<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>GnuPG | devel</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>23 Nov  2009 20:38:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Where is &amp;gt;libassuan-1.1.0</title>
<description>Hi, when I try to compile gnupg and gpgme from trunk I need a libassuan with a new API version, that should be available from version 1.1.0 on. But</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 01:10:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49466</link>
</item><item>
<title>some questions on using gpg in scripting</title>
<description>Hi. I&amp;#039;d like to use gpg in some scripts for decryption only. The encrypted files are mainly symmetrically encrypted (I mean the session key), but it</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 06:47:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49451</link>
</item><item>
<title>does gpg ever write to stdout in if a file could not be decrypted?</title>
<description>Hi. Minor question: Say I use gpg in batch mode to decrypt a file to stdout. Of course this might fail (the passphrase might be wrong, or the message</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 06:38:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49452</link>
</item><item>
<title>DSA2 default status</title>
<description>The default for DSA2 in GPG is currently &amp;quot;off&amp;quot; - that is, by default, we fix the size of a DSA key at 1024 bits, and the q size (to specify the hash)</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 06:47:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49428</link>
</item><item>
<title>Minor fix for dirmngr.texi</title>
<description>--- dirmngr.texi-r321  2009-11-13 15:41:14.541212500 +0100 +++ dirmngr.texi.new  2009-11-13 15:42:24.009554000 +0100 @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ @opindex</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 06:43:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49370</link>
</item><item>
<title>keyserver scheme http broken?</title>
<description>I might miss something here, but for me on gnupg 2.0.13 (and 2.0.11) retrieving keys via the &amp;quot;http://&amp;quot; scheme seems to be broken. (Also it seem that</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 09:24:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49362</link>
</item><item>
<title>Error importing public key</title>
<description>Hi, My partner sent me an ASCII-armored PGP public key (the attached file) that had been generated using GnuPG v2.0.12. Then I failed to import that</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2009 09:20:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49354</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] change decrypt to support larger keys with openpgp card (was: OpenPGP card and 4096 bit keys)</title>
<description>Werner Koch &amp;lt;wk@gnupg.org&amp;gt; said: &amp;gt; On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:55, klaus@flittner.org said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; 2. Change the protocol used for genkey and decrypt &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 06:46:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49315</link>
</item><item>
<title>&amp;lt;GPG Agent&amp;gt; - invalid length of cacheID</title>
<description>Hello, i have the problem, that gpg-agent throws errors when launching the pinentry. I analyzed the problem and would give you my results in the hope</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 13:28:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49220</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Fix memory leak in scdaemon</title>
<description>Hi, in scd/command.c the buffer allocated by cmd_setdata is never freed. The attached patch frees the buffer after use and before a second use of set</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2009 09:49:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49206</link>
</item><item>
<title>Setting digest-algo for a signature via gpgme?</title>
<description>Is it possible to set the digest-algo used via gpgme when creating some clearsigned text? The goal would be to generate a signature and ensure that,</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2009 12:48:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49202</link>
</item><item>
<title>OpenPGP card and 4096 bit keys</title>
<description>Hi, i have a openpgp card that supports 4096 keys (even the one from kernelconcepts seems to support them). But the usage with gpg is restricted to 3</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2009 10:55:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49184</link>
</item><item>
<title>hkp</title>
<description>Hi, Not sure if that is the correct ml, if not sorry in advance. I don&amp;#039;t want to use hkp, but rather http e.g. http://stinkfoot.org:11371/pks/looku</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 13:16:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49162</link>
</item><item>
<title>GPGME: Signature summary</title>
<description>Hi, I do a verification of a file and what baffles me is the summary of the signature. If I use a wrong file it correctly outputs GPGME_SIGSUM_RED,</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 08:32:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49156</link>
</item><item>
<title>g13 and LUKS ?</title>
<description>Hello Werner, I&amp;#039;ve see than you work on EncFS support with g13, do you think your can also add LUKS support ? Thanks in advanced for your answer. B</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 08:07:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49154</link>
</item><item>
<title>Covadis vega-alpha reader don&amp;#039;t support by ccid-driver GnuPG and don&amp;#039;t support readers PINPAD used</title>
<description>Hi, I wanted to used the reader&amp;#039;s pinpad of my reader (covadis vega-alpha), so I need to use your internal ccid-driver. Modification has been done on</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 02:51:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49153</link>
</item><item>
<title>[patch] G13 and EncFS</title>
<description>Hi! As some of you might have noticed, I am currently working on a new GnuPG tool to manage a crypto container with OpenPGP or X.509 keys. This tool</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2009 06:18:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49145</link>
</item><item>
<title>gnupg-2.0.13: unwanted gcc-ism in source code, and a needed library</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve made some further progress in getting gnupg-2.0.13 installed on various local Unix platforms, and today, hit an apparent gcc-ism in the source co</description>
<pubDate>12 Oct  2009 14:15:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49133</link>
</item><item>
<title>GPGME -- Context</title>
<description>Hi, I hope this is the correct place to describe my problem. I have GPGME 1.2.0, GnuPG 1.4.10 and GnuPG 2.0.13 installed on my 64 bit Arch- Linux sy</description>
<pubDate>10 Oct  2009 06:19:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49115</link>
</item><item>
<title>email hashes in PGP keys as protection against spam</title>
<description>Hello, I would like to propose a small change to gpg (which I cannot do myself as I am not a programmer) which should solve the spammers harvest key</description>
<pubDate>04 Oct  2009 19:08:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49086</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [svn] GnuPG - r5171 - trunk/g10</title>
<description>On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 14:31, cvs@cvs.gnupg.org said: &amp;gt; New Revision: 5171 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Modified: &amp;gt;  trunk/g10/ChangeLog &amp;gt;  trunk/g10/encr-data.c &amp;gt;  trunk/g</description>
<pubDate>02 Oct  2009 04:39:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49080</link>
</item><item>
<title>SHA2 in OpenPGP cards?</title>
<description>Hi! Before I spend time testing it, can the OpenPGP card support RSA-SHA2 signatures? /Simon _______________________________________________ Gnupg-</description>
<pubDate>29 Sep  2009 00:46:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49059</link>
</item><item>
<title>Length of public exponent in OpenPGP card specification</title>
<description>Hello, in the specification[1] the algorithm attributes contain a field for the length of the public exponent. The available implementation of the ca</description>
<pubDate>26 Sep  2009 15:50:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49046</link>
</item><item>
<title>GnuPG 2.0 SVN moved to a new branch</title>
<description>Hi, I recently created a new branch for GnuPG 2.0.  svn://cvs.gnupg.org/gnupg/branches/STABLE-BRANCH-2-0 is what you want. Use svn switch to upda</description>
<pubDate>26 Sep  2009 11:15:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49045</link>
</item><item>
<title>libassuan</title>
<description>Attempted compiling gnupg2 svn 5163 this am on ubuntu -- getting this error: configure: *** *** You need libassuan with Pth support to build this pro</description>
<pubDate>26 Sep  2009 05:54:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/49041</link>
</item><item>
<title>Experimental Algorithms again</title>
<description>Hello, I am sorry for posting again, but we didn&amp;#039;t find a solution to the problem yet and didn&amp;#039;t get any responses so far. The main question is, wh</description>
<pubDate>17 Sep  2009 05:54:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48940</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: pinentry-qt4</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Anyone having luck getting pinentry-qt4 to work?  Yes, works in gpg4win 2.0.1rc1 and I could just complie it and run it for pinentry-0.7.6 on lenn</description>
<pubDate>16 Sep  2009 04:58:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48926</link>
</item><item>
<title>GnuPG 2 does not import older keys with RSA-E and RSA-S anymore</title>
<description>It seems that some GnuPG2 2.0.12 packages do not import old keys with the deprecated following algorithms anymore:      2     - RSA Encryp</description>
<pubDate>16 Sep  2009 02:50:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48925</link>
</item><item>
<title>Experimental Algorithms</title>
<description>Hi all, we are working on experimental algorithms and tried to incorporate different signing algorithms into gpg. We created a public key package,</description>
<pubDate>14 Sep  2009 06:34:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48918</link>
</item><item>
<title>can&amp;#039;t get pinentry-qt4 to work</title>
<description>Anyone having luck getting pinentry-qt4 to work? Both -qt and -gtk-2 seems to work ok for me, but as soon as I try -qt4, gpg-agent fails, my debug-</description>
<pubDate>13 Sep  2009 13:02:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48909</link>
</item><item>
<title>GPG User ID Comments and RFC 5322</title>
<description>Hi again. Some days ago I was reading RFC 5322 which will probably become the new standard for internet mail.  In sections 3.4 and 3.4.1 it says: &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>11 Sep  2009 06:54:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48890</link>
</item><item>
<title>does gpg cope with very large key sizes</title>
<description>Hi list and GnuPG developers!  Let me introduce myself,... I&amp;#039;m Philippe Cerfon and I&amp;#039;m currently taking some crypto-lectures... including all that fa</description>
<pubDate>09 Sep  2009 15:43:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48822</link>
</item><item>
<title>strange behavior/maybe a critical bug?</title>
<description>Hello everyone, I´m not a developer but I encountered a strange behavior regarding gpg encrypted messages. Maybe I discovered a critical bug, maybe I</description>
<pubDate>07 Sep  2009 06:53:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48799</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Announce] GnuPG 2.0.13 released</title>
<description>Hello! We are pleased to announce the availability of a new stable GnuPG-2 release: Version 2.0.13. The GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) is GNU&amp;#039;s tool for</description>
<pubDate>04 Sep  2009 10:09:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48761</link>
</item><item>
<title>Out of memory error, Mac 10.6, GnuPG 1.4.10</title>
<description>Hi! Today I downloaded and compiled GnuPG 1.4.10 to my Mac running Snow  Leopard. The compilation went smoothly, with no errors (using ./ configure</description>
<pubDate>04 Sep  2009 06:57:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48756</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Announce] Updated W32 build of GnuPG 1.4.10</title>
<description>Hi, the broken binary build of GnuPG 1.4.10 for Microsoft Windows has been fixed. The new installer has a new file name and includes a small source</description>
<pubDate>03 Sep  2009 07:37:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48741</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Announce] W32 build of GnuPG 1.4.10 is broken</title>
<description>Hi, GnuPG 1.4.10 has been announced yesterday, including a binary for Microsoft windows: &amp;gt;  gnupg-w32cli-1.4.10.exe (1531k) &amp;gt;  gnupg-w32cli-1.4.10</description>
<pubDate>03 Sep  2009 01:14:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48736</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Announce] GnuPG 1.4.10 released</title>
<description>Hello!   We are pleased to announce the availability of a new stable GnuPG-1 release: Version 1.4.10.  The GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) is GNU&amp;#039;s too</description>
<pubDate>02 Sep  2009 10:21:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48723</link>
</item><item>
<title>Compile i386 / x86_64 on Mac 10.6</title>
<description>Hi i did try to compile gnupg for mac 10.6 as fat binary i386 / x86_64. I&amp;#039;ve getting a error while compiling multpile archs: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.</description>
<pubDate>02 Sep  2009 02:56:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48710</link>
</item><item>
<title>Why Is libassuan still a static lib? 2009 Edition</title>
<description>Hello, When I last brought this up (http://markmail.org/message/anh6vlx3dx2vdgyq#query:libassuan%20shared%20Eric%20Dorland+page:1+mid:4jfwogujquqaaqn</description>
<pubDate>16 Aug  2009 15:59:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48609</link>
</item><item>
<title>64bit: util/iobuf.c:322: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size</title>
<description>Hi, There is a warning from the compiler on 64 bit systems: ../../util/iobuf.c: In function &amp;#039;fd_cache_close&amp;#039;: ../../util/iobuf.c:322: warning: cast</description>
<pubDate>16 Aug  2009 05:27:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48607</link>
</item><item>
<title>GnuPG 1.4.10 RC1 available from Debian Experimental</title>
<description>Hi, The recent release candidate 1 for GnuPG 1.4.10 has been packaged and uploaded to Debian&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;experimental&amp;quot; distribution, in order to facilitate t</description>
<pubDate>16 Aug  2009 01:02:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48611</link>
</item><item>
<title>Please test :)</title>
<description>Hi everyone, I&amp;#039;d appreciate it if people could test two particular things in the  keyserver support: 1) LDAP now works with DNS service discovery.</description>
<pubDate>13 Aug  2009 19:21:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48582</link>
</item><item>
<title>Changes in 1.4.10 (was: 1.4.10 release candidate)</title>
<description>Noteworthy changes in version 1.4.10 (unreleased) -------------------------------------------------   * 2048 bit RSA keys are now generated by defa</description>
<pubDate>13 Aug  2009 07:44:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48558</link>
</item><item>
<title>1.4.10 release candidate</title>
<description>Hi, I just uploaded a release candidate for GnuPG 1.4.10:  ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.10rc1.tar.bz2  ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcr</description>
<pubDate>13 Aug  2009 07:40:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48557</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Announce] Gpg4win 2.0.0 has been released</title>
<description>Hi! Building and installing GnuPG on the Microsoft Windows platform is more complicated than doing this on a Unix platform. To help users we are pro</description>
<pubDate>13 Aug  2009 01:37:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48554</link>
</item><item>
<title>r5108 FTBFS without HAVE_LIBREADLINE</title>
<description>Hi, card-util.c: In function &amp;#039;card_edit&amp;#039;: card-util.c:1819: error: &amp;#039;card_edit_completion&amp;#039; undeclared (first use in this function) card-util.c:1819: e</description>
<pubDate>10 Aug  2009 11:41:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48535</link>
</item><item>
<title>GPGME Compilation Questions</title>
<description>Yet more cygwin errors trying this time to compile gpgme: gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wcast-align -Wshadow -Wstrict-prototypes -o t-encrypt.exe t-en crypt.o .</description>
<pubDate>31 Jul  2009 14:50:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48501</link>
</item><item>
<title>GPG SVN Compilation Errors - cygwin</title>
<description>gpg2 svn version 5102 Receiving following errors trying to compile: (I&amp;#039;m open to suggestions) and thanks for help!: /usr/local/lib/libgcrypt.a(pubk</description>
<pubDate>30 Jul  2009 22:09:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48492</link>
</item><item>
<title>Poldi feature suggestion</title>
<description>--- poldi-0.4.1.orig/TODO +++ poldi-0.4.1/TODO @@ -2,6 +2,9 @@ * allow for Dirmngr to be started on demand (in pipe mode) (NO &amp;lt;- Why?!)  Low priori</description>
<pubDate>30 Jul  2009 11:16:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48463</link>
</item><item>
<title>Poldi bug report: better scdaemon handling</title>
<description>- don&amp;#039;t clutter the display with scdaemon stderr  - use a global configuration file for scdaemon --- poldi-0.4.1.orig/conf/Makefile.am +++ poldi-0.4</description>
<pubDate>30 Jul  2009 10:58:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48461</link>
</item><item>
<title>Poldi bug report: better default config file</title>
<description>Default configuration file good for production use, not for one developer&amp;#039;s machine. --- poldi-0.4.1.orig/conf/poldi.conf.skel +++ poldi-0.4.1/conf/p</description>
<pubDate>30 Jul  2009 10:51:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48460</link>
</item><item>
<title>Poldi bug report: allow non-digit PIN</title>
<description>My OpenPGP smartcard has non-digits in its PIN, so it needs poldi to allow that. Note: you may want to also remove the all_digitsp function. --- pol</description>
<pubDate>30 Jul  2009 10:49:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48459</link>
</item><item>
<title>Poldi bug report: quieter, better prompts</title>
<description>Poldi is quite chatty in the PAM conversation, even when not in debug mode. This patch cuts on that. It is mainly justified by the fact that xscreensa</description>
<pubDate>30 Jul  2009 10:46:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48462</link>
</item><item>
<title>Poldi bug report: hangs indefinitely when no card inserted</title>
<description>If poldi is configured in the PAM stack, there is a reader, but no card inserted, poldi waits indefinitely for a card. In a scenario where authenticat</description>
<pubDate>30 Jul  2009 10:38:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48465</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Adding support for z/OS in gnupg and related libraries</title>
<description>On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:40, amul.shah@fnis.com said: &amp;gt; Please excuse the cross-post. Some of the hoops that I jumped through gnupg-devel is fine. W</description>
<pubDate>30 Jul  2009 06:58:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48453</link>
</item><item>
<title>Poldi bug report: absence of DISables (not ENables) x509 support</title>
<description>--- configure.ac~    2008-08-08 01:50:15.000000000 +0200 +++ configure.ac    2009-07-30 12:47:50.000000000 +0200 @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ if test &amp;quot;</description>
<pubDate>30 Jul  2009 03:51:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48448</link>
</item><item>
<title>Poldi bug report: version of the GPL</title>
<description>Hi, The file COPYING is version 2 of the GPL, but a pseudo-random sampling of .c/.h files in the source says GNU GPL v3 or later, thus v2 not allowed</description>
<pubDate>30 Jul  2009 03:32:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48447</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] ncursesw support for pinentry-curses</title>
<description>Hi, Currently pinentry-curses cannot handle multibyte characters and messages from gpg-agent are garbled under multibyte locales (such as ja_JP.UTF-8</description>
<pubDate>29 Jul  2009 20:07:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48446</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] libgpgme header change to fix compilation issues on AIX, z/OS and HP-UX</title>
<description>This patch applies to libgpgme 1.1.8 and fixes compilation issues on AIX 5.3, HP-UX (11.31 IA64) and z/OS R10. I successfully tested (./configure &amp;amp;&amp;amp;</description>
<pubDate>28 Jul  2009 11:37:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48440</link>
</item><item>
<title>Minor bug in --pgp6 option</title>
<description>I checked the source of gnppg 1.4.9 andÂ  2.0.12 and both seem to be missing some settings when the --pgp6 option is used.   In the if statement at</description>
<pubDate>28 Jul  2009 10:35:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48439</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: IT Department having the secure key.</title>
<description>On Jul 27, 2009, at 8:29 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; And: You can only encrypt the files for one key. So only one user  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; will have &amp;gt;&amp;gt; acces</description>
<pubDate>27 Jul  2009 07:34:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48427</link>
</item><item>
<title>Sign a mail</title>
<description>Hello! I try to send emails from an application, which should be signed with  gpg. But I&amp;#039;m not sure, which part of the mail is used for signing. A</description>
<pubDate>20 Jul  2009 08:19:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48396</link>
</item><item>
<title>1024-3072 bit OpenPGP cards</title>
<description>Hi, I talked with David about the new OpenPGP card and how to solve a surprising behaviour. A little background: The new v2 specification of the ca</description>
<pubDate>17 Jul  2009 02:26:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48380</link>
</item><item>
<title>Debian bug#191137: Interoperability problem with pgp 2.6.3i</title>
<description>Hi, May you comment on the following report [1] please, which I will fully quote. I don&amp;#039;t know, if this is still relevant and I would like to know, h</description>
<pubDate>16 Jul  2009 03:48:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48377</link>
</item><item>
<title>GPGME API documentation licence question</title>
<description>Hello, I am currently working on a .NET binding library for GPGME. The number of classes, methods etc. came to a point where documentation might be u</description>
<pubDate>09 Jul  2009 15:50:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48354</link>
</item><item>
<title>updating default digest preferences</title>
<description>Hi folks-- with new versions of gpg pending, is there any chance of getting the default key preferences updated, as referenced here:  https://bugs.</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2009 14:52:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48305</link>
</item><item>
<title>pinentry-0.7.6: Ctrl+V doesn&amp;#039;t work with pinentry-qt4</title>
<description>I noticed that Ctrl+V doesn&amp;#039;t work with new pinentry-qt4 program, but it works with Qt-3-based pinentry-qt. -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2009 19:40:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48301</link>
</item><item>
<title>pgp.mit.edu upgrading to SKS</title>
<description>It might be of more than passing interest to readers of this list to know that pgp.mit.edu migrated from PKS 0.9.6 to SKS 1.1.0 today. -- John Marsh</description>
<pubDate>02 Jul  2009 06:42:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48278</link>
</item><item>
<title>Extended length APDU solved for Cardman</title>
<description>Hi Ludovic, After spending too much time trying to trace the USB commands of the Cardman readers using Windows under KVM I switched back to the old s</description>
<pubDate>30 Jun  2009 00:33:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48254</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Strange Key ID problem. : subkey id is reported where primary key id should be reported as missing?</title>
<description>On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:56, chiaki.ishikawa@ubin.jp said: &amp;gt; (After writing this summary, I now think it is a bug, but am not sure Yes it is a bug. B</description>
<pubDate>29 Jun  2009 00:03:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48232</link>
</item><item>
<title>Strange Key ID problem. : subkey id is reported where primary key id should be reported as missing?</title>
<description>(I sent this to gnupg-bugs@gnu.org a week ago, but nothing seems to happen, and so am sending this out again after a slight modification, and this tim</description>
<pubDate>28 Jun  2009 22:56:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48291</link>
</item><item>
<title>SVN 5052 GPG2 Make Errors - Cygwin</title>
<description>Sorry to keep reporting problems, but thought I would let the developers know the gpg2 make errors with cygwin with the latest svn 5052 release: In f</description>
<pubDate>28 Jun  2009 22:53:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48230</link>
</item><item>
<title>[libksba] asn1-func.c: array index out of range</title>
<description>Hi, as David Binderman (CC:) pointed out in [1], there&amp;#039;s a &amp;#039;array index out of range&amp;#039; bug in current libksba. Patch follows ;) [1] https://bugzilla.</description>
<pubDate>24 Jun  2009 09:26:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48193</link>
</item><item>
<title>GCRY_THREAD_OPTION_PTHREAD_IMPL</title>
<description>Hello This:  #include &amp;lt;gnutls.h&amp;gt; #include &amp;lt;gcrypt.h&amp;gt; #include &amp;lt;errno.h&amp;gt; #include &amp;lt;pthread.h&amp;gt; GCRY_THREAD_OPTION_PTHREAD_IMPL;      int main</description>
<pubDate>24 Jun  2009 04:57:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48185</link>
</item><item>
<title>Required patches for the OpenPG card v2.0</title>
<description>Hi! Unfortunately I realized too late that 2.0.12 still had bugs with the new OpenPGP card[1]. Without actual hardware testing stuff is a bit hard;</description>
<pubDate>23 Jun  2009 09:26:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48168</link>
</item><item>
<title>[GPGME] [PATCH] Fix implicit declaration</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m attaching the patch which fixes the following compiler warning: assuan-socket.c: In function &amp;#039;_gpgme__assuan_sock_connect&amp;#039;: assuan-socket.c:261:</description>
<pubDate>21 Jun  2009 18:56:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48147</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Support --without-adns option</title>
<description>Currently GnuPG tries to build support for ADNS even when the --without-adns option has been passed to `configure`. I&amp;#039;m attaching the patch which fixe</description>
<pubDate>20 Jun  2009 19:44:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48121</link>
</item><item>
<title>GnuPG 2.0 for Win + Feature requests</title>
<description>Hello there! Firstly: I am wondering, that there is still no compiled version (of the 2.0 series) for Windows. What&amp;#039;s the reason? Then I have also t</description>
<pubDate>19 Jun  2009 10:08:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48103</link>
</item><item>
<title>new pinentry release with qt4 support?</title>
<description>Any news/plans on a new pinentry release that includes the new/shiny qt4 support? -- Rex  _______________________________________________ Gnupg-deve</description>
<pubDate>18 Jun  2009 06:06:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48093</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Announce] Dirmngr 1.0.3 released</title>
<description>Hi! We are pleased to announce the availability of Dirmngr version 1.0.3. Dirmngr is a server for managing and downloading certificate revocation li</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2009 06:49:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48084</link>
</item><item>
<title>DSA Implementation in GnuPG</title>
<description>Hi there, we are interested in the actual implementation of DSA in GnuPG, in particular we would like to know whether the primes p, q and the gener</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2009 05:54:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48087</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Announce] GnuPG 2.0.12 released</title>
<description>Hello! We are pleased to announce the availability of a new stable GnuPG-2 release: Version 2.0.12. The GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) is GNU&amp;#039;s tool for</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2009 04:18:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48077</link>
</item><item>
<title>Errors compiling 1.4 Branch on Cygwin</title>
<description>With the latest 1.4 branch revision 5039 and 5040 I can&amp;#039;t seem to compile the source on cygwin.  I haven&amp;#039;t tried with earlier revisions except that I</description>
<pubDate>09 Jun  2009 13:07:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48016</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Security Concern - Open Source Binaries</title>
<description>On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 03:23:42PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: &amp;gt; however, most gnu/linux distributions do. If you want a centralized &amp;gt; software</description>
<pubDate>09 Jun  2009 12:59:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/48018</link>
</item><item>
<title>Camellia for OpenPGP RFC published</title>
<description>A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.      RFC 5581      Title:   The Camellia Cipher in OpenPGP</description>
<pubDate>04 Jun  2009 05:52:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/47935</link>
</item><item>
<title>pinentry debug-wait?</title>
<description>Why isn&amp;#039;t there a --debug-wait option in pinentry.c? It seems that if you set an &amp;quot;OPTION debug-wait&amp;quot; via assuan pinentry will wait for the debugger,</description>
<pubDate>28 May  2009 13:44:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/47896</link>
</item><item>
<title>[solved] Re: gpg 2.0.11 reports invalid packets on keys from gpg 1.4.9 and keyservers</title>
<description>Hi! An older libgcrypt actually showed the problem:  an mpi of size 0 is not allowed  an mpi of size 0 is not allowed  gpg: read_block: read erro</description>
<pubDate>26 May  2009 01:29:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/47888</link>
</item><item>
<title>gpg 2.0.11 reports invalid packets on keys from gpg 1.4.9 and keyservers</title>
<description>I was originally looking at this as a keyserver problem but it has been pointed out to me that this problem cannot be reproduced with GnuPG 1.4.9. &amp;lt;ht</description>
<pubDate>22 May  2009 22:47:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/47860</link>
</item><item>
<title>AW: Re: laying groundwork for an eventual migration away from SHA1 with	gpg</title>
<description>Hmmm, Keysigning parties makes sense if they strictly follow serious procedures and requirements - but can&amp;#039;t give a 100% security (as the most other i</description>
<pubDate>21 May  2009 06:48:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/47840</link>
</item><item>
<title>gpgme and delphi/pascal ?</title>
<description>Hi I hope that this is the right place to ask. Apologies if not. These days I&amp;#039;m becoming a half decent amateur Lazarus/Freepascal programmer, but I&amp;#039;v</description>
<pubDate>18 May  2009 13:42:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/47817</link>
</item><item>
<title>Signing photo IDs (was Re: SHA-1 recommendations)</title>
<description>(Split off from the earlier thread, as the topic has drifted) On May 18, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Incidentally, I don&amp;#039;t sign</description>
<pubDate>18 May  2009 10:09:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/47790</link>
</item><item>
<title>Make --enable-dsa2 the default?</title>
<description>Hi! Now that GnuPG key generation defaults to RSA keys, we may want to make the option --enable-dsa2 the default. The man page currently reads:  @</description>
<pubDate>17 May  2009 05:07:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/47765</link>
</item><item>
<title>RSA+RSA is now the default</title>
<description>Hi! I just committed changes to the GnuPG trunk to make RSA with an RSA subkey the default. This also changes the order of the presented algorithms,</description>
<pubDate>17 May  2009 05:00:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/47764</link>
</item><item>
<title>SHA-1 recommendations</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve been a bit drowned by work, but I&amp;#039;ve had the opportunity lately to draw up that list of recommendations I was threatening to inflict on people.</description>
<pubDate>15 May  2009 20:43:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/47751</link>
</item><item>
<title>Omnikey readers and 2048 bit keys</title>
<description>Hi! While testing the new 2048 bit smartcards I figured that all Omnikey based readers (e.g. CardMan, Cherry keyboards) won&amp;#039;t work. SCM readers work</description>
<pubDate>11 May  2009 10:38:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/47699</link>
</item><item>
<title>Default encryption key algo</title>
<description>Hi, from all responses we gathered regarding the change of the default algorithm for new keys (on several lists) it should be pretty clear that RSA i</description>
<pubDate>11 May  2009 09:48:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/47695</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Make update_keysig_packet honour cert-digest-algo</title>
<description>Hi there, Firstly, I should warn you this is the first set of patches I&amp;#039;ve submitted for any software ever, so please accept my apologies if somethin</description>
<pubDate>10 May  2009 08:11:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/47682</link>
</item><item>
<title>Feature Request: Parseable output if gpg waits for lock</title>
<description>Every now and then some user reports a problem to Enigmail because gpg is hanging for no obvious reason, which then turns out to be gpg waiting for th</description>
<pubDate>08 May  2009 08:01:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/47665</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Caching symmetric encryption passphrase with gpg-agent</title>
<description>Hi, The attached is a new patch for caching symmetric encryption passphrase using a S2K salt as a cache key, as I proposed a couple of months ago. I</description>
<pubDate>08 May  2009 02:38:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/47663</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
