Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 24 Nov 2009 05:59:05 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Hello Mansour, On Wednesday 10 June 2009, Mansour Moufid wrote: > > But keep in mind there is a certain amount of work that comes with > > this. > > 11 Jun 2009 07:13:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/191091 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Robert Buchholz<rbu@gentoo.org> wrote: > However note that the Auditing 10 Jun 2009 13:35:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/191001 On Thursday 04 June 2009, Mansour Moufid wrote: > Hello list, > > I was wondering if I could get peoples' opinions of dev-util/splint > (the Secure Pr 04 Jun 2009 03:58:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/190450 Hello list, I was wondering if I could get peoples' opinions of dev-util/splint (the Secure Programming Lint) [1], and specifically in the context of 03 Jun 2009 20:44:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/190443 Peter Volkov wrote: > Ð' Срд, 13/05/2009 в 17:50 -0500, Aleksey V Lazar пишет: > > >> I'm using Portage version 2.1.6.13 right now. I 01 Jun 2009 10:24:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/190243 Ð' Срд, 13/05/2009 в 17:50 -0500, Aleksey V Lazar пишет: > I'm using Portage version 2.1.6.13 right now. I know for a fact that > I've us 29 May 2009 00:19:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/190089 Robert Buchholz wrote: > On Wednesday 13 May 2009, Aleksey V Lazar wrote: > >> Robert Buchholz wrote: >> >>> On Tuesday 29 July 2008, Bill wro 13 May 2009 15:50:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/188791 On Wednesday 13 May 2009, Aleksey V Lazar wrote: > Robert Buchholz wrote: > > On Tuesday 29 July 2008, Bill wrote: > >>> Currently (to the best of my 12 May 2009 15:24:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/188722 Robert Buchholz wrote: > On Tuesday 29 July 2008, Bill wrote: > >>> Currently (to the best of my understanding) there is no easy way >>> (e.g.: an 12 May 2009 15:18:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/188721 On Tuesday 03 March 2009 17:30:24 Douglas J Hunley wrote: > A while back I setup a small cron job to parse the GLSA feed and post it to > Twitter. I'v 06 Mar 2009 10:57:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/183449 Am Mittwoch 04 März 2009 schrieb Aleksey V Lazar: > Douglas J Hunley wrote: > > If you want to, simply follow > > @Gentoo_Security and you'll get 'in 05 Mar 2009 00:33:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/183376 Twitter. -- Michael Thompson -original message- Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] small announcement for the community From: Aleksey V Lazar <lazar@mnsu 04 Mar 2009 09:47:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/183356 Douglas J Hunley wrote: > If you want to, simply follow > @Gentoo_Security and you'll get 'instant' updates of new GLSAs > > I'm sorry, what does 04 Mar 2009 09:44:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/183355 A while back I setup a small cron job to parse the GLSA feed and post it to Twitter. I've been tweaking it and watching it and it seems stable enough 03 Mar 2009 14:30:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/183327 I can think of three reasons: less clutter, less maintenance, and keeping the machine from wasting time parsing the file on busy systems that may have 14 Jan 2009 13:17:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/179459 Thank you for all the suggestions, they have been very helpful and I now have my tcp wrappers up and running. Just out of curiosity, why doesn't the 12 Jan 2009 16:32:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/179307 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi there... You can also install the "DenyHosts" package, which will parse your syslog for failed 12 Jan 2009 09:50:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/179268 Search for "tcp wrappers howto" on Google. Yes, this must be maintained manually. I recommend to do away with /etc/host.deny and have "ALL :ALL@ALL :d 09 Jan 2009 21:51:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/179152 I have a gentoo desktop profile system and I would like to use tcp wrappers to secure certain services like ssh. I followed the documentation I could 09 Jan 2009 20:51:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/179151 gentoo-security+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org 21 Oct 2008 04:23:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/174017 21 Oct 2008 04:19:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/174016 I will be out of the office starting 18/08/2008 and will not return until 29/08/2008. I will have limited access to my email while away from the off 20 Aug 2008 20:03:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/170746 Hello all, as you might be aware, the Gentoo Security Team encourages users to report security vulnerabilities or findings of code audits that are n 20 Aug 2008 14:37:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/170739 06 Aug 2008 07:12:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/170062 On Tuesday 29 July 2008, Bill wrote: > > Currently (to the best of my understanding) there is no easy way > > (e.g.: an /emerge/ option) to identify a 28 Jul 2008 19:13:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/169641 > Currently (to the best of my understanding) there is no easy way (e.g.: > an /emerge/ option) to identify and update only the packages that have > s 28 Jul 2008 16:33:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/169638 Hello, Robert: Robert Buchholz wrote: > On Monday 21 July 2008, Aleksey V Lazar wrote: > >> Hello. Would it be reasonable to suggest adding a ~se 28 Jul 2008 15:08:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/169632 Pierre-Yves Rofes wrote: > On Mon, July 21, 2008 9:04 pm, Aleksey V Lazar wrote: > >> Hello. Would it be reasonable to suggest adding a ~security 24 Jul 2008 10:20:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/169411 On Tuesday 22 July 2008, Paige Thompson wrote: > misfit[1004]:~% sudo emerge -uva nethack > Password: > > These are the packages that would be merged, 22 Jul 2008 12:04:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/169317 misfit[1004]:~% sudo emerge -uva nethack Password: These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies | !!! All ebuilds 22 Jul 2008 11:01:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/169316 On Monday 21 July 2008, Aleksey V Lazar wrote: > Hello. Would it be reasonable to suggest adding a ~security (or > something like it) flag to denote 22 Jul 2008 03:42:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/169310 Hello. Would it be reasonable to suggest adding a ~security (or something like it) flag to denote packages masked for security reasons? Thanks. Ale 21 Jul 2008 12:04:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/169273 Hello. Would it be reasonable to suggest adding a ~security (or something like it) flag to denote packages masked for security reasons? Thanks. Ale 21 Jul 2008 12:04:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/169274 Hi, I attached a summary of last week's meeting. The summary and the log are also linked from [1] and should find their way to our /proj dir in the 21 Jul 2008 11:49:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/169272 Hi everyone, the security project will hold a public meeting in #gentoo-security this monday, 2008-07-14 at 19:00 UTC (21:00 CEST). The tentative ag 12 Jul 2008 16:18:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/168604 Abhay Kedia wrote: ... > Yes and this is why I want them to be logged separately. Thanks to the helpful > replies by everyone, I have been able to lo 17 Jun 2008 01:46:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62077 Hi, I am trying to run syslog-ng v1.6.8 without root privileges, under dedicated account. All goes fine, except messages from kernel buffer /proc/kms 17 Jun 2008 01:46:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62056 Hi, I'm worried with the so-called "Treacherous Computing" appearance in recent Linux kernels. I have read about it on EFF & GNU portals and can't se 17 Jun 2008 01:46:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62062 antoine schrieb: > On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 12:42 -0400, James Larkby-Lahet wrote: >> >> *However* >> >> SSH version 4 and higher contain an option to ha 17 Jun 2008 01:46:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/61798 On Sat, 17 May 2008, Byron wrote: > It's something of a "lesser of two evils" situation. In the absence of > evidence either way, the only habit th 21 May 2008 09:37:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62487 Robert Buchholz wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Saturday, 17. May 2008, Peter Schneider-Kamp wrote: > >> the recently publicized SSL weak key generation 17 May 2008 18:10:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62486 Hi Peter, On Saturday, 17. May 2008, Peter Schneider-Kamp wrote: > the recently publicized SSL weak key generation for debian-based systems > (c.f. h 17 May 2008 04:15:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62485 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, the recently publicized SSL weak key generation for debian-based systems (c.f. http://www.debian.o 17 May 2008 02:08:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62484 On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Russell Valentine wrote: > Mansour Moufid wrote: >> An attacker would need to be able to manipulate both the rsync server >> and 14 Apr 2008 09:34:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62483 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Just the right message for a security-minded list! And on April Fool's! =) This reminds me of a r 01 Apr 2008 14:07:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62482 I will be out of the office starting 03/31/2008 and will not return until 04/07/2008. I will respond to your message when I return. ________________ 01 Apr 2008 14:01:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62481 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Matthias Bethke wrote: | Hi Eric, | on Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 03:13:43PM -0400, you wrote: |> I'm seeing 01 Apr 2008 11:05:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62480 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Randy Barlow wrote: | http://xkcd.com/364/ | ROTFLMAO!!!!! One more reason to love xkcd. - -- Eric M 01 Apr 2008 10:45:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62479 Matthias Bethke wrote: > As far as I can see, the PGP Global Directory does no verification apart > from checking that an email address exists, so its 01 Apr 2008 08:54:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62478 Hi Eric, on Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 03:13:43PM -0400, you wrote: > I'm seeing a bunch of keys in my keyring with GSWoT(1) and PGP Global > Directory(2) s 01 Apr 2008 08:42:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62477 Ich bin bis 14.04.2008 abwesend Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren! In der Zeit vom 25.03.2008 bis einschließlich 11.04.2008 befinde ich mich im Urlaub 28 Mar 2008 20:00:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62476 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm seeing a bunch of keys in my keyring with GSWoT(1) and PGP Global Directory(2) signatures on them. 28 Mar 2008 12:13:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62475 Robert Buchholz wrote on 03/20/2008 02:07 PM: > (CVS, core gentoo infra) and then check it on the user side. If you > want to do this right now, you 20 Mar 2008 06:46:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62474 Mansour Moufid wrote: > An attacker would need to be able to manipulate both the rsync server > and the actual downloaded packages since Portage verif 20 Mar 2008 06:34:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62473 On Thursday 20 March 2008, Florian Philipp wrote: > Hi list! > > Am I right that there is currently no way portage tries to verify > that the rsync-mi 20 Mar 2008 06:07:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62472 On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 07:49:12AM -0400, Mansour Moufid wrote: [...] > for i in $IP > do > $IPT -A OUTPUT -o $EXTIF -p tcp -s $EXTIP -d $i --dpor 20 Mar 2008 05:31:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62471 On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Florian Philipp <lists@f_philipp.fastmail.net> wrote: > Hi list! > > Am I right that there is currently no way porta 20 Mar 2008 04:49:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62470 Hi list! Am I right that there is currently no way portage tries to verify that the rsync-mirror is not spoofed? Doesn't that pose a major threat? I 20 Mar 2008 03:45:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62469 jehovah@wir-sind-cool.org wrote: > Hi, > > I found many guides on harddisk encryption with cryptsetup-LUKS but none of them clarifies if it makes sens 16 Mar 2008 06:15:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62468 Hi again, am I mistaken to assume that there are only 3 correct combinations? anycipher-cbc-essiv:sha256 anycipher-lrw-benbi anycipher-xts-plain I' 15 Mar 2008 08:54:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62467 Hi, I found many guides on harddisk encryption with cryptsetup-LUKS but none of them clarifies if it makes sense to use a hash-function (like sha256) 15 Mar 2008 05:38:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62466 I will be out of the office starting 10/03/2008 and will not return until 17/03/2008. I will respond to your message when I return. ________________ 11 Mar 2008 14:01:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62465 -- gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org mailing list 11 Mar 2008 08:28:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62464 The idea of avoiding something less popular, is that if someone gets your encrypted data, they could look through the algorithm and find a hole and br 07 Mar 2008 11:02:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62463 -- gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org mailing list 07 Mar 2008 01:15:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62462 > -- > gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org mailing list > > You almost got it right. Remember to put gentoo-security+unsubscribe@gentoo.org in the To-f 07 Mar 2008 00:15:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62461 -- gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org mailing list 07 Mar 2008 00:12:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62460 Hello, Am Donnerstag, 6. März 2008 schrieb Peter Meier: > > I just wanted to jump in and say that I'm personally a fan of Serpent. I > > like to use 07 Mar 2008 00:07:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62459 Hi > I just wanted to jump in and say that I'm personally a fan of Serpent. I > like to use something that's a little less popular, but still open. 06 Mar 2008 08:30:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62458 Florian Philipp wrote: > Hi! > > Now that my initrd-script is ready and provides me with the means to > encrypt partitions with a gpg-encrypted key-f 03 Mar 2008 12:23:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62457 Hi! Now that my initrd-script is ready and provides me with the means to encrypt partitions with a gpg-encrypted key-file [1], I'd like to use the ve 03 Mar 2008 11:53:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62456 I just wanted to jump in and say that I'm personally a fan of Serpent. I like to use something that's a little less popular, but still open. It is s 01 Mar 2008 18:25:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62455 On Sat, 2008-03-01 at 11:48 +0000, Calum wrote: > On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Florian Philipp > <lists@f_philipp.fastmail.net> wrote: > > > > On 01 Mar 2008 05:28:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62454 On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Florian Philipp <lists@f_philipp.fastmail.net> wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 22:31 -0500, Mansour Moufid wrote: > 01 Mar 2008 04:48:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62453 On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 22:31 -0500, Mansour Moufid wrote: > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Steffen Schulz <pepe_ml@gmx.net> wrote: > > 128bit are co 01 Mar 2008 03:43:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62452 On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Steffen Schulz <pepe_ml@gmx.net> wrote: > 128bit are considered secure for the next several years. > On that subjec 29 Feb 2008 20:31:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62451 On 080301 at 01:51, Dan Reidy wrote: > I've never done any benchmarks myself, however a few years back I did read > up on which crytpo engine would b 29 Feb 2008 19:37:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62450 I benchmakerked them also about two years ago. At that time anibus encryption, xtc and lrw modes didnt exist in the kernel. I concentrated on 256 b 29 Feb 2008 19:28:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62449 On Wednesday 27 February 2008 01:58:11 pm Florian Philipp wrote: > Hi! > > I just did some benchmarking on different ciphers for cryptsetup-luks > and 29 Feb 2008 17:48:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62448 On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 15:19 -0500, Mansour Moufid wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Florian Philipp > <lists@f_philipp.fastmail.net> wrote: > 29 Feb 2008 10:09:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62447 -- Darren Taylor Protecht Advisory www.protecht.com.au -- gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org mailing list 28 Feb 2008 13:50:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62446 On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Florian Philipp <lists@f_philipp.fastmail.net> wrote: > One last question for everyone who has read this rather long 28 Feb 2008 13:19:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62445 On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 16:34 +0100, Peter Meier wrote: > Hi > > > I just did some benchmarking on different ciphers for cryptsetup-luks > > will you 28 Feb 2008 11:29:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62444 > > Do you think keysize is more important than choosing a cipher which > > made it further in the AES-contest and therefore using Anubis with > > 3 28 Feb 2008 11:02:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62443 I found something really interesting from an interview with Bruce Schneier who authored Blowfish and Twofish. He recommends using the newer Twofish a 28 Feb 2008 10:47:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62442 Hi > I just did some benchmarking on different ciphers for cryptsetup-luks will you share them somewhere? for the other questions I can say the sam 28 Feb 2008 08:34:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62441 Hello Florian :) Florian Philipp wrote: > I just did some benchmarking on different ciphers for cryptsetup-luks I have not done benchmarks on my own, 28 Feb 2008 04:26:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62440 Hi! I just did some benchmarking on different ciphers for cryptsetup-luks and now I've got some questions: 1. Is it a valid way to benchmark by usin 27 Feb 2008 11:58:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62439 Christopher P. Kern wrote: > Can anyone tell me what service/application would start sendmail? Cron would. And your message makes it sounds like cr 26 Feb 2008 05:44:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62438 security+unsubscribe@gentoo.org -- gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org mailing list 25 Feb 2008 11:10:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62437 On Friday 22 February 2008 04:55:17 Casey Link wrote: > Here are some day to day duties that will be need to get done.This > isn't exhaustive just the 24 Feb 2008 06:43:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62436 Am Donnerstag, den 21.02.2008, 22:55 -0500 schrieb Casey Link: > vulnerabilities, -- gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org mailing list 22 Feb 2008 17:48:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62435 Here are some day to day duties that will be need to get done.This isn't exhaustive just the results of a few minutes of brainstorming: * Stalking th 21 Feb 2008 20:55:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62434 Yes. We should each have assigned tasks which will depend on our respective skill and trait. -- ed*eonsec On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:28 AM, doppel 21 Feb 2008 19:26:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62433 F A S T T R A C K D E G R E E P R O G R A M Obtain the degree you deserve, based on your present knowledge and life experience. A prosperous 21 Feb 2008 19:07:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62431 On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:07:18 --300 "Claudio" <pjp@gentoo.org> wrote: > F A S T T R A C K D E G R E E P R O G R A M > > Obtain the degree you 21 Feb 2008 15:57:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62432 George Prowse wrote: > Eduardo Tongson wrote: >> Nice plan. I think you are more able to lead. Can we communicate more >> in email perhaps a google gr 21 Feb 2008 12:28:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62430 Eduardo Tongson wrote: > Nice plan. I think you are more able to lead. Can we communicate more > in email perhaps a google group or list. IRC is not e 21 Feb 2008 09:22:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62429 Nice plan. I think you are more able to lead. Can we communicate more in email perhaps a google group or list. IRC is not efficient for people in diff 21 Feb 2008 06:52:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62428 A couple days ago I discussed (in #gentoo-security) with Robert (rbu@g.o) a solution to the Kernel security issue. Robert has a good plan to keep the 21 Feb 2008 06:35:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/security/62427