<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>GnuPG | devel</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 15:41:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: hello</title>
<description>I think you should try the gnupg-users list, this is for development. http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users Also, include as much info</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 09:15:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57162</link>
</item><item>
<title>hello</title>
<description>l want to generate key but saying Error in accessing Enigmail service, help me, Thanks</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 19:18:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57161</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Parallel Encryption Revisited</title>
<description>On 2/3/2012 4:22 PM, Yushu Yao wrote: &amp;gt; http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2007-February/023654.html The overriding concern you were presen</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 15:28:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57137</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Parallel Encryption Revisited</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Yushu Yao &amp;lt;yao.yushu@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi Experts, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; 5 years ago there was a post asking about parallel encryptin</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 13:27:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57135</link>
</item><item>
<title>Parallel Encryption Revisited</title>
<description>Hi Experts, 5 years ago there was a post asking about parallel encrypting and got blasted with a series of concerns: http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 13:22:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57136</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gnupg-1.4.12 build issue</title>
<description>On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:00, beebe@math.utah.edu said: &amp;gt; I now have gnupg-1.4.12 successfully built, validated, and installed &amp;gt; on all of our more than</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 08:41:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57126</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: FIX ME! implement ttyname() bionic/libc/bionic/stubs.c:360</title>
<description>Hi, please try this patch: diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index f008d23..47c6d12 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -490,6 +4</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 05:18:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57070</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: FIX ME! implement ttyname() bionic/libc/bionic/stubs.c:360</title>
<description>On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 06:02, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; Any pointers as to how to handle this? Or does it matter? I was able to encrypt on And</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 05:05:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57069</link>
</item><item>
<title>FIX ME! implement ttyname() bionic/libc/bionic/stubs.c:360</title>
<description>I have a built of gpg-agent for Android, when I run it, it prints out some text but &amp;#039;gpg-agent --daemon&amp;#039; seems to stay running. Looks like there migh</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 21:02:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57059</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] Use preferred hashing algorithm when updating signature packets</title>
<description>On Jan 29, 2012, at 5:27 AM, Christian Aistleitner wrote: &amp;gt; Hi David, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; on Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:43:19PM -0500, David Shaw wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; [ hash_for(</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 19:29:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57058</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gnupg-1.4.12 build issue</title>
<description>On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:00:09PM -0700, Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote: &amp;gt; After several attempts today, I tracked down the problem: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;   ../mpi/libmpi</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 13:38:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57044</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] Allow printing key digests in key edit</title>
<description>Hello, on Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:52:31AM -0500, Robert J. Hansen wrote: &amp;gt; Then post your code as a diff against a 2.0.x tree and let interested &amp;gt; us</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 12:02:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57035</link>
</item><item>
<title>gnupg-1.4.12 build issue</title>
<description>I now have gnupg-1.4.12 successfully built, validated, and installed on all of our more than 20 flavors of Unix in our test lab, EXCEPT for one: GNU/L</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 11:00:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57036</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gnupg vs libiconv on Android</title>
<description>On 01/31/2012 12:07 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: &amp;gt; On 01/31/2012 11:57 AM, Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:41, hans@guardianproject</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 09:14:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57023</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gnupg vs libiconv on Android</title>
<description>On 01/31/2012 11:57 AM, Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:41, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; About a better solution for utf8conv.c,</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 09:07:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57022</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gnupg vs libiconv on Android</title>
<description>On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:41, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; About a better solution for utf8conv.c, can you expand on that? Do you &amp;gt; just mean a cl</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 08:57:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57021</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gnupg vs libiconv on Android</title>
<description>On 01/31/2012 10:05 AM, Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:47, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; builds for arm..., so can&amp;#039;t run it on mo</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 08:41:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57020</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: --recv-keys without dirmngr?</title>
<description>On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:24, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; Is it possible to have a working --recv-keys without using dirmngr? I No. &amp;gt; ask becaus</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 07:07:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57017</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gnupg vs libiconv on Android</title>
<description>On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:47, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; builds for arm..., so can&amp;#039;t run it on most build machines). Then I had &amp;gt; to do somethin</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 07:05:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57018</link>
</item><item>
<title>--recv-keys without dirmngr?</title>
<description>Is it possible to have a working --recv-keys without using dirmngr? I ask because I got gpg2, dirmngr, and dirmngr-client built and executing on Andr</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 06:24:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57016</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gnupg vs libiconv on Android</title>
<description>On 01/30/2012 03:25 AM, Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:11, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; How do I disable iconv? I tried combina</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 19:47:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/57002</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] Allow printing key digests in key edit</title>
<description>On 1/30/12 9:44 AM, Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; Even the for many common usages actually broken MD5, still holds strong &amp;gt; when used as the digest in a HMAC.</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 09:33:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56980</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Announce] GnuPG 1.4.12 released</title>
<description>Hello!   We are pleased to announce the availability of a new stable GnuPG-1 release: Version 1.4.12.  The GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) is GNU&amp;#039;s too</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 08:36:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56981</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] Allow printing key digests in key edit</title>
<description>On Jan 30, 2012, at 8:36 AM, Christian Aistleitner wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; These are not defined by OpenPGP and thus I strongly advise against its &amp;gt;&amp;gt; use. SHA-1 i</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 07:10:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56974</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] Allow printing key digests in key edit</title>
<description>On 1/30/12 8:36 AM, Christian Aistleitner wrote: &amp;gt; I suppose we all agree that among those who claim such &amp;quot;nonsense&amp;quot; &amp;gt; are for example renowned crypto</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 06:52:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56973</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] Allow printing key digests in key edit</title>
<description>On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:36, christian@quelltextlich.at said: &amp;gt; I suppose we all agree that among those who claim such &amp;quot;nonsense&amp;quot; are &amp;gt; for example ren</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 06:44:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56972</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] Allow printing key digests in key edit</title>
<description>Hello Werner, on Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:32:58AM +0100, Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:23, christian@quelltextlich.at said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Altho</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 05:36:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56971</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] Allow printing key digests in key edit</title>
<description>On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:23, christian@quelltextlich.at said: &amp;gt; Although SHA1 is considered to be broken by some, key-signing parties That is plain no</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 00:32:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56964</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gnupg vs libiconv on Android</title>
<description>On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:11, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; How do I disable iconv? I tried combinations ./configure --disable-nls --without-iconv-</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 00:25:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56963</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Allow printing key digests in key edit</title>
<description>Hello, Although SHA1 is considered to be broken by some, key-signing parties typically still rely on asserting validity of keys by comparing their fi</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 07:23:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56950</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Updating gitignore</title>
<description>Hello, common/t-dns-cert, and common/t-openpgp-oid are generated by make, but not listed in .gitignore. The below patch adds them. Kind regards, Chr</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 05:53:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56949</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] Use preferred hashing algorithm when updating signature packets</title>
<description>Hi David, on Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:43:19PM -0500, David Shaw wrote: &amp;gt; [ hash_for() -&amp;gt; opt.cert_digest_algo ] Of course, you&amp;#039;re right. Find the upd</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 02:27:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56948</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] Use preferred hashing algorithm when updating signature packets</title>
<description>On Jan 28, 2012, at 11:43 PM, David Shaw wrote: &amp;gt; On Jan 28, 2012, at 4:46 PM, Christian Aistleitner wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; when updating a signa</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan  2012 20:57:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56946</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] Use preferred hashing algorithm when updating signature packets</title>
<description>On Jan 28, 2012, at 4:46 PM, Christian Aistleitner wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; when updating a signature packet, GnuPG reuses the hashing algorithm of the &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan  2012 20:43:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56945</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Use preferred hashing algorithm when updating signature packets</title>
<description>Hello, when updating a signature packet, GnuPG reuses the hashing algorithm of the original signature packet. Hence, if the preferred hashing algorit</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan  2012 13:46:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56941</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gnupg vs libiconv on Android</title>
<description>On Jan 28, 2012, at 6:26 AM, Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:22, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; libiconv-1.14 built and installed</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan  2012 11:11:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56937</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gnupg vs libiconv on Android</title>
<description>On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:22, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; libiconv-1.14 built and installed for Android, and now it dies looking &amp;gt; for ICONV_CONST</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan  2012 03:26:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56921</link>
</item><item>
<title>gnupg vs libiconv on Android</title>
<description>In the continuing saga of the Android port, I&amp;#039;m now running into libiconv. First I tried without libiconv using --disable-nls, and it still died with</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 14:22:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56909</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GnuPG master migrated to nPth</title>
<description>On 01/26/2012 09:00 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: &amp;gt; Bionic libc does not seem to have these though: pthread_tryjoin_np &amp;gt; pthread_getname_np but do</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 09:59:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56908</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GnuPG master migrated to nPth</title>
<description>On 01/26/2012 08:50 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: &amp;gt; Next, npth&amp;#039;s ./configure complains it can&amp;#039;t find pthread, I&amp;#039;m looking &amp;gt; into this now. pthrea</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 09:51:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56907</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>On 01/27/2012 09:42 AM, Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:55, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I got past the stdint.h problem, but am</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 09:26:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56906</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>Ok, that worked for me, at least as much as the gnulib update did. I&amp;#039;m now at iconv, so time for another build, and I&amp;#039;ll report back. .hc On 01/27/2</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 09:22:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56905</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>Hi, please try this patch to solve the build problems on gnupg. It is basically the same as used in gnulib. I have not tested it, though. Eventuell</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 08:52:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56904</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:55, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; I got past the stdint.h problem, but am now onto the pthread. I guess Please try the la</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 06:42:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56902</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>On Jan 27, 2012, at 8:55 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Jan 27, 2012, at 5:06 AM, Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:35, hans</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 05:57:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56901</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>On Jan 27, 2012, at 5:06 AM, Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:35, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; breaker for gnupg on Android since</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 05:55:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56900</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:35, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; breaker for gnupg on Android since there doesn&amp;#039;t seem to be interest in &amp;gt; the gnulib mai</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 02:06:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56896</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GnuPG master migrated to nPth</title>
<description>On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:00, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; As for pthread, in Android its in libc, so this fails: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  AC_CHECK_LIB(pthread, pthre</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 02:05:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56895</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GnuPG master migrated to nPth</title>
<description>On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:50, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; First thing, config.sub and config.guess are too old, they don&amp;#039;t support &amp;gt; the host &amp;#039;arm</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 02:02:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56894</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GnuPG master migrated to nPth</title>
<description>----- Original Message ----- From: &amp;quot;Hans-Christoph Steiner&amp;quot; &amp;lt;hans@guardianproject.info&amp;gt; To: &amp;lt;gnupg-devel@gnupg.org&amp;gt; Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012</description>
<pubDate>26 Jan  2012 23:49:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56893</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>On 01/26/2012 03:35 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: &amp;gt; Werner Koch &amp;lt;wk at gnupg.org&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:41, simon at josefsson.org sai</description>
<pubDate>26 Jan  2012 14:51:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56888</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>Werner Koch &amp;lt;wk at gnupg.org&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt; On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:41, simon at josefsson.org said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; The error messages suggests it is the former, yo</description>
<pubDate>26 Jan  2012 12:35:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56887</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GnuPG master migrated to nPth</title>
<description>On 01/26/2012 02:50 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On 01/26/2012 12:00 PM, Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:46, hans@guardianproje</description>
<pubDate>26 Jan  2012 12:00:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56886</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GnuPG master migrated to nPth</title>
<description>On 01/26/2012 12:00 PM, Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:46, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Any ideas bout npth on Android? Is npth re</description>
<pubDate>26 Jan  2012 11:50:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56884</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GnuPG master migrated to nPth</title>
<description>On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:46, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; Any ideas bout npth on Android? Is npth required to run gnupg? Would you mind try build</description>
<pubDate>26 Jan  2012 09:00:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56881</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GnuPG master migrated to nPth</title>
<description>Any ideas bout npth on Android? Is npth required to run gnupg? .hc On Jan 26, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; just a quick update</description>
<pubDate>26 Jan  2012 08:46:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56880</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GnuPG master migrated to nPth</title>
<description>Hi, just a quick update: npth now builds also on kfreebsd and GnuPG basically runs on that platform.  Salam-Shalom,   Werner -- Die Gedanken sin</description>
<pubDate>26 Jan  2012 08:39:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56879</link>
</item><item>
<title>GnuPG master migrated to nPth</title>
<description>Hi, I merged the npth branch of GnuPG into master. Thus there is no more need for GNU Pth. The drawback is that you need to build and install the r</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2012 08:04:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56869</link>
</item><item>
<title>1.4.12 beta installer for Windows</title>
<description>Hi, I created a pre-release of an GnuPG 1.4.12 installer for Windows:  ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/gnupg/gnupg-w32cli-1.4.12-git51c1e84.exe ft</description>
<pubDate>23 Jan  2012 02:26:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56833</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Fix minor typo in comments</title>
<description>or missing words, replace scare with scarce Signed-off-by: Gilles Espinasse &amp;lt;g.esp@free.fr&amp;gt; --- cipher/random.c |  4 ++-- cipher/rndw32.c |  2</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2012 23:47:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56814</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] 1.4 Fix clock_gettime configure detection</title>
<description>AC_CHECK_FUNCS is not enought for clock_gettime as AC_SEARCH_LIBS has to be used Changed configure clock_gettime test to only run in the case when ci</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2012 23:21:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56813</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] Fix clock_gettime detection</title>
<description>forgot to say it is for 1.4. This is probably not the right way as gpg would link to librt and libpthread every time clock_gettime is found when in f</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2012 22:01:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56812</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Fix clock_gettime detection</title>
<description>AC_CHECK_FUNCS is not enought as AC_SEARCH_LIBS has to be used before Tested to work with ac_cv_func_gettimeofday= ./configure using --enable-minimal</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2012 14:41:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56804</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Smartcards and 1.4</title>
<description>On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:29, martin@martinpaljak.net said: &amp;gt; Decryption with 4K keys works with 1.4 but not with 2.X (last time I checked) That works</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2012 09:23:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56796</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>Hans-Christoph Steiner &amp;lt;hans@guardianproject.info&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt; Excellent, thanks. Feel free to CC me on threads there if you want my &amp;gt; input. I&amp;#039;ve do</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2012 06:54:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56795</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>On Jan 20, 2012, at 4:16 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote: &amp;gt; Hans-Christoph Steiner &amp;lt;hans@guardianproject.info&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Jan 19, 2012, at 10:20 AM,</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2012 06:25:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56794</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Smartcards and 1.4</title>
<description>On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 13:28, Werner Koch &amp;lt;wk@gnupg.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:21, martin@martinpaljak.net said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I also use 1.4 for sm</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2012 04:29:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56793</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: randomart is troubling</title>
<description>On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:08, rjh@sixdemonbag.org said: &amp;gt; It was an interesting experiment, but as far as I know only PGP has ever &amp;gt; implemented it. It</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2012 03:34:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56792</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Smartcards and 1.4</title>
<description>On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:21, martin@martinpaljak.net said: &amp;gt; Doesn&amp;#039;t --reader-port fix this? Yes. Either use reader-port in scdaemon.conf or in gpg -</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2012 03:28:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56790</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Smartcards and 1.4</title>
<description>On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:54, John@enigmail.net said: &amp;gt; One additional question, would the addition of gpg-agent support into the &amp;gt; Windows 1.4.x allow</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2012 03:26:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56791</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Smartcards and 1.4</title>
<description>On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:42, dshaw@jabberwocky.com said: &amp;gt; As I see it, #2 and #3 both still allow using smartcards with 1.4.x. &amp;gt; #2 will keep working</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2012 03:03:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56789</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Smartcards and 1.4</title>
<description>On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:54, John Clizbe &amp;lt;John@enigmail.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Currently in 1.4.11, --card-status will see both readers, but only return &amp;gt; r</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2012 02:21:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56788</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>Hans-Christoph Steiner &amp;lt;hans@guardianproject.info&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt; On Jan 19, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hans-Christoph Steiner &amp;lt;hans@g</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2012 01:16:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56787</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Smartcards and 1.4</title>
<description>David Shaw wrote: &amp;gt; On Jan 17, 2012, at 5:50 AM, Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; GnuPG 1.4 uses the smartcard code from 2.0. This is made possibl</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2012 16:54:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56786</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Smartcards and 1.4</title>
<description>On Jan 17, 2012, at 5:50 AM, Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; GnuPG 1.4 uses the smartcard code from 2.0. This is made possible by &amp;gt; using some glue co</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2012 15:42:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56785</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: randomart is troubling [was: Re: QR code]</title>
<description>On 1/19/12 3:56 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: &amp;gt; you might have noticed that i *wasn&amp;#039;t* recommending short strings of &amp;gt; random words. if you&amp;#039;re inte</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2012 13:08:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56784</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: randomart is troubling [was: Re: QR code]</title>
<description>On 01/19/2012 02:23 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: &amp;gt; - we are not claiming randomart is tried and true &amp;gt; - we are not replacing standard manual fin</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2012 12:56:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56783</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: QR code (was: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?)</title>
<description>On Jan 19, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:33:19 +0100, Werner Koch &amp;lt;wk@gnupg.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; - display random</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2012 11:24:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56781</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: randomart is troubling [was: Re: QR code]</title>
<description>On Jan 19, 2012, at 1:44 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: &amp;gt; On 01/19/2012 01:25 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; About randomart display of fingerp</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2012 11:23:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56780</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: QR code (was: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?)</title>
<description>On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:33:19 +0100, Werner Koch &amp;lt;wk@gnupg.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; - display randomart image of fingerprint for keysigning exchanges  Introduci</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2012 10:59:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56782</link>
</item><item>
<title>randomart is troubling [was: Re: QR code]</title>
<description>On 01/19/2012 01:25 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: &amp;gt; About randomart display of fingerprints, we really like the idea as it is implemented in OpenS</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2012 10:44:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56779</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: QR code (was: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?)</title>
<description>On Jan 19, 2012, at 5:33 AM, Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:33, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; You can follow our progress on our</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2012 10:25:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56778</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:41, simon@josefsson.org said: &amp;gt; The error messages suggests it is the former, you need to integrate &amp;gt; gnulib in the documented</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2012 10:02:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56777</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>On Jan 19, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote: &amp;gt; Hans-Christoph Steiner &amp;lt;hans@guardianproject.info&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Excellent, thanks for steppin</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2012 09:35:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56776</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>Hans-Christoph Steiner &amp;lt;hans@guardianproject.info&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt; Excellent, thanks for stepping up on this! Here&amp;#039;s the Android &amp;gt; cross-compiler, its a b</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2012 07:20:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56775</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>On Jan 19, 2012, at 9:41 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote: &amp;gt; Werner Koch &amp;lt;wk@gnupg.org&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:52, hans@guardianproject.info s</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2012 07:14:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56774</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>Werner Koch &amp;lt;wk@gnupg.org&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt; On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:52, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; strange errors. Also the &amp;#039;allocsa&amp;#039; module seem</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2012 06:41:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56773</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Smartcards and 1.4</title>
<description>On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:59, gniibe@fsij.org said: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; 2. Feature freeze, keep the code as it is and don&amp;#039;t update it from 2.0. &amp;gt;&amp;gt;  (I will do this for</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2012 05:38:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56772</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:52, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; strange errors. Also the &amp;#039;allocsa&amp;#039; module seem to have become the &amp;gt; &amp;#039;malloca&amp;#039; module, s</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2012 02:38:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56769</link>
</item><item>
<title>QR code (was: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?)</title>
<description>On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:33, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; You can follow our progress on our wiki, this is part of the PSST project: &amp;gt; https://gua</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2012 02:33:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56768</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Smartcards and 1.4</title>
<description>On 2012-01-17 at 11:50 +0100, Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; 1. Drop the smartcard stuff completely. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; 2. Feature freeze, keep the code as it is and don&amp;#039;t up</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 21:59:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56767</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>On 01/18/2012 10:56 AM, Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:05, hans@at.or.at said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Well, I got pth built so I think it&amp;#039;ll work. For no</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 14:52:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56763</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:03, hans@guardianproject.info said: &amp;gt; If you care, both --disable-ldap and &amp;quot;--disable-ldap --without-ldap&amp;quot; did &amp;gt; not work for</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 09:29:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56761</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>On 01/18/2012 10:56 AM, Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:05, hans@at.or.at said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Well, I got pth built so I think it&amp;#039;ll work. For no</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 09:03:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56760</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:05, hans@at.or.at said: &amp;gt; Well, I got pth built so I think it&amp;#039;ll work. For now I&amp;#039;ll keep it, unless you think the Android por</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 07:56:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56758</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>On 1/18/12 10:10 AM, Alphazo wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner &amp;lt;hans@at.or.at&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Jan 18, 2012, at 5:28 AM, W</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 07:33:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56759</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>How does this project compare to APG for Android? http://www.thialfihar.org/projects/apg/ https://market.android.com/details?id=org.thialfihar.androi</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 07:10:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56757</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>On Jan 18, 2012, at 5:28 AM, Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I have not seen your previous two mails (HTML parts?), but let me give &amp;gt; you a short comme</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 07:05:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56756</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PHP5+PECL-gnupg-1.3 fails in CLI mode (&amp;quot;Result too large&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;could not init keylist&amp;quot;)</title>
<description>On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:38, leftfoot@siu.edu said: &amp;gt; Attempting a simple PHP (pecl) gnupg key lookup fails with a &amp;quot;could not init &amp;gt; keylist&amp;quot; error in a</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 05:30:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56754</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: porting gnupg to Android, is pth required?</title>
<description>Hi, I have not seen your previous two mails (HTML parts?), but let me give you a short comment anyway: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Fri, Jan 13, 2012, at 16:09, Hans-Chris</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 02:28:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/56753</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

