Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 23 Nov 2009 05:33:05 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg This change made a big difference for me also thanks. -Dan > Oi, good catch! With one line of code, we see a 10-20% search-time speed > improveme 19 Sep 2008 22:37:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3463 On Sep 19, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Nathan Kurz wrote: > You prompted me to run a few quick tests as well: Great stuff, Nathan. I'd like to move the desi 19 Sep 2008 19:14:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3462 On Sep 19, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Nathan Kurz wrote: > The third thing (tiny, but perhaps easy to fix) is that > Scorepost_read_record is spending 40% of 19 Sep 2008 17:28:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3461 On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com> wrote: > I've now performed the experiment pitting Lucene's TermQuery again 19 Sep 2008 11:25:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3459 Quoting "Marvin Humphrey" <marvin@rectangular.com>: > It would be helpful to see a C stack trace to confirm the suspicion. > If it's the same numbe 19 Sep 2008 03:12:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3458 Quoting "Eric Howe" <eric@pieinsky.ca>: > Henka, what does your schema look like? Do you have any vectorized > fields? I think I came across a simil 19 Sep 2008 00:17:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3457 On Sep 17, 2008, at 1:16 PM, Nathan Kurz wrote: > But since the processing time is > probably close to proportional to the file size, maybe this is w 18 Sep 2008 21:25:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3456 Henka, what does your schema look like? Do you have any vectorized fields? I think I came across a similar issue (but neglected to report it, slip 18 Sep 2008 13:31:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3452 Quoting "Marvin Humphrey" <marvin@rectangular.com>: > Do you recall the last time you updated before r3875? r3875 itself > is definitely not the cu 18 Sep 2008 12:01:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3451 On Sep 18, 2008, at 1:49 AM, Henka wrote: > Revision 3875 consistently fails on an optimize of *one* of my > indexes. Do you recall the last time 18 Sep 2008 07:45:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3450 Quoting Henka <henka@cityweb.co.za>: > Revision 3875 consistently fails on an optimize of *one* of my > indexes. The script simply opens the index 18 Sep 2008 05:05:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3449 Quoting Henka <henka@cityweb.co.za>: > I'm busy running it through gdb to obtain more info, and will repost shortly. gdb and perl debug don't provide 18 Sep 2008 04:18:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3448 Greetings, Revision 3875 consistently fails on an optimize of *one* of my indexes. The script simply opens the index (a previously merged multi- 18 Sep 2008 01:49:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3447 On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Dan <dmarkham@gmail.com> wrote: > I warmed up the index then reset the opreport and ran the query once.. > > Here is 17 Sep 2008 13:16:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3442 > the hotstop with something like Oprofile might be a good way to focus his attention I warmed up the index then reset the opreport and ran the query 17 Sep 2008 11:23:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3441 On Sep 14, 2008, at 10:02 PM, Nathan Kurz wrote: > Taking Dan's tests at face value, for the moment, I'm not quite > understanding how the issues you 16 Sep 2008 23:36:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3440 > Dan, my quick summary as a long-term observer is that there would be > no unsolveable reason that KinoSearch should be significantly slower > than S 14 Sep 2008 22:55:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3439 On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com> wrote: >> Is there anything I can do to make these searches perform better? 14 Sep 2008 22:02:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3438 > In my book, benchmarking claims presented without code, corpus, stats, raw > data, and detailed methodological descriptions qualify as "anecdotal > 14 Sep 2008 18:05:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3437 On Sep 13, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Dan wrote: > So now I have made claims... :) > I'll try to give more details. In my book, benchmarking claims presented 14 Sep 2008 16:36:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3436 Sure... All times are for 1000 Searches. Small Hit(112) count (bag:belly) Solr: 2.12 Sec. Kino: 2.41 Sec. That Looks Great 415/sec vs 472/sec.. Lar 14 Sep 2008 12:12:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3435 Quoting Dan <dmarkham@gmail.com>: > Once I start asking for more that one value both with large hits it > gets real bad. i.e. (foo:common OR foo:more 14 Sep 2008 10:41:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3434 So I have been testing search times of KinoSearch -r3875 vs Solr.. I'm not trying to do a full test matrix just testing it on a few things I would li 13 Sep 2008 13:56:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3433 r3857 All test passing and the "clean up" seems to be working great. Thanks, -Dan _______________________________________________ KinoSearch mailin 09 Sep 2008 22:40:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3414 On Sep 9, 2008, at 4:27 AM, Paul-Kenji Cahier wrote: > With all those fixes it now builds perfectly. > The tests still fail (of course). Please try 09 Sep 2008 20:41:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3413