<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>GnuPG | devel</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>10 Feb  2012 01:45:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>hello</title>
<description>l want to generate key but saying Error in accessing Enigmail service, help me, Thanks</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 19:18:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57161</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Parallel Encryption Revisited</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Yushu Yao &amp;lt;yao.yushu@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi Experts, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; 5 years ago there was a post asking about parallel encryptin</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 13:27:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57135</link>
</item><item>
<title>Parallel Encryption Revisited</title>
<description>Hi Experts, 5 years ago there was a post asking about parallel encrypting and got blasted with a series of concerns: http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 13:22:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57136</link>
</item><item>
<title>FIX ME! implement ttyname() bionic/libc/bionic/stubs.c:360</title>
<description>I have a built of gpg-agent for Android, when I run it, it prints out some text but &amp;#039;gpg-agent --daemon&amp;#039; seems to stay running. Looks like there migh</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 21:02:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57059</link>
</item><item>
<title>gnupg-1.4.12 build issue</title>
<description>I now have gnupg-1.4.12 successfully built, validated, and installed on all of our more than 20 flavors of Unix in our test lab, EXCEPT for one: GNU/L</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 11:00:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57036</link>
</item><item>
<title>--recv-keys without dirmngr?</title>
<description>Is it possible to have a working --recv-keys without using dirmngr? I ask because I got gpg2, dirmngr, and dirmngr-client built and executing on Andr</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 06:24:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57016</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Announce] GnuPG 1.4.12 released</title>
<description>Hello!   We are pleased to announce the availability of a new stable GnuPG-1 release: Version 1.4.12.  The GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) is GNU&amp;#039;s too</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 08:36:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56981</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Allow printing key digests in key edit</title>
<description>Hello, Although SHA1 is considered to be broken by some, key-signing parties typically still rely on asserting validity of keys by comparing their fi</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 07:23:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56950</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Updating gitignore</title>
<description>Hello, common/t-dns-cert, and common/t-openpgp-oid are generated by make, but not listed in .gitignore. The below patch adds them. Kind regards, Chr</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 05:53:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56949</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Use preferred hashing algorithm when updating signature packets</title>
<description>Hello, when updating a signature packet, GnuPG reuses the hashing algorithm of the original signature packet. Hence, if the preferred hashing algorit</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan  2012 13:46:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56941</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

