<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gentoo | Security</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>24 Nov  2009 00:09:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>the Gentoo Audit project and dev-util/splint</title>
<description>Hello list, I was wondering if I could get peoples&amp;#039; opinions of dev-util/splint (the Secure Programming Lint) [1], and specifically in the context of</description>
<pubDate>03 Jun  2009 20:44:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/190443</link>
</item><item>
<title>small announcement for the community</title>
<description>A while back I setup a small cron job to parse the GLSA feed and post it to Twitter. I&amp;#039;ve been tweaking it and watching it and it seems stable enough</description>
<pubDate>03 Mar  2009 14:30:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/183327</link>
</item><item>
<title>TCP Wrapper Documentation</title>
<description>I have a gentoo desktop profile system and I would like to use tcp wrappers to secure certain services like ssh. I followed the documentation I could</description>
<pubDate>09 Jan  2009 20:51:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/179151</link>
</item><item>
<title>[no subject]</title>
<description></description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2008 04:19:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/174016</link>
</item><item>
<title>Prince, Samuel is out of the office.</title>
<description>I will be out of the office starting 18/08/2008 and will not return until 29/08/2008. I will have limited access to my email while away from the off</description>
<pubDate>20 Aug  2008 20:03:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/170746</link>
</item><item>
<title>Reporting restricted bugs works again</title>
<description>Hello all, as you might be aware, the Gentoo Security Team encourages users to report security vulnerabilities or findings of code audits that are n</description>
<pubDate>20 Aug  2008 14:37:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/170739</link>
</item><item>
<title>[no subject]</title>
<description></description>
<pubDate>06 Aug  2008 07:12:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/170062</link>
</item><item>
<title>Security project meeting summary</title>
<description>Hi, I attached a summary of last week&amp;#039;s meeting. The summary and the log are also linked from [1] and should find their way to our /proj dir in the</description>
<pubDate>21 Jul  2008 11:49:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/169272</link>
</item><item>
<title>Security project meeting - Monday, 2008-07-14, 19:00 UTC</title>
<description>Hi everyone, the security project will hold a public meeting in #gentoo-security this monday, 2008-07-14 at 19:00 UTC (21:00 CEST). The tentative ag</description>
<pubDate>12 Jul  2008 16:18:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/168604</link>
</item><item>
<title>Running app-admin/syslog-ng without root privileges</title>
<description>Hi, I am trying to run syslog-ng v1.6.8 without root privileges, under dedicated account. All goes fine, except messages from kernel buffer /proc/kms</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2008 01:46:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62056</link>
</item><item>
<title>Why we need TPM in Linux kernel?</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m worried with the so-called &amp;quot;Treacherous Computing&amp;quot; appearance in recent Linux kernels. I have read about it on EFF &amp;amp; GNU portals and can&amp;#039;t se</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2008 01:46:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62062</link>
</item><item>
<title>ssl weak key generation (supposed to effect only debian)</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, the recently publicized SSL weak key generation for debian-based systems (c.f. http://www.debian.o</description>
<pubDate>17 May  2008 02:08:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62484</link>
</item><item>
<title>Prince, Samuel is out of the office.</title>
<description>I will be out of the office starting 03/31/2008 and will not return until 04/07/2008. I will respond to your message when I return. ________________</description>
<pubDate>01 Apr  2008 14:01:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62481</link>
</item><item>
<title>AUTO: Janek Lünstedt ist außer Haus (Rückkehr am 14.04.2008)</title>
<description>Ich bin bis 14.04.2008 abwesend  Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren! In der Zeit vom 25.03.2008 bis einschließlich 11.04.2008 befinde ich mich im Urlaub</description>
<pubDate>28 Mar  2008 20:00:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62476</link>
</item><item>
<title>gpg keys; GSWoT &amp;amp; PGP Global Directory Key</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I&amp;#039;m seeing a bunch of keys in my keyring with GSWoT(1) and PGP Global Directory(2) signatures on them.</description>
<pubDate>28 Mar  2008 12:13:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62475</link>
</item><item>
<title>Portage rsync security</title>
<description>Hi list! Am I right that there is currently no way portage tries to verify that the rsync-mirror is not spoofed? Doesn&amp;#039;t that pose a major threat? I</description>
<pubDate>20 Mar  2008 03:45:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62469</link>
</item><item>
<title>Cryptsetup-LUKS: cryptsetup -c anycipher-xts-plain:sha256 or not :sha256?</title>
<description>Hi, I found many guides on harddisk encryption with cryptsetup-LUKS but none of them clarifies if it makes sense to use a hash-function (like sha256)</description>
<pubDate>15 Mar  2008 05:38:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62466</link>
</item><item>
<title>Prince, Samuel is out of the office.</title>
<description>I will be out of the office starting 10/03/2008 and will not return until 17/03/2008. I will respond to your message when I return. ________________</description>
<pubDate>11 Mar  2008 14:01:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62465</link>
</item><item>
<title>sub</title>
<description>-- gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org mailing list</description>
<pubDate>11 Mar  2008 08:28:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62464</link>
</item><item>
<title>(intet emne)</title>
<description>-- gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org mailing list</description>
<pubDate>07 Mar  2008 01:15:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62462</link>
</item><item>
<title>gentoo-security+unsubscribe@gentoo.org</title>
<description>-- gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org mailing list</description>
<pubDate>07 Mar  2008 00:12:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62460</link>
</item><item>
<title>User authentication with key-file and gpg-agent</title>
<description>Hi! Now that my initrd-script is ready and provides me with the means to encrypt partitions with a gpg-encrypted key-file [1], I&amp;#039;d like to use the ve</description>
<pubDate>03 Mar  2008 11:53:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62456</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Encryption Ciphers gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org</title>
<description>I benchmakerked them also about two years ago. At that time anibus encryption, xtc and lrw modes didnt exist in the kernel.  I concentrated on 256 b</description>
<pubDate>29 Feb  2008 19:28:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62449</link>
</item><item>
<title>[no subject]</title>
<description>-- Darren Taylor Protecht Advisory www.protecht.com.au -- gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org mailing list</description>
<pubDate>28 Feb  2008 13:50:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62446</link>
</item><item>
<title>Encryption Ciphers</title>
<description>Hi! I just did some benchmarking on different ciphers for cryptsetup-luks and now I&amp;#039;ve got some questions: 1. Is it a valid way to benchmark by usin</description>
<pubDate>27 Feb  2008 11:58:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62439</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
