Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 18:16:13 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> writes: >>>>>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Werner Koch wrote: > >>> Please find a patch included below. It applies cleanly t 11 Jan 2012 10:35:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56718 >>>>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Werner Koch wrote: >> Please find a patch included below. It applies cleanly to the trunk >> as well as to 1.5.0. I've tes 11 Jan 2012 10:33:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56717 On 11.01.2012 16:55:59, +0100, Simon Crowe <smncrowe@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Simon, > All, > > Stephan, thanks for the information with respect to the p 11 Jan 2012 08:47:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56713 All, Stephan, thanks for the information with respect to the perl script. With respect to the MAC size, i need the MAC size for HMAC-SHA384 Regards 11 Jan 2012 07:55:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56712 On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 07:49, ulm@gentoo.org said: > Please find a patch included below. It applies cleanly to the trunk > as well as to 1.5.0. I've tes 11 Jan 2012 00:39:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56703 On 10.01.2012 21:59:19, +0100, Simon Crowe <smncrowe@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Simon, > All, > > I am trying to run the CAVP tests against a set of test v 10 Jan 2012 23:43:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56702 >>>>> On Mon, 09 Jan 2012, Werner Koch wrote: > Well, we could now use it but there is not much point besides > reading of old backups. Maybe I give 10 Jan 2012 22:49:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56700 All, I am trying to run the CAVP tests against a set of test vectors, specifically SigGen and SigVer, however I am getting an error message stating 10 Jan 2012 12:59:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56697 On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 02:23, ulm@gentoo.org said: > According to others it expires at 2012-01-07 which is today. Well, we could now use it but there i 09 Jan 2012 04:52:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56678 On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:15, chris.adamson@mcri.edu.au said: > I am trying to get gpg2 using AES-NI as I need to backup a LOT of > data and wou 09 Jan 2012 04:46:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56677 Hi List, I am trying to get gpg2 using AES-NI as I need to backup a LOT of data and would like the extra performance. I have an Intel i7-980X whi 09 Jan 2012 01:15:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56674 >>>>> On Mon, 16 May 2011, Werner Koch wrote: > On Mon, 16 May 2011 19:27, ulm@gentoo.org said: >> According to <http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/pgp-faq/#P 06 Jan 2012 17:23:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56663 Hi, I just saw a few typos in random-fips.c and wanted to submit corrections. Is this the right place and format for doing so? I've pasted a diff 28 Dec 2011 02:50:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56590 On 12/21/2011 08:51 PM, Werner Koch wrote: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:18, ken.werner@linaro.org said: > >> This code generates the following assembler e 21 Dec 2011 12:51:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56556 On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:18, ken.werner@linaro.org said: > This code generates the following assembler error message when compiling > for -march=armv5t 21 Dec 2011 11:51:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56547 In ARM mode the input register of the umull must be different from the output register. Signed-off-by: Ken Werner <ken.werner@linaro.org> --- mpi/lo 21 Dec 2011 09:18:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56546 Hi There, Currently the definition of umul_ppmm (longlong.h) looks like this: #define umul_ppmm(xh, xl, a, b) 21 Dec 2011 09:18:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56545 On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 01:44, bradh@frogmouth.net said: > I don't know about X11, but Samba doesn't require copyright assignment. > http://www.samba.org 03 Dec 2011 07:38:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56430 I am very sorry for the cognitive dissonant, to be honest I was so tired that I slept immediately after writing the email and now even for myself is h 02 Dec 2011 21:38:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56429 On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 08:46:03 PM Werner Koch wrote: > BTW, a lot of high profile projects require copyright assignments, for > example X11 or Samba. I d 02 Dec 2011 16:44:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56428 On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 10:58, andre@amorim.me said: > open .. payday ? Care to explain? Salam-Shalom, Werner A3: Please. Q3: Should I avoid top 02 Dec 2011 12:04:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56427 open .. payday ? On 2 December 2011 09:46, Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> wrote: > On Thu,  1 Dec 2011 16:32, ben.guthro@virtualcomputer.com said: > >> B 02 Dec 2011 01:58:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56423 On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 16:32, ben.guthro@virtualcomputer.com said: > Best of luck to you, and Stallman in stifling innovation by way of dead trees. Tha 02 Dec 2011 01:46:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56419 Sorry to hear that. I guess I will not be contributing to this OSS project. I have contributed to quite a few projects in the pas - both for work, a 01 Dec 2011 07:32:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56415 On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 13:49, ben.guthro@virtualcomputer.com said: > I figured it was a bit of a long shot that you'd take the patch > as-is...but thoug 01 Dec 2011 06:59:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56411