Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 23 Nov 2009 05:31:20 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:38, philcerf@googlemail.com said: > But could it EVER happen, that gpg still printed something to stdout? Sure, if gpg detect 23 Nov 2009 02:59:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49467 Hi, when I try to compile gnupg and gpgme from trunk I need a libassuan with a new API version, that should be available from version 1.1.0 on. But 23 Nov 2009 01:10:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49466 On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 03:47:34PM +0100, Philippe Cerfon wrote: > So far so good. I would however like to let is use > ~/.gnupg/pub|secring.gpg but o 21 Nov 2009 08:14:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49454 Hi. I'd like to use gpg in some scripts for decryption only. The encrypted files are mainly symmetrically encrypted (I mean the session key), but it 21 Nov 2009 06:47:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49451 Hi. Minor question: Say I use gpg in batch mode to decrypt a file to stdout. Of course this might fail (the passphrase might be wrong, or the message 21 Nov 2009 06:38:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49452 On Nov 19, 2009, at 2:57 AM, Werner Koch wrote: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:02, dshaw@jabberwocky.com said: > >> V5 is nowhere near 6 months away. I'd 19 Nov 2009 06:17:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49441 On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:02, dshaw@jabberwocky.com said: > V5 is nowhere near 6 months away. I'd be shocked if it happened before 2011. There just is 18 Nov 2009 23:57:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49440 On 11/18/2009 01:50 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > If V5 is going to be more than six months or so, though, then I think > enabling DSA2 by default sho 18 Nov 2009 11:08:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49433 On Nov 18, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Werner Koch wrote: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:47, dshaw@jabberwocky.com said: > >> Proposal: I think it's time to make - 18 Nov 2009 11:07:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49435 On Nov 18, 2009, at 1:50 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > David Shaw wrote: >> Thoughts? > > Depending on how soon the V5 key spec is ready, we may wan 18 Nov 2009 11:02:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49434 David Shaw wrote: > Thoughts? Depending on how soon the V5 key spec is ready, we may want to fold everything in all at once. Changing defaults isn't 18 Nov 2009 10:50:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49432 On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:47, dshaw@jabberwocky.com said: > Proposal: I think it's time to make --enable-dsa2 the default. It's been supported for 3 ye 18 Nov 2009 08:28:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49430 The default for DSA2 in GPG is currently "off" - that is, by default, we fix the size of a DSA key at 1024 bits, and the q size (to specify the hash) 18 Nov 2009 06:47:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49428 Bernhard Reiter wrote: > Am Freitag, 13. November 2009 05:12:30 schrieb David Shaw: >> Some keyservers run hkp over port 80 to deal with firewalls (so 13 Nov 2009 08:06:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49371 --- dirmngr.texi-r321 2009-11-13 15:41:14.541212500 +0100 +++ dirmngr.texi.new 2009-11-13 15:42:24.009554000 +0100 @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ @opindex 13 Nov 2009 06:43:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49370 Am Freitag, 13. November 2009 05:12:30 schrieb David Shaw: > Some keyservers run hkp over port 80 to deal with firewalls (so it's   > hkp://keyserver. 13 Nov 2009 00:40:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49368 On Nov 12, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Bernhard Reiter wrote: >> There isn't really a *http* keyserver (in the sense of >> being a database of many keys that c 12 Nov 2009 20:12:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49366 David, On Thursday 12 November 2009, David Shaw wrote: > On Nov 12, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Bernhard Reiter wrote: > > I might miss something here, but fo 12 Nov 2009 12:19:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49365 On Nov 12, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Bernhard Reiter wrote: > I might miss something here, but for me on gnupg 2.0.13 (and 2.0.11) > retrieving keys via the 12 Nov 2009 10:17:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49363 I might miss something here, but for me on gnupg 2.0.13 (and 2.0.11) retrieving keys via the "http://" scheme seems to be broken. (Also it seem that 12 Nov 2009 09:24:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49362 Hi, I don't know if the original key was from a Mac. I got no issues when I imported the original key to PGP Desktop (v9.8). The original key can be 11 Nov 2009 19:03:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49357 Viet H. Phan wrote: > Hi, > > My partner sent me an ASCII-armored PGP public key (the attached file) > that had been generated using GnuPG v2.0.12. T 11 Nov 2009 11:38:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49355 Hi, My partner sent me an ASCII-armored PGP public key (the attached file) that had been generated using GnuPG v2.0.12. Then I failed to import that 11 Nov 2009 09:20:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49354 On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:46, klaus@flittner.org said: > Attached you find a patch which addresses the decrypt issue. > It changes the setdata command o 09 Nov 2009 08:53:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49344 Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> said: > On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:55, klaus@flittner.org said: > > 2. Change the protocol used for genkey and decrypt > > 08 Nov 2009 06:46:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49315