
abaumann at yahoo
Nov 12, 2009, 12:40 AM
Post #4 of 4
(1637 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: ARCH Linux, xorg-server 1.7.1 and ivtvfb
[In reply to]
|
|
--- On Wed, 11/11/09, Andy Walls <awalls [at] radix> wrote: > From: Andy Walls <awalls [at] radix> > Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] ARCH Linux, xorg-server 1.7.1 and ivtvfb > To: "Discussion list for development of the IVTV driver" <ivtv-devel [at] ivtvdriver> > Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2009, 10:08 PM > On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 18:36 +0100, > Andreas Baumann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > Reposting here from 'ivtv-users' (realizing that this > is maybe the better > > place): > > > > > > As ARCH Linux is always bleeding edge things tend to > break sometimes. :-) > > > > I "fixed" the 'xf86-video-ivtvfb' package in the AUR: > > > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23898 > > > > I would be happy to get feedback from people who > actually know how to > > fix this issue properly. I'm not feeling very > comfortable just removing > > the RAC code from the module. > > > Andreas, > > Well, I'm no expert on the ivtvfb driver for X, I can take > a look at it. > > However, right now I just tried to install Fedora 12 Beta > in my machine > with my PVR-350 so I could work on ivtvfb and kernel > 2.6.3[01] problem > reports, but the install just aborted on me. > > I'll try and get to looking at it, but it could be a > while. Is there > any Xorg documentation or mailing list posts > explaining the deprecation > of the RAC calls and any possible replacement mechanism? No, I just found a wiki entry about the VGA arbiter supposed to replace RAC: http://www.x.org/wiki/VgaArbiter Greetings Andreas > > Regards, > Andy > > > Cheers > > > > Andreas > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ivtv-devel mailing list > ivtv-devel [at] ivtvdriver > http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel > _______________________________________________ ivtv-devel mailing list ivtv-devel [at] ivtvdriver http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
|