nigelenki at comcast
Sep 22, 2004, 10:31 PM
Views: 1425
Permalink
|
|
Re: OT: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons
[In reply to]
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
JHolder wrote:
| John Richard Moser said:
| [snip]
|
|>JHolder wrote:
|>| John Richard Moser said:
|>| [snip]
|>|
|>|>It's no secret that -fstack-protector-all breaks some programs that
|>|>- -fstack-protector doesn't (i.e. Firefox, Thunderbird, Mozilla). In
|
| [snip]
|
|>|
|>| Just out of curiousity, does anyone know if using libsafe
|>| (http://www.research.avayalabs.com/project/libsafe/) would tend to break
|>| programs?
|>
|>According to http://www.trl.ibm.com/projects/security/ssp/node5.html ,
|>libsafe has greater overhead.
|>
|
|
| Good answer. Embarrassingly enough, your answer sounds like you spent 30
| seconds with google. Something, which by all rights I should have done
| myself. But as I am supposed to be working right now ;-) I appreciate
| your time for doing the research on my odd musings.
|
I came accross this stuff a while back, I had 'em on hand.
Found 'em with google after 4 or 5 searches trying to determine how the
heck old SSP was.
| John
|
| --
| gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list
|
|
- --
All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the
Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBUl+rhDd4aOud5P8RAqWwAJ9boVfdlXPLvOBwnJdeVBsuN97ysQCeIA8G
3SMVo/yU8JAvc66V3x9EhUs=
=3z4S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-security [at] gentoo mailing list
|
