JSager at MSA
Jan 19, 2009, 12:52 PM
Post #5 of 5
(1752 views)
Permalink
|
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ivtv-users-bounces [at] ivtvdriver [mailto:ivtv-users-
> bounces [at] ivtvdriver] On Behalf Of Matthew Daubenspeck
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 1:28 PM
> To: ivtv-users [at] ivtvdriver
> Subject: Re: [ivtv-users] PVR150/PVR250 in same PC
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 04:34:20PM -0700, engage wrote:
> > My understanding is that the PVR150 will produce a zero byte file when
> there
> > is a PVR250 installed in the same PC. So, should I get rid of the PVR150
> and
> > replace it with a PVR250? This would put 2 - PVR250's in the same box.
> Or
> > will I still have a zero byte file size from one of the PVR's? I'm
> planning
> > on putting a HD card in the same box also. Would that be an issue?
>
> Not sure where you are getting that from, I had a 250 and 150 in a
> master and the same setup in a slave backend for years and never had any
> problems whatsoever.
I have had a PVR-350, PVR-250, PVR-150 and PVR-500 in the same backend for
several years as well with no problems. I am also using this machine as a
frontend, but not with the PVR-350's frame buffer. I am currently upgrading
it to an NVidia 8400GS PCI video card. We'll see how well that works out.
> --
> Matthew Daubenspeck
> http://oddprocess.org
>
> Gentoo Linux i686 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz
> 13:27:23 up 11 days, 19:16, 4 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
>
> _______________________________________________
> ivtv-users mailing list
> ivtv-users [at] ivtvdriver
> http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
_______________________________________________
ivtv-users mailing list
ivtv-users [at] ivtvdriver
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
|
