Mailing List Archive: kinosearch: discuss

Revision 3299 build fails

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

henka at cityweb

Apr 11, 2008, 6:56 AM

Post #1 of 3 (923 views)
Permalink

Revision 3299 build fails

Hi Marvin,

Just in case you're not aware of it: revision 3299 build fails with:

Unprocessed constructors: 'KinoSearch::Index::FilePurger' at
../boilerplater/lib/Boilerplater/Binding/Perl.pm line 104
Boilerplater::Binding::Perl::write_bindings('Boilerplater::Binding::Perl=HASH(0xa25619c)')
called at buildlib/Lucy/Build.pm line 370
Lucy::Build::ACTION_boilerplater('KinoSearch::Build=HASH(0x9d815e0)')
called at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Module/Build/Base.pm line
1485
Module::Build::Base::_call_action('KinoSearch::Build=HASH(0x9d815e0)',
'boilerplater') called at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Module/Build/Base.pm line 1469
Module::Build::Base::dispatch('KinoSearch::Build=HASH(0x9d815e0)',
'boilerplater') called at buildlib/Lucy/Build.pm line 385
Lucy::Build::ACTION_code('KinoSearch::Build=HASH(0x9d815e0)')
called at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Module/Build/Base.pm line
1485
Module::Build::Base::_call_action('KinoSearch::Build=HASH(0x9d815e0)',
'code') called at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Module/Build/Base.pm line 3823
Module::Build::Base::depends_on('KinoSearch::Build=HASH(0x9d815e0)',
'code') called at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Module/Build/Base.pm line 2230
Module::Build::Base::ACTION_build('KinoSearch::Build=HASH(0x9d815e0)')
called at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Module/Build/Base.pm line
1485
Module::Build::Base::_call_action('KinoSearch::Build=HASH(0x9d815e0)',
'build') called at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Module/Build/Base.pm line 1474
Module::Build::Base::dispatch('KinoSearch::Build=HASH(0x9d815e0)')
called at ./Build line 59

Regards
Henry

_______________________________________________
KinoSearch mailing list
KinoSearch [at] rectangular
http://www.rectangular.com/mailman/listinfo/kinosearch

marvin at rectangular

Apr 11, 2008, 11:13 AM

Post #2 of 3 (871 views)
Permalink

Re: Revision 3299 build fails [In reply to]

On Apr 11, 2008, at 6:56 AM, henka [at] cityweb wrote:

> Just in case you're not aware of it: revision 3299 build fails with:
>
>
> Unprocessed constructors: 'KinoSearch::Index::FilePurger' at

Thanks for the heads up. I'd neglected to "svn add" a new file.
Fixed by r3300.

Marvin Humphrey
Rectangular Research
http://www.rectangular.com/

_______________________________________________
KinoSearch mailing list
KinoSearch [at] rectangular
http://www.rectangular.com/mailman/listinfo/kinosearch

henka at cityweb

Apr 11, 2008, 1:08 PM

Post #3 of 3 (863 views)
Permalink

Re: Revision 3299 build fails [In reply to]

> Thanks for the heads up. I'd neglected to "svn add" a new file.
> Fixed by r3300.

Thanks!

For the record, r3300 also has a few test failures:

t/212-multi_posting_list.........dubious
Test returned status 0 (wstat 11, 0xb)
DIED. FAILED test 5
Failed 1/5 tests, 80.00% okay

t/109-read_locking...............dubious
Test returned status 0 (wstat 139, 0x8b)
DIED. FAILED tests 8-15
Failed 8/15 tests, 46.67% okay

t/212-multi_posting_list.........dubious
Test returned status 0 (wstat 139, 0x8b)
DIED. FAILED test 5
Failed 1/5 tests, 80.00% okay

Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/107-index_file_names.t 0 139 3 2 3
t/109-read_locking.t 0 139 15 16 8-15
t/212-multi_posting_list.t 0 139 5 2 5

Regards
Henry

_______________________________________________
KinoSearch mailing list
KinoSearch [at] rectangular
http://www.rectangular.com/mailman/listinfo/kinosearch

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads