<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>GnuPG | devel</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>24 Nov  2009 22:48:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Where is &amp;gt;libassuan-1.1.0</title>
<description>Hi, when I try to compile gnupg and gpgme from trunk I need a libassuan with a new API version, that should be available from version 1.1.0 on. But</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 01:10:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49466</link>
</item><item>
<title>some questions on using gpg in scripting</title>
<description>Hi. I&amp;#039;d like to use gpg in some scripts for decryption only. The encrypted files are mainly symmetrically encrypted (I mean the session key), but it</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 06:47:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49451</link>
</item><item>
<title>does gpg ever write to stdout in if a file could not be decrypted?</title>
<description>Hi. Minor question: Say I use gpg in batch mode to decrypt a file to stdout. Of course this might fail (the passphrase might be wrong, or the message</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 06:38:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49452</link>
</item><item>
<title>DSA2 default status</title>
<description>The default for DSA2 in GPG is currently &amp;quot;off&amp;quot; - that is, by default, we fix the size of a DSA key at 1024 bits, and the q size (to specify the hash)</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 06:47:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49428</link>
</item><item>
<title>Minor fix for dirmngr.texi</title>
<description>--- dirmngr.texi-r321  2009-11-13 15:41:14.541212500 +0100 +++ dirmngr.texi.new  2009-11-13 15:42:24.009554000 +0100 @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ @opindex</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 06:43:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49370</link>
</item><item>
<title>keyserver scheme http broken?</title>
<description>I might miss something here, but for me on gnupg 2.0.13 (and 2.0.11) retrieving keys via the &amp;quot;http://&amp;quot; scheme seems to be broken. (Also it seem that</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 09:24:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49362</link>
</item><item>
<title>Error importing public key</title>
<description>Hi, My partner sent me an ASCII-armored PGP public key (the attached file) that had been generated using GnuPG v2.0.12. Then I failed to import that</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2009 09:20:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49354</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] change decrypt to support larger keys with openpgp card (was: OpenPGP card and 4096 bit keys)</title>
<description>Werner Koch &amp;lt;wk@gnupg.org&amp;gt; said: &amp;gt; On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:55, klaus@flittner.org said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; 2. Change the protocol used for genkey and decrypt &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 06:46:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49315</link>
</item><item>
<title>&amp;lt;GPG Agent&amp;gt; - invalid length of cacheID</title>
<description>Hello, i have the problem, that gpg-agent throws errors when launching the pinentry. I analyzed the problem and would give you my results in the hope</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 13:28:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49220</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Fix memory leak in scdaemon</title>
<description>Hi, in scd/command.c the buffer allocated by cmd_setdata is never freed. The attached patch frees the buffer after use and before a second use of set</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2009 09:49:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49206</link>
</item><item>
<title>Setting digest-algo for a signature via gpgme?</title>
<description>Is it possible to set the digest-algo used via gpgme when creating some clearsigned text? The goal would be to generate a signature and ensure that,</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2009 12:48:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49202</link>
</item><item>
<title>OpenPGP card and 4096 bit keys</title>
<description>Hi, i have a openpgp card that supports 4096 keys (even the one from kernelconcepts seems to support them). But the usage with gpg is restricted to 3</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2009 10:55:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49184</link>
</item><item>
<title>hkp</title>
<description>Hi, Not sure if that is the correct ml, if not sorry in advance. I don&amp;#039;t want to use hkp, but rather http e.g. http://stinkfoot.org:11371/pks/looku</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 13:16:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49162</link>
</item><item>
<title>GPGME: Signature summary</title>
<description>Hi, I do a verification of a file and what baffles me is the summary of the signature. If I use a wrong file it correctly outputs GPGME_SIGSUM_RED,</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 08:32:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49156</link>
</item><item>
<title>g13 and LUKS ?</title>
<description>Hello Werner, I&amp;#039;ve see than you work on EncFS support with g13, do you think your can also add LUKS support ? Thanks in advanced for your answer. B</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 08:07:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49154</link>
</item><item>
<title>Covadis vega-alpha reader don&amp;#039;t support by ccid-driver GnuPG and don&amp;#039;t support readers PINPAD used</title>
<description>Hi, I wanted to used the reader&amp;#039;s pinpad of my reader (covadis vega-alpha), so I need to use your internal ccid-driver. Modification has been done on</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 02:51:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49153</link>
</item><item>
<title>[patch] G13 and EncFS</title>
<description>Hi! As some of you might have noticed, I am currently working on a new GnuPG tool to manage a crypto container with OpenPGP or X.509 keys. This tool</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2009 06:18:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49145</link>
</item><item>
<title>gnupg-2.0.13: unwanted gcc-ism in source code, and a needed library</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve made some further progress in getting gnupg-2.0.13 installed on various local Unix platforms, and today, hit an apparent gcc-ism in the source co</description>
<pubDate>12 Oct  2009 14:15:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49133</link>
</item><item>
<title>GPGME -- Context</title>
<description>Hi, I hope this is the correct place to describe my problem. I have GPGME 1.2.0, GnuPG 1.4.10 and GnuPG 2.0.13 installed on my 64 bit Arch- Linux sy</description>
<pubDate>10 Oct  2009 06:19:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49115</link>
</item><item>
<title>email hashes in PGP keys as protection against spam</title>
<description>Hello, I would like to propose a small change to gpg (which I cannot do myself as I am not a programmer) which should solve the spammers harvest key</description>
<pubDate>04 Oct  2009 19:08:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49086</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [svn] GnuPG - r5171 - trunk/g10</title>
<description>On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 14:31, cvs@cvs.gnupg.org said: &amp;gt; New Revision: 5171 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Modified: &amp;gt;  trunk/g10/ChangeLog &amp;gt;  trunk/g10/encr-data.c &amp;gt;  trunk/g</description>
<pubDate>02 Oct  2009 04:39:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49080</link>
</item><item>
<title>SHA2 in OpenPGP cards?</title>
<description>Hi! Before I spend time testing it, can the OpenPGP card support RSA-SHA2 signatures? /Simon _______________________________________________ Gnupg-</description>
<pubDate>29 Sep  2009 00:46:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49059</link>
</item><item>
<title>Length of public exponent in OpenPGP card specification</title>
<description>Hello, in the specification[1] the algorithm attributes contain a field for the length of the public exponent. The available implementation of the ca</description>
<pubDate>26 Sep  2009 15:50:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49046</link>
</item><item>
<title>GnuPG 2.0 SVN moved to a new branch</title>
<description>Hi, I recently created a new branch for GnuPG 2.0.  svn://cvs.gnupg.org/gnupg/branches/STABLE-BRANCH-2-0 is what you want. Use svn switch to upda</description>
<pubDate>26 Sep  2009 11:15:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49045</link>
</item><item>
<title>libassuan</title>
<description>Attempted compiling gnupg2 svn 5163 this am on ubuntu -- getting this error: configure: *** *** You need libassuan with Pth support to build this pro</description>
<pubDate>26 Sep  2009 05:54:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49041</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
