Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 15:26:16 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On Sun, 12 Feb 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Given the stuff async is used for, maybe just make all async execution > > > freezable? > > > > 12 Feb 2012 14:02:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1490904 Allow this macro to be used in an if/else block. Use do {} while (0) and pr_info. (perhaps this should be pr_debug) Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@ 12 Feb 2012 13:59:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1490903 On Tuesday, February 07, 2012, Jean Pihet wrote: > The PM QoS feature depends on CONFIG_PM which depends on > PM_SLEEP || PM_RUNTIME. This breaks CPU 12 Feb 2012 13:37:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1490901 On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 15:53 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 14:39 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > For step downs this isn't suc 12 Feb 2012 13:33:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1490902 On Sunday, February 12, 2012, mark gross wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:44:10AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [...] > > I'd like us and Android 12 Feb 2012 13:32:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1490899 On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:26:06PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 12.02.2012 22:20, schrieb Al Viro: > >On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:01:49PM +010 12 Feb 2012 13:28:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1490900 On Sunday, February 12, 2012, mark gross wrote: > why are these two patches? > > I think you could squash them into one and it would be just fine. W 12 Feb 2012 13:27:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1490891 On Sunday, February 12, 2012, Alan Stern wrote: > On Fri, 10 Feb 2012, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 04:44:48PM -050 12 Feb 2012 13:26:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1490890 Am 12.02.2012 22:20, schrieb Al Viro: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:01:49PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Am 12.02.2012 21:27, schrieb Al Viro: > 12 Feb 2012 13:26:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1490898 Traditionally the kernel has refused to setup EFI at all if there's been a mismatch in 32/64-bit mode between EFI and the kernel. On some platforms t 12 Feb 2012 13:24:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1490894