<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>GnuPG | devel</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>01 Dec  2008 08:27:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: Differentiating GPG data from random data</title>
<description>On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 09:09:09AM -0500, Ted wrote: &amp;gt; Thank you for the information. It confirms what I thought after &amp;gt; reading the RFCs. It would be</description>
<pubDate>27 Nov  2008 19:42:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45891</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Differentiating GPG data from random data</title>
<description>On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:21 PM, David Shaw &amp;lt;dshaw@jabberwocky.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Those bytes will more-or-less work, but as you say won&amp;#039;t catch everythi</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2008 06:09:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45885</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Differentiating GPG data from random data</title>
<description>On Nov 24, 2008, at 5:19 PM, Ted wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hope this is not off-topic here. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m writing a program that searches for files that are made up</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2008 20:21:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45883</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Announce] GPGME 1.1.7 released</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve replied without paying attention to where this message is sent and as a result sent it to announce list instead of the devel one. Reposting it he</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2008 18:15:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45882</link>
</item><item>
<title>Differentiating GPG data from random data</title>
<description>Hi, Hope this is not off-topic here. I&amp;#039;m writing a program that searches for files that are made up of random data. GPG data (that is not ascii armo</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2008 14:19:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45881</link>
</item><item>
<title>select pinentry-curses/qt depending on situation</title>
<description>Hey list! What is the best way (if any) to select which pinentry (-curses/-qt/-gtk) to run, depending on situation, i.e. whether X is running and whe</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2008 08:21:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45886</link>
</item><item>
<title>reply: how to make a debug version of the gpg</title>
<description>Hi  I&amp;#039;m sorry. I want to learn the gpg&amp;#039; flow exactly. I think it&amp;#039;s better for me if I can debug it.  Kk11 ----- original----- Sender: gnupg-devel-b</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 20:57:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45859</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to make a debug version of the gpg</title>
<description>On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 02:35:35PM +0800, Yunfeng wrote: &amp;gt; Hi everyone &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Stupid question. How to make a debug version of the gpg?! &amp;gt; Any tips or ur</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 09:59:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45854</link>
</item><item>
<title>how to make a debug version of the gpg</title>
<description>Hi everyone Stupid question. How to make a debug version of the gpg?! Any tips or urls can be referenced?! Thanks Kk11  __________________________</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2008 22:35:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45844</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to identify a good signature by an untrusted key with gpgme 1.1.7</title>
<description>On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:33, ivo.alxneit@psi.ch said: &amp;gt; summary=3    (GPGME_SIGSUM_VALID + GPGME_SIGSUM_GREEN) &amp;gt; fpr=D0E3ADE78E893E9CAEC1E2F401DEC21</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2008 02:38:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45818</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PGP Support/Help</title>
<description>On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 09:53:00PM +0530, anuj sharma wrote: &amp;gt;  I&amp;#039;m having a hard &amp;gt;  time installing GPG v1.07 on Linux Rehdat ES-4. Why that par</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2008 13:22:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45815</link>
</item><item>
<title>[BUG] gpg has problems decrypting HTML email</title>
<description>Hi all, I have been having problems with GPG decrypting mail from various coworkers for a while, and only recently did I manage to get some insite in</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2008 10:47:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45805</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Poldi compilation.</title>
<description>Hi again, I wrote: &amp;gt; Just a quick note that I&amp;#039;ve just built poldi 0.4 for the first time and it also seems that &amp;#039;make install&amp;#039; doesn&amp;#039;t install pam_p</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2008 04:43:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45802</link>
</item><item>
<title>Poldi compilation.</title>
<description>Hi all, Just a quick note that I&amp;#039;ve just built poldi 0.4 for the first time and had to add: #include &amp;lt;limits.h&amp;gt; to the file src/util/support.c in o</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2008 02:56:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45801</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gpg2 svn 4868 undefined,reference to `read_w32_registry_string&amp;#039;</title>
<description>Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 02:42, tomp@idirect.com said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; ../common/libcommon.a(libcommon_a-homedir.o):homedir.c:(.text+0xaa1): &amp;gt;&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2008 09:23:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45792</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gpg2 svn 4868 undefined,reference to `read_w32_registry_string&amp;#039;</title>
<description>On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 02:42, tomp@idirect.com said: &amp;gt; ../common/libcommon.a(libcommon_a-homedir.o):homedir.c:(.text+0xaa1): &amp;gt; undefined reference to `r</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2008 11:48:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45786</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Secret Sharing (again)</title>
<description>On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 19:03, phil@nwl.cc said: &amp;gt; * How good are the chances to eventually getting this mainstream? That is mostly a matter of legal pa</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2008 11:42:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45785</link>
</item><item>
<title>Secret Sharing (again)</title>
<description>Hey, all! Long time no read, so there&amp;#039;s news: First of all, I changed my email address. The prior &amp;lt;sutter@informatik.hs-furtwangen.de&amp;gt; will run out</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2008 10:03:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45784</link>
</item><item>
<title>gpg2 svn 4868 undefined,reference to `read_w32_registry_string&amp;#039;</title>
<description>Hello during the &amp;#039;make&amp;#039; phase of gpg2 svn 4868 the following error occurs: ../common/libcommon.a(libcommon_a-homedir.o):homedir.c:(.text+0xaa1): und</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2008 17:42:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45781</link>
</item><item>
<title>libgpg-error home page missing</title>
<description>libgpg-error homepage returns an error (nice pun?) :-) https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237148 http://www.gnupg.org/related_software/librarie</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2008 02:45:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45758</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gpgsm not listing key usage caps &amp;quot;esc&amp;quot; in regular output?</title>
<description>On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:39, bernhard@intevation.de said: &amp;gt; As the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; in the colons mean it is able to certify other keys, &amp;gt; I take it that the liste</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2008 00:40:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45741</link>
</item><item>
<title>Pinentry svn 188 problems configure.ac and undefined macros</title>
<description>Hello     In trying to compile pinentry svn 188 I came across 2 problems. 1) ./autogen.sh generated the following errors: $ ./autogen.sh Runnin</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2008 00:20:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45735</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [gnupg-ru] GnuPG with Qt Gui for an email client</title>
<description>M. Peterson wrote: &amp;gt; Hello &amp;gt; we develop an email client based on c++/ Qt gui and want to ask, if &amp;gt; there is some Qt gui for GnuPG: &amp;gt; Or if someone ha</description>
<pubDate>01 Nov  2008 15:27:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45813</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [gnupg-ru] GnuPG with Qt Gui for an email client</title>
<description>M. Peterson wrote: &amp;gt; Hello &amp;gt; we develop an email client based on c++/ Qt gui and want to ask, if &amp;gt; there is some Qt gui for GnuPG: &amp;gt; Or if someone ha</description>
<pubDate>01 Nov  2008 13:51:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45810</link>
</item><item>
<title>GnuPG with Qt Gui for an email client</title>
<description>Hello we develop an email client based on c++/ Qt gui and want to ask, if there is some Qt gui for GnuPG: Or if someone has experience in implementing</description>
<pubDate>01 Nov  2008 03:55:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45728</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gpgsm not listing key usage caps &amp;quot;esc&amp;quot; in regular output?</title>
<description>On Freitag, 31. Oktober 2008, Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:50, bernhard@intevation.de said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; It seems that gpgsm will not add &amp;quot;key u</description>
<pubDate>31 Oct  2008 07:39:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45720</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gpgsm not listing key usage caps &amp;quot;esc&amp;quot; in regular output?</title>
<description>On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:50, bernhard@intevation.de said: &amp;gt; It seems that gpgsm will not add &amp;quot;key usage&amp;quot; if a key has &amp;quot;esc&amp;quot; &amp;gt; capabilities. Is this a de</description>
<pubDate>31 Oct  2008 06:55:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45719</link>
</item><item>
<title>gpgsm not listing key usage caps &amp;quot;esc&amp;quot; in regular output?</title>
<description>It seems that gpgsm will not add &amp;quot;key usage&amp;quot; if a key has &amp;quot;esc&amp;quot; capabilities. Is this a defect? Seems like it. See below the &amp;quot;Bernhard Reiter&amp;quot; key do</description>
<pubDate>31 Oct  2008 01:50:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45718</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gpg2 svn 4862 will not execute under win32</title>
<description>On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:37, tomp@idirect.com said: &amp;gt; If I restore the previous version &amp;quot;jnlib/w32-gettext.c&amp;quot; gpg2.exe runs &amp;gt; without any problems The</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2008 00:52:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45702</link>
</item><item>
<title>gpg2 svn 4862 will not execute under win32</title>
<description>I get the following error when trying to run svn 4862: pop-up window - gpg2.exe Application Error The instruction at &amp;quot;0x004766a0&amp;quot; referenced memory a</description>
<pubDate>28 Oct  2008 15:37:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45699</link>
</item><item>
<title>OpenPGP Issue</title>
<description>Hi,  I am trying to encrypt a file from webMethods Integration Server using OpenPGP package after all the configurations were done correctly and rece</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2008 13:45:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45804</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fwd: gpgme 1.1.7 and verify signature</title>
<description>Hello Gnu Developers. Perhaps it was the wrong list again... so now I&amp;#039;m sending it also to the gnu-devel list. Thank Florian -------- Original Mess</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2008 00:25:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45661</link>
</item><item>
<title>how to identify a good signature by an untrusted key with gpgme 1.1.7</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi all i do not quite understand how i should interpret the result of `gpgme_op_verify_result(ctx)`.</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2008 04:33:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45811</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: can decrypt a message only with gpgme lib?!</title>
<description>Bernhard Reiter wrote: &amp;gt; On Freitag, 17. Oktober 2008, Yunfeng wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; But I am not clear that can I decrypt a message only use the Gpgme lib?! &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2008 03:20:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45628</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: can decrypt a message only with gpgme lib?!</title>
<description>On Freitag, 17. Oktober 2008, Yunfeng wrote: &amp;gt; But I am not clear that can I decrypt a message only use the Gpgme lib?! Yes, you can decrypt a messag</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2008 02:43:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45627</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GPG2 svn 4853 error if HAVE_W32_SYSTEM is defined</title>
<description>On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:01, wk@gnupg.org said: &amp;gt; On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 08:45, tomp@idirect.com said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Making check in common &amp;gt;&amp;gt; PASS: t-convert.exe &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2008 08:25:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45588</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GPG2 svn 4853 error if HAVE_W32_SYSTEM is defined</title>
<description>On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 08:45, tomp@idirect.com said: &amp;gt; Making check in common &amp;gt; PASS: t-convert.exe &amp;gt; t-gettime.c:78: test 0 failed Can you please run</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2008 02:01:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45587</link>
</item><item>
<title>GPG2 svn 4853 error if HAVE_W32_SYSTEM is defined</title>
<description>GPG V2 SVN 4853 introduced a error when compiling on win32 systems ( I know it&amp;#039;s not supported ) Making check in common PASS: t-convert.exe t-gettime</description>
<pubDate>18 Oct  2008 23:45:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45586</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Announce] GPGME 1.1.7 released</title>
<description>Hi, We are pleased to announce version 1.1.7 of GnuPG Made Easy, a library designed to make access to GnuPG easier for applications. It may be found</description>
<pubDate>17 Oct  2008 13:03:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45582</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: can decrypt a message only with gpgme lib?!</title>
<description>Yunfeng wrote: &amp;gt; I read the &amp;gt; gpgme.info(http://mibai.tec.u-ryukyu.ac.jp/cgi-bin/info2www?(gpgme.info)Top) &amp;gt; &amp;gt; But I am not clear that can I decrypt</description>
<pubDate>17 Oct  2008 11:28:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45809</link>
</item><item>
<title>can decrypt a message only with gpgme lib?!</title>
<description>Hi group    I read the gpgme.info(http://mibai.tec.u-ryukyu.ac.jp/cgi-bin/info2www?(gpgme.info)Top)   But I am not clear that can I decrypt a me</description>
<pubDate>16 Oct  2008 22:47:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45574</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gpg agent frm within daemon</title>
<description>On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:52, buanzo@buanzo.com.ar said: &amp;gt; Any advice? A single URL to a piece of code should suffice ;) I know that there is a webmail</description>
<pubDate>13 Oct  2008 00:01:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45529</link>
</item><item>
<title>gpg agent frm within daemon</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi group, I&amp;#039;m using GPGME from within an Apache module, and I need to run some operations that requi</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2008 07:52:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45519</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gpgme verify</title>
<description>Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Yes... everything is the same. (Using MYSY on windows) &amp;gt; &amp;gt; [That is not supported. You are own your own.] OK. But I looks mor</description>
<pubDate>06 Oct  2008 06:29:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45494</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gpgme verify</title>
<description>On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:14, f.schwind@chili-radiology.com said: &amp;gt; Yes... everything is the same. (Using MYSY on windows) [That is not supported. You</description>
<pubDate>06 Oct  2008 05:36:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45491</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gpgme verify</title>
<description>Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:14, f.schwind@chili-radiology.com said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Yes, I&amp;#039;m even using the same gpg-homedir! The secret.gpg, th</description>
<pubDate>06 Oct  2008 04:14:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45490</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gpgme verify</title>
<description>On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:14, f.schwind@chili-radiology.com said: &amp;gt; Yes, I&amp;#039;m even using the same gpg-homedir! The secret.gpg, the Same gpgme version?</description>
<pubDate>06 Oct  2008 03:21:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45488</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gpgme verify</title>
<description>Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:32, f.schwind@chili-radiology.com said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Like I wrote above, the same code is working for me on linux</description>
<pubDate>06 Oct  2008 01:14:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45487</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gpgme verify</title>
<description>On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:32, f.schwind@chili-radiology.com said: &amp;gt; Like I wrote above, the same code is working for me on linux, but I get &amp;gt; the GPGME_</description>
<pubDate>06 Oct  2008 00:55:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45486</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gpgme verify</title>
<description>Bill Foster wrote: &amp;gt; Florian Schwind wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I have some trouble with gpgme on windows. Verifying signatures with: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; gpgme_verify_resu</description>
<pubDate>06 Oct  2008 00:32:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45485</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problem building GnuPG 2.0.9 for Windows</title>
<description>On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 07:13, bfoster@clearwire.net said: &amp;gt; Two questions. When you build the zlib library, do you use the &amp;gt; cross-compiler, or &amp;gt; do you</description>
<pubDate>03 Oct  2008 06:01:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45446</link>
</item><item>
<title>multiple &amp;#039;.text&amp;#039; sections found with different attributes (E0000020) in libksba.dll.a</title>
<description>hi   Sorry Forget to attach the explanation of the LNK4078    Error Message  multiple &amp;#039;section name&amp;#039; sections found with different attributes</description>
<pubDate>03 Oct  2008 00:24:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45445</link>
</item><item>
<title>multiple &amp;#039;.text&amp;#039; sections found with different attributes (E0000020) in libksba.dll.a</title>
<description>Hi everyone   When I add the libksba.dll.a to vs2003. It gives me these warning:   libksba.lib(d000063.o) : warning LNK4078: multiple &amp;#039;.text&amp;#039; sec</description>
<pubDate>02 Oct  2008 23:07:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45444</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gpgme verify</title>
<description>Florian Schwind wrote: &amp;gt; Hi. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I have some trouble with gpgme on windows. Verifying signatures with: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; gpgme_verify_result_t result; &amp;gt; result = gp</description>
<pubDate>02 Oct  2008 22:40:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45443</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problem building GnuPG 2.0.9 for Windows</title>
<description>Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 16:59, bfoster@clearwire.net said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I replaced each occurrence of &amp;#039;/home/bill&amp;#039; with &amp;#039;~&amp;#039; in my post,</description>
<pubDate>02 Oct  2008 22:13:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45441</link>
</item><item>
<title>reply: reply: how to compile libksba into windows version</title>
<description>Hi everyone Thanks for your helping. I have another problem. I need to call some functions like gpgsm_**. Which dll contains these functions, how to</description>
<pubDate>02 Oct  2008 20:57:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45440</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problem building GnuPG 2.0.9 for Windows</title>
<description>On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 16:59, bfoster@clearwire.net said: &amp;gt; I replaced each occurrence of &amp;#039;/home/bill&amp;#039; with &amp;#039;~&amp;#039; in my post, merely &amp;gt; for brevity&amp;#039;s sake.</description>
<pubDate>02 Oct  2008 09:39:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45437</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problem building GnuPG 2.0.9 for Windows</title>
<description>At http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.2.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/libzman.html concerning deflateInit, deflateInit2, inflateInit, and</description>
<pubDate>02 Oct  2008 08:57:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45436</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problem building GnuPG 2.0.9 for Windows</title>
<description>Werner Koch wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:15, bfoster@clearwire.net said: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; -L~/w32root/lib -lgcrypt -lgpg-error -L~/w32root/lib &amp;gt;&amp;gt;   &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>02 Oct  2008 07:59:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45434</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problem building GnuPG 2.0.9 for Windows</title>
<description>On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:15, bfoster@clearwire.net said: &amp;gt; -L~/w32root/lib -lgcrypt -lgpg-error -L~/w32root/lib Did you set the w32root envvar? It se</description>
<pubDate>02 Oct  2008 07:13:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45432</link>
</item><item>
<title>gpgme verify</title>
<description>Hi. I have some trouble with gpgme on windows. Verifying signatures with: gpgme_verify_result_t result; result = gpgme_op_verify_result(ctx); I alw</description>
<pubDate>02 Oct  2008 06:58:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45433</link>
</item><item>
<title>Problem building GnuPG 2.0.9 for Windows</title>
<description>Hello, I am trying to build GnuPG 2.0.9 for Win32 (Windows XP). I am using the Debian testing (Lenny) platform, with the MinGW cross-compiler. I&amp;#039;ve</description>
<pubDate>02 Oct  2008 06:15:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45431</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: reply: how to compile libksba into windows version</title>
<description>On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 04:50, yunxin.li@gmail.com said: &amp;gt; Following the instruction. I have got the libksba-8.dll. &amp;gt; But I can&amp;#039;t find the relevant lib f</description>
<pubDate>01 Oct  2008 23:23:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45427</link>
</item><item>
<title>reply: how to compile libksba into windows version</title>
<description>Hi all Following the instruction. I have got the libksba-8.dll. But I can&amp;#039;t find the relevant lib file. Where is it? Or how to generate it. I want u</description>
<pubDate>01 Oct  2008 19:50:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45426</link>
</item><item>
<title>Problem building GnuPG 2.0.9 for Windows</title>
<description>Hello, I am trying to build GnuPG 2.0.9 for Win32 (Windows XP). I am using the Debian testing (Lenny) platform, with the MinGW cross-compiler. I&amp;#039;ve</description>
<pubDate>01 Oct  2008 15:50:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45808</link>
</item><item>
<title>Unicode filename support on Windows</title>
<description>Hi, I was trying to use a Japanese (UTF-16) filename on an English Windows Server 2008, but I got the following error: C:\&amp;gt;gpg -e テスト.txt gpg:</description>
<pubDate>01 Oct  2008 06:14:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45421</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: scd/apdu.c SVN 4829 error in compiling on WIN_32</title>
<description>At Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:56:09 -0400, Tom Pegios &amp;lt;tomp@idirect.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; RE: SVN 4829 &amp;gt; Compiling scd/apdu.c when HAVE_W32_SYSTEM is defined gene</description>
<pubDate>28 Sep  2008 05:08:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45406</link>
</item><item>
<title>scd/apdu.c SVN 4829 error in compiling on WIN_32</title>
<description>RE: SVN 4829 Compiling scd/apdu.c when HAVE_W32_SYSTEM is defined generates the following errors: apdu.c: In function &amp;#039;pcsc_get_status&amp;#039;: apdu.c:1095:</description>
<pubDate>27 Sep  2008 21:56:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45405</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need to distinguish between g10_log_info and g10_log_error</title>
<description>Thanks for clearning this out. Looks like by status fd is 1 by default which is fine with me. As I&amp;#039;ve mentioned, my goal was to keep stderr strictly f</description>
<pubDate>26 Sep  2008 10:25:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45394</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need to distinguish between g10_log_info and g10_log_error</title>
<description>On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:20, ovz@yahoo.com said: &amp;gt; Actually, --logger-fd did the job for me. I&amp;#039;m ok with status messages and as I understood from the s</description>
<pubDate>26 Sep  2008 03:41:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45391</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need to distinguish between g10_log_info and g10_log_error</title>
<description>Actually, --logger-fd did the job for me. I&amp;#039;m ok with status messages and as I understood from the sources logger was the source of messages on stderr</description>
<pubDate>26 Sep  2008 03:20:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45389</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need to distinguish between g10_log_info and g10_log_error</title>
<description>Yes, --skip-verify does the job, thanks. Nevertheless I will go for best practice and use the right keyring in my script. WBR Oleg V. Zhylin  ovz@ya</description>
<pubDate>26 Sep  2008 03:16:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45390</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need to distinguish between g10_log_info and g10_log_error</title>
<description>Hi, let me remark that you should always use  --status-fd N  if you want to automate gpg&amp;#039;s operation (N == 1 works if you also use the --output opt</description>
<pubDate>26 Sep  2008 00:50:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45387</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need to distinguish between g10_log_info and g10_log_error</title>
<description>On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 06:06:30PM -0700, Oleg V. Zhylin wrote: &amp;gt;  BTW I had to overcome another problem before my script started functioning as it i</description>
<pubDate>26 Sep  2008 00:41:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45386</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need to distinguish between g10_log_info and g10_log_error</title>
<description>Yes, you&amp;#039;re right. Up to recently I&amp;#039;ve used $LASTEXITCODE to check for errors. $LASTEXITCODE and $? are two quite related ones http://blogs.msdn.com/</description>
<pubDate>25 Sep  2008 18:06:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45384</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message ?</title>
<description>On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 22:19, dshaw@jabberwocky.com said: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;   clearsigned message &amp;lt;-------&amp;gt; message + detached signature &amp;gt; &amp;gt; This is possible. In fa</description>
<pubDate>25 Sep  2008 13:41:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45378</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message ?</title>
<description>On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 08:17:25PM +0100, Brian Candler wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 04:03:47PM +0200, Matija Nalis wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; That is indeed very</description>
<pubDate>25 Sep  2008 13:19:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45377</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: configure: check for sgml to texi tools fails with OpenSP</title>
<description>On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 01:58:41PM -0500, John Clizbe wrote: &amp;gt; Last night I was building a svn rev of 1.4.10 on my Slackware box. Going over &amp;gt; the out</description>
<pubDate>25 Sep  2008 13:11:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45376</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message ?</title>
<description>On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 08:17:25PM +0100, Brian Candler wrote: &amp;gt;   clearsigned message &amp;lt;-------&amp;gt; message + detached signature Actually that particu</description>
<pubDate>25 Sep  2008 12:33:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45374</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message ?</title>
<description>On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 04:03:47PM +0200, Matija Nalis wrote: &amp;gt; That is indeed very reasonable (I didn&amp;#039;t think of big non-seekable &amp;gt; stream and was ho</description>
<pubDate>25 Sep  2008 12:17:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45375</link>
</item><item>
<title>configure: check for sgml to texi tools fails with OpenSP</title>
<description>Last night I was building a svn rev of 1.4.10 on my Slackware box. Going over the output from configure, I thought it odd the the test for sgml to tex</description>
<pubDate>25 Sep  2008 11:58:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45373</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need to distinguish between g10_log_info and g10_log_error</title>
<description>Oleg V. Zhylin wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m using gpg from Powershell and it detects error condition not by return value, but by presence of data on standard error. I</description>
<pubDate>25 Sep  2008 10:06:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45370</link>
</item><item>
<title>Need to distinguish between g10_log_info and g10_log_error</title>
<description>Hi All,   I&amp;#039;m using gpg from Powershell and it detects error condition not by return value, but by presence of data on standard error. I&amp;#039;ve checked</description>
<pubDate>25 Sep  2008 07:50:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45368</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message ?</title>
<description>Hi! What about invoking gpg this way:  cat foo.asc | sed &amp;#039;/^-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED/a Hash: MD5&amp;#039; | gpg --verify This will add the required MD5 line.</description>
<pubDate>25 Sep  2008 07:32:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45367</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message ?</title>
<description>On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 08:54:58AM -0400, David Shaw wrote: &amp;gt; On Sep 25, 2008, at 8:05 AM, Matija Nalis wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;Would it be possible in such a case</description>
<pubDate>25 Sep  2008 07:03:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45366</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message ?</title>
<description>On Sep 25, 2008, at 8:05 AM, Matija Nalis wrote: &amp;gt; I did most of the testing with default debian Etch gnupg 1.4.6-2, &amp;gt; but I&amp;#039;ve also verified that pr</description>
<pubDate>25 Sep  2008 05:54:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45365</link>
</item><item>
<title>WARNING: signature digest conflict in message ?</title>
<description>I did most of the testing with default debian Etch gnupg 1.4.6-2, but I&amp;#039;ve also verified that problem exists is gnupg 1.4.9-3 The problem is if one</description>
<pubDate>25 Sep  2008 05:05:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45364</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to compile libksba into windows version</title>
<description>At Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:24:44 +0800, Yunfeng &amp;lt;yunxin.li@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I need run libksba in windows. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I find in google but cannot find a win</description>
<pubDate>24 Sep  2008 05:37:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45342</link>
</item><item>
<title>how to compile libksba into windows version</title>
<description>Hi everyone   I need run libksba in windows.  I find in google but cannot find a windows version libksba.   Anyone can teach me how to compile t</description>
<pubDate>23 Sep  2008 22:24:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45333</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Announce] Libksba 1.0.4 released</title>
<description>Hello! We are pleased to announce version 1.0.4 of Libksba. Libksba is an X.509 and CMS (PKCS#7) library. It is for example required to build the S</description>
<pubDate>22 Sep  2008 01:51:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45287</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How to detect a GunPG file.</title>
<description>GnuPG files are simply OpenPGP files and conform to RFC-4880: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4880 Yunfeng wrote: &amp;gt; Hi all &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&#039;m working on a</description>
<pubDate>21 Sep  2008 02:54:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45199</link>
</item><item>
<title>How to detect a GunPG file.</title>
<description>Hi all   I&amp;#039;m working on a project that need to distinguish GunPG files among a lot of files without extension name.   I read the following post(</description>
<pubDate>21 Sep  2008 01:54:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45198</link>
</item><item>
<title>PATCH: assuan_socket_connect_fd()</title>
<description>Heres a patch to create an assuan_context_t for an already connected socket FD. This implements assuan_socket_connect_fd(). The &amp;quot;data&amp;quot; parameter is li</description>
<pubDate>19 Sep  2008 19:36:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45193</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Announce] Libgcrypt 1.4.3 released</title>
<description>Hello!  The GNU project is pleased to announce the availability of Libgcrypt version 1.4.3. Libgcrypt is a general purpose library of cryptographic</description>
<pubDate>18 Sep  2008 08:23:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45169</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: doc, gpgme: should&amp;#039;nt GPGME_DEBUG be mentioned</title>
<description>Marcus, On Friday 12 September 2008 21:57, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: &amp;gt; At Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:05:36 +0200, &amp;gt; Bernhard Reiter wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Just checking</description>
<pubDate>15 Sep  2008 00:51:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45071</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: doc, gpgme: should&amp;#039;nt GPGME_DEBUG be mentioned</title>
<description>At Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:05:36 +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; [1 &amp;lt;multipart/signed (7bit)&amp;gt;] &amp;gt; [1.1 &amp;lt;text/plain; iso-8859-1 (quoted-printable)&amp;gt;] &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>12 Sep  2008 12:57:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45066</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GPGME - signing binary (PDF) files</title>
<description>On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:26, razvan@anaconda.cs.pub.ro said: &amp;gt; --- &amp;gt; gpg --output doc.sig --detach-sig doc &amp;gt; --- We do this all the time with GPGME.</description>
<pubDate>10 Sep  2008 02:34:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45052</link>
</item><item>
<title>GPGME - signing binary (PDF) files</title>
<description>Hi! I am sorry for posting this message both on the devel and users mailing lists but I am not sure where a question related to GPGME should be poste</description>
<pubDate>10 Sep  2008 01:26:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45046</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Announce] Libgcrypt 1.4.2 released</title>
<description>Hello!  The GNU project is pleased to announce the availability of Libgcrypt version 1.4.2. Libgcrypt is a general purpose library of cryptographic</description>
<pubDate>08 Sep  2008 11:02:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45022</link>
</item><item>
<title>assuan_tcp_connect()?</title>
<description>Any plans on including something equivalent any time soon? Or maybe something like assuan_init_socket_server_ext() only for a client that has already</description>
<pubDate>07 Sep  2008 04:19:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45014</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
