Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: ivtv: devel

Amplifiers, filters, cable, and PVR-x50's (was Re: Gotta buy a vowel: compiling patched tuner.c - RESOLVED)

 

 

ivtv devel RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


mtdean at thirdcontact

Feb 25, 2005, 7:52 PM

Post #1 of 8 (3804 views)
Permalink
Amplifiers, filters, cable, and PVR-x50's (was Re: Gotta buy a vowel: compiling patched tuner.c - RESOLVED)

David Cain wrote:

> ... I've now accomplished what I set out to do and have UHF channels
> (albeit not channel 69, but since that's UPN here it's no great
> loss... ;)
> ...
> OK, I'm going to go to bed and dream of amplifiers for my poor OTA TV
> signal...

Just thought I'd chime in here with some info I've been meaning to
post. A lot of people--especially those using the LG TAPE (type 47) and
TCL 2002N (type 50) tuners for which I provided the tuner
definitions--have complained of poor picture quality when using the
tuner. After much discussion (i.e. see
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ivtv/devel/16163 for one of many
threads), "remote" testing, and a *lot* of repetition of my assurance
that the tuner definitions are correct according to the tuner
datasheets, I (and, to the best of my knowledge, the others involved in
the discussion) came to the conclusion that the picture quality was a
systemic problem, most likely due to signal quality.

Even so, if your signal quality is poor, there are a lot of things you
can do to enhance it. I set up a Myth box for a friend who has 4
PVR-250's (all with the LG TAPE tuner) and his picture quality improved
from unusable (even with 1 tuner and no splitter) to excellent (better
than he could get with a direct run to a TV)--even on an 8 1/2 foot TV
screen (using a projector--which magnifies the imperfections in the signal).

Shane did a lot of research to figure out how to improve his signal, and
his efforts paid off for him, so I wanted to ensure that others who may
be in a similar situation know there's still hope. Since Shane hasn't
gotten into the IvyTV mailing list, I'm posting the information for
him. I hope others find this information useful, and if anyone has more
to add or corrections/clarifications, please post.

The points listed below should help to improve your signal quality, and,
therefore, your picture quality. Each point will bring varying amounts
of improvement--ranging from not noticeable to "wow" improvements--if
used individually. However, you'll probably get the best improvement
using a combination of suggestions. If you can, I highly recommend
taking all the steps. I had been trying to convince Shane to switch
from his analog cable connection to digital cable or satellite cable
because his picture quality was so much lower than the quality I got
from my satellite receiver with S-Video to the PVR-x50; however, since
making the last of the changes described, I can barely tell a difference
between his picture and mine.

- Ensure you are using good connectors on all cable (including patch
cables). Screw-on connectors are very poor quality and leak a lot of
signal. Crimp-on connectors provide a much better signal with much less
leakage--but only if properly installed (if not properly installed, they
can actually provide more leakage than screw-on connectors). You will
need a good quality (large and heavy) crimper to get a good connection
(check with friends/work/etc. to see if you can borrow one to save you
the $40-$100 for the crimper). Cheap/small/lightweight crimpers
typically cause you to create lower-quality connections than screw-on
connectors would provide. Shane and I replaced all the connectors in
his system (on all cables and patch cables).
- Use RG-6 cable--not RG-59--especially for long runs (greater than
about 20feet). Even better--as long as you're going to the trouble of
replacing the cable--spend a couple extra bucks to get some RG-6
quad-shield cable. Remember, also, that cable quality can also have an
impact (Canare and Belden make good cable, but you might get lucky with
no-name/house brand spools). Since you'll likely buy a spool of cable,
you might as well use the leftovers to make your patch cables from
RG-6. Although it probably won't affect attenuation much for such short
runs, it definitely won't hurt to use RG-6 for these, too.
- Don't over-split the signal. 2-way splitters will attenuate the
signal less than 4-way splitters (about 3.5dB and 7.0-7.5dB
respectively), so choose appropriately. If not using a cable/output,
terminate it. You should be able to make a 5-900MHz splitter work, but
might get better quality from a 5-1000MHz splitter.
- Use an amplifier--especially when using a splitter. The amp
should cover the range from 50MHz to 900MHz at minimum. Anything more
is unlikely to provide any benefit (NTSC uses frequencies up to
806MHz). The amplifier should be connected before anything that can
attenuate the signal--amplify the signal, not the noise. Ideally, it
should be connected directly to the line from the cable company. Since,
in reality, this is seldom possible (lack of power outside, need for an
HPF (see below), etc.), get it as close to the cable company's line as
possible (or, as close to the antenna for those not using cable).
- If you have a cable modem, you may get interference on low
channels when uploading data to the 'net (typically, uploads are at <
54MHz while download is striped in with the channels). If so, you can
get a high-pass filter (HPF) and place a 2-way splitter at the cable
company's line. One side goes to your cable modem and the other to the
HPF. The line from the HPF goes to the amp, then to your PVR's.

Shane's equipment. Note that this is by no means the best equipment
available, but it's working well for him. Some of the equipment he
purchased before doing the research. For other equipment, he chose
"good enough" rather than the best.
- Cable: cheap RG-6 cable (~$30/1000ft spool)
- Connectors: crimp-on connectors connected using the Ideal
Crimpmaster #30-503 (about $30 for the die alone (if you already use the
Crimpmaster for making 10-base T connections) or about $60 for the
die/tool combo). It's not the best on the market, but was about the top
of my price range, and I trusted the quality because I was using the
same tool for making ethernet cables. If you're lucky, you might be
able to find a the tool/die combo for about $30 (I got mine for that
when Home Depot quit carrying them several years ago). Note that it
takes a lot of pressure to crimp an F-Connector and it will hurt your
hands... :) More expensive ones hurt less...
- Amp: cheap Arista 50-900MHz with a variable 30dB gain control.
- Splitter: cheap Arista 5-900MHz 4-way splitter (
http://www.aristagroup.com/Arista_prod/video_cat/video_acc3.htm#a2 ).
- HPF:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=67277&item=5753889145&rd=1&ssPageName=WDVW

All signal levels given in the diagram below are approximate. All are
calculated/guesstimated using approximate expected signal attenuation
for various devices except the level at the entry to the house, which
was obtained by hooking Shane's cable modem directly to the cable
company's line and calling tech support and asking them to query the
modem for signal strength. The cable/connectors are assumed to cause no
attenuation, but in reality the cable alone could cause as much as
7-10dB/100ft. Losses at connectors vary depending on the quality of the
installation of the connector.

Shane's hookup:

cable from (+3.5dB in)
cable co ------> 2-way splitter ------> cable modem
(+3.5dB | (0 dB)
measured) |
v
HPF (0dB)
|
|
v
(-1.25dB in) amplifier (set at ~ +11.75dB)
|
|
v (+7dB in)
(+10.5dB in) 2-way splitter ---------> 4-way splitter
| (0dB out)
|
v (+7dB in)
------ 4-way splitter --------
| | | |
v v v v
PVR-250 PVR-250 PVR-250 PVR-250
(all feeds to PVR-250's at approx 0dB)

The 4-way splitter on the right is to allow Shane to pipe the TV signal
to other rooms in his house. That way, he has the option to hook up
TV's (without having to build more Myth frontends) in other rooms. If
you take it out, you'll get less attenuation, but he has a very clean
signal, even with it there.

Good luck, and HTH.

Mike



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
ivtv-devel mailing list
ivtv-devel[at]lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel


adrianp at broadpark

Feb 26, 2005, 4:01 AM

Post #2 of 8 (3708 views)
Permalink
Re: Amplifiers, filters, cable, and PVR-x50's [In reply to]

>>>>> "Mike" == Michael T Dean <mtdean[at]thirdcontact.com> writes:

Mike> Just thought I'd chime in here with some info I've been
Mike> meaning to post. A lot of people--especially those using

<superb info. snipped>

Thanks Mike and Shane for this excellent info.

Sincerely,

Adrian Phillips

--
Who really wrote the works of William Shakespeare ?
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shakespeare/


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
ivtv-devel mailing list
ivtv-devel[at]lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel


papenfuss at juneau

Feb 26, 2005, 5:20 AM

Post #3 of 8 (3715 views)
Permalink
Re: Amplifiers, filters, cable, and PVR-x50's (was Re: [ivtv-devel] Gotta buy a vowel: compiling patched tuner.c - RESOLVED) [In reply to]

My only question is:
3.5 dB whats? dBm, dBW, dBuV, dBarbitrary_cable_number?

|
\ /

> cable from (+3.5dB in)
> cable co ------> 2-way splitter ------> cable modem
> (+3.5dB | (0 dB)
> measured) |
> v
> HPF (0dB)
> |

...but I'm not one to pick nits... :)

-Cory

*************************************************************************
* Cory Papenfuss *
* Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student *
* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University *
*************************************************************************



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
ivtv-devel mailing list
ivtv-devel[at]lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel


bite-me-spamboy at jimmiedave

Feb 26, 2005, 8:57 AM

Post #4 of 8 (3718 views)
Permalink
Re: Amplifiers, filters, cable, and PVR-x50's (was Re: Gotta buy a vowel: compiling patched tuner.c - RESOLVED) [In reply to]

Excellent information - I agree.

Thought I'd add these points as well:

I purchased and returned a couple amplifiers the other day - one amp for
the antenna end (before any splitters), and another with four outputs (a
"DA" or "Distribution Amplifier") for the entertainment center: the TV, a
couple tuners on the Myth box, and my stereo receiver.

I brought them home and found that the rated bandwidth on the amps cuts off
before they get far into the OTA UHF band. They were apparently designed to
amplify US-Cable only, and not OTA antenna signals.

They went back and I shopped at the local Fry's and found a couple nicer
amps that go up to 900MHz. The Vanco amp that will go at the antenna end
also has a switchable "FM Trap" designed to remove interfering FM radio
signals (which are plunked down in the middle of the US VHF TV band, near
channel 6 - can't remember if they're below or above). The FM trap switch
will stay off on my amp 'cause I want to use the signal for my radio
receiver as well. The Vanco has a pot to adjust gain, maxed on mine.

If you are trying to get a US over-the-air signal and you want to get UHF
channels, you need to check the amp you're buying to make sure it is rated
for up to 900MHz. I was surprised that they were selling amps that wouldn't
do UHF in the US, but they look at me funny these days when I try to buy
stuff for an OTA antenna setup too, so...

I currently have the amp that will eventually go up on the antenna end
(lazy/busy right now) inline at the MythTV input, and it makes a
significant improvement to the quality of the picture. Most UHF channels
went from unusable/crashable to noisy-watchable. The channel I wanted most
(30 - PBS) got the most improvement in the UHF band, which is a great
thing. Channel 69, the top of our local band never did come in (and again,
since that one is UPN, that might just be a great thing too! ;). I expect
further improvement when this amp goes to the head-end and I add some more
gain with the DA at the MythTV end. I'll fine-tune the antenna location and
orientation as well (it's an inside-the-attic mount, and is fighting with
ductwork, pipes and wiring for a clear shot at Atlanta's antenna district).

I haven't gotten around to installing the DA just yet, but wanted to make a
point about that amp as well. Typically, a consumer-level 1-in, 4-out DA
does not have an individual output stage for each of the four outputs.
Instead, it's just an amplifier inline with a four-way splitter. This means
f.e., that if you're using only three of the four outputs, you should
terminate the unused output. You can use a commercial terminator, or solder
up your own out of a small 75-ohm resistor and an F-connector.

My setup when finished will look like this (ASCII art - use monospaced font):

/// ______
| _______________ | |-- PVR-350
|--| antenna amp |--S----/ long cable /----| DA |-- PVR-250 (soon)
--------------- | | |-- VHS deck, TV
| | |-- FM Stereo
Bedroom TV ------

Regarding the quality of the picture from Tuner 47, prior to amplification,
the channels that came in best were VHF 2 and 5. They looked very good
indeed, and wouldn't have required any amplification if that was all I
wanted to look at. Interestingly, the best channels are at the low end, and
channel 69 won't come in at all - maybe we're watching Tuner 47's
performance roll off as frequency increases...

Finally, Thanks Michael for maintaining the definitions on my tuner, and
thanks everyone else working on ivtv!

DC

"Michael T. Dean" wrote:
>David Cain wrote:
>
>> ... I've now accomplished what I set out to do and have UHF channels
>> (albeit not channel 69, but since that's UPN here it's no great
>> loss... ;)
>> ...
>> OK, I'm going to go to bed and dream of amplifiers for my poor OTA TV
>> signal...
>
>Just thought I'd chime in here with some info I've been meaning to
>post. A lot of people--especially those using the LG TAPE (type 47) and
>TCL 2002N (type 50) tuners for which I provided the tuner
>definitions--have complained of poor picture quality when using the
>tuner.

--
--
| http://www.jimmiedave.com/
|
| "Grease is great,
| grease is good,
| let us have some
| on our fo-od"
|
| - Bruce Gibson


mythtv at edsons

Feb 26, 2005, 10:23 AM

Post #5 of 8 (3699 views)
Permalink
Re: Amplifiers, filters, cable, and PVR-x50's (was Re: [ivtv-devel] Gotta buy a vowel: compiling patched tuner.c - RESOLVED) [In reply to]

David Cain wrote:

>
>
> Regarding the quality of the picture from Tuner 47, prior to
> amplification, the channels that came in best were VHF 2 and 5. They
> looked very good indeed, and wouldn't have required any amplification
> if that was all I wanted to look at. Interestingly, the best channels
> are at the low end, and channel 69 won't come in at all - maybe we're
> watching Tuner 47's performance roll off as frequency increases...
>
You're seeing a normal behaviour of any cable system. Attenuation is
frequency dependent, and the higher frequencies have a higher
attenuation. You seem to have a low signal to start with, thus the
higher frequencies are worst hit.

Cheers,

Rudy

P.S. This is also why you should keep satellite cable as short as
possible. DVB-S signals are in the 2-3 GHz range, and cables tend to
have a hight attenuation at those frequencies....


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
ivtv-devel mailing list
ivtv-devel[at]lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel


mtdean at thirdcontact

Feb 27, 2005, 8:12 AM

Post #6 of 8 (3715 views)
Permalink
Re: Re: Amplifiers, filters, cable, and PVR-x50's (was Re: [ivtv-devel] Gotta buy a vowel: compiling patched tuner.c - RESOLVED) [In reply to]

Cory Papenfuss wrote:

> My only question is:
> 3.5 dB whats? dBm, dBW, dBuV, dBarbitrary_cable_number?
>
> |
> \ /
>
>> cable from (+3.5dB in)
>> cable co ------> 2-way splitter ------> cable modem
>> (+3.5dB | (0 dB)
>> measured) |
>> v
>> HPF (0dB)
>> |
>
>
> ...but I'm not one to pick nits... :)

That would be dBarbitrary_cable_number_combined_with_my_ignorance... ;)

The values are probably meaningless (I guess I should have gone farther
than just saying approximate/guesstimate :), but if nothing else should
show that everything connected to the cables (not to mention the cables
themselves) contributes to losses.

Now I guess I have to go look up dBm, dBW, and dBuV... Too much to
learn. To little time. :)

Mike


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
ivtv-devel mailing list
ivtv-devel[at]lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel


bite-me-spamboy at jimmiedave

Feb 27, 2005, 9:02 AM

Post #7 of 8 (3714 views)
Permalink
Re: Re: Amplifiers, filters, cable, and PVR-x50's (was Re: [ivtv-devel] Gotta buy a vowel: compiling patched tuner.c - RESOLVED) [In reply to]

I'm expecting to be schooled here, but if I remember correctly, dB in
isolation is the logarithmic expression of a ratio.

In the case of the 2-way splitter it would refer to the ratio of input
level to level on a given outut from the splitter. No reference level
needed.

However, the "measurement" of the signal from the cable company would have
to be in relation to some reference level. That reference level would be
assumed or calibrated by the test equipment, and may be printed on the unit
someplace.

dBm, dBW, dBµV et al are needed when a specification or measurement is
being compared against an established reference level (i.e. a "+4 dB" line
level input to professional recording equipment is actually +4dBm - a
specific power ratio).

But it's OK to say a splitter costs 3.5 dB - you're describing the ratio of
input signal to output. You can describe it as power or voltage and the
numbers should still add up, at least if the loss is resistive or
distributive in nature.

DC

>Cory Papenfuss wrote:
>
>> My only question is:
>> 3.5 dB whats? dBm, dBW, dBuV, dBarbitrary_cable_number?
>>
>> |
>> \ /
>>
>>> cable from (+3.5dB in)
>>> cable co ------> 2-way splitter ------> cable modem
>>> (+3.5dB | (0 dB)
>>> measured) |
>>> v
>>> HPF (0dB)
>>> |
>>
>>
>> ...but I'm not one to pick nits... :)
>
>That would be dBarbitrary_cable_number_combined_with_my_ignorance... ;)
>
>The values are probably meaningless (I guess I should have gone farther
>than just saying approximate/guesstimate :), but if nothing else should
>show that everything connected to the cables (not to mention the cables
>themselves) contributes to losses.
>
>Now I guess I have to go look up dBm, dBW, and dBuV... Too much to
>learn. To little time. :)
>
>Mike
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
>Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
>Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
>_______________________________________________
>ivtv-devel mailing list
>ivtv-devel[at]lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel

--
--
| http://www.jimmiedave.com/
|
| "Grease is great,
| grease is good,
| let us have some
| on our fo-od"
|
| - Bruce Gibson


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click
_______________________________________________
ivtv-devel mailing list
ivtv-devel[at]lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel


papenfuss at juneau

Feb 27, 2005, 9:46 AM

Post #8 of 8 (3707 views)
Permalink
Re: Re: Amplifiers, filters, cable, and PVR-x50's (was Re: [ivtv-devel] Gotta buy a vowel: compiling patched tuner.c - RESOLVED) [In reply to]

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, David Cain wrote:

> I'm expecting to be schooled here, but if I remember correctly, dB in
> isolation is the logarithmic expression of a ratio.
>
> In the case of the 2-way splitter it would refer to the ratio of input
> level to level on a given outut from the splitter. No reference level
> needed.
>
> However, the "measurement" of the signal from the cable company would have
> to be in relation to some reference level. That reference level would be
> assumed or calibrated by the test equipment, and may be printed on the unit
> someplace.
>
> dBm, dBW, dBµV et al are needed when a specification or measurement is
> being compared against an established reference level (i.e. a "+4 dB" line
> level input to professional recording equipment is actually +4dBm - a
> specific power ratio).
>
> But it's OK to say a splitter costs 3.5 dB - you're describing the ratio of
> input signal to output. You can describe it as power or voltage and the
> numbers should still add up, at least if the loss is resistive or
> distributive in nature.
>
You are correct, and well-said. It's just one of my pet peeves
when someone says, "My wireless card has XXX dB of power output"...
doesn't mean anything since dB is inherently relative. The only number in
the original post that's suspect is the +3.5 "dB" from the cable
company. It should have some sort of reference attached (maybe it's
understood in the cable circle to be dBm or whatever).

Also, the usual definition of the ratio is in terms of the *power*
between the two signals. That's a big point of confusion for EE's first
introduced to dBs... power goes as the *square* of voltage. Thus, voltage
gain formula is 20*log10(Vout/Vin), whereas for power it's
10*log10(Pout/Pin).

Just for the record:
dBW <- Relative to 1.0 Watts
dBm <- Relative to 1.0 milliwatts
dBuV <- Relative to 1.0 microvolt (can't recall if this one is correctly
defined in terms of power or not)

Oh, and for antennas, it's assumed that it's "gain compared to an
isotropic radiator," so saying XX dB gain for an antenna is acceptable.

-Cory

*************************************************************************
* Cory Papenfuss *
* Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student *
* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University *
*************************************************************************

ivtv devel RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact lists@gossamer-threads.com
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.