<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>GnuPG | devel</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>01 Dec  2008 08:55:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: Differentiating GPG data from random data</title>
<description>On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 09:09:09AM -0500, Ted wrote: &amp;gt; Thank you for the information. It confirms what I thought after &amp;gt; reading the RFCs. It would be</description>
<pubDate>27 Nov  2008 19:42:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45891</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Differentiating GPG data from random data</title>
<description>On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:21 PM, David Shaw &amp;lt;dshaw@jabberwocky.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Those bytes will more-or-less work, but as you say won&amp;#039;t catch everythi</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2008 06:09:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45885</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Differentiating GPG data from random data</title>
<description>On Nov 24, 2008, at 5:19 PM, Ted wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hope this is not off-topic here. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m writing a program that searches for files that are made up</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2008 20:21:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45883</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Announce] GPGME 1.1.7 released</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve replied without paying attention to where this message is sent and as a result sent it to announce list instead of the devel one. Reposting it he</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2008 18:15:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45882</link>
</item><item>
<title>Differentiating GPG data from random data</title>
<description>Hi, Hope this is not off-topic here. I&amp;#039;m writing a program that searches for files that are made up of random data. GPG data (that is not ascii armo</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2008 14:19:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45881</link>
</item><item>
<title>select pinentry-curses/qt depending on situation</title>
<description>Hey list! What is the best way (if any) to select which pinentry (-curses/-qt/-gtk) to run, depending on situation, i.e. whether X is running and whe</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2008 08:21:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45886</link>
</item><item>
<title>reply: how to make a debug version of the gpg</title>
<description>Hi  I&amp;#039;m sorry. I want to learn the gpg&amp;#039; flow exactly. I think it&amp;#039;s better for me if I can debug it.  Kk11 ----- original----- Sender: gnupg-devel-b</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 20:57:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45859</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to make a debug version of the gpg</title>
<description>On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 02:35:35PM +0800, Yunfeng wrote: &amp;gt; Hi everyone &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Stupid question. How to make a debug version of the gpg?! &amp;gt; Any tips or ur</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2008 09:59:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45854</link>
</item><item>
<title>how to make a debug version of the gpg</title>
<description>Hi everyone Stupid question. How to make a debug version of the gpg?! Any tips or urls can be referenced?! Thanks Kk11  __________________________</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2008 22:35:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45844</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to identify a good signature by an untrusted key with gpgme 1.1.7</title>
<description>On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:33, ivo.alxneit@psi.ch said: &amp;gt; summary=3    (GPGME_SIGSUM_VALID + GPGME_SIGSUM_GREEN) &amp;gt; fpr=D0E3ADE78E893E9CAEC1E2F401DEC21</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2008 02:38:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/45818</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
