Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Gentoo: Security

(no subject)

 

 

First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All Gentoo security RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


dsims at therubicongroup

Jun 7, 2005, 1:09 PM

Post #1 of 31 (2597 views)
Permalink
(no subject)

--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list


cokehabit2003 at yahoo

Jun 7, 2005, 12:37 AM

Post #2 of 31 (2559 views)
Permalink
Re: (no subject) [In reply to]

Whoa, i feel a disturbance in the Gentoo force! The IQ of te list has
gone down..........

G


Robert Muchacki wrote:

> I don't think so... Notice that the user is different...
>
> muchar
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: John Paine
> To: gentoo-security [at] lists
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 2:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] (no subject)
>
>
> Im guessing the user is trying to signup on this list, and thinks that
> sending a blank email will get a bounceback registration like some
> sites do with mailing lists...just a guess...
>
>
> On 6/7/05, Sean Wells <sean [at] datamosaics> wrote:
> That's #3...any reason for this?
>
> Sean Wells
> Network Administrator
> Data Mosaics, Inc.
> 2406 S. Dishman Mica Rd. Suite 6
> Spokane Valley, WA 99206
> 866.904.DMSF (phone)
> 509.928.4236 (fax)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel [mailto:imapcnomad [at] verizon ]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 5:25 PM
> To: gentoo-security [at] lists
> Subject: [gentoo-security] (no subject)
>
>
>
> --
> gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list
>
> --
> gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list
>
>
>
>
>



___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list


imapcnomad at verizon

Jun 7, 2005, 5:25 PM

Post #3 of 31 (2566 views)
Permalink
(no subject) [In reply to]

--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list


sean at datamosaics

Jun 7, 2005, 5:37 PM

Post #4 of 31 (2564 views)
Permalink
RE: (no subject) [In reply to]

That's #3...any reason for this?

Sean Wells
Network Administrator
Data Mosaics, Inc.
2406 S. Dishman Mica Rd. Suite 6
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
866.904.DMSF (phone)
509.928.4236 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: Joel [mailto:imapcnomad [at] verizon]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 5:25 PM
To: gentoo-security [at] lists
Subject: [gentoo-security] (no subject)



--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list

--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list


paine16 at gmail

Jun 7, 2005, 5:43 PM

Post #5 of 31 (2563 views)
Permalink
Re: (no subject) [In reply to]

Im guessing the user is trying to signup on this list, and thinks that
sending a blank email will get a bounceback registration like some sites do
with mailing lists...just a guess...

On 6/7/05, Sean Wells <sean [at] datamosaics> wrote:
>
> That's #3...any reason for this?
>
> Sean Wells
> Network Administrator
> Data Mosaics, Inc.
> 2406 S. Dishman Mica Rd. Suite 6
> Spokane Valley, WA 99206
> 866.904.DMSF (phone)
> 509.928.4236 (fax)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel [mailto:imapcnomad [at] verizon]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 5:25 PM
> To: gentoo-security [at] lists
> Subject: [gentoo-security] (no subject)
>
>
>
> --
> gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list
>
> --
> gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list
>
>


--
John Paine


muchar at muchar

Jun 7, 2005, 5:49 PM

Post #6 of 31 (2565 views)
Permalink
Re: (no subject) [In reply to]

I don't think so... Notice that the user is different...

muchar

----- Original Message -----
From: John Paine
To: gentoo-security [at] lists
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 2:43 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] (no subject)


Im guessing the user is trying to signup on this list, and thinks that
sending a blank email will get a bounceback registration like some sites do
with mailing lists...just a guess...


On 6/7/05, Sean Wells <sean [at] datamosaics> wrote:
That's #3...any reason for this?

Sean Wells
Network Administrator
Data Mosaics, Inc.
2406 S. Dishman Mica Rd. Suite 6
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
866.904.DMSF (phone)
509.928.4236 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: Joel [mailto:imapcnomad [at] verizon ]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 5:25 PM
To: gentoo-security [at] lists
Subject: [gentoo-security] (no subject)



--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list

--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list





--
John Paine

--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list


user00265 at gmail

Jun 7, 2005, 5:58 PM

Post #7 of 31 (2560 views)
Permalink
Re: (no subject) [In reply to]

Who knows, it's just annoying...



Robert Muchacki wrote:

> I don't think so... Notice that the user is different...
>
> muchar
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: John Paine
> To: gentoo-security [at] lists
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 2:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] (no subject)
>
>
> Im guessing the user is trying to signup on this list, and thinks that
> sending a blank email will get a bounceback registration like some
> sites do with mailing lists...just a guess...
>
>
> On 6/7/05, Sean Wells <sean [at] datamosaics> wrote:
> That's #3...any reason for this?
>
> Sean Wells
> Network Administrator
> Data Mosaics, Inc.
> 2406 S. Dishman Mica Rd. Suite 6
> Spokane Valley, WA 99206
> 866.904.DMSF (phone)
> 509.928.4236 (fax)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel [mailto:imapcnomad [at] verizon ]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 5:25 PM
> To: gentoo-security [at] lists
> Subject: [gentoo-security] (no subject)
>
>
>
> --
> gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list
>
> --
> gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list
>
>
>
>
>
Attachments: signature.asc (0.26 KB)


cokehabit2003 at yahoo

Jun 7, 2005, 6:11 PM

Post #8 of 31 (2574 views)
Permalink
Re: (no subject) [In reply to]

Watch out, Javier Barrio will castrate you for top posting... =-O



Sean Wells wrote:

>Yes but I think some of us find it amusing :P
>
>Sean Wells
>Network Administrator
>Data Mosaics, Inc.
>2406 S. Dishman Mica Rd. Suite 6
>Spokane Valley, WA 99206
>866.904.DMSF (phone)
>509.928.4236 (fax)
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jason [mailto:mindseyex2 [at] shaw]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 6:26 PM
>To: gentoo-security [at] lists
>Subject: RE: [gentoo-security] (no subject)
>
> But does this really require a big discussion? Wouldn't it be less annoying
>to just ignore it?
>
>Just my 2 cents... (btw, Hi everyone, this is the first email I have sent to
>this list)
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Elisamuel Resto [mailto:user00265 [at] gmail]
>Sent: Tuesday June 7, 2005 5:58 PM
>To: gentoo-security [at] lists
>Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] (no subject)
>
>Who knows, it's just annoying...
>
>
>
>Robert Muchacki wrote:
>
>
>
>>I don't think so... Notice that the user is different...
>>
>>muchar
>>
>>----- Original Message ----- From: John Paine
>>To: gentoo-security [at] lists
>>Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 2:43 AM
>>Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] (no subject)
>>
>>
>>Im guessing the user is trying to signup on this list, and thinks that
>>sending a blank email will get a bounceback registration like some
>>sites do with mailing lists...just a guess...
>>
>>
>>On 6/7/05, Sean Wells <sean [at] datamosaics> wrote:
>>That's #3...any reason for this?
>>
>>Sean Wells
>>Network Administrator
>>Data Mosaics, Inc.
>>2406 S. Dishman Mica Rd. Suite 6
>>Spokane Valley, WA 99206
>>866.904.DMSF (phone)
>>509.928.4236 (fax)
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Joel [mailto:imapcnomad [at] verizon ]
>>Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 5:25 PM
>>To: gentoo-security [at] lists
>>Subject: [gentoo-security] (no subject)
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list
>>
>>--
>>gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>





___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list


dspiteri at cadre

Jun 7, 2005, 6:15 PM

Post #9 of 31 (2555 views)
Permalink
Re: (no subject) [In reply to]

About as annoying as twice as many responses to blank email.

Elisamuel Resto wrote:
> Who knows, it's just annoying...
>
>
>
> Robert Muchacki wrote:
>
>
>>I don't think so... Notice that the user is different...
>>
>>muchar
>>
>>----- Original Message ----- From: John Paine
>>To: gentoo-security [at] lists
>>Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 2:43 AM
>>Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] (no subject)
>>
>>
>>Im guessing the user is trying to signup on this list, and thinks that
>>sending a blank email will get a bounceback registration like some
>>sites do with mailing lists...just a guess...
>>
>>
>>On 6/7/05, Sean Wells <sean [at] datamosaics> wrote:
>>That's #3...any reason for this?
>>
>>Sean Wells
>>Network Administrator
>>Data Mosaics, Inc.
>>2406 S. Dishman Mica Rd. Suite 6
>>Spokane Valley, WA 99206
>>866.904.DMSF (phone)
>>509.928.4236 (fax)
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Joel [mailto:imapcnomad [at] verizon ]
>>Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 5:25 PM
>>To: gentoo-security [at] lists
>>Subject: [gentoo-security] (no subject)
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list
>>
>>--
>>gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list


mindseyex2 at shaw

Jun 7, 2005, 6:26 PM

Post #10 of 31 (2562 views)
Permalink
RE: (no subject) [In reply to]

But does this really require a big discussion? Wouldn't it be less annoying
to just ignore it?

Just my 2 cents... (btw, Hi everyone, this is the first email I have sent to
this list)

-----Original Message-----
From: Elisamuel Resto [mailto:user00265 [at] gmail]
Sent: Tuesday June 7, 2005 5:58 PM
To: gentoo-security [at] lists
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] (no subject)

Who knows, it's just annoying...



Robert Muchacki wrote:

> I don't think so... Notice that the user is different...
>
> muchar
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: John Paine
> To: gentoo-security [at] lists
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 2:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] (no subject)
>
>
> Im guessing the user is trying to signup on this list, and thinks that
> sending a blank email will get a bounceback registration like some
> sites do with mailing lists...just a guess...
>
>
> On 6/7/05, Sean Wells <sean [at] datamosaics> wrote:
> That's #3...any reason for this?
>
> Sean Wells
> Network Administrator
> Data Mosaics, Inc.
> 2406 S. Dishman Mica Rd. Suite 6
> Spokane Valley, WA 99206
> 866.904.DMSF (phone)
> 509.928.4236 (fax)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel [mailto:imapcnomad [at] verizon ]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 5:25 PM
> To: gentoo-security [at] lists
> Subject: [gentoo-security] (no subject)
>
>
>
> --
> gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list
>
> --
> gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list
>
>
>
>
>


--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list


awaschb at gwdg

Jun 7, 2005, 11:38 PM

Post #11 of 31 (2564 views)
Permalink
Re: (no subject) [In reply to]

Jason wrote:
> But does this really require a big discussion? Wouldn't it be less
> annoying to just ignore it?

Even less annoying than top posters!


agorecki at ectrolinux

Jun 8, 2005, 12:02 AM

Post #12 of 31 (2565 views)
Permalink
Re: (no subject) [In reply to]

On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 08:38:41 +0200, Andreas Waschbuesch wrote:
> Even less annoying than top posters!

I have an enormous regular expression to match RBQ messages, if you'd like to
use it to filter your mail :) On average, I remove three dozen messages a day
just based upon that one filter.


--
Anthony Gorecki
Ectro-Linux Foundation
--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list


cummings at stingray

Jun 8, 2005, 9:14 AM

Post #13 of 31 (2566 views)
Permalink
Re: (no subject) [In reply to]

On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, John Paine wrote:

> sending a blank email will get a bounceback registration like some sites do
> with mailing lists...just a guess...

I doubt it, I get blank emails like this all the time and it's supposed to
be related somehow to spam.

In any event, you can't stop it so you might as well ignore it.

--
Matthew P. Cummings
1974 Cessna 150L N10667
Moberly, MO (MBY)
--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list


coder at valenciawireless

Jun 8, 2005, 9:15 AM

Post #14 of 31 (2557 views)
Permalink
Re: (no subject) [In reply to]

George Prowse <cokehabit2003 [at] yahoo> escribió:

> Whoa, i feel a disturbance in the Gentoo force! The IQ of te list has
> gone down..........

Ugh, that was said by a person that top posts...

--
Por una UE sin PATENTES - http://EuropeSwPatentFree.hispalinux.es
GnuPG key ID 0x6D2FF8B5 @ pgp.escomposlinux.org
Linux/BSD BOFH - http://anurix.com/
http://fluzo.org/


paine16 at gmail

Jun 8, 2005, 11:08 AM

Post #15 of 31 (2556 views)
Permalink
Re: (no subject) [In reply to]

Most people who sign up for any of the Gentoo mailing lists enjoy reading
about gentoo related topics, such as gentoo weekly news letter or
gentoo-security. I personally don't see the reason to progress on this
subject after a blank email....10+ replays is just crazy. It is really time
that these replays stop...but as I think about it, even this email is
supporting it. Just dont respond :)

Ohhh the urge....I must replay :) have a good one.

On 6/8/05, Javier Barrio <coder [at] valenciawireless> wrote:
>
> George Prowse <cokehabit2003 [at] yahoo> escribió:
>
> > Whoa, i feel a disturbance in the Gentoo force! The IQ of te list has
> > gone down..........
>
> Ugh, that was said by a person that top posts...
>
> --
> Por una UE sin PATENTES - http://EuropeSwPatentFree.hispalinux.es
> GnuPG key ID 0x6D2FF8B5 @ pgp.escomposlinux.org<http://pgp.escomposlinux.org>
> Linux/BSD BOFH - http://anurix.com/
> http://fluzo.org/
>
>
>


--
John Paine


sean at datamosaics

Jun 8, 2005, 11:11 AM

Post #16 of 31 (2576 views)
Permalink
RE: (no subject) [In reply to]

Yes but I think some of us find it amusing :P

Sean Wells
Network Administrator
Data Mosaics, Inc.
2406 S. Dishman Mica Rd. Suite 6
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
866.904.DMSF (phone)
509.928.4236 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason [mailto:mindseyex2 [at] shaw]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 6:26 PM
To: gentoo-security [at] lists
Subject: RE: [gentoo-security] (no subject)

But does this really require a big discussion? Wouldn't it be less annoying
to just ignore it?

Just my 2 cents... (btw, Hi everyone, this is the first email I have sent to
this list)

-----Original Message-----
From: Elisamuel Resto [mailto:user00265 [at] gmail]
Sent: Tuesday June 7, 2005 5:58 PM
To: gentoo-security [at] lists
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] (no subject)

Who knows, it's just annoying...



Robert Muchacki wrote:

> I don't think so... Notice that the user is different...
>
> muchar
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: John Paine
> To: gentoo-security [at] lists
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 2:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] (no subject)
>
>
> Im guessing the user is trying to signup on this list, and thinks that
> sending a blank email will get a bounceback registration like some
> sites do with mailing lists...just a guess...
>
>
> On 6/7/05, Sean Wells <sean [at] datamosaics> wrote:
> That's #3...any reason for this?
>
> Sean Wells
> Network Administrator
> Data Mosaics, Inc.
> 2406 S. Dishman Mica Rd. Suite 6
> Spokane Valley, WA 99206
> 866.904.DMSF (phone)
> 509.928.4236 (fax)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel [mailto:imapcnomad [at] verizon ]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 5:25 PM
> To: gentoo-security [at] lists
> Subject: [gentoo-security] (no subject)
>
>
>
> --
> gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list
>
> --
> gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list
>
>
>
>
>


--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list

--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list


beu at gentoo

Jun 8, 2005, 12:00 PM

Post #17 of 31 (2556 views)
Permalink
Re: (no subject) [In reply to]

On Wednesday 08 Jun 2005 17:15, Javier Barrio wrote:
> George Prowse <cokehabit2003 [at] yahoo> escribió:
> > Whoa, i feel a disturbance in the Gentoo force! The IQ of te list has
> > gone down..........
>
> Ugh, that was said by a person that top posts...

meh, grow up, eh ? ;)

Best,
Elfyn

--
Elfyn McBratney
beu/irc.freenode.net http://dev.gentoo.org/~beu/
+------------O.o--------------------- http://dev.gentoo.org/~beu/pubkey.asc

PGP Key ID: 0x69DF17AD
PGP Key Fingerprint:
DBD3 B756 ED58 B1B4 47B9 B3BD 8D41 E597 69DF 17AD


billk at iinet

Jun 8, 2005, 8:41 PM

Post #18 of 31 (2563 views)
Permalink
Re: (no subject) [In reply to]

Be aware that some earlier versions of evolution (last I remember was
approx ~12 mths ago from memory) had a bug that displayed emails as
blank when they weren't. It was only certain types of content that
triggered the bug. Never saw a reason given, but it was certainly
frustrating ...

BillK


On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 14:08 -0400, John Paine wrote:
> Most people who sign up for any of the Gentoo mailing lists enjoy
> reading about gentoo related topics, such as gentoo weekly news letter
> or gentoo-security. I personally don't see the reason to progress on
> this subject after a blank email....10+ replays is just crazy. It is
> really time that these replays stop...but as I think about it, even
> this email is supporting it. Just dont respond :)
>
> Ohhh the urge....I must replay :) have a good one.
>

>

--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list


krispykringle at gentoo

Jun 14, 2005, 10:51 PM

Post #19 of 31 (2560 views)
Permalink
Re: (no subject) [In reply to]

On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:14:47AM -0500, cummings [at] stingray wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, John Paine wrote:
>
> >sending a blank email will get a bounceback registration like some sites do
> >with mailing lists...just a guess...
>
> I doubt it, I get blank emails like this all the time and it's supposed to
> be related somehow to spam.
>
> In any event, you can't stop it so you might as well ignore it.

My philosophy is that if you can't beat 'em, join 'em.

In that spirit, I've written a small script to send blank e-mails
randomly to your address book a few times a day. It's a quick job, but
it should work with most address book formats. Let me know what you
think. You can find it at http://www.af0.net/~dan/?autosend

Cheers,
Dan


swalter at zedat

Jun 15, 2005, 4:02 AM

Post #20 of 31 (2564 views)
Permalink
Re: (no subject) [In reply to]

Good work ;)

Dan Margolis wrote:

>On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:14:47AM -0500, cummings [at] stingray wrote:
>
>
>
>it should work with most address book formats. Let me know what you
>think. You can find it at http://www.af0.net/~dan/?autosend
>
>

--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list


paine16 at gmail

Jun 15, 2005, 10:50 AM

Post #21 of 31 (2559 views)
Permalink
Re: (no subject) [In reply to]

I wonder what the longest running email reply is in gentoo mailing list
history......

On 6/15/05, Sebastian Walter <swalter [at] zedat> wrote:
>
> Good work ;)
>
> Dan Margolis wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:14:47AM -0500, cummings [at] stingray wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >it should work with most address book formats. Let me know what you
> >think. You can find it at http://www.af0.net/~dan/?autosend
> >
> >
>
> --
> gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list
>
>


--
John Paine


sean at datamosaics

Jun 15, 2005, 11:14 AM

Post #22 of 31 (2560 views)
Permalink
RE: (no subject) [In reply to]

Probably something equally as useless..





Sean Wells
Network Administrator
Data Mosaics, Inc.
2406 S. Dishman Mica Rd. Suite 6
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
866.904.DMSF (phone)
509.928.4236 (fax)

_____

From: John Paine [mailto:paine16 [at] gmail]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 10:50 AM
To: gentoo-security [at] lists
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] (no subject)



I wonder what the longest running email reply is in gentoo mailing list
history......

On 6/15/05, Sebastian Walter < <mailto:swalter [at] zedat>
swalter [at] zedat> wrote:

Good work ;)

Dan Margolis wrote:

>On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:14:47AM -0500, cummings [at] stingray wrote:
>
>
>
>it should work with most address book formats. Let me know what you
>think. You can find it at http://www.af0.net/~dan/?autosend
>
>

--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list




--
John Paine


binaural at gmail

Jun 15, 2005, 11:24 AM

Post #23 of 31 (2559 views)
Permalink
Re: (no subject) [In reply to]

On 6/15/05, Sean Wells <sean [at] datamosaics> wrote:
>
>
>
> Probably something equally as useless….
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sean Wells
> Network Administrator
> Data Mosaics, Inc.
> 2406 S. Dishman Mica Rd. Suite 6
> Spokane Valley, WA 99206
> 866.904.DMSF (phone)
> 509.928.4236 (fax)
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From: John Paine [mailto:paine16 [at] gmail]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 10:50 AM
> To: gentoo-security [at] lists
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] (no subject)
>
>
>
>
> I wonder what the longest running email reply is in gentoo mailing list
> history......
>
>
> On 6/15/05, Sebastian Walter < swalter [at] zedat> wrote:
>
> Good work ;)
>
> Dan Margolis wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:14:47AM -0500, cummings [at] stingray wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >it should work with most address book formats. Let me know what you
> >think. You can find it at
> http://www.af0.net/~dan/?autosend
> >
> >
>
> --
> gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list
>
>
>
>
> --
> John Paine

Hi, I just joined gentoo-security. I would like to complement the
constructiveness and efficacy of this listserv.

Noah

--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list


stuart.g.howard at gmail

Jun 15, 2005, 11:25 AM

Post #24 of 31 (2558 views)
Permalink
Re: (no subject) [In reply to]

Well on the "Gentoo user" list I can give you a

Top of the list at 59 replies ----------->[gentoo-user] next step X
OR
A true classic at 54 replies ----------- > [gentoo-user] Gentoo discrimination

Gmail is your friend :)

stu



On 6/15/05, Sean Wells <sean [at] datamosaics> wrote:
>
>
>
> Probably something equally as useless….
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sean Wells
> Network Administrator
> Data Mosaics, Inc.
> 2406 S. Dishman Mica Rd. Suite 6
> Spokane Valley, WA 99206
> 866.904.DMSF (phone)
> 509.928.4236 (fax)
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From: John Paine [mailto:paine16 [at] gmail]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 10:50 AM
> To: gentoo-security [at] lists
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] (no subject)
>
>
>
>
> I wonder what the longest running email reply is in gentoo mailing list
> history......
>
>
> On 6/15/05, Sebastian Walter < swalter [at] zedat> wrote:
>
> Good work ;)
>
> Dan Margolis wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:14:47AM -0500, cummings [at] stingray wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >it should work with most address book formats. Let me know what you
> >think. You can find it at
> http://www.af0.net/~dan/?autosend
> >
> >
>
> --
> gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list
>
>
>
>
> --
> John Paine


--
"There are 10 types of people in this world: those who understand
binary, those who don't"

--Unknown

--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list


marco at accessplus

Jun 15, 2005, 3:39 PM

Post #25 of 31 (2558 views)
Permalink
Re: (no subject) [In reply to]

--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list

First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All Gentoo security RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.