sandals at crustytoothpaste
Jan 31, 2012, 5:20 PM
Post #4 of 4
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:23:25PM +0000, MFPA wrote:
Re: [META] please start To: with email@example.com, i.e.:
[In reply to]
> On Monday 30 January 2012 at 7:06:43 PM, in
> <mid:20120130190643.GB184889 [at] crustytoothpaste>, brian m.
> carlson wrote:
> > The problem is that unlike regular list messages, the
> > dupes don't come with the list headers, which makes
> > sorting them based on the list headers problematic.
> The group's email address gnupg-users [at] gnupg usually appears in the
> To: or CC: field of the duplicate message. Why not filter/sort on
> that and catch most of them?
Because that means that instead of using one procmail rule to autosort
all mailing lists I have to write one for every list I might subscribe
to. This is error-prone and defeats the purpose of using a generic tool
to do repetitive tasks easily. Most mailing lists have a List-ID header
for this purpose. Majordomo lists use a different convention which is
also easily sorted on.
Also, when I'm subscribed to a mailing list, I expect people to post
their replies to the list unless there's a personal reply that is not
appropriate for the list. For lists that require subscriptions, that
means that it's guaranteed that everybody will get a copy, which is the
point of a mailing list. Why intentionally send me an extra? Who wants
two copies of an email?
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187