Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 13 Feb 2012 03:38:32 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Please ignore 20 Sep 2007 03:55:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69120 * liran tal wrote, On 19/09/07 15:05: > Hey everyone, > > What can be attributed as the cause for the problem of not performing an > NAT/Masquerade? 20 Sep 2007 03:51:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69122 gmane has picked up the new lists, marc.info probably also (if not it will soon), so effective immediately, I'm disabling subscriptions and postings t 20 Sep 2007 03:51:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69121 Steven Van Acker wrote: > [...] > Moreover, if there is an error in iptables-restore, none of the changes > are committed to kernelspace. So I no long 19 Sep 2007 08:05:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69116 On Sep 18 2007 11:53, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >Mhh .. but do we have to handle this in the kernel? Instead >of: > >+ if (info->time_start < info 19 Sep 2007 07:32:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69114 Hey everyone, What can be attributed as the cause for the problem of not performing an NAT/Masquerade? This is a basic scenario where a computer on t 19 Sep 2007 07:05:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69112 Martin Josefsson wrote: > On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Martin Josefsson wrote: > >> Here's a small patch that reworks the iptables/ip6tables error >> reporti 19 Sep 2007 05:56:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69110 Jan Engelhardt wrote: > warning: format '%ld' expects type 'long int', but argument 3 has type 'int'. > > Oh well, oh well. Patch below. > === > > 19 Sep 2007 05:52:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69111 Hi, Jseper: I have a problem which you have solved. Error:Couldn't load target 'standard': /lib/iptc/iptables/libipt_standard.so:undefined symbol: r 19 Sep 2007 00:51:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69113 I have some quesions about address multicasting through NAT server using iptables. 1 Does NAT server allow address multicasting ? 2 if does allow, 19 Sep 2007 00:43:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69115 On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 11:53:57AM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > Conclusion: It is not really a race, it just depends on w 18 Sep 2007 04:42:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69098 Just a reminder, the netfilter and netfilter-devel lists have moved to kernel.org, you can subscribe to the new lists at http://vger.kernel.org/vger- 18 Sep 2007 04:35:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69102 Pascal Hambourg wrote: > Hello, > > Patrick McHardy a écrit : > >> >> The cross-subscription appears to work, unfortunately (due to the >> subscribe 18 Sep 2007 04:25:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69101 David Miller wrote: > From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> > Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:47:34 +0200 > > >>Any better ideas or suggestions? > > > 18 Sep 2007 04:23:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69103 Thomas Graf wrote: > * Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> 2007-09-17 13:47 > >>Patrick McHardy wrote: >> >>>netfilter-devel cross-subscription test, p 18 Sep 2007 04:21:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69104 Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Sep 17 2007 15:54, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >>>+++ linux-2.6.23/include/linux/netfilter/xt_time.h >>>@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ >>>+ 18 Sep 2007 02:53:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69096 Hi, On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Dong_Wei wrote: > When I tested 2.6.20.16, found something strange. The following is the test > case: > 1. Establish a co 18 Sep 2007 02:05:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69095 Hi, On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Dong_Wei wrote: > When I tested 2.6.20.16, found something strange. The following is the test > case: > 1. Establish a co 18 Sep 2007 02:05:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69118 Hi, all. When I tested 2.6.20.16, found something strange. The following is the test case: 1. Establish a connection between client and server [.C 17 Sep 2007 18:43:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69094 Part 2/2. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:13:55 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Netfilter Developer Mailing List <netfilter-devel@ 17 Sep 2007 10:57:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69092 I guess these mails don't make it to the old list anymore :p ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:01:43 +0200 (CEST) Cc: 17 Sep 2007 10:57:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69093 From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:47:34 +0200 > Any better ideas or suggestions? Just don't forward, and every few d 17 Sep 2007 10:13:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69085 From: Maximilian Wilhelm <max@rfc2324.org> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:06:49 +0200 > What about moving all subscriptions We decided not to do this, an 17 Sep 2007 10:10:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69086 Am Monday, den 17 September hub Patrick McHardy folgendes in die Tasten: > Patrick McHardy wrote: > > netfilter-devel cross-subscription test, please 17 Sep 2007 10:06:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69091 * Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> 2007-09-17 13:47 > Patrick McHardy wrote: > > netfilter-devel cross-subscription test, please ignore > > > The c 17 Sep 2007 08:30:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69087 Hello, Patrick McHardy a écrit : > > The cross-subscription appears to work, unfortunately (due to the > subscriber-only posting settings of the old 17 Sep 2007 08:23:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69083 netfilter list is kinda slow... On Sep 17 2007 17:01, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >>> + u_int32_t monthdays_match; >>> + u_int16_t time_start; >>> + 17 Sep 2007 08:13:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69080 On Sep 17 2007 15:54, Patrick McHardy wrote: >Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> ipt_time from POM-ng augmented by: >> >> * xtables >> * ipv6 support > >I be 17 Sep 2007 08:01:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69081 Robbie Dinn wrote: > /Lurk mode off/ > Replying off list because this might be stupid/irrelevant/off topic. It was on-list but I prefer to keep the 17 Sep 2007 07:08:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69090 Jan Engelhardt wrote: > ipt_time from POM-ng augmented by: > > * xtables > * ipv6 support I bet this was tricky :) > * day-of-month support (fo 17 Sep 2007 06:54:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69088 SEBASTIEN LEGER wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to develop a queue handler using netfilter and > iptables mangling to catch all data coming in and out of 17 Sep 2007 06:43:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69082 Eric Leblond wrote: > Hello, > > The following patch fixes the handling of netlink packets containing > multiple messages. > > As exposed during net 17 Sep 2007 06:41:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69089 /Lurk mode off/ Replying off list because this might be stupid/irrelevant/off topic. Patrick McHardy wrote: > Patrick McHardy wrote: >> netfilter-dev 17 Sep 2007 06:41:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69084 Patrick McHardy wrote: > netfilter-devel cross-subscription test, please ignore The cross-subscription appears to work, unfortunately (due to the su 17 Sep 2007 04:47:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69075 netfilter-devel cross-subscription test, please ignore - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a m 17 Sep 2007 04:35:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69079 Hi, I am developping an application that uses libnfconntrack. I currently try to get the ipv6 addresses from a conntrack. However it seems it is no 17 Sep 2007 00:58:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69074 > Hi!: > > I tried to find a photo to put the names but I didn't find any photo to edit > ... > > Jorge Dávila. > http://nfws.inl.fr/en/wp-content/u 15 Sep 2007 10:46:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69061 > Hi!: > > I tried to find a photo to put the names but I didn't find any photo to edit > ... > > Jorge Dávila. > http://nfws.inl.fr/en/wp-content/u 15 Sep 2007 10:46:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69071 libipt_time from POM-ng, augmented by: * day-of-month support (for example "match on the 15th of each month") * inversion support for --weekdays an 15 Sep 2007 10:41:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69065 On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 11:03:08AM -0600, Jorge Davila wrote: > Hi!: > > I tried to find a photo to put the names but I didn't find any photo to > ed 15 Sep 2007 10:40:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69063 On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 11:03:08AM -0600, Jorge Davila wrote: > Hi!: > > I tried to find a photo to put the names but I didn't find any photo to > ed 15 Sep 2007 10:40:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69072 Hi!: I tried to find a photo to put the names but I didn't find any photo to edit ... Jorge Dávila. On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:37:45 +0200 Harald W 15 Sep 2007 10:03:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69062 From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:40:13 +0200 > Soyoung Park should also be on there next to Dave, but she seems to b 15 Sep 2007 09:13:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69058 For 2.6.24. Please comment, thanks! === ipt_time from POM-ng augmented by: * xtables * ipv6 support * day-of-month support (for example "match 15 Sep 2007 09:07:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69059 On Sep 10 2007 12:39, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >On Sep 10 2007 12:33, Patrick McHardy wrote: >>Jan Engelhardt wrote: >>> On Sep 10 2007 11:18, Patrick Mc 15 Sep 2007 08:28:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69057 Harald Welte wrote: > I don't have an annotated photo, but maybe somebody wants to make one > using the following data: > > (all from left to right) 15 Sep 2007 03:40:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69052 On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 07:09:21PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Sep 13 2007 18:42, Harald Welte wrote: > > > >testing the new debian based lis 15 Sep 2007 03:04:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69053 On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:30:48PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Sep 12 2007 12:36, Patrick McHardy wrote: > > The netfilter and netfilter-deve 15 Sep 2007 02:37:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69055 On Sep 13 2007 18:42, Harald Welte wrote: > >testing the new debian based list setup the lists move anyway and shortly before, it got converted to de 13 Sep 2007 10:09:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69049 testing the new debian based list setup -- - Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> http://netfilter.org/ ============================ 13 Sep 2007 09:42:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69050 Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > This patch adds support to relate a connection to an existing master > connection. This patch is used by conntrackd to corr 13 Sep 2007 08:49:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69048 This patch adds support to relate a connection to an existing master connection. This patch is used by conntrackd to correctly replicate related conne 13 Sep 2007 08:47:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69047 Hi, I'm trying to develop a queue handler using netfilter and iptables mangling to catch all data coming in and out of my network card. I'm using a h 13 Sep 2007 06:20:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69077 Am Donnerstag, den 13.09.2007, 09:37 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Classen: > I would also suggest to remove TTL handling completly and already did > so. Fi 13 Sep 2007 02:59:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69041 Am Donnerstag, den 30.08.2007, 09:00 +0200 schrieb Patrick Schaaf: > > * RETURN: -1 if an error occured > > * 1 if the packet was succesful 13 Sep 2007 00:37:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69040 On Sep 12 2007 12:36, Patrick McHardy wrote: > The netfilter and netfilter-devel mailinglists are moving > to kernel.org, you can subscribe to the new 12 Sep 2007 11:30:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69038 Hi! There will be an administrative downtime of pracitcally all netfilter.org services during the next couple of days (thursday/friday). I don't real 12 Sep 2007 08:37:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69036 From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:41:45 +0200 > This change allows the generic attribute interface to be used within > the 12 Sep 2007 05:45:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69031 This change allows the generic attribute interface to be used within the netfilter subsystem where this flag was initially introduced. The byte-order 12 Sep 2007 05:41:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69032 The netfilter and netfilter-devel mailinglists are moving to kernel.org, you can subscribe to the new lists at: http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.htm 12 Sep 2007 03:36:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69029 The netfilter and netfilter-devel mailinglists are moving to kernel.org, you can subscribe to the new lists at: http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.htm 12 Sep 2007 03:36:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69035 From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 00:20:41 +0200 (MEST) > [NETFILTER]: Fix/improve deadlock condition on module removal 11 Sep 2007 02:29:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69019 From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 00:20:39 +0200 (MEST) > [NETFILTER]: nf_conntrack_ipv4: fix "Frag of proto ..." messag 11 Sep 2007 02:27:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69018 On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Martin Josefsson wrote: > Here's a small patch that reworks the iptables/ip6tables error reporting a > bit. The purpose of this 11 Sep 2007 01:42:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69017 On Sep 10 2007 12:33, Patrick McHardy wrote: >Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> On Sep 10 2007 11:18, Patrick McHardy wrote: >>> >>>I just noticed the u32 exte 10 Sep 2007 03:39:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69013 Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Sep 10 2007 11:18, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >>Hi Jan, >> >>I just noticed the u32 extension is missing from iptables. >>Co 10 Sep 2007 03:33:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69012 On Sep 10 2007 11:18, Patrick McHardy wrote: >Hi Jan, > >I just noticed the u32 extension is missing from iptables. >Could you send me your latest ver 10 Sep 2007 03:28:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69011 [NETFILTER]: Fix/improve deadlock condition on module removal netfilter So I've had a deadlock reported to me. I've found that the sequence of event 09 Sep 2007 15:20:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69010 [NETFILTER]: nf_conntrack_ipv4: fix "Frag of proto ..." messages Since we're now using a generic tuple decoding function in ICMP connection tracking, 09 Sep 2007 15:20:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69009 Hi Dave, these patches fix an incorrect warning message in IPv4 connection tracking and the module unload deadlock notices by Neil Horman. Please ap 09 Sep 2007 15:20:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69008 You wrote: > I see now how vBE trees can achieve O(log log N) (after reading the > wikipedia article). The tree is actually a trie, where each next la 09 Sep 2007 15:12:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69007 On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 12:45:48AM +0200, Thomas Heinz wrote: > Hi Steven Hi Thomas! :) > You wrote: > > In HIPAC, all rules are stored in a trie i 08 Sep 2007 11:16:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69004 On Sep 8 2007 13:28, Steven Van Acker wrote: > >it's remarkable that we have never tried it this way before. >I tested adding 10000 lines with iptable 08 Sep 2007 06:59:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69003 On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 09:26:09AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >iptables-restore takes a file as input, not a series of iptables > >commands. > > 08 Sep 2007 06:28:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69002 On Sep 7 2007 19:06, Steven Van Acker wrote: >> > The result is that for 1 minute, some traffic can get through the firewall rules >> > while other ca 08 Sep 2007 00:26:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/69000 Hi Steven You wrote: > In HIPAC, all rules are stored in a trie indexed by specifier. By > walking down such a trie given e.g. an IP address, all rul 07 Sep 2007 15:45:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68994 Steven Van Acker wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 08:46:42PM +0200, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote: > >>> The result is that for 1 minute, some traffic c 07 Sep 2007 14:09:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68993 On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 08:46:42PM +0200, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote: > > The result is that for 1 minute, some traffic can get through the firewall rul 07 Sep 2007 12:06:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68992 Am Friday, den 7 September hub Steven Van Acker folgendes in die Tasten: Hi! > I've been thinking about some kind of namespaces in iptables where o 07 Sep 2007 11:46:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68991 Hi again, I've been thinking about some kind of namespaces in iptables where one can switch from one set of rules to another set of rules by flickin 07 Sep 2007 11:02:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68990 On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 12:57:16PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > We're holding the netfilter workshop next week, and one of the > topics will be a p 07 Sep 2007 04:44:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68989 Steven Van Acker wrote: > Hi, > > I'm a user of nf-HIPAC (http://www.hipac.org) and I've tried to monitor it's > progress into the main kernel tree. 07 Sep 2007 03:57:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68988 Hi, I'm a user of nf-HIPAC (http://www.hipac.org) and I've tried to monitor it's progress into the main kernel tree. Unfortunately, the work on nf-HI 07 Sep 2007 02:09:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68987 On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 09:35:32AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 08:55 -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 05:39 06 Sep 2007 08:40:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68980 On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 08:55 -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 05:39:11PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 15:27 - 06 Sep 2007 06:35:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68976 On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 05:39:11PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 15:27 -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > > > Now, I suppose its possibl 06 Sep 2007 05:55:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68975 Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Sep 5 2007 17:30, Sirine Chaitou wrote: > >>Hello, >>I need to see a traffic flowing between two nodes over >>a serial por 06 Sep 2007 04:31:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68974 On Sep 5 2007 17:30, Sirine Chaitou wrote: >Hello, >I need to see a traffic flowing between two nodes over >a serial port /dev/ttyS0. The log files sh 06 Sep 2007 04:21:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68973 On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 12:33:52PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Neil Horman wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 02:13:26AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrot 06 Sep 2007 04:08:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68972 Neil Horman wrote: > On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 02:13:26AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > >>On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 17:22 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> 06 Sep 2007 03:33:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68971 Laszlo Attila Toth wrote: > I made a new patch for connrate: it was not optional (not tested) and > wasn't in the Makefile's PF_EXT_SLIB: line. It is 06 Sep 2007 02:56:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68958 On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 08:41 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 16:26 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 16:30 -0400, 05 Sep 2007 17:58:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68970 On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 05:39:11PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 15:27 -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > > > Now, I suppose its possibl 05 Sep 2007 17:17:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68969 On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 16:26 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 16:30 -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > > > 2nd of two patches. This pat 05 Sep 2007 15:41:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68957 On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 15:27 -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > Now, I suppose its possible that I've not been looking at the right source tree > when doing 05 Sep 2007 14:39:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68968 On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 06:51 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 15:27 -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 03:41:37AM 05 Sep 2007 13:59:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68967 On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 15:27 -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 03:41:37AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > > You have this backwards 05 Sep 2007 13:51:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68956 On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 16:30 -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > 2nd of two patches. This patch enhances modprobe to operate like rmmod > in non-blocki 05 Sep 2007 13:26:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68966 On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 15:27 -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > Now, I suppose its possible that I've not been looking at the right source tree > when doing 05 Sep 2007 13:17:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68965 On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 03:41:37AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 13:08 -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 02: 05 Sep 2007 12:27:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/iptables/devel/68964