Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 25 Nov 2009 01:34:31 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On 11/23/2009 07:17 AM, kuttuani wrote: > I have GNUPG versions 1.2 and 1.4 installed on two servers A and B > respectively. > > I got a gpg key from 23 Nov 2009 06:02:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49475 On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 17:57 +0530, Rahul R wrote: > then could you plz explain why it is not giving me any error on server > B that has a gpg version 23 Nov 2009 04:33:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49472 then could you plz explain why it is not giving me any error on server B that has a gpg version 1.4? 2009/11/23 Christoph Anton Mitterer < christoph. 23 Nov 2009 04:27:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49473 You simply should not use such a key (without signed UIDs),.. except you really really know what you're doing. The key is probably damaged, or it migh 23 Nov 2009 04:25:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49471 Hi All, I have GNUPG versions 1.2 and 1.4 installed on two servers A and B respectively. I got a gpg key from a client, i imported it on Server B wi 23 Nov 2009 04:20:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49474 Hi All, I have GNUPG versions 1.2 and 1.4 installed on two servers A and B respectively. I got a gpg key from a client, i imported it on Server B wi 23 Nov 2009 04:17:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49470 On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:13, nils.faerber@kernelconcepts.de said: > Errr... you need the OpenPGP smart card to us it with GnuPG as a > key-storing smar 23 Nov 2009 01:55:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49465 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 The following message was sent to my spam folder, and since I never saw a reply to it, maybe it was s 22 Nov 2009 19:28:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49464 On Nov 21, 2009, at 3:13 PM, markus reichelt wrote: > * markus reichelt <ml@mareichelt.de> wrote: > >> gpg: key generation failed: Card error >> Key 21 Nov 2009 18:26:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49461 On Nov 21, 2009, at 6:47 PM, markus reichelt wrote: > * David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com> wrote: > >> If you mean the signature verification level, 21 Nov 2009 18:07:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49460 Should the GPA Clipboard tool be displaying expired encryption keys when you go to encrypt the buffer? There's no indication of expired status for 21 Nov 2009 18:05:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49462 * David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com> wrote: > If you mean the signature verification level, then it is visible in > the --list-sigs output - 3 for "p 21 Nov 2009 15:47:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49459 On 11/21/2009 01:48 PM, ratzip wrote: > If some one has signed my key and set the trust level > on my key, how could I check the trust level he set? > 21 Nov 2009 14:47:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49458 On Nov 21, 2009, at 1:48 PM, ratzip wrote: > HI,guys > If some one has signed my key and set the trust level on my key, how > could I check the tru 21 Nov 2009 14:22:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49457 * markus reichelt <ml@mareichelt.de> wrote: > gpg: key generation failed: Card error > Key generation failed: Card error > > That's on a stock Slack 21 Nov 2009 12:13:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49456 HI,guys If some one has signed my key and set the trust level on my key, how could I check the trust level he set? which commands should I use? -- 21 Nov 2009 10:48:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49455 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 makrober wrote: > Melikamp T. Medley wrote: >> Thanks for your answers, David, Timo. >> >> A somewhat 21 Nov 2009 07:11:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49453 Melikamp T. Medley wrote: > Thanks for your answers, David, Timo. > > A somewhat related question: is there a tool that is designed > to produce "und 21 Nov 2009 04:46:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49450 I think this will be great help: http://explorecsharp.blogspot.com/2009/09/most-useful-gpg-commands-you-wont-find.html Namaste (Greetings/Regards) A 19 Nov 2009 22:08:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49469 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 November 19th 2009 for gnupg-users@gnupg.org IMO steganography should be mixed with cryptography to be 19 Nov 2009 18:36:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49449 vedaal@hush.com wrote: > Unlike cryptography, where the standard is that the encryption is > secure, even when the algorithm is known and well studie 19 Nov 2009 18:28:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49448 On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:02:35 -0500 Brian Mearns <mearns.b@gmail.com> wrote: >If he wants to hide the fact that he has an encrypted document, >that' 19 Nov 2009 15:40:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49447 Sorry, sent to author instead of list again. Message below. On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Brian Mearns <mearns.b@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19 Nov 2009 08:03:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49444 There is no way (yet, ;-) ), to do what you want in gnupg, as a gnupg encrypted file will show that it was encrypted either symmetrically or to a ke 19 Nov 2009 07:26:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49443 Hi there, I'm new to the list and actually trying to get my Smartcard working for encryption, using the Shell Token V2 from gemalto. If I try to ge 19 Nov 2009 05:42:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49442 John W. Moore III wrote: > Yes, there are! They are the Questions that _were_never_ asked! Japanese: 聞くのは一時の恥、聞かぬのは� 18 Nov 2009 17:34:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49439 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 John Clizbe wrote: > M.B.Jr. wrote: >> Thanks again, David. >> >> The last dumb question, I promise, 18 Nov 2009 16:34:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49438 M.B.Jr. wrote: > Thanks again, David. > > The last dumb question, I promise, would be: There aren't any dumb questions. > how can I see my primary 18 Nov 2009 13:20:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49437 Hi, I cannot create keys on my shiny new v2 smartcard. Personalizing the card works just fine, as does changing PINs. But when I want to generate ne 18 Nov 2009 11:32:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49436 Thanks again, David. The last dumb question, I promise, would be: how can I see my primary key and my subkey as well? On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:3 18 Nov 2009 08:51:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49431 On Nov 18, 2009, at 8:49 AM, M.B.Jr. wrote: > Hi David, > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:21 AM, David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com> wrote: >> On Nov 18 Nov 2009 06:38:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49429 Hi David, On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:21 AM, David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com> wrote: > On Nov 17, 2009, at 10:00 PM, M.B.Jr. wrote: > >> both my pub 18 Nov 2009 05:49:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49427 Laurent Jumet schrieb: > Hello ! Hi! > I'm trying for the first time GPG with a SmartCard (chip card) and it doesn't work despite the device is r 18 Nov 2009 04:13:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49426 Hello ! I'm trying for the first time GPG with a SmartCard (chip card) and it doesn't work despite the device is recognized. I'm trying with 18 Nov 2009 03:56:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49425 On Nov 17, 2009, at 10:00 PM, M.B.Jr. wrote: > Hi list, > one lame confusion I'm facing now. > > I was reading GnuPG's "Signing Subkey Cross-Certific 17 Nov 2009 19:21:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49424 Hi list, one lame confusion I'm facing now. I was reading GnuPG's "Signing Subkey Cross-Certification" page [1], and as a matter of fact, these two s 17 Nov 2009 19:00:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49423 Mario Castel�n Castro wrote: > Thanks by the --enable-dsa2 tip. > > Someone can tellme wath line should i put on my gpg.cong?. enable-dsa2 > BTW I 17 Nov 2009 18:58:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49422 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 November 17th 2009 for gnupg-users@gnupg.org Hi, I suggest to search for steganography, the cience/art 17 Nov 2009 18:39:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49420 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 November 17th for gnupg-users@gnupg.org Thanks by the --enable-dsa2 tip. Someone can tellme wath line 17 Nov 2009 17:58:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49419 Melikamp T. Medley wrote: > OK so I looked it up and I think what I want is called "deniable > encryption". What you've described here isn't deniable 17 Nov 2009 17:53:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49418 Thank you, Robert. OK so I looked it up and I think what I want is called "deniable encryption". I was just hoping that people here would recommend s 17 Nov 2009 17:06:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49417 Susan Stewart wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm filing a bug for my IM client (Gajim) because it currently only > allows sending of encrypted and/or signed 17 Nov 2009 16:13:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49415 Mario Castel�n Castro wrote: > November 14th 2009 for gnupg-users@gnupg.org subject "Problem with the > agent, gpg2" > > Hi, I sucefulle compiled and 17 Nov 2009 16:09:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49414 Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > Melikamp The Medley <melikamp@melikamp.com> writes: >> and enter a passphrase, I get an encrypted foo-file.gpg. > > gpg 17 Nov 2009 16:04:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49413 benoit.andry@orange-ftgroup.com wrote: > Hello, > > have installed Gpg4win 2.0.1 (2009-09-28). Default setup. > am running windows XP SP2 > outlook 17 Nov 2009 15:34:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49412 Mario Castelán Castro wrote: > November 17th for gnupg-users@gnupg.org > > I need GNU PG 2 because i want to get out of the 1024 bits limit and > SH 17 Nov 2009 15:29:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49416 On Nov 17, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Melikamp T. Medley wrote: > Thanks for your answers, David, Timo. > > A somewhat related question: is there a tool that 17 Nov 2009 14:50:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49409 On Nov 17, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > Mario Castel�n Castro wrote: >> I need GNU PG 2 because i want to get out of the 1024 bits lim 17 Nov 2009 14:49:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49410 On Nov 17, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Mario Castel�n Castro wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > November 17th for David SMITH <dave.s 17 Nov 2009 14:39:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49411 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Mario Castelán Castro escribió: > November 17th for gnupg-users@gnupg.org > > I need GNU PG 2 beca 17 Nov 2009 13:54:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49408 Mario Castel�n Castro wrote: > I need GNU PG 2 because i want to get out of the 1024 bits limit and > SHA forced for DSA, i want my next key (2010-201 17 Nov 2009 13:29:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49407 * Mario Castel�n Castro <mariocastelancastro@gmail.com> wrote: > I need GNU PG 2 because i want to get out of the 1024 bits limit > and SHA forced fo 17 Nov 2009 13:24:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49421 Melikamp The Medley wrote: > I mean, is there a reliable way to tell that something is _not_ an > encrypted file? If you mean, "a reliable way to tel 17 Nov 2009 13:20:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49406 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 November 17th for gnupg-users@gnupg.org I need GNU PG 2 because i want to get out of the 1024 bits lim 17 Nov 2009 13:04:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49405 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 November 17th for David SMITH <dave.smith@st.com> Linux do not have a file command, that belogs to the 17 Nov 2009 12:54:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49404 Thanks for your answers, David, Timo. A somewhat related question: is there a tool that is designed to produce "undetectable" encryption, i.e. someth 17 Nov 2009 09:38:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49403 Melikamp The Medley <melikamp@melikamp.com> writes: > and enter a passphrase, I get an encrypted foo-file.gpg. gpg seems to be able to determine the 17 Nov 2009 09:04:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49401 On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:52:29AM -0500, Melikamp The Medley wrote: > Sorry if you get two of these, I screwed up while subscribing > to the list. > 17 Nov 2009 08:28:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49402 Hi everyone! Sorry if you get two of these, I screwed up while subscribing to the list. I have a question relating to the symmetric encryption. If I 17 Nov 2009 07:52:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49400 Hi, I'd like to use my MUA on an a regular desktop computer that also runs web browsers and other potentially buggy software. I don't want to have my 17 Nov 2009 05:42:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49399 T. Howell-Cintron wrote: > I'm roughly familiar with GnuPG and have used it in the past when I had > a single presence, a single e-mail address, etc. 16 Nov 2009 14:33:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49397 CONNIE RODRIGUEZ wrote: > I hope someone can help. I can encrypt files for our vendor but they cannot decrypt as it errors to secret key not availabl 16 Nov 2009 14:30:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49396 I hope someone can help. I can encrypt files for our vendor but they cannot decrypt as it errors to secret key not available. I signed the vendors p 16 Nov 2009 14:09:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49395 Mario Castelán Castro wrote the following on 11/16/09 11:08 AM: > November 16th 2009 for gnupg-users@gnupg.org, subject "Problem with > the agent, gp 16 Nov 2009 12:45:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49394 T. Howell-Cintron wrote: > I'm roughly familiar with GnuPG and have used it in the past when I had > a single presence, a single e-mail address, etc. 16 Nov 2009 12:10:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49393 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Mario Castelán Castro escribió: > November 16th 2009 for gnupg-users@gnupg.org, subject "Problem wi 16 Nov 2009 10:08:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49392 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 November 16th 2009 for gnupg-users@gnupg.org, subject "Problem with the agent, gpg2" I do not have tha 16 Nov 2009 08:08:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49391 Hello, have installed Gpg4win 2.0.1 (2009-09-28). Default setup. am running windows XP SP2 outlook 2003 -(11.8206.8221) SP3 I managed to create th 16 Nov 2009 07:12:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49398 Михаил �'олубцов (maill.ru) wrote: > Could you help me, please? I wonder if you show me a way how to solve > this problem. This problem 16 Nov 2009 06:24:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49390 Hello! Is there a way to to get rid of any insignificant gnupg questions? I'm trying to encrypt automatically a file using a public key of other com 16 Nov 2009 01:32:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49389 T. Howell-Cintron wrote: > I'm in a position now where I'm using multiple e-mail addresses, for > different purposes, but want to share the same key f 16 Nov 2009 00:09:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49388 I'm roughly familiar with GnuPG and have used it in the past when I had a single presence, a single e-mail address, etc. I'm in a position now where 15 Nov 2009 20:29:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49387 Mario Castelán Castro wrote the following on 11/14/09 11:31 PM: > November 14th 2009 for gnupg-users@gnupg.org subject "Problem with the > agent, gpg 15 Nov 2009 08:13:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49385 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 November 14th 2009 for gnupg-users@gnupg.org subject "Problem with the agent, gpg2" Hi, I sucefulle co 14 Nov 2009 20:31:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49384 Also -- Keep in mind that I am not criticizing that weblog entry. I am only saying, "don't believe the hype." Much of what it says is accurate: it 14 Nov 2009 17:13:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49383 David Alexander Russell wrote: > Essentially what I read was that the default 1024-bit DSA key isn't > strong enough, due to some flaw in SHA-1 which 14 Nov 2009 17:06:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49382 Robert J. Hansen wrote: > DSA is not a Bad Thing. Whoever it was who told you this did you a > disservice. If you'd like to tell us what you've hear 14 Nov 2009 15:51:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49381 David Alexander Russell wrote: > However I don't know what the 'best practice' is with regards to > keypairs and so on. GnuPG best practices, in a si 14 Nov 2009 15:43:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49380 On 11/14/2009 01:45 PM, Susan Stewart wrote: > I'm filing a bug for my IM client (Gajim) because it currently only > allows sending of encrypted and/o 14 Nov 2009 13:39:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49379 I've just bought a netbook with Ubuntu preinstalled, and since integrating with GnuPG is much easier than it is on Windows I thought it would be a goo 14 Nov 2009 11:58:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49378 Greetings, I'm filing a bug for my IM client (Gajim) because it currently only allows sending of encrypted and/or signed presence or messages to cont 14 Nov 2009 10:45:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49377 Hi David Vedaal and everyone This is something even I have thought: this seems to be a sure way to prevent such computing from being able to 'guess' 14 Nov 2009 07:02:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49376 Michel Villeneuve wrote: > Firstly, by "supported" I mean, if it becomes a standard communication > tool, could creation of key process be modified (n 13 Nov 2009 19:40:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49375 Firstly, by "supported" I mean, if it becomes a standard communication tool, could creation of key process be modified (name, email adress, comment => 13 Nov 2009 15:03:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49374 > Will the new open protocol wave be supported (signing and encryption) by gnupg ? > > It's otherway around, wave should support OpenPGP, but then 13 Nov 2009 13:28:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49373 On Friday 13 November 2009, Michel Villeneuve wrote: > Will the new open protocol wave be supported (signing and encryption) > by gnupg ? I think you 13 Nov 2009 13:22:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49372 Will the new open protocol wave be supported (signing and encryption) by gnupg ? -- Michel Villeneuve 43, faubourg Jean Jaurès 07700 Bourg St-Andé 13 Nov 2009 04:20:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49369 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Morten Kjærulff escribió: > Thanks. I get the point - for me, any minimal encryption would be > eno 12 Nov 2009 10:26:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49364 Thanks. I get the point - for me, any minimal encryption would be enough, as nobody cares about my photos of my famely. On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:49 12 Nov 2009 06:39:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49361 > I think it is not a problem to decrypt the key file in the startup process, > isn't it!? Is it possible to access the card reader (omnikey 4040) an 12 Nov 2009 03:06:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49360 Viet H. Phan wrote: > Might there be any bugs in GnuPG 2.0.12? As the key was generated by > GnuPG 2.0.12, but then couldn't be imported to GnuPG 2.0. 11 Nov 2009 19:43:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49358 On Nov 11, 2009, at 10:49 AM, Kevin Kammer wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:01:09AM -0500 > Also sprach David Shaw: >> AES256 is probably the best 11 Nov 2009 10:48:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49356 Hello, I would recommend putting it below the document root of the webserver for added security - you really don't want crawlers easily discovering 11 Nov 2009 08:00:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49353 On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:01:09AM -0500 Also sprach David Shaw: > AES256 is probably the best all-round choice in GPG if you want to > just say "stro 11 Nov 2009 07:49:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49352 (a) assume nothing is safe (b) assume that if your information is not valuable to national security agencies or organized crime, it is in less danger 11 Nov 2009 06:23:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49351 On Nov 11, 2009, at 7:13 AM, Morten Kj�rulff wrote: > Hi, > > I am new here, so sorry if I ask stupid questions. > > I would like to use my unused st 11 Nov 2009 06:01:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49350 Hi, I am new here, so sorry if I ask stupid questions. I would like to use my unused storage on various web servers for backup of my personal data, 11 Nov 2009 04:13:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49349 I've encrypted a dat file using GPG (from gpg4win-2.0.1.exe). We changed the encrypted filename from .gpg to .pgp. My counter part used PGP -p <file 10 Nov 2009 18:49:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49359 On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:53, jmcneal@fh-eberswalde.de said: > I'm using GnuPG 2.0.12 (GPG4Win) and have problems in decrypting multiple files with the 09 Nov 2009 08:20:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49340 Hi, Thanks for the info & detailed response. I'm going to go with option C as you suggest. Must admit I hadn't realised that .MAN pages are the d 09 Nov 2009 07:55:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/49345