Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 16:55:19 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg I think you should try the gnupg-users list, this is for development. http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users Also, include as much info 10 Feb 2012 09:15:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57162 l want to generate key but saying Error in accessing Enigmail service, help me, Thanks 09 Feb 2012 19:18:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57161 On 2/3/2012 4:22 PM, Yushu Yao wrote: > http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2007-February/023654.html The overriding concern you were presen 03 Feb 2012 15:28:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57137 On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Yushu Yao <yao.yushu@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Experts, > > 5 years ago there was a post asking about parallel encryptin 03 Feb 2012 13:27:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57135 Hi Experts, 5 years ago there was a post asking about parallel encrypting and got blasted with a series of concerns: http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail 03 Feb 2012 13:22:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57136 On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:00, beebe@math.utah.edu said: > I now have gnupg-1.4.12 successfully built, validated, and installed > on all of our more than 02 Feb 2012 08:41:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57126 Hi, please try this patch: diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index f008d23..47c6d12 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -490,6 +4 01 Feb 2012 05:18:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57070 On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 06:02, hans@guardianproject.info said: > Any pointers as to how to handle this? Or does it matter? I was able to encrypt on And 01 Feb 2012 05:05:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57069 I have a built of gpg-agent for Android, when I run it, it prints out some text but 'gpg-agent --daemon' seems to stay running. Looks like there migh 31 Jan 2012 21:02:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57059 On Jan 29, 2012, at 5:27 AM, Christian Aistleitner wrote: > Hi David, > > on Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:43:19PM -0500, David Shaw wrote: >> [ hash_for( 31 Jan 2012 19:29:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57058 On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:00:09PM -0700, Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote: > After several attempts today, I tracked down the problem: > > ../mpi/libmpi 31 Jan 2012 13:38:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57044 Hello, on Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:52:31AM -0500, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > Then post your code as a diff against a 2.0.x tree and let interested > us 31 Jan 2012 12:02:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57035 I now have gnupg-1.4.12 successfully built, validated, and installed on all of our more than 20 flavors of Unix in our test lab, EXCEPT for one: GNU/L 31 Jan 2012 11:00:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57036 On 01/31/2012 12:07 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > On 01/31/2012 11:57 AM, Werner Koch wrote: >> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:41, hans@guardianproject 31 Jan 2012 09:14:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57023 On 01/31/2012 11:57 AM, Werner Koch wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:41, hans@guardianproject.info said: > >> About a better solution for utf8conv.c, 31 Jan 2012 09:07:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57022 On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:41, hans@guardianproject.info said: > About a better solution for utf8conv.c, can you expand on that? Do you > just mean a cl 31 Jan 2012 08:57:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57021 On 01/31/2012 10:05 AM, Werner Koch wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:47, hans@guardianproject.info said: > >> builds for arm..., so can't run it on mo 31 Jan 2012 08:41:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57020 On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:24, hans@guardianproject.info said: > Is it possible to have a working --recv-keys without using dirmngr? I No. > ask becaus 31 Jan 2012 07:07:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57017 On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:47, hans@guardianproject.info said: > builds for arm..., so can't run it on most build machines). Then I had > to do somethin 31 Jan 2012 07:05:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57018 Is it possible to have a working --recv-keys without using dirmngr? I ask because I got gpg2, dirmngr, and dirmngr-client built and executing on Andr 31 Jan 2012 06:24:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57016 On 01/30/2012 03:25 AM, Werner Koch wrote: > On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:11, hans@guardianproject.info said: > >> How do I disable iconv? I tried combina 30 Jan 2012 19:47:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57002 On 1/30/12 9:44 AM, Werner Koch wrote: > Even the for many common usages actually broken MD5, still holds strong > when used as the digest in a HMAC. 30 Jan 2012 09:33:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56980 Hello! We are pleased to announce the availability of a new stable GnuPG-1 release: Version 1.4.12. The GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) is GNU's too 30 Jan 2012 08:36:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56981 On Jan 30, 2012, at 8:36 AM, Christian Aistleitner wrote: >> These are not defined by OpenPGP and thus I strongly advise against its >> use. SHA-1 i 30 Jan 2012 07:10:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56974 On 1/30/12 8:36 AM, Christian Aistleitner wrote: > I suppose we all agree that among those who claim such "nonsense" > are for example renowned crypto 30 Jan 2012 06:52:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56973