Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Gentoo: User
Re: package masking
 

Index | Next | Previous | View Flat


neil at digimed

Apr 28, 2012, 8:10 AM


Views: 156
Permalink
Re: package masking [In reply to]

On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 14:49:54 +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote:

> > Certainly not. The most reasonable way is to maintain your own meta
> > package in an overlay. Just copy gnome-*.ebuild there and remove all
> > dependencies you don't like.
>
> Sounds like a good idea. I am not to happy with some meta packages
> either. I'll give it a try.

If you use portage-2.2, sets provide an easier way to do this. A set is
just a list of package atoms, one per line, in a file
in /etc/portage/sets, say /etc/portage/sets/gnome. Then you just emerge
@gnome.

Unlike a versioned ebuild, there is no need to modify the set when new
versions are released, the set will always use the latest matching
version.


--
Neil Bothwick

Diarrhoea is hereditary, it runs in your genes.
Attachments: signature.asc (0.19 KB)

Subject User Time
package masking samuraiii at volny Apr 28, 2012, 2:21 AM
    Re: package masking lists at binarywings Apr 28, 2012, 3:04 AM
        Re: package masking gentoo-user at hadt Apr 28, 2012, 5:49 AM
            Re: package masking neil at digimed Apr 28, 2012, 8:10 AM
                Re: package masking gentoo-user at hadt Apr 28, 2012, 9:45 AM

  Index | Next | Previous | View Flat
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.