
michel.villeneuve at gmail
Nov 13, 2009, 3:03 PM
Post #4 of 5
(715 views)
Permalink
|
Firstly, by "supported" I mean, if it becomes a standard communication tool, could creation of key process be modified (name, email adress, comment => name wave adress comment), because I understood that an email adress cannot be a wave adress. Is there deep technical issus there or just a matter of vocabulary ? Secondly, > Say, if you (let's call A) start conversation with someone, B. In this > case, it wouldn't be too much of problem communicating using OpenPGP. > Then what happens if person C is added in the middle of conversation? > C wouldn't be able to decipher anything prior to his/her joining as > messages are not encrypted for C. Adding a participant to a wavelate means to me that the wavelet has to be reencrypted by adding C's public key ... but I'm not a tech expert so It might be silly ... -- Michel Villeneuve _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users [at] gnupg http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
|