Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 08 Nov 2009 13:51:57 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Currently, the order to schedule events is as follows: - cpu context pinned events - cpu context non-pinned events - task context pinned events - tas 08 Nov 2009 12:13:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1150990 Split up pinned and non-pinned events processing in two helpers so that it's more flexible to handle them seperately. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbec 08 Nov 2009 12:13:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1150989 Don't use list_for_each_entry() just to swap the first and last entry in the list. Instead, use a direct list->next derefencing. This saves up a usel 08 Nov 2009 12:13:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1150987 Split-up struct perf_event_context::group_list into pinned_grp_list and volatile_grp_list (non-pinned). This first appears to be useless as it duplic 08 Nov 2009 12:13:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1150988 Hi, This is an rfc patchset, only compile tested just to ensure I'm taking a good direction before going ahead. This is intended to rework a bit the 08 Nov 2009 12:13:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1150986 I wonder why isn't the PATA CS5536 driver using 32-bit ops. Does the following make any sense? It seems to work on my IXP425-based router. Signed-of 08 Nov 2009 12:05:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1150983 Hi, I just want to correct a mistake in comments, about ext2_find_entry. -- diff -uNr a/fs/ext2/dir.c b/fs/ext2/dir.c --- a/fs/ext2/dir.c 2009-1 08 Nov 2009 12:00:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1150982 Use ARRAY_SIZE macro of kernel api instead. Signed-off-by: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@gmail.com> --- drivers/ata/sata_mv.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 08 Nov 2009 11:30:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1150967 Hi, I wonder if this is entirely correct? If so, why? Only relevant parts left. * RETURNS: * Bytes consumed. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 08 Nov 2009 11:27:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1150966 Anybody using 32-bit PATA/SATA transfers on IXP4xx? :-) Long story, mostly with PCI in mind: - readb/readw/readl, writeb/writew/writel macros are val 08 Nov 2009 10:49:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1150964