Mailing List Archive: GnuPG: users

1.4.7 packages for OS X

1 2

View All

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

rjh at sixdemonbag

Mar 6, 2007, 7:06 AM

Post #1 of 32 (1895 views)
Permalink

1.4.7 packages for OS X

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

I've taken the liberty of packaging up 1.4.7 for OS X. (I apologize
to Benjamin if I'm stepping on his toes here; by my recollection,
he's doing packages for 2.0.x, not 1.4.x, so I _should_ be safe.)

They haven't been tested broadly, but so far they've worked on every
system I've thrown them at (five machines, a smattering of Intel and
PowerPC).

Please note that these packages include IDEA support, which may
(depending on your jurisdiction) give you some patent troubles.
Please be responsible and download in accordance with your region's
laws and the GNU GPL, and please only use IDEA for reading existing
messages and not for creating new ones.

Packages:

http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-PowerPC.dmg
http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-i386.dmg

Signatures for the two packages can be found at:

http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-PowerPC.dmg.asc
http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-i386.dmg

Clearly, GnuPG.org is the appropriate site to refer people to for
source code. However, to keep everything according to Hoyle, source
code is also available from:

http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/gnupg-1.4.7.tar.bz2
http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/idea.c.gz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJF7YOPAAoJELcA9IL+r4EJDuoIAOP5dZnUCcXg62rqMcMyoOkS
RCiGIy3NGy5q4Y3nTalvScrdI08sjcP3+tlTFIu8+EMnd9iZMhdc1BEH7Pe6tADL
jVt34j4sloYVYfa5o58/gaKG3Y/3d9g/yMrfEhIq3pMC/khGiEAXboOg5LkA8dDG
b2WeplsiUWXfKKi1vZ7cwiQ7dyqV5AAltqM8JJ8rliIobthcAXHIE8BeNA8dDmhD
HAp+O7QF/vf2uMSSVuWQ7g6W30EVzp7UXbJf2YrXdrGQ/JFx5DzH6+gpCvJW5abV
mI8Ym9PT2hWjKMEgXTvyUdP/QEh9i4MKam+CTcA0BjYWwd7zAC5N2+VaCXT/oLQ=
=Ev4J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

reynt0 at cs

Mar 6, 2007, 5:51 PM

Post #2 of 32 (1866 views)
Permalink

Re: 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

With full appreciation for your and everyone's work,
could I ask that, when posting, people be specific
which OSX they are talking about? I'm still looking
for an easy way to get the latest gnupg but for
OS 10.3.9, not OS 10.4.x. That is, a way which
doesn't involve having to install extraneous software
with its extra level of trust (eg Fink); and which
also avoids the Apple trend to asserting Micro$oft-like
control over users' computers
(cf eg <http://www.eulascan.com/product.aspx?pid=22> and
the links there, about 10.4, and one fears, 10.5 too);
and which also I can summarize in a "HowTo" recipe that
I can then use to distribute to academic and scientific
users who need to start using encryption and IMHO should
be encouraged to use open source.

Sorry for being wordy.

On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Robert J. Hansen wrote:

> I've taken the liberty of packaging up 1.4.7 for OS X. (I apologize
> to Benjamin if I'm stepping on his toes here; by my recollection,
> he's doing packages for 2.0.x, not 1.4.x, so I _should_ be safe.)
. . .

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

rjh at sixdemonbag

Mar 6, 2007, 8:17 PM

Post #3 of 32 (1855 views)
Permalink

Re: 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

> With full appreciation for your and everyone's work,
> could I ask that, when posting, people be specific
> which OSX they are talking about?

Tiger has been out for two years now; I think it's reasonable to
think that, unless specified otherwise, software will be targeting
Tiger.

> I'm still looking for an easy way to get the latest
> gnupg but for OS 10.3.9, not OS 10.4.x.

Unfortunately, I can't help you.

I would also recommend switching to one of the free Unices if you
don't want to upgrade to 10.4 or 10.5. Once 10.5 comes out, 10.3
will probably be EOLed and there will be no further security
updates. Please give serious thought to either (a) migrating to a
free UNIX or (b) upgrading to 10.4/10.5.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJF7jznAAoJELcA9IL+r4EJqYoH/170XHe+wl4PrrhBBi3cXm8R
XbWsjDqABTPh5yA7qfchaYFVj7jxzp6mv1G7m471qfIWGNdVsfvT+8bxP9MiL96h
guC2C6uv45vRDsOSif54F5LQIwJ1zx9Agaiu3C/k5OpuyALlTrpqJKYwQueTWX82
BneejqLUwYbTGDPOxZR7V0Q3mvBV50PyIPUmfoqRPMo5uJ/eH3iyalImNkCxmzns
ZrOD1t6IwZGyLQgOGOYYejrvk2yt9RPcgAHXGpsBkacfpHRtpLW9e+CzpV6EEgaV
BEkHobo51GsOiXympmnBwyfty4jG/VNS1wDIOtuvdWK+1zumGrjL8XC1qbh8CvE=
=JbXx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

shavital at mac

Mar 7, 2007, 2:55 AM

Post #4 of 32 (1860 views)
Permalink

Re: 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

reynt0 wrote the following on 3/7/07 3:51 AM:
[...]

> I'm still looking
> for an easy way to get the latest gnupg but for
> OS 10.3.9, not OS 10.4.x.

[...]

At <http://macgpg.sourceforge.net/>, please scroll down to 'Files"
where you will find:

For Mac OS X 10.3.x
1.4.1, MD5: f4eb3c7d233e18fd1bf56d6bb576bbd9
Detached Sig

GnuPG 1.4.1 can be downloaded from the hyperlink as a .dmg binary installer.

I can't remember whether or which security problems 1.4.1 comported, but
you will find complementary information in that site.

All the above, until or if you decide to upgrade from 10.3.9.

Charly

Charly

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: GnuPG for Privacy
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQEVAwUBRe6aHM3GMi2FW4PvAQjIuwf/VzglXbC0/gg5I3EGU4//8RHn/PZh42lA
i2P0fuTvYK4XMb1KEBz+tBdDbXRFin98w2SRoWkyDtUCrvY2DdflRtvmcwUGSt5l
CWIyIw4B1ijRYQIFenEppug63R+Wq1XZRM1lPLHDYeq/wWFAwzZP7iar9tKEjOtv
fl90YByeQw5DSllJVXD1R+QueVaBPlQA1/CkBCIBqYB771TsLsXQPFSkPBgg6s+W
D7R3irNcsvsqZbvJ0gIIlZnygLmA9MhhqQCv1I1LTUzMIjgM4EyhdJHdSbRvt9uN
gS7dEvi1fAzUHgciNXZzQwbNP0RJuNBjdTtKW/0xKAUdVk5f5hFCtg==
=KqVh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

benjamin at py-soft

Mar 7, 2007, 3:11 AM

Post #5 of 32 (1854 views)
Permalink

Re: 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> I've taken the liberty of packaging up 1.4.7 for OS X.

Take a look at the macgpg project at http://macgpg.sourceforge.net/

> (I apologize to Benjamin if I'm stepping on his toes here; by my recollection,
> he's doing packages for 2.0.x, not 1.4.x, so I _should_ be safe.)

I've packaged up 1.4.5 and 1.4.6 and was looking at getting 1.4.7 done
asap, but you may have saved me the trouble! :)

As for the 2.x branch, there hasn't been enough interest for me to
devote considerable amounts of my time to getting it packaged up.

> Packages:
> http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-PowerPC.dmg
> http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-i386.dmg

Join macgpg and we'll show you how to make universal binaries.

Ben

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

swelter at mus

Mar 7, 2007, 6:11 AM

Post #6 of 32 (1854 views)
Permalink

Re: [Macgpg-users] 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

(Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:55:28PM +0200) Charly Avital wrote/schrieb/egrapse:
> I can't remember whether or which security problems 1.4.1 comported, but
> you will find complementary information in that site.

Since we've just had a security related update to 1.4.6 and a security
related update to 1.4.7, I'd be hesitant to use or recommend 1.4.1.

> All the above, until or if you decide to upgrade from 10.3.9.

There are Macs that can't upgrade beyond 10.3.9 and that will still work
fine with that system for many years to come.

Myself I tend to compile gnupg anyway, which IIRC never was much of a
problem on 10.3.9 anyway. But I understand that some people don't have
the knowledge or confidence to do that.

Regards,

Sascha

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

rjh at sixdemonbag

Mar 7, 2007, 9:29 AM

Post #7 of 32 (1855 views)
Permalink

Re: 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

> I've packaged up 1.4.5 and 1.4.6 and was looking at getting 1.4.7 done
> asap, but you may have saved me the trouble! :)

Thank you for being gracious. :)

I updated the packages (very slightly) to install into /usr/local,
instead of /usr. It seems to be a tradeoff--while I know a few OS X
users who have (for reasons inscrutable to me) elected to remove /usr/
local from their PATH, there are a fair number of OS X crypto apps
hardwired to expect it in /usr/local. Mulberry, GPGMail, etc.

The original links still work; they point to non-IDEA-enabled
builds. For completeness' sake, the links are all listed here:

http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-PowerPC-IDEA.dmg
http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-PowerPC.dmg
http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-i386-IDEA.dmg
http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-i386.dmg

Signatures are available at:

http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-PowerPC-IDEA.dmg.asc
http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-PowerPC.dmg.asc
http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-i386-IDEA.dmg.asc
http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-i386.dmg.asc

Warning: these packages still have not been extensively tested.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJF7vZzAAoJELcA9IL+r4EJe8wH/35U9JN32iHDdGRX9Z6I1LOy
Yeelk1QHPD/QAGMMC+4FTg3v442v4vFQxapYjVAcBJsD0hoBzpKVSQEAH1JqzVc7
1VkAcDGrdCRSYKGovOXhcv/T4bltsGUOV0NlbBX8rz1vX75Pt1UCOZsLUo0TAD7a
EtqrpSN7WlD1MjbxJXrlvJ4lWKaLUL0inmD6IG8v/XPhK6N+K2MMpbslwvorsA5d
q1+8ic5M5g1kaQDwzkFs0r5CBP2QA8F4zIW6VPNAJFswWtbHTuUR4hL5K8mtCNRN
m1Gi/An4P7h2eKurKwcmuGqdCtXl9E5zpatOGuLnsLPXq5uybMDN63dhRWtd9UI=
=3E8Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

shavital at mac

Mar 7, 2007, 9:35 AM

Post #8 of 32 (1869 views)
Permalink

Re: [Macgpg-users] 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

Sascha Welter wrote the following on 3/7/07 4:11 PM:
> (Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:55:28PM +0200) Charly Avital wrote/schrieb/egrapse:
>> I can't remember whether or which security problems 1.4.1 comported, but
>> you will find complementary information in that site.
>
> Since we've just had a security related update to 1.4.6 and a security
> related update to 1.4.7, I'd be hesitant to use or recommend 1.4.1.

Quite, but later versions of gnupg, as far as I have read, are not
compatible with OS X 10.3.9.

See MacGPG's web site <http://macgpg.sourceforge.net/>, where different
versions of GnuPG are posted for OS 10.1.x, 10.2.x, 10.3.x, and now 10.4.x.

Apparently the "last" GnuPG version for 10.3.9 is 1.4.1. For better or
for worse.

>
>> All the above, until or if you decide to upgrade from 10.3.9.
>
> There are Macs that can't upgrade beyond 10.3.9 and that will still work
> fine with that system for many years to come.

I also have a G3 iMac, running 10.3.9, works fine.

I have even a venerable 1998 vintage Wallstreet, where I succeeded to
install Panther, but that was a long time ago.

>
> Myself I tend to compile gnupg anyway, which IIRC never was much of a
> problem on 10.3.9 anyway. But I understand that some people don't have
> the knowledge or confidence to do that.

Till now, I have compiled gnupg from source. I don't have the
knowledge, I follow the instructions set in MacGPG's web site. If or
when something goes wrong, I ask questions, get answers (most of the
time), and try to remedy. Call that confidence? I don't know.

I only know it has worked till now, including GnuPG 2.0.2

Charly

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

rjh at sixdemonbag

Mar 7, 2007, 9:50 AM

Post #9 of 32 (1856 views)
Permalink

Re: [Macgpg-users] 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

> Why isn't this application packaged like normal OS X apps in an
> application bundle? Why the Unix(Linux) bundling and installing?

Usually, these "normal" OS X apps are Cocoa apps. If it has a nifty-
keen GUI on it, odds are good that it's a Cocoa app and is thus
packaged as a .app. But otherwise, odds are good that it's a regular
UNIX utility and will be packaged like a regular UNIX utility.

For instance, the Apple Developer Tools are packaged both like .apps
and like regular UNIX utilities. XCode is a Cocoa apps, and as such,
it's packaged as a .app. But Apple's C compiler is a regular UNIX
utility, and as such, it's packaged as /usr/bin/gcc.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJF7vt6AAoJELcA9IL+r4EJmokIAMxwltRifxUIuVfQ7IKcKmiQ
uZaIetXMFswVDupBqI5QvCj1tapyQYIdyfrnTaB8vWrJmsDlQsPA3MrZE8OhRbVW
lrqmOhbWD4wSTd4+7FqI+K5VEhmaSCo4Rf9F6iXdOiKB0p4FKodgWOsdUvNsCLFk
sVpuIzr7XYynqX03rtN30pQRZXl8yVhic9gBQx34S+7y50e8GriHmshAJYaMe779
bIesznJNxNRX4bQ8XjsRGuAZV6aqI2OCKvwlNqge1xJVrWu4tLtn6eCjEvUGj650
2cxMEWXCLw+9x5SwzwKCK4j7MeIlU/6cPvXySSvF4fowv2mB4HLMM2zni03RGvM=
=OW5W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

dshaw at jabberwocky

Mar 7, 2007, 10:08 AM

Post #10 of 32 (1851 views)
Permalink

Re: [Macgpg-users] 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 07:35:57PM +0200, Charly Avital wrote:
> Sascha Welter wrote the following on 3/7/07 4:11 PM:
> > (Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:55:28PM +0200) Charly Avital wrote/schrieb/egrapse:
> >> I can't remember whether or which security problems 1.4.1 comported, but
> >> you will find complementary information in that site.
> >
> > Since we've just had a security related update to 1.4.6 and a security
> > related update to 1.4.7, I'd be hesitant to use or recommend 1.4.1.
>
> Quite, but later versions of gnupg, as far as I have read, are not
> compatible with OS X 10.3.9.

Do you mean binary releases from somewhere or building your own? If
you're building your own, this is not the case, or at least, should
not be the case. If compiling 1.4.7 on Panther doesn't work, report
it as a bug. I will fix it.

David

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

ryan.lamothe at quantumworx

Mar 7, 2007, 10:36 AM

Post #11 of 32 (1849 views)
Permalink

Re: [Macgpg-users] 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Why isn't this application packaged like normal OS X apps in an
application bundle? Why the Unix(Linux) bundling and installing?

On Mar 7, 2007, at 12:29 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
>> I've packaged up 1.4.5 and 1.4.6 and was looking at getting 1.4.7
>> done
>> asap, but you may have saved me the trouble! :)
>
> Thank you for being gracious. :)
>
> I updated the packages (very slightly) to install into /usr/local,
> instead of /usr. It seems to be a tradeoff--while I know a few OS X
> users who have (for reasons inscrutable to me) elected to remove /usr/
> local from their PATH, there are a fair number of OS X crypto apps
> hardwired to expect it in /usr/local. Mulberry, GPGMail, etc.
>
> The original links still work; they point to non-IDEA-enabled
> builds. For completeness' sake, the links are all listed here:
>
> http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-PowerPC-IDEA.dmg
> http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-PowerPC.dmg
> http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-i386-IDEA.dmg
> http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-i386.dmg
>
> Signatures are available at:
>
> http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-PowerPC-IDEA.dmg.asc
> http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-PowerPC.dmg.asc
> http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-i386-IDEA.dmg.asc
> http://rjhansen.cs.uiowa.edu/~rjh/GnuPG-1.4.7-i386.dmg.asc
>
> Warning: these packages still have not been extensively tested.
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
>
> iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJF7vZzAAoJELcA9IL+r4EJe8wH/35U9JN32iHDdGRX9Z6I1LOy
> Yeelk1QHPD/QAGMMC+4FTg3v442v4vFQxapYjVAcBJsD0hoBzpKVSQEAH1JqzVc7
> 1VkAcDGrdCRSYKGovOXhcv/T4bltsGUOV0NlbBX8rz1vX75Pt1UCOZsLUo0TAD7a
> EtqrpSN7WlD1MjbxJXrlvJ4lWKaLUL0inmD6IG8v/XPhK6N+K2MMpbslwvorsA5d
> q1+8ic5M5g1kaQDwzkFs0r5CBP2QA8F4zIW6VPNAJFswWtbHTuUR4hL5K8mtCNRN
> m1Gi/An4P7h2eKurKwcmuGqdCtXl9E5zpatOGuLnsLPXq5uybMDN63dhRWtd9UI=
> =3E8Y
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
> share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?
> page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Macgpg-users mailing list
> Macgpg-users [at] lists
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/macgpg-users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFF7vgzzTrtVKxWL8MRAlFXAJ94/QozVsI+arEPj/kuDYCV3OdF8gCcCY4s
i86T1JTseNZJVVCSnErM2ms=
=9Yhv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

ryan.lamothe at quantumworx

Mar 7, 2007, 11:09 AM

Post #12 of 32 (1847 views)
Permalink

Re: [Macgpg-users] 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thank you for your reply. Although not all .app bundles are Cocoa
apps, Eclipse is a good example.

How difficult would be it be to package this application as a .app
bundle instead of all over the filesystem like the typical Unix
application (which makes installing/uninstalling/upgrading a pita)?

Thanks!

On Mar 7, 2007, at 12:50 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
>> Why isn't this application packaged like normal OS X apps in an
>> application bundle? Why the Unix(Linux) bundling and installing?
>
> Usually, these "normal" OS X apps are Cocoa apps. If it has a
> nifty-keen GUI on it, odds are good that it's a Cocoa app and is
> thus packaged as a .app. But otherwise, odds are good that it's a
> regular UNIX utility and will be packaged like a regular UNIX utility.
>
> For instance, the Apple Developer Tools are packaged both
> like .apps and like regular UNIX utilities. XCode is a Cocoa apps,
> and as such, it's packaged as a .app. But Apple's C compiler is a
> regular UNIX utility, and as such, it's packaged as /usr/bin/gcc.
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
>
> iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJF7vt6AAoJELcA9IL+r4EJmokIAMxwltRifxUIuVfQ7IKcKmiQ
> uZaIetXMFswVDupBqI5QvCj1tapyQYIdyfrnTaB8vWrJmsDlQsPA3MrZE8OhRbVW
> lrqmOhbWD4wSTd4+7FqI+K5VEhmaSCo4Rf9F6iXdOiKB0p4FKodgWOsdUvNsCLFk
> sVpuIzr7XYynqX03rtN30pQRZXl8yVhic9gBQx34S+7y50e8GriHmshAJYaMe779
> bIesznJNxNRX4bQ8XjsRGuAZV6aqI2OCKvwlNqge1xJVrWu4tLtn6eCjEvUGj650
> 2cxMEWXCLw+9x5SwzwKCK4j7MeIlU/6cPvXySSvF4fowv2mB4HLMM2zni03RGvM=
> =OW5W
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFF7v+/zTrtVKxWL8MRAobJAJ9PwwUUddaLmYmWzLKdQcidnUZJvACg329N
1BF0JCgj7lSK/XAbo5VTtCA=
=k8+v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

shavital at mac

Mar 7, 2007, 12:21 PM

Post #13 of 32 (1863 views)
Permalink

Re: [Macgpg-users] 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

David Shaw wrote the following on 3/7/07 8:08 PM:
[...]

> Do you mean binary releases from somewhere or building your own? If
> you're building your own, this is not the case, or at least, should
> not be the case. If compiling 1.4.7 on Panther doesn't work, report
> it as a bug. I will fix it.
>
> David

Maybe I misunderstood the indications in <http://macgpg.sourceforge.net>.

I shall try to compile 1.4.7 on Panther (not just right now), and report
back.

Charly

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

breen.mullins at gmail

Mar 7, 2007, 12:32 PM

Post #14 of 32 (1851 views)
Permalink

Re: [Macgpg-users] 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

On 3/7/07, David Shaw <dshaw [at] jabberwocky> wrote:
>
> Do you mean binary releases from somewhere or building your own? If
> you're building your own, this is not the case, or at least, should
> not be the case. If compiling 1.4.7 on Panther doesn't work, report
> it as a bug. I will fix it.

It worked for me. I didn't report success because I didn't think it
was an issue.

Breen

--
Breen Mullins
Menlo Park, Calif.

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

benjamin at py-soft

Mar 7, 2007, 3:03 PM

Post #15 of 32 (1853 views)
Permalink

Re: [Macgpg-users] 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

Ryan R. LaMothe wrote:
> How difficult would be it be to package this application as a .app
> bundle instead of all over the filesystem like the typical Unix
> application (which makes installing/uninstalling/upgrading a pita)?

There's nothing stopping you doing it and making the result available to
all.

Ben

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

benjamin at py-soft

Mar 7, 2007, 3:05 PM

Post #16 of 32 (1865 views)
Permalink

Re: [Macgpg-users] 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

Charly Avital wrote:
> Maybe I misunderstood the indications in <http://macgpg.sourceforge.net>.

My understanding is that the macgpg team decided to stop supporting old
versions of Mac OS.

However, the recent version of gnupg should (touch wood!) compile from
source without any (real) problems.

Ben

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

benjamin at py-soft

Mar 7, 2007, 3:12 PM

Post #17 of 32 (1865 views)
Permalink

Re: 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> I updated the packages (very slightly) to install into /usr/local,
> instead of /usr.

Um, macgpg should install to /usr/local.

> Warning: these packages still have not been extensively tested.

I haven't had chance to look at them yet. When I get time I'll finish
out the macgpg packaging instructions, which includes details on
universal binaries.

Take care,

Ben

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

dshaw at jabberwocky

Mar 7, 2007, 3:21 PM

Post #18 of 32 (1846 views)
Permalink

Re: [Macgpg-users] 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 11:05:09PM +0000, Benjamin Donnachie wrote:
> Charly Avital wrote:
> > Maybe I misunderstood the indications in <http://macgpg.sourceforge.net>.
>
> My understanding is that the macgpg team decided to stop supporting old
> versions of Mac OS.
>
> However, the recent version of gnupg should (touch wood!) compile from
> source without any (real) problems.

Yes indeed.

Let me reiterate: as far as I'm concerned, if the current GPG doesn't
build on a particular version of OSX, that's a bug. And I'll do my
best to fix GPG so it does build.

David

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

benjamin at py-soft

Mar 7, 2007, 3:40 PM

Post #19 of 32 (1879 views)
Permalink

Re: [Macgpg-users] 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

Benjamin Donnachie wrote:
>> Warning: these packages still have not been extensively tested.
> I haven't had chance to look at them yet.

I've just had a quick look at your installer and I'm afraid that it
wouldn't meet the standards set by the macgpg team. Take a look at the
documents I've sent you which should hopefully explain all.

Take care,

Ben

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

ryan.lamothe at quantumworx

Mar 7, 2007, 4:24 PM

Post #20 of 32 (1860 views)
Permalink

Re: [Macgpg-users] 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

It's not a matter of "why not do it yourself" but a matter of "why
isn't it being done" kind of question.

A graphical installer and uninstaller for the entire suite would be
nice. Maybe I will find time to work on it, maybe someone else can too.

It is the same kind of question I ask the Mono and MonoDevelop
people, who not only did not write MonoDevelop using Windows Forms
(they used GTK), but an installation of "MonoDevelop for OS X"
requires a plethora of Fink/DarwinPorts Linux libs installed in order
to even begin using the entire package. But that is another story
for another list.

On Mar 7, 2007, at 6:03 PM, Benjamin Donnachie wrote:

> Ryan R. LaMothe wrote:
>> How difficult would be it be to package this application as a .app
>> bundle instead of all over the filesystem like the typical Unix
>> application (which makes installing/uninstalling/upgrading a pita)?
>
> There's nothing stopping you doing it and making the result
> available to
> all.
>
> Ben
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
> share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?
> page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Macgpg-users mailing list
> Macgpg-users [at] lists
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/macgpg-users

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

benjamin at py-soft

Mar 7, 2007, 5:14 PM

Post #21 of 32 (1861 views)
Permalink

Re: 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> The original links still work; they point to non-IDEA-enabled builds.
> For completeness' sake, the links are all listed here:

IDEA is generally best implemented as a module. That way you don't need
to worry about any patent / copyright issues.

GnuPG 1.4.7 universal binaries from the macgpg team are now available on
the website - see http://macgpg.sourceforge.net/

Ben

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

rjh at sixdemonbag

Mar 7, 2007, 5:39 PM

Post #22 of 32 (1867 views)
Permalink

Re: 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

> IDEA is generally best implemented as a module. That way you don't
> need
> to worry about any patent / copyright issues.

I don't see any real difference between the two, really. If it's not
legal to distribute the single binary with IDEA, then it's not legal
to distribute the module. And going the module way, you wind up
getting a large number of support requests saying "I downloaded the
module, but I still can't read IDEA traffic", since people tend not
to be all that familiar with editing gpg.conf.

I should also point out, while I'm at it, that I don't recommend
using IDEA. But the old RSA/IDEA legacy is unlikely to go away
anytime soon, not as long as there's a ton of poorly-written
anonymity software that depends on PGP 2.6.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJF72lnAAoJELcA9IL+r4EJfdcH/jTDTWS69AXWA+IduP/gL5G6
QMWsgkRQF/tI0vyG+6jhDsdwbmRUDiFtoL+6Fp2omzq5fuzpEine2E/e/rfwhRRz
rdjkrXhpo18qTGMFEDqBw01mzGi6Oz8ZDBeNZeRUCaZzDpYTTRvw7ZbBvNDbWcTF
sq98hKUhTsiG6LXko5O7tcoDSgoatfga+HQeZn7hXPENjGWNS1vZhwRX0DoCY99X
ov5xv5QRpSlJoziOs5JZRlnCErMIW7x+dfd1SCXqbLYSa/n3UOC0fVL/XYgkdpCQ
UY87yrCuhZBVhdqK+EUd0l/J1qSJZ3wZqCPcd8xuHUEj/VQltbagq8yf6DTw8GY=
=Xuyh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

shavital at mac

Mar 7, 2007, 9:21 PM

Post #23 of 32 (1859 views)
Permalink

Re: [Macgpg-users] 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

At 6:21 PM -0500 3/7/07, David Shaw wrote:
[...]
>Yes indeed.
>
>Let me reiterate: as far as I'm concerned, if the current GPG doesn't
>build on a particular version of OSX, that's a bug. And I'll do my
>best to fix GPG so it does build.
>
>David

On an iMac CPU Type: PowerPC 750 (22.14) running MacOS 10.3.9 (code named
"Pahther"), compiling from source with idea.c copied to 'Cipher':
- ----------------------------
./configure: [...] Version info: gnupg 1.4.7
Configured for: Darwin (powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0).
All 27 tests passed.

% gpg --version
gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.7
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
under certain conditions. See the file COPYING for details.

Home: ~/.gnupg
Supported algorithms:
Pubkey: RSA, RSA-E, RSA-S, ELG-E, DSA
Cipher: IDEA, 3DES, CAST5, BLOWFISH, AES, AES192, AES256, TWOFISH
Hash: MD5, SHA1, RIPEMD160, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512, SHA224
Compression: Uncompressed, ZIP, ZLIB, BZIP2
- ---------------------------

Therefore, GnuPG 1.4.7 builds correctly under Mac OS 10.3.9.
I misunderstood the indications in MacGPG's web site.

Thank you David for your feedback.

Charly

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: GnuPG for Privacy

iQEVAwUBRe+dRM3GMi2FW4PvAQjV5QgArePI9tr5+nHHQGwGtE27xJEvzeozlVWc
VB9lAc2D/312om6+CBaaL9dTvIIBLh08DG2jJ7PWMWoasLmxy/LaplCPwGnr283C
HEkGy0z0sqOTVxfqXE4jua6+LOsBwQE+d/FHphyPq09nMHZD5Iw0U0w6a72uYG5v
0xVwBNE3WoEX0Pr9apRv0DeqCvE81WRqMFK0QjZtor85STG05xXIcqnsVBs9NjWb
ccYk98oQqXLLsXrPT5l53BsxoUURYCKdwZWo7oXnqFvSKIDZKeVFbiacOdat4q9f
tmuI8SrqaOqQJgNrfMd5aEkuDTnG9rmnT8Tt7vgl9xE3JLhBiG1jdQ==
=Hvtf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

benjamin at py-soft

Mar 8, 2007, 1:13 AM

Post #24 of 32 (1868 views)
Permalink

Re: 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> I don't see any real difference between the two, really. If it's not
> legal to distribute the single binary with IDEA, then it's not legal to
> distribute the module. And going the module way, you wind up getting a
> large number of support requests saying "I downloaded the module, but I
> still can't read IDEA traffic", since people tend not to be all that
> familiar with editing gpg.conf.

Put simply, the module route ensures that any patent / copyright issues
are firmly the users "problem". As I understand it, the licence is not
compatible with the GPL and therefore should not be distributed with GnuPG.

Ben

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

reynt0 at cs

Mar 8, 2007, 8:59 AM

Post #25 of 32 (1863 views)
Permalink

Re: [Macgpg-users] 1.4.7 packages for OS X [In reply to]

I apologize if I am wasting the time of some busy
and appreciated people, but I'd like to ask for
clarification:

The latest macgpg.sourceforge.net "HowTo", v4.16,
says gcc 4.0.1 is needed. That gcc seems to be
Apple-natively available only with OS 10.4, and not
installable in 10.3.9 (with reliable result) from
currently available XCode; gcc 3.3 seems to be
the highest in XCode for 10.3. So..., what gcc do
you have and how did you get it? (If the answer is
simple, and I'm stupid, that makes me happiest
because it is least trouble for me to fix.)

On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Charly Avital wrote:
. . .
> On an iMac CPU Type: PowerPC 750 (22.14) running MacOS 10.3.9 (code named
> "Pahther"), compiling from source with idea.c copied to 'Cipher':
. . .
> Therefore, GnuPG 1.4.7 builds correctly under Mac OS 10.3.9.
> I misunderstood the indications in MacGPG's web site.
. . .

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users [at] gnupg
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

1 2

View All

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads