Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 11:52:44 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> writes: >>>>>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Werner Koch wrote: > >>> Please find a patch included below. It applies cleanly t 11 Jan 2012 10:35:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56718 >>>>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Werner Koch wrote: >> Please find a patch included below. It applies cleanly to the trunk >> as well as to 1.5.0. I've tes 11 Jan 2012 10:33:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56717 On 11.01.2012 16:55:59, +0100, Simon Crowe <smncrowe@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Simon, > All, > > Stephan, thanks for the information with respect to the p 11 Jan 2012 08:47:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56713 All, Stephan, thanks for the information with respect to the perl script. With respect to the MAC size, i need the MAC size for HMAC-SHA384 Regards 11 Jan 2012 07:55:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56712 On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 07:49, ulm@gentoo.org said: > Please find a patch included below. It applies cleanly to the trunk > as well as to 1.5.0. I've tes 11 Jan 2012 00:39:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56703 On 10.01.2012 21:59:19, +0100, Simon Crowe <smncrowe@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Simon, > All, > > I am trying to run the CAVP tests against a set of test v 10 Jan 2012 23:43:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56702 >>>>> On Mon, 09 Jan 2012, Werner Koch wrote: > Well, we could now use it but there is not much point besides > reading of old backups. Maybe I give 10 Jan 2012 22:49:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56700 All, I am trying to run the CAVP tests against a set of test vectors, specifically SigGen and SigVer, however I am getting an error message stating 10 Jan 2012 12:59:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56697 On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 02:23, ulm@gentoo.org said: > According to others it expires at 2012-01-07 which is today. Well, we could now use it but there i 09 Jan 2012 04:52:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56678 On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:15, chris.adamson@mcri.edu.au said: > I am trying to get gpg2 using AES-NI as I need to backup a LOT of > data and wou 09 Jan 2012 04:46:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56677 Hi List, I am trying to get gpg2 using AES-NI as I need to backup a LOT of data and would like the extra performance. I have an Intel i7-980X whi 09 Jan 2012 01:15:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56674 >>>>> On Mon, 16 May 2011, Werner Koch wrote: > On Mon, 16 May 2011 19:27, ulm@gentoo.org said: >> According to <http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/pgp-faq/#P 06 Jan 2012 17:23:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56663 Hi, I just saw a few typos in random-fips.c and wanted to submit corrections. Is this the right place and format for doing so? I've pasted a diff 28 Dec 2011 02:50:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56590 On 12/21/2011 08:51 PM, Werner Koch wrote: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:18, ken.werner@linaro.org said: > >> This code generates the following assembler e 21 Dec 2011 12:51:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56556 On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:18, ken.werner@linaro.org said: > This code generates the following assembler error message when compiling > for -march=armv5t 21 Dec 2011 11:51:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56547 In ARM mode the input register of the umull must be different from the output register. Signed-off-by: Ken Werner <ken.werner@linaro.org> --- mpi/lo 21 Dec 2011 09:18:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56546 Hi There, Currently the definition of umul_ppmm (longlong.h) looks like this: #define umul_ppmm(xh, xl, a, b) 21 Dec 2011 09:18:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56545 On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 01:44, bradh@frogmouth.net said: > I don't know about X11, but Samba doesn't require copyright assignment. > http://www.samba.org 03 Dec 2011 07:38:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56430 I am very sorry for the cognitive dissonant, to be honest I was so tired that I slept immediately after writing the email and now even for myself is h 02 Dec 2011 21:38:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56429 On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 08:46:03 PM Werner Koch wrote: > BTW, a lot of high profile projects require copyright assignments, for > example X11 or Samba. I d 02 Dec 2011 16:44:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56428 On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 10:58, andre@amorim.me said: > open .. payday ? Care to explain? Salam-Shalom, Werner A3: Please. Q3: Should I avoid top 02 Dec 2011 12:04:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56427 open .. payday ? On 2 December 2011 09:46, Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> wrote: > On Thu,  1 Dec 2011 16:32, ben.guthro@virtualcomputer.com said: > >> B 02 Dec 2011 01:58:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56423 On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 16:32, ben.guthro@virtualcomputer.com said: > Best of luck to you, and Stallman in stifling innovation by way of dead trees. Tha 02 Dec 2011 01:46:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56419 Sorry to hear that. I guess I will not be contributing to this OSS project. I have contributed to quite a few projects in the pas - both for work, a 01 Dec 2011 07:32:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56415 On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 13:49, ben.guthro@virtualcomputer.com said: > I figured it was a bit of a long shot that you'd take the patch > as-is...but thoug 01 Dec 2011 06:59:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56411 I figured it was a bit of a long shot that you'd take the patch as-is...but thought it was useful functionality that might, at least spark a discussi 01 Dec 2011 04:49:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56410 On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 22:59, ben.guthro@virtualcomputer.com said: > For large encryption streams - it can be convenient to write a checkpoint file, > t 01 Dec 2011 04:28:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56409 For large encryption streams - it can be convenient to write a checkpoint file, to be able to be able to resume later. This implements save/load of 30 Nov 2011 13:59:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56405 On Sun, 6 Nov 2011 19:55, vincent.torri@gmail.com said: > I searched in the latest source code without finding any Win32 calls (like > CreateMutex). 06 Nov 2011 11:51:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56260 On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> wrote: > On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 10:51, vincent.torri@gmail.com said: > > > afaics in the libg 06 Nov 2011 10:55:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56259 On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 10:51, vincent.torri@gmail.com said: > afaics in the libgcrypt code, only pthread or gnu pth is used for mutexes. > Is it possibl 06 Nov 2011 08:33:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56258 Hey afaics in the libgcrypt code, only pthread or gnu pth is used for mutexes. Is it possible to add Windows functions for mutexes ? thank you Vinc 05 Nov 2011 02:51:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56253 On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:57, kurt.w.heberlein@hp.com said: > Does anyone have a good set of tests for running against the RSAVS > test vectors? 21 Oct 2011 22:05:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56152 Hi, Does anyone have a good set of tests for running against the RSAVS test vectors? I have been successful writing my own to do the Key Generat 21 Oct 2011 09:57:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/56151 On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 16:23, ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org said: > this is http://bugs.debian.org/643336 reported by Marc Dequènes, the > crash was not 11 Oct 2011 01:01:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55931 Perfect! Problem solved: ldd pointed out that it used runtime libraries located in /lib while libgpg-error and libgcrypt were installed to /usr/local/ 09 Oct 2011 12:30:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55916 Hello, this is http://bugs.debian.org/643336 reported by Marc Dequènes, the crash was not easily reproducible with gnutls-cli. The respective system 09 Oct 2011 07:23:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55915 On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:36, mailnov@1fehr.ch said: > After I compiled netatalk 2.2, I noticed an error message "symbol > gcry_cipher_setkey, version G 07 Oct 2011 01:35:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55892 On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Vincent Torri <vincent.torri@gmail.com>wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Vincent Torri <vincent.torri@gma 02 Oct 2011 20:02:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55851 On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Vincent Torri <vincent.torri@gmail.com>wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> wrote 02 Oct 2011 14:32:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55850 On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 11:04:38AM +0200, Werner Koch wrote: > On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:43, vincent.torri@gmail.com said: > > Actually, I need libgcrypt 02 Oct 2011 06:39:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55853 On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:43, vincent.torri@gmail.com said: > Actually, I need libgcrypt for crypto in gnutls. So it means that, > currently, it's useles 02 Oct 2011 02:04:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55849 On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> wrote: > On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:02, vincent.torri@gmail.com said: > > > configuration: ./ 30 Sep 2011 22:34:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55842 On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> wrote: > On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:02, vincent.torri@gmail.com said: > > > configuration: ./ 30 Sep 2011 11:43:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55838 On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:02, vincent.torri@gmail.com said: > configuration: ./configure --prefix=/opt/efl --host=x86_64-w64-mingw32 > --disable-nls --d 30 Sep 2011 07:58:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55837 Hey, I'm trying to compile libgpg-error for Windows 64 bits with mingw-w64. I cross compile it on linux (ubuntu). configuration: ./configure --prefi 30 Sep 2011 01:02:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55835 Hi, I successfully compiled libgcrypt on my ubuntu server. Before, I compiled libgpg-error version 1.9 successful as well. I use the term successful 29 Sep 2011 15:36:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55834 Hi, I successfully compiled libgcrypt on my ubuntu server. Before, I compiled libgpg-error version 1.9 successful as well. I use the term successful 29 Sep 2011 15:34:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55836 Il giorno ven, 23/09/2011 alle 14.56 +0200, Werner Koch ha scritto: > > Well, in this case we should compare the libtool versions against the > one w 23 Sep 2011 06:32:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55807 On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:41, flameeyes@flameeyes.eu said: > This is for libgcrypt, not gnupg 1.4; but I'd assume libtool's own macro Sorry, I didn't l 23 Sep 2011 05:56:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55806 Il giorno ven, 23/09/2011 alle 10.09 +0200, Werner Koch ha scritto: > > I won't apply such changes for GnuPG 1.4. It is a stable code base > and > c 23 Sep 2011 02:41:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55803 On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:03, flameeyes@flameeyes.eu said: > The version taken from GnuPG 1.4 assumes any cross-compiled package have > prefixed undersco 23 Sep 2011 01:09:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55802 Distributions such as Gentoo Linux use /usr/lib64 for system libraries on multilib setups, so in those cases, ignore the libraries as well. Signed-of 22 Sep 2011 07:34:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55783 The version taken from GnuPG 1.4 assumes any cross-compiled package have prefixed underscores, which is not the case; by using libtool's own macro, we 22 Sep 2011 07:03:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55784 On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 07:59, borneo.antonio@gmail.com said: > The command "make check" creates new files in ./tests/ > Add them to the ignore file. I u 09 Sep 2011 05:31:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55705 The command "make check" creates new files in ./tests/ Add them to the ignore file. Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com> --- .gi 08 Sep 2011 22:59:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55703 Hi, both are now fixed in the repo. Thanks, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. ____________________________ 08 Sep 2011 07:12:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55693 On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> wrote: > On Mon,  5 Sep 2011 08:26, borneo.antonio@gmail.com said: > >> Could you please pr 07 Sep 2011 07:57:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55687 On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 08:26, borneo.antonio@gmail.com said: > Could you please provide me, as reference, the version of gcc you are using? gcc (Debian 06 Sep 2011 01:46:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55681 Hi Werner, Werner Koch wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:29, steve@stephen-fisher.com said: > >> /usr/local/include/gcrypt.h:1656: warning: 'gcry_ 04 Sep 2011 23:26:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55677 > Maybe after the US patent expires next year. Er... the U.S. patent expired May 16. It claims a priority date of the international patent applicati 29 Aug 2011 07:12:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55629 @deftypefun {const char *}*gcry_strsource* (@w{gcry_error_t @var{err}}) The function @code{*gcry_strerror*} returns a pointer to a statically allocat 26 Aug 2011 09:53:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55620 Hello. Have a look at gcrypt.texi <http://cvs.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/doc/gcrypt.texi?root=Libgcrypt&view=log> @noindent The result 26 Aug 2011 08:40:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55619 Am Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:15:52 +0200 schrieb Andreas Radke <a.radke@arcor.de>: > I'm packaging libgcrypt for ArchLinux. My build system has a core i7 > 12 Aug 2011 01:14:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55458 On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:51, tmraz@redhat.com said: > gcry_sexp_nth_mpi() ? Is there currently any known use in existing > software that expects the GC 25 Jul 2011 04:30:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55276 On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 12:39 +0200, Werner Koch wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:41, tmraz@redhat.com said: > > > Hmm... wouldn't it be more proper to 25 Jul 2011 03:51:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55274 On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:41, tmraz@redhat.com said: > Hmm... wouldn't it be more proper to make the default MPI format for > gcry_sexp_nth_mpi USG? Giv 25 Jul 2011 03:39:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55273 On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 09:22 +0200, Werner Koch wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 16:36, ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org said: > > > Is changing this to "res 25 Jul 2011 00:41:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55272 On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 16:36, ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org said: > Is changing this to "res = gcry_sexp_nth_mpi (list, 1, GCRYMPI_FMT_USG);" > the proper 25 Jul 2011 00:22:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55269 I'm trying to build version 1.5 in Mac OS X 10.7 using clang. The build stops with: libtool: link: gcc -dynamiclib -Wl,-undefined -Wl,dynamic_lookup 24 Jul 2011 15:33:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55266 On 2011-07-04 Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org> wrote: > On 2011-07-04 Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> wrote: > > I see this in gnutls/lib/pk-l 24 Jul 2011 07:36:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55260 On Thursday 14 July 2011 17:53:40 Werner Koch wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:29, steve@stephen-fisher.com said: > > /usr/local/include/gcrypt.h:1656: 14 Jul 2011 01:54:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55160 On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:29, steve@stephen-fisher.com said: > /usr/local/include/gcrypt.h:1656: warning: 'gcry_ac_id_t' is deprecated > > The release a 14 Jul 2011 00:53:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55158 Since upgrading to libgcrypt 1.5.0 recently, I'm having problems with messages such as these... /usr/local/include/gcrypt.h:1643: warning: 'gcry_ac_ 13 Jul 2011 09:29:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55145 I'm packaging libgcrypt for ArchLinux. My build system has a core i7 AES capable cpu running x86_64 kernel and userland. The x86_64 package builds fin 08 Jul 2011 07:15:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55106 On 2011-07-04 Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> wrote: > I see this in gnutls/lib/pk-libgcrypt.c:_wrap_gcry_pk_decrypt > bigint_t res; > res = g 04 Jul 2011 10:51:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55085 Hi! I see this in gnutls/lib/pk-libgcrypt.c:_wrap_gcry_pk_decrypt bigint_t res; res = gcry_sexp_nth_mpi (s_plain, 0, 0); gcry_sexp 04 Jul 2011 00:18:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55076 On 2011-07-02 Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> wrote: > On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 13:22, ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org said: > > This is new breakage, building aga 03 Jul 2011 00:28:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55067 On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 17:40, arfrever.fta@gmail.com said: > The following error occurs when trying to use GnuPG 2.0.17 with Libgcrypt 1.5.0: > > gpg: pk 02 Jul 2011 11:12:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55064 On 2011-07-02 Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org> wrote: > On 2011-07-02 Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org> wrote: >> ugrading li 02 Jul 2011 09:19:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55062 The following error occurs when trying to use GnuPG 2.0.17 with Libgcrypt 1.5.0: gpg: pkglue.c:41: mpi_from_sexp: Assertion `data' failed. This prob 02 Jul 2011 08:40:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55063 On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 13:22, ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org said: > This is new breakage, building against 1.5.0beta1 works. You should check two things: 02 Jul 2011 05:23:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55061 On 2011-07-02 Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org> wrote: > ugrading libgcrypt from 1.4.6 to 1.5.0 causes 5 new test suite errors > in gnutls 02 Jul 2011 04:22:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55059 Hello, ugrading libgcrypt from 1.4.6 to 1.5.0 causes 5 new test suite errors in gnutls 2.17.1: ------------------------- PASS: pgps2kgnu client: Han 02 Jul 2011 03:27:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55060 > Hi! > > I looked again at it and there is indeed a bug lingering in Libgcrypt. > What a pitty that I released 1.5.0 a few hours ago. > > Please find 29 Jun 2011 06:55:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55056 Hi! I looked again at it and there is indeed a bug lingering in Libgcrypt. What a pitty that I released 1.5.0 a few hours ago. Please find attach a 29 Jun 2011 06:36:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55055 Hello! The GNU project is pleased to announce the availability of Libgcrypt version 1.5.0. This is the new stable version of Libgcrypt and upward c 29 Jun 2011 03:18:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/55050 On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:15, mailjohnmorris@gmail.com said: > It seems to be working fine now. Good to hear. Nevertheless I meanwhile implemented a f 13 Jun 2011 05:12:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/54824 On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 23:24, mailjohnmorris@gmail.com said: > > > Signature sig = 10 Jun 2011 10:15:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/54808 Hi! I fixed the leading zero problems in the OAEP and PSS code and merged ueno-pss into master. All the pkcs#1v2 tests do run fine. If you want to 10 Jun 2011 02:05:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/54807 On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 23:24, mailjohnmorris@gmail.com said: > Signature sig = Signature.getInstance("MD5WithRSA"); I don't know what scheme this is. 10 Jun 2011 00:02:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/54804 Hi, I'm trying to verify digital signatures generated in libgcrypt in a java app using "MD5WithRSA" type signatures. I think perhaps I am creating t 09 Jun 2011 14:24:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/54802 On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:43, wk@gnupg.org said: > I am currently hacking the test vectors. OAEP test vectors done. It was useful: A bug turned out. 09 Jun 2011 09:59:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/54799 On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:23, ueno@unixuser.org said: > For PSS, that is defined in RFC3447 8.1.1: Oops, I missed that. I add a note. I am currently 09 Jun 2011 06:43:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/54798 Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> writes: > Is there a reason why you use (ctx->nbits - 1) when passing the size of > the key to the OAEP and PSS functions? 09 Jun 2011 06:23:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/54797 Hi, Is there a reason why you use (ctx->nbits - 1) when passing the size of the key to the OAEP and PSS functions? The functions round them to full 09 Jun 2011 06:01:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/54796 On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:08, simon@josefsson.org said: > Would it be possible to specify the random bits to use to gcry_pk_sign > in the sexp somehow? 09 Jun 2011 02:20:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/54794 Daiki Ueno <ueno@unixuser.org> writes: >> I'd also like to see a way to test at least the verification of a PSS >> message against a known test vecto 09 Jun 2011 02:08:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/54793 Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> writes: > Having said this, I'd propose to change the semantics and require that > mHash is passed to gcry_pk_sign and gcr 09 Jun 2011 01:40:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/54792 Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> writes: > I'd also like to see a way to test at least the verification of a PSS > message against a known test vector. Ar 09 Jun 2011 00:50:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/gcrypt/54791