Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 24 Nov 2009 13:05:31 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg This change made a big difference for me also thanks. -Dan > Oi, good catch! With one line of code, we see a 10-20% search-time speed > improveme 19 Sep 2008 22:37:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3463 On Sep 19, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Nathan Kurz wrote: > You prompted me to run a few quick tests as well: Great stuff, Nathan. I'd like to move the desi 19 Sep 2008 19:14:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3462 On Sep 19, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Nathan Kurz wrote: > The third thing (tiny, but perhaps easy to fix) is that > Scorepost_read_record is spending 40% of 19 Sep 2008 17:28:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3461 On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com> wrote: > I've now performed the experiment pitting Lucene's TermQuery again 19 Sep 2008 11:25:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3459 Quoting "Marvin Humphrey" <marvin@rectangular.com>: > It would be helpful to see a C stack trace to confirm the suspicion. > If it's the same numbe 19 Sep 2008 03:12:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3458 Quoting "Eric Howe" <eric@pieinsky.ca>: > Henka, what does your schema look like? Do you have any vectorized > fields? I think I came across a simil 19 Sep 2008 00:17:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3457 On Sep 17, 2008, at 1:16 PM, Nathan Kurz wrote: > But since the processing time is > probably close to proportional to the file size, maybe this is w 18 Sep 2008 21:25:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3456 Henka, what does your schema look like? Do you have any vectorized fields? I think I came across a similar issue (but neglected to report it, slip 18 Sep 2008 13:31:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3452 Quoting "Marvin Humphrey" <marvin@rectangular.com>: > Do you recall the last time you updated before r3875? r3875 itself > is definitely not the cu 18 Sep 2008 12:01:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3451 On Sep 18, 2008, at 1:49 AM, Henka wrote: > Revision 3875 consistently fails on an optimize of *one* of my > indexes. Do you recall the last time 18 Sep 2008 07:45:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3450 Quoting Henka <henka@cityweb.co.za>: > Revision 3875 consistently fails on an optimize of *one* of my > indexes. The script simply opens the index 18 Sep 2008 05:05:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3449 Quoting Henka <henka@cityweb.co.za>: > I'm busy running it through gdb to obtain more info, and will repost shortly. gdb and perl debug don't provide 18 Sep 2008 04:18:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3448 Greetings, Revision 3875 consistently fails on an optimize of *one* of my indexes. The script simply opens the index (a previously merged multi- 18 Sep 2008 01:49:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3447 On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Dan <dmarkham@gmail.com> wrote: > I warmed up the index then reset the opreport and ran the query once.. > > Here is 17 Sep 2008 13:16:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3442 > the hotstop with something like Oprofile might be a good way to focus his attention I warmed up the index then reset the opreport and ran the query 17 Sep 2008 11:23:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3441 On Sep 14, 2008, at 10:02 PM, Nathan Kurz wrote: > Taking Dan's tests at face value, for the moment, I'm not quite > understanding how the issues you 16 Sep 2008 23:36:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3440 > Dan, my quick summary as a long-term observer is that there would be > no unsolveable reason that KinoSearch should be significantly slower > than S 14 Sep 2008 22:55:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3439 On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com> wrote: >> Is there anything I can do to make these searches perform better? 14 Sep 2008 22:02:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3438 > In my book, benchmarking claims presented without code, corpus, stats, raw > data, and detailed methodological descriptions qualify as "anecdotal > 14 Sep 2008 18:05:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3437 On Sep 13, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Dan wrote: > So now I have made claims... :) > I'll try to give more details. In my book, benchmarking claims presented 14 Sep 2008 16:36:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3436 Sure... All times are for 1000 Searches. Small Hit(112) count (bag:belly) Solr: 2.12 Sec. Kino: 2.41 Sec. That Looks Great 415/sec vs 472/sec.. Lar 14 Sep 2008 12:12:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3435 Quoting Dan <dmarkham@gmail.com>: > Once I start asking for more that one value both with large hits it > gets real bad. i.e. (foo:common OR foo:more 14 Sep 2008 10:41:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3434 So I have been testing search times of KinoSearch -r3875 vs Solr.. I'm not trying to do a full test matrix just testing it on a few things I would li 13 Sep 2008 13:56:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3433 r3857 All test passing and the "clean up" seems to be working great. Thanks, -Dan _______________________________________________ KinoSearch mailin 09 Sep 2008 22:40:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3414 On Sep 9, 2008, at 4:27 AM, Paul-Kenji Cahier wrote: > With all those fixes it now builds perfectly. > The tests still fail (of course). Please try 09 Sep 2008 20:41:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3413 On Sep 9, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Dan wrote: > So i have played around a bit and removed all the seg_5.* files and > things seem to correct itself. > I'm 09 Sep 2008 16:04:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3408 So after aborting a index updating session... the readers are running just fine but all new writers get a Can't open 'seg_5.ds': File exists at ../c_ 09 Sep 2008 11:45:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3402 Quoting "Marvin Humphrey" <marvin@rectangular.com>: > Thanks, this was easier to see from the patched Schema file than it > would have been from a d 09 Sep 2008 06:43:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3400 > On Sep 8, 2008, at 7:51 PM, Paul-Kenji Cahier wrote: >> Strawberry perl actually uses mingw to provide as much unix >> compatibility as possible, s 09 Sep 2008 04:27:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3399 On Sep 8, 2008, at 7:51 PM, Paul-Kenji Cahier wrote: > Strawberry perl actually uses mingw to provide as much unix > compatibility as possible, so it 08 Sep 2008 22:29:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3398 > On Sep 8, 2008, at 5:39 PM, Paul-Kenji Cahier wrote: >> I have been desperatly trying to compile any of the .20_x versions >> under windows, unde 08 Sep 2008 19:51:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3395 On Sep 8, 2008, at 5:39 PM, Paul-Kenji Cahier wrote: > I have been desperatly trying to compile any of the .20_x versions > under windows, under bo 08 Sep 2008 19:02:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3394 Hello, I have been desperatly trying to compile any of the .20_x versions under windows, under both activeperl and strawberry perl but without succes 08 Sep 2008 17:39:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3392 On Sep 5, 2008, at 12:08 PM, Henka wrote: > Quoting "Marvin Humphrey" <marvin@rectangular.com>: >> Sorry to ask for this again, but can you send the 08 Sep 2008 05:25:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3388 On Sep 7, 2008, at 9:31 PM, Dan wrote: > $invindexer->delete_by_term( svid => $svid); > Invalid parameter: 'svid' at xs/XSBind.c:314 kino_XSBind_allo 07 Sep 2008 22:13:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3387 I can do searches by "svid:foo" but it does not like me deleting docs by svid.. I think I'm using it correctly... $invindexer->delete_by_term( svid 07 Sep 2008 21:31:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3386 On Sep 7, 2008, at 3:49 PM, Dan wrote: > what's the best way to see what a query is getting analyzed to.. Use $query->to_string(). > Seems like I u 07 Sep 2008 16:35:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3385 what's the best way to see what a query is getting analyzed to.. Seems like I used to be able to call Dumper on a $query object and it would show the 07 Sep 2008 15:49:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3384 works.. Thanks for the help.. -Dan _______________________________________________ KinoSearch mailing list KinoSearch@rectangular.com http://www.rec 07 Sep 2008 14:20:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3383 On Sep 7, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Dan wrote: > ==414== Invalid read of size 4 > ==414== at 0x457AB6C: kino_DocReader_fetch_doc (DocReader.c:54) Thanks 07 Sep 2008 14:02:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3382 > * A self-contained script, patch, test case, or small tarball > containing code which isolates and demonstrates the problem. ----------- My Sche 07 Sep 2008 11:39:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3377 On Sep 6, 2008, at 11:36 PM, Dan wrote: > What will i need to send to help you debug it. Ideally, one of these: * A self-contained script, patch 07 Sep 2008 06:38:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3374 What will i need to send to help you debug it. I have built a small index and just wrote a simple searcher.. It seg faults when calling $hits->next() 06 Sep 2008 23:36:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3372 Quoting "Marvin Humphrey" <marvin@rectangular.com>: > Sorry to ask for this again, but can you send the diff as an > attachment? I tried extracting 05 Sep 2008 12:08:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3350 On Sep 5, 2008, at 7:20 AM, Henka wrote: > I think what really snared me was the implied "create" when using a > *Searcher*, not indexer. I agree 05 Sep 2008 09:21:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3349 Henry, > here's the svn diff: > > Index: sample/conf.pl > =================================================================== > --- sample/conf.pl 05 Sep 2008 09:08:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3348 Quoting "Marvin Humphrey" <marvin@rectangular.com>: > On Sep 5, 2008, at 3:16 AM, Henka wrote: > >> As a matter of interest, I noticed the following e 05 Sep 2008 07:20:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3347 argh, I wasn't paying attention, here's the svn diff: Index: sample/conf.pl =================================================================== --- s 05 Sep 2008 07:16:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3346 Here's the diff for the schema and indexer. --- sample-orig/USConSchema.pm 2008-09-03 14:43:11.000000000 +0200 +++ sample-longfield-sim/USConSchem 05 Sep 2008 07:10:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3345 Quoting "Marvin Humphrey" <marvin@rectangular.com>: > This was a confusing change, no doubt, and I'm sorry it snared you. Cool, thanks for the prompt 05 Sep 2008 07:05:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3344 On Sep 5, 2008, at 4:11 AM, Henka wrote: > Testing KSx::Search::LongFieldSim in revision 3811 using the sample/ > code, I've encountered the follow 05 Sep 2008 06:54:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3343 On Sep 5, 2008, at 3:16 AM, Henka wrote: > As a matter of interest, I noticed the following error when > (incorrectly) opening an existing inverted 05 Sep 2008 06:44:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3342 Greetings, Testing KSx::Search::LongFieldSim in revision 3811 using the sample/ code, I've encountered the following error when creating an index: 05 Sep 2008 04:11:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3341 Greetings, As a matter of interest, I noticed the following error when (incorrectly) opening an existing inverted index in a searcher: Couldn't __ 05 Sep 2008 03:16:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3340 On Sep 2, 2008, at 1:06 PM, Mike Barborak wrote: > if I re-index a document (done in a different process and without > spec_field being called), I 02 Sep 2008 21:28:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3337 Hello, I am trying to debug an issue I am having with KinoSearch::Search::QueryFilter (from KinoSearch version 0.162) and am hoping I might get a poi 02 Sep 2008 13:06:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3336 Hi Marvin Thanks for your response, I got it working nicely :-D Regards, Riyaad 02 Sep 2008 07:10:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3335 On Aug 30, 2008, at 12:46 AM, Riyaad Miller wrote: > "uranium OR billion +language:(Afrikaans English) +region: > (South_Africa Africa International 30 Aug 2008 07:00:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3323 Hi All Marvin, thanks for the great work to date - I'm almost there :-). I'm using KS 0.162 and everything's working nicely. There is however 30 Aug 2008 00:46:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3322 On Aug 27, 2008, at 2:52 AM, Roberto Henriquez Laurent wrote: > The error is gone! Excellent. > when do you plan to make that maintenance release? 27 Aug 2008 14:01:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3296 Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > This appears to be a bug in 0.162. I believe it has been fixed by > commit r3742. > > I'll make a bugfix release, but 27 Aug 2008 02:52:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3287 Hi, There is a utility that comes with the KinoSearch distribution called dump_index. Running that shows these terms associated with the body field: 25 Aug 2008 12:56:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3280 On 08/25/2008 08:42 AM, Henry wrote: > On Mon, August 25, 2008 1:12 pm, Ben Aurel wrote: >> My question is, what would you suggest for indexing office 25 Aug 2008 07:00:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3278 On Mon, August 25, 2008 1:12 pm, Ben Aurel wrote: > My question is, what would you suggest for indexing office formats ? > How do you extract text wit 25 Aug 2008 06:42:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3277 hi I've red through most of the documentation trying to understand what filetypes KS supports. There is the interesting oscon presentation on http://w 25 Aug 2008 04:12:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3275 On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 15:22 -0400, Mike Barborak wrote: > Hi, > > After creating your index with PolyAnalyzer, your body field will have > the terms 24 Aug 2008 23:10:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3274 Hi, After creating your index with PolyAnalyzer, your body field will have the terms "short" and "body" but not "short body." Take a look at KinoSear 23 Aug 2008 12:22:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3264 Hi list, I am a newbie here I have written an indexer to index all my mails. I am able to search on to & from fields but not search on the actual 23 Aug 2008 06:01:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3260 I am trying to write a search tool for my own mailbox. I have used plucene::simple but that works for only a limited number of mails More mails insid 23 Aug 2008 03:19:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3259 On Aug 18, 2008, at 6:46 AM, Riyaad Miller wrote: > When passing the query string "+Health +language:(English) +region: > (Africa International) +sk 21 Aug 2008 21:42:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3253 On Aug 21, 2008, at 9:08 AM, Roberto Henriquez Laurent wrote: > Using 0.162, I'm having trouble trying to update an index. It's not > on NFS and I 21 Aug 2008 21:35:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3251 Hi all, Using 0.162, I'm having trouble trying to update an index. It's not on NFS and I call finish() with optimize => 0. The error is as follows: 21 Aug 2008 09:08:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3249 Hi one and all Marvin, thanks for your help to date (brilliant work and ongoing support). I've stumbled across a rather interesting problem. I've i 18 Aug 2008 06:46:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3252 On Aug 14, 2008, at 10:48 AM, Mark Holland wrote: > However, in the latest trunk of KinoSearch, ->finish(optimize => 1) > no longer seems to work. 16 Aug 2008 19:42:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3238 Hi All, I'm doing some parallel indexing by firing off batches using gearman, then once a task completes using ->add_invindex() to merge the batch t 14 Aug 2008 10:48:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3235 On Aug 10, 2008, at 10:54 AM, Dobrica Pavlinusic wrote: > Just a quick note that current svn trunk is missing > KinoSearch/Util/Stringhelper.h Than 10 Aug 2008 22:12:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3234 Just a quick note that current svn trunk is missing KinoSearch/Util/Stringhelper.h /usr/bin/perl Build --makefile_env_macros 1 cc -I. -I../c_src/h -I 10 Aug 2008 10:54:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3232 On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Riyaad Miller <riyaad.miller@predix.com> wrote: > I'm looking to build a search option that allows the user to 'Match 06 Aug 2008 12:51:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3231 Hi All Thank you for your help to date, totally appreciated. I'm currently looking into doing a search that is both case sensitive as well as case 06 Aug 2008 01:33:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3230 On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com> wrote: > > On Jul 30, 2008, at 11:03 AM, Nathan Kurz wrote: > >> The bit vec 01 Aug 2008 12:32:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3188 On Jul 30, 2008, at 11:03 AM, Nathan Kurz wrote: > The bit vectors become > unworkable once you have a large number of facets (think of using > 'auth 30 Jul 2008 12:38:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3181 On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Nathan Kurz <nate@verse.com> wrote: > My mental model of faceted search (likely faulty) has two > requirements: to b 30 Jul 2008 11:03:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3178 On Jul 29, 2008, at 4:33 AM, Andrew Bramble wrote: > A FS class would trawl the index on startup (or even better during > index time and store with t 29 Jul 2008 15:44:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3164 On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:33 AM, Andrew Bramble <bramble.andrew@gmail.com> wrote: > To provide faceted search (FS) capability for KinoSearch (KS) > re 29 Jul 2008 13:53:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3159 Given my head is in this problem space already , I figure there's no harm distilling some thoughts while the ideas are 'fresh'. Forgive me if there a 29 Jul 2008 04:33:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3156 On Jul 25, 2008, at 7:25 PM, hao chen wrote: > After indexing some html files (4.7G), I got a _1.cfs file that is > 8.4G. Is this normal? Probably 26 Jul 2008 01:12:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3128 After indexing some html files (4.7G), I got a _1.cfs file that is 8.4G. Is this normal? I only modified the directory of the sample invindex.plx file 25 Jul 2008 19:25:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3127 On Jul 24, 2008, at 1:20 AM, Riyaad Miller wrote: > Would it be possible to index files and NOT have any clear text > visible in the indexes? No, 24 Jul 2008 14:47:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3123 Hi Marvin I'm using version KinoSearch-0.162 and wondered if the following is possible? Is there anyway one can reduce or totally eliminate the am 24 Jul 2008 01:20:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3122 Ignore this ... should have JFGI properly. On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Andrew Bramble <bramble.andrew@gmail.com> wrote: > Is anybody else seein 23 Jul 2008 19:36:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3120 Is anybody else seeing this from svn trunk ? Fails the following tests with 'symbol lookup error' Failed Test Stat Wstat Total 23 Jul 2008 18:59:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3119 Thanks guys but I'm already past that point. What I've been working on lately is attempting to aggregate data from CPAN and other places into the ind 22 Jul 2008 21:33:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3113 On Jul 21, 2008, at 8:03 AM, Riyaad Miller wrote: > However when doing so for a string of words (eg. $Source = "foo foo > foo blah blah") it return 22 Jul 2008 19:49:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3110 > > also need CPAN::Mini, a POD extractor, etc. I'n fact, for setting up a > bare-bones CPAN search, extracting the desirable data from all those > a 22 Jul 2008 19:42:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3109 On Jul 22, 2008, at 5:57 PM, Justin DeVuyst wrote: > Basically my goal is to make searchable, in one place, everything > known about modules on the C 22 Jul 2008 19:33:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3108 On Jul 22, 2008, at 5:28 PM, Andrew Bramble wrote: > To use the CPAN example again, rather than choosing to search for > "date parser" and license 22 Jul 2008 19:31:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3107 Justin , Plans ? Plans ? I'm still struggling for ideas :) Don't stop on my account. I never finish anythi... KinoSearch was one of several approach 22 Jul 2008 19:11:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3105 Hello, I was playing around with indexing and searching CPAN with KinoSearch recently myself. Could you elaborate on what your plans are? I'd like 22 Jul 2008 17:57:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3103 Hello, After getting useful results and fast with KinoSearch .20 I began looking at ways to narrow results further using field specific refinements. 22 Jul 2008 17:28:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3102 Hi All I'm using KinoSearch-0.162. When doing a search for a single word ($Source), KS returns the correct results. However when doing so for a str 21 Jul 2008 08:03:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3106