Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 25 Nov 2009 04:21:55 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg This change made a big difference for me also thanks. -Dan > Oi, good catch! With one line of code, we see a 10-20% search-time speed > improveme 19 Sep 2008 22:37:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3463 On Sep 19, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Nathan Kurz wrote: > You prompted me to run a few quick tests as well: Great stuff, Nathan. I'd like to move the desi 19 Sep 2008 19:14:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3462 On Sep 19, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Nathan Kurz wrote: > The third thing (tiny, but perhaps easy to fix) is that > Scorepost_read_record is spending 40% of 19 Sep 2008 17:28:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3461 On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com> wrote: > I've now performed the experiment pitting Lucene's TermQuery again 19 Sep 2008 11:25:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3459 Quoting "Marvin Humphrey" <marvin@rectangular.com>: > It would be helpful to see a C stack trace to confirm the suspicion. > If it's the same numbe 19 Sep 2008 03:12:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3458 Quoting "Eric Howe" <eric@pieinsky.ca>: > Henka, what does your schema look like? Do you have any vectorized > fields? I think I came across a simil 19 Sep 2008 00:17:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3457 On Sep 17, 2008, at 1:16 PM, Nathan Kurz wrote: > But since the processing time is > probably close to proportional to the file size, maybe this is w 18 Sep 2008 21:25:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3456 Henka, what does your schema look like? Do you have any vectorized fields? I think I came across a similar issue (but neglected to report it, slip 18 Sep 2008 13:31:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3452 Quoting "Marvin Humphrey" <marvin@rectangular.com>: > Do you recall the last time you updated before r3875? r3875 itself > is definitely not the cu 18 Sep 2008 12:01:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3451 On Sep 18, 2008, at 1:49 AM, Henka wrote: > Revision 3875 consistently fails on an optimize of *one* of my > indexes. Do you recall the last time 18 Sep 2008 07:45:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/kinosearch/discuss/3450