Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Gentoo: Security
Re: OT: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons
 

Index | Next | Previous | View Flat


nigelenki at comcast

Sep 22, 2004, 10:31 PM


Views: 2274
Permalink
Re: OT: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons [In reply to]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



JHolder wrote:
| John Richard Moser said:
| [snip]
|
|>JHolder wrote:
|>| John Richard Moser said:
|>| [snip]
|>|
|>|>It's no secret that -fstack-protector-all breaks some programs that
|>|>- -fstack-protector doesn't (i.e. Firefox, Thunderbird, Mozilla). In
|
| [snip]
|
|>|
|>| Just out of curiousity, does anyone know if using libsafe
|>| (http://www.research.avayalabs.com/project/libsafe/) would tend to break
|>| programs?
|>
|>According to http://www.trl.ibm.com/projects/security/ssp/node5.html ,
|>libsafe has greater overhead.
|>
|
|
| Good answer. Embarrassingly enough, your answer sounds like you spent 30
| seconds with google. Something, which by all rights I should have done
| myself. But as I am supposed to be working right now ;-) I appreciate
| your time for doing the research on my odd musings.
|

I came accross this stuff a while back, I had 'em on hand.

Found 'em with google after 4 or 5 searches trying to determine how the
heck old SSP was.

| John
|
| --
| gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list
|
|

- --
All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the
Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBUl+rhDd4aOud5P8RAqWwAJ9boVfdlXPLvOBwnJdeVBsuN97ysQCeIA8G
3SMVo/yU8JAvc66V3x9EhUs=
=3z4S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list

Subject User Time
Stack smash protected daemons nigelenki at comcast Sep 22, 2004, 8:54 AM
    Re: Stack smash protected daemons klausman at schwarzvogel Sep 22, 2004, 11:46 AM
    Re: [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons solar at gentoo Sep 22, 2004, 4:49 PM
        Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons miguel.filipe at gmail Sep 22, 2004, 8:00 PM
    Re: [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons nigelenki at comcast Sep 22, 2004, 9:01 PM
        Re: [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons nigelenki at comcast Sep 22, 2004, 9:06 PM
        Re: OT: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons trs-gml at simulakrum Sep 22, 2004, 9:20 PM
            Re: OT: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons nigelenki at comcast Sep 22, 2004, 9:22 PM
                Re: OT: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons trs-gml at simulakrum Sep 22, 2004, 9:47 PM
            Re: OT: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons nigelenki at comcast Sep 22, 2004, 10:31 PM
                Re: OT: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons BarrySchwartz124 at comcast Sep 23, 2004, 8:37 AM
        Re: [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons solar at gentoo Sep 22, 2004, 10:26 PM
            Re: Stack smash protected daemons koon at gentoo Sep 23, 2004, 1:31 AM
                Re: Stack smash protected daemons koon at gentoo Sep 23, 2004, 7:05 AM
                    Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Stack smash protected daemons nigelenki at comcast Sep 23, 2004, 8:21 PM
                        Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Stack smash protected daemons solar at gentoo Sep 23, 2004, 11:02 PM
                            Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Stack smash protected daemons nigelenki at comcast Sep 23, 2004, 11:34 PM
                Re: Re: Stack smash protected daemons nigelenki at comcast Sep 23, 2004, 10:27 AM
    Re: [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons nigelenki at comcast Sep 26, 2004, 11:39 AM

  Index | Next | Previous | View Flat
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.