author: Yingha 23 Nov 2009 03:52:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157060 Commit-ID: 163d3866cfa79aa5945f1ee5e43fb3ed1455f75c Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/163d3866cfa79aa5945f1ee5e43fb3ed1455f75c Author: Yingha 23 Nov 2009 03:52:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157061 Commit-ID: 37ef2a3029fde884808ff1b369677abc7dd9a79a Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/37ef2a3029fde884808ff1b369677abc7dd9a79a Author: Yingha 23 Nov 2009 03:52:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157056 Commit-ID: e670761f12f4069d204f433bf547d9c679a4fd05 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/e670761f12f4069d204f433bf547d9c679a4fd05 Author: Yingha 23 Nov 2009 03:51:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157057 On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 12:43 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:36:15PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > IIRC this was kbuild and 23 Nov 2009 03:50:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157055 * Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_buffer.c b/drivers/char/tty_buffer.c > > index 66fa4e1..92a0864 100644 23 Nov 2009 03:48:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157053 Hi Jarod, Jarod Wilson wrote: > Core Linux Infrared Remote Control driver and infrastructure > > -Add Kconfig and Makefile bits > -Add device driver 23 Nov 2009 03:47:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157054 * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 12:22 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I wonder why it was decided t 23 Nov 2009 03:45:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157052 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:36:15PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 12:22 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I wonder why 23 Nov 2009 03:43:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157051 On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 12:22 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder why it was decided to do newidle balancing in the NUMA > domain? And with ne 23 Nov 2009 03:36:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157050 On 11/23/2009 01:00 PM, Dor Laor wrote: > On 11/23/2009 11:44 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:19:05AM -0600, Adam Litke wr 23 Nov 2009 03:31:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157049 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:47:24PM -0500, Youquan,Song wrote: > > The alg->cra_name and alg->cra_driver_name, from the description, > cra_name is the 23 Nov 2009 03:31:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157048 > diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_buffer.c b/drivers/char/tty_buffer.c > index 66fa4e1..92a0864 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tty_buffer.c > +++ b/drivers 23 Nov 2009 03:31:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157047 Hi, I wonder why it was decided to do newidle balancing in the NUMA domain? And with newidle_idx == 0 at that. This means that every time the CPU go 23 Nov 2009 03:22:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157045 On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 08:37:29PM +0100, Joern Engel wrote: > +static int logfs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry) > +{ > + struct 23 Nov 2009 03:17:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157046 Ingo Molnar writes: > I'd still like to hear back from Paulus whether PowerPC is affected > negatively - IIRC it was PowerPC where we got the -m64 f 23 Nov 2009 03:14:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157044 Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, indexer wrote: > >>> while the bisect should have be done with >>> >>> good 2.6.30 >>> bad 2.6.31 >> 23 Nov 2009 03:11:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157043 Commit f691fe1da7e2715137d21ae5a80bec64db4625db is really broken wrt. the userspace interface for tracing because of the weird KVM_MMU_PAGE_PRINTK mac 23 Nov 2009 03:06:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157041 Signed-off-by: Patrick Boettcher <pboettcher@kernellabs.com> ---- diff --git a/tools/checkstack.pl b/tools/checkstack.pl index e0af9c7..4fed8c7 10075 23 Nov 2009 03:05:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157042 Signed-off-by: Patrick Boettcher <pboettcher@kernellabs.com> ---- diff --git a/tools/checkstack.pl b/tools/checkstack.pl index 14ee68e..e0af9c7 10075 23 Nov 2009 03:04:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157040 On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:45:10AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > So you place a comment there; it should be there anyway. Having nop > during suspend/ 23 Nov 2009 03:02:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157038 Hi, I shamelessly stole the checkstack-script for a project of mine and now want to contribute what I changed: 1) CHECKSTACK: sparc: fix regex to m 23 Nov 2009 03:01:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157036 On 11/23/2009 11:44 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:19:05AM -0600, Adam Litke wrote: >> Rusty and Anthony, >> If I've addre 23 Nov 2009 03:00:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157035 On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 22:18 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> > > IS_ERR returns only 1 or 0. The callsite of setup_re 23 Nov 2009 02:55:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157037 On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 09:08 +0200, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > Hello Liam, > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 08:07:59PM +0100, ext Liam Girdwood wrote: > > O 23 Nov 2009 02:55:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157039 Hi, On Mon 23-11-09 03:09:19, tmhikaru@gmail.com wrote: > Okay, finally had some time to dismantle the machine in question and > inserted the b 23 Nov 2009 02:54:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157034 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:21:17PM -0500, Youquan,Song wrote: > > Sorry for late. I use the cryptodev-2.6 tree, enable AESNI and PCLMULQDQ NI. > > St 23 Nov 2009 02:52:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157033 * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote: > Normally we flatten the inherited hierarchy by attaching all childs to > the top parent, therefore 23 Nov 2009 02:51:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157032 On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 11:48 +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:33:45 +0100 > Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > 23 Nov 2009 02:50:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157031 On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:33:45 +0100 Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 10:54 +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > 23 Nov 2009 02:48:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157029 On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:55:28 +0530 Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > * Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> [2009-11-23 11:09:26]: 23 Nov 2009 02:46:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157030 Normally we flatten the inherited hierarchy by attaching all childs to the top parent, therefore a child's child_total_time_* should never get increme 23 Nov 2009 02:37:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157021 Make perf_swevent_get_recursion_context return a context number and disable preemption. This could be used to remove the IRQ disable from the trace b 23 Nov 2009 02:37:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157022 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Ingo noticed that the C99 initialisation of the structure resulted in a memset() and an assignment. Use explicit as 23 Nov 2009 02:37:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157027 Move the update_event_times() call in __perf_event_exit_task() into list_del_event() because that holds the proper lock (ctx->lock) and seems a more n 23 Nov 2009 02:37:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157026 It appeared we did call update_event_times() on exit, but we failed to update the context time, which renders the former moot. XXX: locking is a bit 23 Nov 2009 02:37:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157024 If we leave the event in STATE_INACTIVE, any read of the event after the detach will increase the running count but not the enabled count and cause fu 23 Nov 2009 02:37:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157025 Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> --- kernel/perf_event.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Index: l 23 Nov 2009 02:37:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157020 We had two almost identical functions, avoid the duplication. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> --- kernel/perf_event.c | 31 23 Nov 2009 02:37:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157023 -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo i 23 Nov 2009 02:37:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157028 Michael Tokarev writes: > In short, processes on linux loses signals. You neglected to attach a self-contained test program for this alleged problem 23 Nov 2009 02:34:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157019 On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 10:54 +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > > > > + hw->wiphy->ps_default = false; > > > > + > I tried the patch last night 23 Nov 2009 02:33:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157018 > Hm. Looks to me like it's doing what it was told to do. Yes. I realised this morning too. > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_buffer.c b/drivers/ch 23 Nov 2009 02:28:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157016 On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:44:10PM +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote: > Function task_[us]times() are called consecutively in almost all > cases. However t 23 Nov 2009 02:28:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157017 * Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> [2009-11-23 11:09:26]: [snip] > + > + utime = task_utime(tsk); > + stime = task_stim 23 Nov 2009 02:25:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157015 On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 07:47:30PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 06:02:22AM -0500, Youquan,Song wrote: > > > > I have watched cr 23 Nov 2009 02:20:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157012 > Can you show me a sample /proc/crypto showing this problem and how > you created it? > Sorry for late. I use the cryptodev-2.6 tree, enable AESNI a 23 Nov 2009 02:20:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1156992 When process exit in the middle of thread_group_cputime() loop, {u,s}time values will be accounted twice. One time - in all threads loop, second - in 23 Nov 2009 02:16:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157014 Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Regarding file.c ipc.c lib.c lsm.c > > > > You can use container_of() inside callback functions to avoid "void *". > yeah th 23 Nov 2009 02:11:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157011 Tetsuo Handa wrote: > And the rest of files... > > > > Regarding match.c > > Why not to start YYTD_ID_something from 0 so that we can avoid "- 1" 23 Nov 2009 02:10:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157008 Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Hello. > > Sorry for late response. np. we are all busy and any time taken to review code is greatly appreciated > I browsed a 23 Nov 2009 02:10:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157009 Eric Paris wrote: > On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 00:16 +0000, David Howells wrote: >> Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> +/* sec_flags for security 23 Nov 2009 02:10:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157010 Tetsuo Handa wrote: > [PATCH] LSM: Move security_path_chmod()/security_path_chown() to after mutex_lock(). > > We should call security_path_chmod()/s 23 Nov 2009 02:09:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157006 * Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:34:59AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.or 23 Nov 2009 02:09:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157007 On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:00:21AM +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote: > >>> Could you please test this patch, if it solve all utime decrease > >>> problems 23 Nov 2009 02:09:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157013 Add support for NEXIO (or iNexio) USB touchscreens to usbtouchscreen driver. Tested with NEX170MRT 17" LCD monitor with integrated touchscreen (with x 23 Nov 2009 02:05:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157005 Find input enpoint automatically instead of assuming that the first one is OK. This is needed for devices with multiple endpoints such as iNexio where 23 Nov 2009 02:04:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157004 Convert usbtouchscreen from storing usb_device to usb_interface. This is needed for multi-interface touchscreen devices such as iNexio. Signed-off-b 23 Nov 2009 02:04:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157002 Jiri Kosina ha scritto: > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Claudio Scordino wrote: > > >> may I ask you the current status of this patch ? I noticed that it 23 Nov 2009 02:03:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157003 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Adrian von Bidder <avbidder@fortytwo.ch> wrote: > Heyho! > > On Sunday 22 November 2009 22.27:50 Peter Feuerer wrote 23 Nov 2009 01:58:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157001 On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:42:46 +0100 Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 16:29 +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > 23 Nov 2009 01:54:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1156999 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Well, it boots for me, but then, I've not been able to reproduce any > issues anyway :/ > > /me goes try a PREEMPT=n kernel, s 23 Nov 2009 01:53:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1156998 On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 03:49:19PM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:33:45PM +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote: > > Originally ta 23 Nov 2009 01:52:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1157000 On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 08:01:57PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Just compiled with -mincoming-stack- 23 Nov 2009 01:51:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1156997 On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, indexer wrote: > > while the bisect should have be done with > > > > good 2.6.30 > > bad 2.6.31 > > > > William, could you ple 23 Nov 2009 01:45:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1156993 Hi, Please send wireless patches to the correct list (linux-wireless) in the future. On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 19:36 -0500, mike@mspradling.com wrote: 23 Nov 2009 01:45:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1156996 On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:19:05AM -0600, Adam Litke wrote: > Rusty and Anthony, > If I've addressed all outstanding issues, please consider this patc 23 Nov 2009 01:44:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1156995 On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 08:21:41AM -0800, Shirley Ma wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 07:19 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > Interesting use after free :) 23 Nov 2009 01:43:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1156994 On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 16:29 +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > > + hw->wiphy->ps_default = false; > > + > > hw->queues = 4; > > hw->max_rat 23 Nov 2009 01:42:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1156991 (Adding some CC's.) On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 2:16 PM, André Goddard Rosa <andre.goddard@gmail.com> wrote: > Avoid calling kfree() under pidmap spinloc 23 Nov 2009 01:38:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1156989 ULE (Unidirectional Lightweight Encapsulation RFC 4326) decapsulation code has a bug that incorrectly treats ULE SNDU packed into the remaining 2 or 3 23 Nov 2009 01:37:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1156990 This patch implements shrinking the reserved memory for crash kernel, if it is more than enough. For example, if you have already reserved 128M, now 23 Nov 2009 01:37:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1156988 On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 23:32 -0800, Yong Zhang wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Peter P Waskiewicz Jr > <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com> wrot 23 Nov 2009 01:36:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1156986 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:34:59AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:13:07 23 Nov 2009 01:35:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1156987 On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Claudio Scordino wrote: > may I ask you the current status of this patch ? I noticed that it > has not been merged, yet. > > 23 Nov 2009 01:25:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1156985 On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > Minor copy-and-pasteism in the regulator docs (against > git from today): > > Signed-off-by: 23 Nov 2009 01:23:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1156984 On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:42:09 pm Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > > > Fix the following htmldocs warning 23 Nov 2009 01:20:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1156983 Heyho! On Sunday 22 November 2009 22.27:50 Peter Feuerer wrote: > issues with AOA 150 netbooks should be solved with current 2.6.32-git > tree. You 23 Nov 2009 01:17:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1156982