<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>GnuPG | devel</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 11:50:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>hello</title>
<description>l want to generate key but saying Error in accessing Enigmail service, help me, Thanks</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 19:18:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57161</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Parallel Encryption Revisited</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Yushu Yao &amp;lt;yao.yushu@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi Experts, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; 5 years ago there was a post asking about parallel encryptin</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 13:27:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57135</link>
</item><item>
<title>Parallel Encryption Revisited</title>
<description>Hi Experts, 5 years ago there was a post asking about parallel encrypting and got blasted with a series of concerns: http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 13:22:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57136</link>
</item><item>
<title>FIX ME! implement ttyname() bionic/libc/bionic/stubs.c:360</title>
<description>I have a built of gpg-agent for Android, when I run it, it prints out some text but &amp;#039;gpg-agent --daemon&amp;#039; seems to stay running. Looks like there migh</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 21:02:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57059</link>
</item><item>
<title>gnupg-1.4.12 build issue</title>
<description>I now have gnupg-1.4.12 successfully built, validated, and installed on all of our more than 20 flavors of Unix in our test lab, EXCEPT for one: GNU/L</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 11:00:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57036</link>
</item><item>
<title>--recv-keys without dirmngr?</title>
<description>Is it possible to have a working --recv-keys without using dirmngr? I ask because I got gpg2, dirmngr, and dirmngr-client built and executing on Andr</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 06:24:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57016</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Announce] GnuPG 1.4.12 released</title>
<description>Hello!   We are pleased to announce the availability of a new stable GnuPG-1 release: Version 1.4.12.  The GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) is GNU&amp;#039;s too</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 08:36:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56981</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Allow printing key digests in key edit</title>
<description>Hello, Although SHA1 is considered to be broken by some, key-signing parties typically still rely on asserting validity of keys by comparing their fi</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 07:23:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56950</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Updating gitignore</title>
<description>Hello, common/t-dns-cert, and common/t-openpgp-oid are generated by make, but not listed in .gitignore. The below patch adds them. Kind regards, Chr</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 05:53:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56949</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Use preferred hashing algorithm when updating signature packets</title>
<description>Hello, when updating a signature packet, GnuPG reuses the hashing algorithm of the original signature packet. Hence, if the preferred hashing algorit</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan  2012 13:46:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56941</link>
</item><item>
<title>gnupg vs libiconv on Android</title>
<description>In the continuing saga of the Android port, I&amp;#039;m now running into libiconv. First I tried without libiconv using --disable-nls, and it still died with</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 14:22:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56909</link>
</item><item>
<title>GnuPG master migrated to nPth</title>
<description>Hi, I merged the npth branch of GnuPG into master. Thus there is no more need for GNU Pth. The drawback is that you need to build and install the r</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2012 08:04:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56869</link>
</item><item>
<title>1.4.12 beta installer for Windows</title>
<description>Hi, I created a pre-release of an GnuPG 1.4.12 installer for Windows:  ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/gnupg/gnupg-w32cli-1.4.12-git51c1e84.exe ft</description>
<pubDate>23 Jan  2012 02:26:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56833</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Fix minor typo in comments</title>
<description>or missing words, replace scare with scarce Signed-off-by: Gilles Espinasse &amp;lt;g.esp@free.fr&amp;gt; --- cipher/random.c |  4 ++-- cipher/rndw32.c |  2</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2012 23:47:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56814</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] 1.4 Fix clock_gettime configure detection</title>
<description>AC_CHECK_FUNCS is not enought for clock_gettime as AC_SEARCH_LIBS has to be used Changed configure clock_gettime test to only run in the case when ci</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2012 23:21:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56813</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Fix clock_gettime detection</title>
<description>AC_CHECK_FUNCS is not enought as AC_SEARCH_LIBS has to be used before Tested to work with ac_cv_func_gettimeofday= ./configure using --enable-minimal</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2012 14:41:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56804</link>
</item><item>
<title>randomart is troubling [was: Re: QR code]</title>
<description>On 01/19/2012 01:25 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: &amp;gt; About randomart display of fingerprints, we really like the idea as it is implemented in OpenS</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2012 10:44:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56779</link>
</item><item>
<title>QR code (was: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?)</title>
<description>On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:33, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; You can follow our progress on our wiki, this is part of the PSST project: &amp;gt; https://gua</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2012 02:33:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56768</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 20:51 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Fri, Jan 13, 2012, at 16:09, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m in th</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 14:44:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56749</link>
</item><item>
<title>PHP5+PECL-gnupg-1.3 fails in CLI mode (&amp;quot;Result too large&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;could not init keylist&amp;quot;)</title>
<description>Attempting a simple PHP (pecl) gnupg key lookup fails with a &amp;quot;could not init keylist&amp;quot; error in a Solaris environment, using PHP CLI mode. Note that us</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 14:38:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56750</link>
</item><item>
<title>get the trust level of an external key</title>
<description>Hi, To save space in a keyring, I would like to store only full trusted key in it. Is there a way to check the trust level of an external certificat</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 11:50:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56747</link>
</item><item>
<title>Smartcards and 1.4</title>
<description>Hi, GnuPG 1.4 uses the smartcard code from 2.0. This is made possible by using some glue code and copies of the required source files. The problem</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 02:50:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56743</link>
</item><item>
<title>GnuPG 1.4 for Windows</title>
<description>Hi, over the last days I did some work on the GnuPG 1.4 port for Windows. The major change is that I now use the mingw64 toolchain (the 32 bit versio</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 02:39:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56742</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] yat2m: don&amp;#039;t dereference pointer to freed memory</title>
<description>Here&amp;#039;s an untested patch. Coverity spotted the use-after-free. &amp;gt;From b99a8f0d77509d9f77aa5e42890e927abbbafae0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meye</description>
<pubDate>14 Jan  2012 13:36:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56731</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] gpg-agent: fix lc-messages handling not to change Xauthority setting</title>
<description>Hi Werner, Coverity spotted the missing break. This one is clearly legitimate: &amp;gt;From d270326fb3f7ad86470e85b2aaa3b06cdf2aaddf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 20</description>
<pubDate>14 Jan  2012 13:22:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56730</link>
</item><item>
<title>[solved] Re: Unable to compile GnuPG 2.1 beta 3</title>
<description>Hi, after some private mails, we finally found the bug: commit 30ec869b8c63f1edcc58110ed20b83b0e77248f8    gpg: Fix segv with RSA_S keys.</description>
<pubDate>11 Jan  2012 11:20:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56716</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Added user defined pinentry prompts for SCD.</title>
<description>This adds scdaemon &amp;quot;OPTION pin-prompt&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;OPTION pin-admin-prompt&amp;quot; along with special escapes to replace in the prompt string to inform the user of</description>
<pubDate>10 Jan  2012 19:19:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56699</link>
</item><item>
<title>FOSDEM 2012, Hardware Security and Cryptography, Call for Papers</title>
<description>AKA &amp;quot;Protect your privates!&amp;quot; FOSDEM 2012 will [1] take place in Brussels, the heart of EU. In 2012, as almost all EU countries have either ongoing ro</description>
<pubDate>10 Jan  2012 00:45:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56693</link>
</item><item>
<title>gpg refusing to sign bug?</title>
<description>Dear List, I *think* this is a bug, but it might be expected behaviour. Steps to reproduce: Using gpg 2.0.18 Sign a UID of a key with a local signa</description>
<pubDate>09 Jan  2012 16:30:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56688</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Fix desktop-devel-list archive link</title>
<description>Add the missing dot Signed-off-by: Gilles Espinasse &amp;lt;g.esp@free.fr&amp;gt; --- scripts/autogen.sh |  2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(</description>
<pubDate>07 Jan  2012 13:59:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56669</link>
</item><item>
<title>Shall we do a 1.4.12 ?</title>
<description>Hi, the last 1.4 release is more than a year old (2010-10-08). The repo has collected a few minor bug fixes and small enhancements. Shall I do a ne</description>
<pubDate>06 Jan  2012 05:22:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56652</link>
</item><item>
<title>GNUPG Vs MacAfee 7.1 E business server : Bad signature, doesn&amp;#039;t match file contents!</title>
<description>Hi Team, Issue: I imported both encryption key and signing key from MacFee 7.1 e-business server into GNUPG 1.4. I encryt and signing with the new k</description>
<pubDate>05 Jan  2012 07:34:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56646</link>
</item><item>
<title>Options for pinpad entry</title>
<description>While adding lower level support for pinpad entry, I am considering that it is better to have some user options for the feature. That&amp;#039;s because:  (</description>
<pubDate>04 Jan  2012 20:08:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56641</link>
</item><item>
<title>ECC and smartcards</title>
<description>Are there any plans to include ECC support within the OpenPGP Smartcard specification? If not, would a proposal be welcome? Take care, Ben</description>
<pubDate>03 Jan  2012 03:28:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56621</link>
</item><item>
<title>&amp;quot;key not found on keyserver&amp;quot; error message to stdout</title>
<description>Dear all, just another small bug report: Description: &amp;quot;key not found on keyserver&amp;quot; error message to stdout Version: 2.0.17 Steps that will reproduc</description>
<pubDate>26 Dec  2011 14:02:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56573</link>
</item><item>
<title>Issues with smart card since update to FC16</title>
<description>Hi all, I&amp;#039;ve been using the Fellowship smart card for years under Debian and Fedora, up until updating to Fedora 16.  Ever since I keep having issu</description>
<pubDate>23 Dec  2011 14:10:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56561</link>
</item><item>
<title>Migrating from OpenPGP card + gnupg 1.4 to 2.1</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m testing the latest beta 3 and tried the suggested command to my secring.gpg to 2.1 keyring. Before I explain what I get, here is how my key is set</description>
<pubDate>21 Dec  2011 06:35:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56537</link>
</item><item>
<title>OpenPGP card specification: Data Object of 0x7f21 (&amp;quot;CERT-3&amp;quot;)</title>
<description>Hi, This is my comment for OpenPGP card specification version 2.0, with regard to Data Object 0x7f21, according to my experience of developing Gnuk.</description>
<pubDate>20 Dec  2011 19:24:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56527</link>
</item><item>
<title>Unable to compile GnuPG 2.1 beta 3</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m trying to compile the newly released GnuPG 2.1 beta 3 but it fails. First I had to update my libassuan to 2.0.3 but now I get this: gcc -DHAVE_CO</description>
<pubDate>20 Dec  2011 09:23:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56524</link>
</item><item>
<title>GnuPG 2.1 beta 3 released</title>
<description>Hello!   We just released the third *beta version* of GnuPG 2.1. It has been released to give you the opportunity to check out the new features.</description>
<pubDate>20 Dec  2011 08:26:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56516</link>
</item><item>
<title>ccid_driver_improvement</title>
<description>Hi,  I created ccid_driver_improvement branch on the repository of git.gnupg.org. It&amp;#039;s for master branch now, but I think it can be applied to stabl</description>
<pubDate>19 Dec  2011 19:51:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56514</link>
</item><item>
<title>&amp;#039;xyt.jpg&amp;#039; is not a JPEG file</title>
<description>Dear all, I think one of our users found a bug in GnuPG: Description: &amp;#039;xyt.jpg&amp;#039; is not a JPEG file Version: 2.0.17 URL: http://support.gpgtools.org/</description>
<pubDate>15 Dec  2011 08:46:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56459</link>
</item><item>
<title>Card reader fixes</title>
<description>Hi, since a couple of versions Scdaemon did not worked properly with regard to changing cards. I have now fixed a couple of such problems and for me</description>
<pubDate>14 Dec  2011 01:43:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56452</link>
</item><item>
<title>Gnuk version 0.16</title>
<description>Hi,  Gnuk version 0.16 is out. Gnuk is software implementation of a USB token for GNU Privacy Guard. Gnuk supports OpenPGP card protocol version 2,</description>
<pubDate>13 Dec  2011 23:04:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56450</link>
</item><item>
<title>Parallel builds</title>
<description>Hi, I am a Sage developer &amp;lt;http:www.sagemath.org&amp;gt;, and we package and build libgpg_error as part of Sage. We recently discovered a problem with para</description>
<pubDate>13 Dec  2011 11:09:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56449</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Fix alignment in serpent.c</title>
<description>When compiling with -Wcast-align I&amp;#039;ve got some warnings in serpent.c upon closer examination it revealed that this is a real problem. Serpent assume</description>
<pubDate>13 Dec  2011 06:49:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56448</link>
</item><item>
<title>Is there a way to use just one line with parameters when manipulating key-ring at the at command prompt?</title>
<description>Please disregard my previous message. I made a mistake and forgot to change the subject. Here is the question again, this time with the correct subjec</description>
<pubDate>05 Dec  2011 13:38:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56442</link>
</item><item>
<title>pinentry-curses and pinpad entry</title>
<description>When using pinpad entry, GnuPG invokes pinentry and then kill it. It&amp;#039;s OK killing pinentry program when it&amp;#039;s GUI, but when it runs on terminal, the t</description>
<pubDate>04 Dec  2011 18:01:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56434</link>
</item><item>
<title>Strange error message when running pinentry-gtk-2</title>
<description>Hello! on one computer, Iâ€™m running a gpg-agent from gnupg-2.0.18 and pinentry-gtk-2 from pinentry-0.8.1 under a Gentoo system. A few minutes ago,</description>
<pubDate>02 Dec  2011 01:05:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56420</link>
</item><item>
<title>pinpad entry support in Git repository</title>
<description>Hi,  In the Git repository of GnuPG (of master branch), I added pinpad input support for PC/SC. It is enabled for OpenPGPcard 2.0. Could you please</description>
<pubDate>01 Dec  2011 21:09:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56418</link>
</item><item>
<title>No more ChangeLogs</title>
<description>Hi! About a year ago I migrated all GnuPG related repositories from SVN to GIT. Now is the time to finish this process and get rid of the ChangeLog</description>
<pubDate>01 Dec  2011 02:21:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56406</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH gnupg] accept --with-libgpg-error-prefix as well as --with-gpg-error-prefix</title>
<description>* m4/gpg-error.m4: Update from git master. --- ChangeLog    |  5 +++++ m4/gpg-error.m4 |  14 ++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)</description>
<pubDate>28 Nov  2011 04:47:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56379</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH libgcrypt] accept --with-libgpg-error-prefix as well as --with-gpg-error-prefix</title>
<description>* m4/gpg-error.m4: Update from git master. --- ChangeLog    |  5 +++++ m4/gpg-error.m4 |  15 +++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+</description>
<pubDate>28 Nov  2011 04:46:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56378</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH libksba] accept --with-libgpg-error-prefix as well as --with-gpg-error-prefix</title>
<description>* m4/gpg-error.m4: Update from git master. --- ChangeLog    |  5 +++++ m4/gpg-error.m4 |  14 ++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)</description>
<pubDate>28 Nov  2011 04:45:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56380</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH libassuan] accept --with-libgpg-error-prefix as well as --with-gpg-error-prefix</title>
<description>* m4/gpg-error.m4: Update from git master. --- ChangeLog    |  5 +++++ m4/gpg-error.m4 |  14 ++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)</description>
<pubDate>28 Nov  2011 04:44:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56377</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH libgpg-error] accept --with-libgpg-error-prefix as well as --with-gpg-error-prefix</title>
<description>* src/gpg-error.m4 (AM_PATH_GPG_ERROR): Also accept --with-libgpg-error-prefix=PFX, for consistency with our three library sibling packages. ---  Cha</description>
<pubDate>28 Nov  2011 04:44:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56376</link>
</item><item>
<title>gpg-agent: use --disable-scdaemon, yet still get SC-related error?</title>
<description>Does this ring a bell with anyone? I&amp;#039;m using gpg-agent from Fedora 16&amp;#039;s gnupg2-2.0.18-2.fc16.x86_64, invoked with these options:   exec gpg-agent</description>
<pubDate>27 Nov  2011 13:38:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56371</link>
</item><item>
<title>cert-related &amp;quot;make check&amp;quot; failures</title>
<description>Hello, With these five working directories (all up to date from git):  gnupg  libgcrypt  libassuan  libksba  libgpg-error I ran the following</description>
<pubDate>27 Nov  2011 12:52:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56370</link>
</item><item>
<title>Gnuk version 0.15</title>
<description>Hi,  Gnuk version 0.15 is out. Gnuk is software implementation of a USB token for GNU Privacy Guard. Gnuk supports OpenPGP card protocol version 2,</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2011 23:00:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56365</link>
</item><item>
<title>How to change the secret key passphrase on command line with just one command?</title>
<description>Hi, Is there a way to change the secret key passphrase programmatically, with just one line without having to go through the &amp;quot;Edit&amp;quot; menu? Thank you in</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2011 21:02:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56289</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] tests: avoid write-beyond-end-of-heap buffer</title>
<description>In libgcrypt&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;make check&amp;quot; (latest from git), I was surprised to see the &amp;quot;basic&amp;quot; test fail. Here&amp;#039;s a patch: Avoid scary-looking (with MALLOC_CHECK_</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2011 02:38:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56278</link>
</item><item>
<title>RFC 4880 Test Suite</title>
<description>Dear all, I&amp;#039;ve recognized the &amp;quot;check&amp;quot; make target in the GnuPG and Libgcrypt sources and I&amp;#039;m wondering what the best source for an RFC 4880 test suit</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2011 00:15:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56270</link>
</item><item>
<title>how to determine default GPG key ID?</title>
<description>Hello, Is there some way to make GPG print the default key ID without actually signing something or having access to a signature? Preferably without</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2011 06:54:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56264</link>
</item><item>
<title>bug with DNS back-end?</title>
<description>Hi, I noticed that attempting to refresh Simon Josefsson&amp;#039;s key, via this   gpg --refresh B565716F always elicits this warning:   gpg: requesti</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2011 06:36:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56265</link>
</item><item>
<title>Creating a subkey from an existing key</title>
<description>Hi! GPGSM has a way to create a self-signed certificate or a certificate signing requests using an existing key. This feature was missing from GPG,</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2011 00:55:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56261</link>
</item><item>
<title>SHA-256 with 2048-bit DSA key</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, I&amp;#039;m trying to understand more precisely how PGP works for another project I&amp;#039;m working on (PG</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2011 12:42:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56254</link>
</item><item>
<title>integrating OTR keys into PGP key</title>
<description>As part of the Guardian Project, I am starting work on a 6 month project = around keeping keys in sync across phone and laptop and am currently = thin</description>
<pubDate>01 Nov  2011 22:35:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56240</link>
</item><item>
<title>export cleaned certificate.</title>
<description>Hi, I d like to export some cleaned certificate : without any signature except the last one auto-signature on each uid. The tip using the character</description>
<pubDate>28 Oct  2011 05:33:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56188</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fix few warnings in libgcrypt/cipher</title>
<description>-- Regards Vladimir &amp;#039;Ï†-coder/phcoder&amp;#039; Serbinenko</description>
<pubDate>23 Oct  2011 11:44:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56159</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] fix double-free in g10/export.c</title>
<description>Using gnupg of Git master branch, I encountered SEGV (at malloc) when I did &amp;quot;gpg2 --export-secret-keys&amp;quot;. I think that there is double free in g10/exp</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2011 06:56:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56147</link>
</item><item>
<title>web for: STEED - Usable end-to-end encryption</title>
<description>Am Wednesday, 19. October 2011 17:16:09 schrieb Marcus Brinkmann: &amp;gt; On 10/19/2011 11:07 AM, Bernhard Reiter wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;   http://g10code.com/steed.htm</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2011 05:13:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56145</link>
</item><item>
<title>STEED - Usable end-to-end encryption</title>
<description>Hi! Over the last year Marcus and me discussed ideas on how to make encryption easier for non-crypto geeks. We explained our plans to several people</description>
<pubDate>17 Oct  2011 11:11:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56005</link>
</item><item>
<title>Changes to PKCS#11 definitions</title>
<description>Hey Marcus, I&amp;#039;ve made some minor fixes to the pkcs11.h header that comes from the Scute project, and wanted to contribute them back as requested. T</description>
<pubDate>17 Oct  2011 00:01:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55996</link>
</item><item>
<title>GnuPG icons in vector form?</title>
<description>Anyone know where the GnuPG icons in vector form are? I&amp;#039;m redesigning seahorse, and I&amp;#039;d like to use the GnuPG icon in seahorse to represent the &amp;quot;Pla</description>
<pubDate>13 Oct  2011 22:49:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55973</link>
</item><item>
<title>Gnuk version 0.14</title>
<description>Hi, Gnuk version 0.14 is out. Gnuk is software implementation of a USB token for GNU Privacy Guard. Gnuk supports OpenPGP card protocol version 2, a</description>
<pubDate>13 Oct  2011 19:26:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55972</link>
</item><item>
<title>The audit log (was: Q: gpgsm says &amp;quot;Unsupported certificate&amp;quot;)</title>
<description>On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:11, albrecht.dress@arcor.de said: &amp;gt; Would be great if gpgme could provide a little more information about such situations (alt</description>
<pubDate>10 Oct  2011 11:54:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55927</link>
</item><item>
<title>convert .asc to .gpg (and eventually vice-versa)</title>
<description>Hi, It is maybe a dumb question, but I don&amp;#039;t have found an easy way to convert a signed message from .asc to a .gpg ?  I have to send signed message</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2011 15:36:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55920</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Support Cherry SmartTerminal ST-2000</title>
<description>--- scd/ccid-driver.c |  16 ++++++++++------ 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/scd/ccid-driver.c b/scd/ccid-driver.c</description>
<pubDate>07 Oct  2011 13:51:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55906</link>
</item><item>
<title>Q: gpgsm says &amp;quot;Unsupported certificate&amp;quot;</title>
<description>Hi all, a while ago, I added gpg and gpgsm support to the MUA balsa (see &amp;lt;http://pawsa.fedorapeople.org/balsa/&amp;gt;), building on top of gpgme. One user</description>
<pubDate>04 Oct  2011 12:19:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55865</link>
</item><item>
<title>GPGME Ruby binding 2.0.0 released</title>
<description>Hi, I usually don&amp;#039;t announce the releases here, but I do this time since the latest version 2.0.0 is a major overhaul of the API from 1.x series. It</description>
<pubDate>02 Oct  2011 19:57:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55852</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH 2/2] add pkg-config support</title>
<description>This moves gpg-error into the pkg-config world which is a lot easier to work with than random foo-config scripts. This also implicitly fixes the -L b</description>
<pubDate>22 Sep  2011 20:37:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55797</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH 1/2] ignore more generated files</title>
<description>Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger &amp;lt;vapier@gentoo.org&amp;gt; --- .gitignore |  45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 45 insertions</description>
<pubDate>22 Sep  2011 20:37:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55798</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] gpgsm-gencert.sh: make sure not to abort after creating temp file.</title>
<description>From: Diego Elio PettenÃ² &amp;lt;flameeyes@gmail.com&amp;gt; Signed-off-by: Diego Elio PettenÃ² &amp;lt;flameeyes@gmail.com&amp;gt; Signed-off-by: Diego Elio PettenÃ² &amp;lt;flameeye</description>
<pubDate>22 Sep  2011 06:55:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55782</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] gpg-error-config: handle /usr/lib64, /lib64 just like /usr/lib and /lib</title>
<description>Distributions such as Gentoo Linux use /usr/lib64 for system libraries on multilib setups, so in those cases, ignore the libraries as well. Signed-of</description>
<pubDate>22 Sep  2011 06:45:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55781</link>
</item><item>
<title>gpgkeymgr 0.3 released</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve released version 0.3 of my tool gpgkeymgr today. With gpgkeymgr you can clean up and manage your GnuPGP-keyring, by removing old and unnecessar</description>
<pubDate>21 Sep  2011 06:14:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55774</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] tests: avoid use of freed pointer</title>
<description>[spotted by coverity] This is only in tests/, but easy to fix, so... I&amp;#039;ve included extra context so you can see how var-&amp;gt;value would be used in the f</description>
<pubDate>20 Sep  2011 07:35:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55755</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] avoid use of freed pointer</title>
<description>Without this patch, pk2 would be freed twice. &amp;gt;From 2a18a4b757e0896e738fefbbaa8ff8c23a9edf89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering &amp;lt;meyering@re</description>
<pubDate>20 Sep  2011 07:26:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55756</link>
</item><item>
<title>link failure when building against latest libgcrypt</title>
<description>Hi, Just a quick FYI that building gnupg (latest from git), using the latest sources of libgcrypt leads to link failures like this:   /w/gnupg/g10</description>
<pubDate>19 Sep  2011 12:09:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55745</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Remove the environment file when quitting.</title>
<description>Please see Debian bug #642021 for more information:  http://bugs.debian.org/642021 --- Hi there! Please Cc: me, I am not subscribed to the list.</description>
<pubDate>19 Sep  2011 11:33:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55809</link>
</item><item>
<title>GnuPG 1.4.11 v. VMS batch mode</title>
<description>Greetings:   A victim of my GnuPG 1.4.11 for VMS kit recently ran into an interesting problem. A DCL procedure (think: &amp;quot;shell script&amp;quot;) works when r</description>
<pubDate>07 Sep  2011 21:33:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55691</link>
</item><item>
<title>GnuPG 2.0.18 won&amp;#039;t use libcurl</title>
<description>The 2.0.18 configure script test for libcurl is broken. The test program&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;#include &amp;lt;curl/curl.h&amp;gt;&amp;#039; directive is missing its leading &amp;#039;#&amp;#039;. From config</description>
<pubDate>06 Sep  2011 22:56:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55685</link>
</item><item>
<title>protection against hardware attacks (RAM removal)</title>
<description>Hello, as probably most of you know it is possible to grab key material from a PC by powering off the system and immediate removal of the RAM and co</description>
<pubDate>01 Sep  2011 06:57:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55655</link>
</item><item>
<title>OpenPGP card: verify or set a PIN -&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Conditions of use not satisfied&amp;quot; (69 85)</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m not sure whether this is a GPG problem as such (and if not, I would appreciate a pointer to a suitable list), but I just received an OpenPGP v</description>
<pubDate>25 Aug  2011 14:11:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55579</link>
</item><item>
<title>Program announce: gpgkeymgr</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;d like to announce the first official version (0.2) of the new program gpgkeymgr. It is an small tool for managing and cleaning up you&amp;#039;re keyr</description>
<pubDate>15 Aug  2011 09:46:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55486</link>
</item><item>
<title>[rant] using a hardware token with GnuPG</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hello, I have a CryptoStick v1.2 and up to date Debian sid (amd64). I&amp;#039;m having some hard time trying</description>
<pubDate>15 Aug  2011 06:00:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55485</link>
</item><item>
<title>Translation of GnuPG Tools descriptions</title>
<description>Hi! Tools descriptions in /tools/gpgconf-comp.c are addressed to NULL PO  domain name, not extracted and so untranslatable: http://git.gnupg.org/cg</description>
<pubDate>14 Aug  2011 02:52:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55476</link>
</item><item>
<title>Trust Signature and Trust Level Bug</title>
<description>Dear List, I think I have found two bugs in the way that gpg handles the interaction between trust signatures and locally assigned owner trust. I&amp;#039;m</description>
<pubDate>12 Aug  2011 03:05:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55460</link>
</item><item>
<title>Peaceful coexistence of GnuPG and other smart card software</title>
<description>Hello, First of all, I&amp;#039;m really excited about GnuPG 2.0.18 release. Right now CryptoStick v1.2 is the most exciting commonly available smart card/tok</description>
<pubDate>10 Aug  2011 09:24:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55439</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [gpgtools-users] GnuPG 2.0.18 release?</title>
<description>Hi there, On 07.08.2011, at 13:17, Benjamin Donnachie wrote: &amp;gt; On 6 Aug 2011, at 22:38, Martin Paljak &amp;lt;martin@martinpaljak.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Will there</description>
<pubDate>07 Aug  2011 09:27:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55405</link>
</item><item>
<title>Future for GnuPG 1.4.x for Windows</title>
<description>Hello list I am using GnuPG 1.4.11 on several Windows systems and I have now a question about future development of GnuPG: On the Website of GnuPG.o</description>
<pubDate>07 Aug  2011 03:57:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/55403</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

